Paul
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Craig
<paul....@oceanfree.net> wrote in message
news:8b8b7n$ikq$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
I shall check it out. Being short of time I was rather hoping some kind
person might have the data in a file or spreadsheet?
Paul
In article <8b8u7h$4ce$1...@uranium.btinternet.com>,
Agreed, but you can't work out the G.A without a standard time.
I'd encourage anyone to compile their own standard times.
Mal Davies
Craig
<racin...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8ba7g4$enh$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
Afraid not - just their version of them. When seeking a standard time, you
need to specify what you are asking for. For instance, one set of standard
times might be based on what a horse rated 140 by Raceform might expect to
achieve on good ground. Another set of standards may be based on the
expectations of good horses as rated by Weekender handicapper. A third ( and
to my mind silly) set of standards might be based on the normal class of horse
running at the track concermned. To my mind, ratings using the last approach
(ie Topspeed) are simply not able to compare properly results at different
classes of tracks.
Mordin's standards are based on around 3+ seconds above what a top class horse
should achieve.
The standards themselves dont really matter, altough it is comforting to know
that they are based on sound methodology and facts. It is the use made of
differences of actual times from the standard which is the basis of reliable
speed figures.
Hope this helps. TonyW
eppd)