Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
England & Australia ratings
31 views
Skip to first unread message
billsutt...@gmail.com
Jul 20, 2015, 1:38:42 AM7/20/15
to
Lyth 0
Cook 5
Ballance 1
Bell 0
Root 2
Stokes 0 ( that runnout negates everything good he done )
Buttler 2
Ali 3
Broad 5
Wood 1
Anderson 1
Lyth and Bell get "0" due to those dropped catches
Warner 6
Rogers 8
Smith 9
Clarke 3 ( I thought his Captaincy was good )
Voges 2
Marsh 5
Nevil 5
MJ 7
Starc 3
Hazelwood 7
Lyons 3
A 600 run turn around in a week ....... is a coin toss worth that ?
Dave Cornwell
Jul 20, 2015, 4:39:14 AM7/20/15
to
Bit harsh on your own players I thought!
>
>
>
>
>
John Hall
Jul 20, 2015, 5:57:06 AM7/20/15
to
In message <32d32edc-df7b-4e16...@googlegroups.com>,
billsutt...@gmail.com writes
Buttler 4 (his keeping was pretty good), Wood 4 and Anderson 3.
For Australia, I'd give Marsh and Nevill 6, Johnson 9, Starc and Lyons
6.
That wouldn't much affect the difference in the total points scored by
the two sides, though.
>
>
>A 600 run turn around in a week ....... is a coin toss worth that ?
>
Almost certainly not.
--
I'm not paid to implement the recognition of irony.
(Taken, with the author's permission, from a LiveJournal post)
billsutt...@gmail.com writes
>
>Lyth 0
>Cook 5
>Ballance 1
>Bell 0
>Root 2
>Stokes 0 ( that runnout negates everything good he done )
>Buttler 2
>Ali 3
>Broad 5
>Wood 1
>Anderson 1
>
>Lyth and Bell get "0" due to those dropped catches
>
>
>Warner 6
>Rogers 8
>Smith 9
>Clarke 3 ( I thought his Captaincy was good )
>Voges 2
>Marsh 5
>Nevil 5
>MJ 7
>Starc 3
>Hazelwood 7
>Lyons 3
I think you're a very hard marker. I'd give Cook , Stokes and Broad 7,
>Lyth 0
>Cook 5
>Ballance 1
>Bell 0
>Root 2
>Stokes 0 ( that runnout negates everything good he done )
>Buttler 2
>Ali 3
>Broad 5
>Wood 1
>Anderson 1
>
>Lyth and Bell get "0" due to those dropped catches
>
>
>Warner 6
>Rogers 8
>Smith 9
>Clarke 3 ( I thought his Captaincy was good )
>Voges 2
>Marsh 5
>Nevil 5
>MJ 7
>Starc 3
>Hazelwood 7
>Lyons 3
Buttler 4 (his keeping was pretty good), Wood 4 and Anderson 3.
For Australia, I'd give Marsh and Nevill 6, Johnson 9, Starc and Lyons
6.
That wouldn't much affect the difference in the total points scored by
the two sides, though.
>
>
>A 600 run turn around in a week ....... is a coin toss worth that ?
>
--
I'm not paid to implement the recognition of irony.
(Taken, with the author's permission, from a LiveJournal post)
Offramp
Jul 20, 2015, 3:17:03 PM7/20/15
to
Those ratings look about right. It was bloody awful to watch.
0 new messages