On May 20, 6:40 pm, Weatherlawyer <
weatherlaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have in the past equated earthquakes with tornadoes seeing them
> being replaced by the latter when I have posted a warning for large
> earthquakes.
>
> I am forming the opinion that this occurs when there is a phreatic or
> VEI situation. The tell tale is a bulge on the ring of isobars that
> surround the South Pole.
> Also I think that rather than the precipitation masses reaching the
> coast of Antarctica, they appear to dissipate, becoming multicentered
> Lows before dispersing.
>
> It all requires more thought and much more dilligence but I have been
> busy trying to co-opt an old weather book into modern meteorology.
> Dificult to do as his idea was based on an electromagnetic theory that
> didn't stand the test of time.
>
> But at least he wasn't buggered by Richardson's computing fiasco that
> has hampered research so badly since WW 2. Maybe we should all be born
> a century later.
The tornadoes that struck the USA this week; while we were supposed to
be enjoying fine weather here in Britain; arrived with no warning from
the Met Office charts of the sea level pressures in the North
Atlantic.
There are several better charts for the purpose produced by the USA:
>
http://www.opc.ncep.noaa.gov/ for example.
Unfortunately I don't use them. I don't know how to get them as
forecasts. Analysis charts are all very well but they contain very
little data error and it is the data error -especially the ones in the
Met Office models; that I rely on for earthquake signals.
I have a good idea how the model runs portray weather fronts to good
effect. Other forecasts use different mathematical procedures called
algorithms. And they produce different fronts. They show weather
systems at different pressures.
And they go wrong in ways I can not make sense of at present.
Last thing online yesterday (Tuesday 21 May 2013) I was trying to show
on a USA North Atlantic sea level pressure chart, how the blocked
pressure in the Atlantic would evolve into a tornado signal. When the
pieces don't fit, you can, in your enthusiasm for preventing death and
destruction, jump to conclusions that you should see are wrong
conclusions.
And you tend to make them fit. I was expecting there to be more
tornadoes. I wanted to see them coming. So I made it look like they
were going to.
But it is best to be safe than sorry, no?
No.
You tell people lies about the charts, the people won't see your
error. They will instead, think it is their fault. It will put them
off. And the error is compounded in their minds when the tornado or
disaster or whatever doesn't turn up. That's when they think
(correctly) that I am feeding them bullshit.
When a severe tornado cell is about to strike the USA... If it shows
up on the Met Office chart, there will be a cohesive Low pressure
system on the coast of the USA or Canada. Actually very little of the
USA shows up on the Met Office chart. Not the one that is on general
release anyway.
<rant>
Maggots from the Palace of Westminster got into the Met Office around
about the time I was getting interested in the weather. They turned
the pot of gold into a piss pot. It has got worse since then, with the
amalgamation of the weather centre and the handbags that are pushing
climate policies.
What we need are a bunch of G* rioters to set up a mobile phone war
against the way things are set up in Britain. All those stupid
children who were radicalised at the time of the Tory Blair project to
get Britain involved in the Iraq war. We want them to set off a
revolution here to execute all the climatologists. And at the same
time all the fat pigs in the Big Oil factions should be dealt with.
Chop off their heads and hang the corpses on lamp posts. Along with
the Investment bankers. Send out teams of assassins to the Bahamas and
Seychelles and wherever the bastards have taken their families and
their gold. And kill them all.
Then on to Switzerland and every other place they think of as safe
havens.
After that, while the writing is still on the wall and the blood still
fresh on the street, we should turn on the gangsters who own and or
run the supermarkets and have been systematically screwing the
agricultures of the world for the last half century.
Find everyone of them; each and every one; and execute them. Have
their sons to the nth generation removed from the planet and their
virgin daughters sold into prostitution and slavery and their houses
turned into public toilets.
After that we can hope to return to a sustainable eco-system. Rivers
should be cleaned from where they have been turned into sewers. And
the land should be allowed to regenerate. I don't have a clue how they
are going to deal with land drains and monoculture.
But unfortunately, if that is going to happen it will require
Armageddon to accomplish. So until then I am not going to bother
trying to change the world. All we will end up with is a different
gang of crooks running the place. Maybe god is already handling it
with floods and the like?
It seems unjust to cripple farming to get at the supermarkets. But the
supermarkets are just pulling the chain. The actual damage to the
planet is being done by farmers willing to compromise with them. And
anyway, the supermarkets have been crippling the farmers all along,
compromise or not.
</rant> (Sorry about that. But I didn't do it.)
What I will try to do is find a better chart I can work with.
Yesterday evening, the weather turned perfect. The clouds cleared and
it got warmer. We had a fine night and the birds were singing when I
woke up this morning. It is now a grey, cloudy morning with a breeze
blowing so maybe the trornadoes are on the way again?
They only strike for a few days in winter generally but in the North
Atlantic the hurrican season is different to all the other seas in the
Northern Hemisphere. The hurricane season officially begins in June
not April. Actually we haven't had any hurricanes anywhere yet this
season. Burma had a close call that did enough damage there. But I
don't think it made hurricane strength, did it?
Off to the left of the Atlantic, the season that begins in April is
the tornado season.
It may sound like I want my cake and ate it.
Tornadoes DO equate to earthquakes as far as weather forecast charts
go. Obviously the discrepancy is in the way that analysis charts are
assembled. Not enough is known of unstable systems in the tornado
regions, so the input is screwed up enough for me to make genuine
mistakes -as opposed to stupid ones.
What could go wrong now is that dick-heads in the various
Meteorological Offices around the word will see where the models are
going wrong by analysing the energy values to the charts that the
unstability brings.
They will thus be able to correct the models and drive out all errors.
And thus prevent cohesive steps being taken to alert the general
populace about them. Fortunately at the moment the bastards are in
denial so things look like remaining as they are for the next year and
more.