<be...@eex.neet> wrote in message
news:kldef55id7vndmah8...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 10:06:13 -0800 (PST), David <
dafy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On 8 Nov, 19:44, ChristianKnight <
ChristianKni...@operamail.com>
>>wrote:
>>>
http://tvnz.co.nz/business-news/consent-otago-windfarm-rejected-3116360>>>
>>> It makes me cringe in disappointed despair why anyone may choose to
>>> preserve an ordinary tussock desert landscape, that couldn't be more
>>> boring, at the expense of a clean green renewable source of
>>> electricity proposably enough to supply the entire South Island in a
>>> few years.
>>> Personally I think windmills add beauty to the landscape like spinning
>>> flowers.
>>> Not only do they look amazing but what they do is amazing giving
>>> electricity to homes. helping people cook and wash their cloths listen
>>> to music learn on the Internet.
>>> Where the environmental court rule at this extremely nonsensical level
>>> the Government should step in straight away and sack everyone on the
>>> concerned committee.
>>>
>>> Christ's love
>>
>>well, I agree with you on this one....
>>
>>i have seen the wind farm [on the horizon] down by
>>Lumsden and i was impressed.
>
> sadly so do i.
>
> I was back in Scotland a few years ago, i drove from Earlston to
> Edinburgh over Soutra, there were dozens of the things, and I
> thought that they were lovely. I even remarked to my neice, that
> "you would think that it was windy enough up here without the big
> fans", she looked puzzled, my sons laughed.
I agree, seeing them slowly spinning is relaxing and calming, much more
environmentally friendly then coal or nuclear power stations.
It just seems these people always need something to moan on about.
Bring them on....I went to a seaside town some time ago and they had
installed about 40 in the sea, it was very relaxing and far better then an
endless seascape, at night hey are lit up which again is nice to look at.