John never baptised a woman but only the Jewish men.
Rajinder Nijjhar
BEWARE OF THE HIRELINGS. THEY WORK FOR MAMMON AND NOT FOR GOD. THEY ARE
SLAVES TO THEIR MAMMON MASTERS AND NOT FREEMEN IN GOD. THEY ARE HYPOCRITES
OF THE FIRST ORDER LIVING ON WIDOW'S MITE.
PLEASE FORWARD MY E-MAIL TO FRIENDS AND REPRODUCE MY VIDEOS AS YOU MAY LIKE
THEM. NO COPYRIGHTS IN GOD BUT IN MAMMON. WATCH YOUR BIBLE HAS COPYRIGHTS.
YOUTUBE PLAYLIST OF RUSSIAN HYPOCRITE ANTICHRIST BISHOPS WHITEWASHED FROM
OUTSIDE:-
http://www.youtube.com/my_playlists?p=6D13822075CA5541
This is what I wrote to an Orthodox Greek Church Priest:-
I always rely upon holy spirit, common sense and look what I have found:-
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/rajinder.nijjhar/johnsig.pdf
Salvation not through Christ Jesus but His Word:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EW1zeaWjgI
First of all the Baptism was for the Jewish people and not for the Gentile.
Just returned from a Church and a Brother over there confirmed this
revelation.
Jesus took this Baptism to confirm that He came for the spiritually sick
Jewish people and not for the clean-hearted Gentile.
And the Jewish people hated Him the Most whilst the Gentile appreciated His
Merciful deeds and Preaching most. How much the Jewish people hated Jesus
and loved their own and the Torah is demonstrated in curing the ten lepers
and only one, a Samaritan, sought His Word and the rest nine Jews went to
their own fold.
Soon after the deaths of Jesus, James, the Just and St.Stephen, these
Gentiles started killing Jews in villages and they ran to Jerusalem for
Protection. And there, their own crook Rabbis and Pharisees cheated and
fleeced them. Roman encircled them too for their Bad behaviour as they are
doing today and killed them mercilessly. Even the Romans were surprised at
their suffering but Jesus had warned the wailing women, wail for your
children and not for me.
Now, the stupid Jews went for the Temple Priests dressed in silken clothes
whilst the sensible ones went for John, the Baptist.
Jesus spilt His Blood to set us FREE of those Temple Priests dressed in silk
and living upon the widow's mite. At the Russian Conference in High Wycombe,
I saw a widow dressed poorly and too old to walk even who also contributed
to the upkeep of the Bishops and their stooges dressed in silken gold laced
Tunics as they put on during the service.
In them, the Saying of Christ Jesus,
"When an unclean spirit, the hypocrite Temple Priests and Rabbis, goes out
of a man, Christ Jesus set us FREE of their Yoke by giving His own sacrifice
as the Lamb of God, he goes through dry places, seeking rest, and finds
none. These Temple Priest used to being served by the simpletons, could not
find their victims as most people hated them for killing the Just men like
Jesus, James and Stephen. Then he says, I will return to my house from which
I came. These Jews became Bishops in Churches and brought back the written
Torah as a Bait to catch those simpletons and established themselves in the
Churches especially of Judea region where they expelled the third-eye
opening Apostles. When these sycophant Bishops got the Romans in their fold,
then they killed the Apostles by throwing them before the animals, burning
them at stake, burning their Books, etc until recently people like Martin
Luther showed us Freedom of expression. And when he, the Temple Priests, the
Messianic Jews comes, he finds it empty, swept, and put in order. This
Christ Jesus had done through His Sacrifice and Blood.
Then he goes and takes with him seven other spirits, Seven Deacons that you
find in Orthodox and other established Churches instead of Fellowships in
honour of Christ Jesus, more wicked than himself, and they enter and dwell
there; Put on Yokes on people as the Popes did, and the last state of that
man, the present state of the simpletons that are easily caught in the web,
is worse than the first, the state before Christ Jesus came, they had to
bear the Yoke of one Rabbi only. So shall it also be with this wicked
generation of Messianic Jews and their stooges, these Russian Bishops and
their stooges. Can you find simpletons worse than these Russians and the
Bishops more impressively dressed than these Russians please?" (Matthew 12:
43-45).
I was just wondering what Jesus would think of you if He happens to enter
your Church while you are performing the service in your Regalia?
In Jesus what comes out of your own mouth that matters and not what the
Books, the Scriptures. say. It is the Time for Gospel and those who preach
Gospel are NOT DRESSED in silk and gold but ordinary civilian dresses, who
work for their living as Christ Paul did as a Tent maker.
I am not accusing you of any wrong doing in Jesus but please just talk to
your own heart and that is what I do myself.
I like your sermons and they make a lot of sense. Let us see what you think
of my views?
God bless you.
Ch. Rajinder Nijjhar, M.Sc.
Retired Senior Lecturer in Metallurgy
Tel. 0118 962 3200
More you spend "His Treasures", preach Gospel, more you please Father to
receive more.
Scriptures + holy spirit (common sense) = Gospel
For articles on Sister Christian and Sikh communities, visit: -
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/rajinder.nijjhar/sikhism.htm
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/rajinder.nijjhar/starbet.jpg
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/rajinder.nijjhar/threen.pdf
Produced over 1850 Youtube Videos on Interfaith + Documentary:-
http://uk.youtube.com/profile?user=nijjhar1
https://www.google.com/video/upload/Status?hl=en-GB
Videos by a Cuban worth watching how Messianic Jews killed Christianity:-
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=-CBLaxTJ9fE
St. Photina, an article by a Russian Bishop:-
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/rajinder.nijjhar/photina.htm
Hajj is for boys 12 to 16 years old to make them faithful to their tribal
fathers, Ilah:-
http://www.youtube.com/my_playlists?pi=0&ps=20&sf=&sa=0&sq=&dm=0&p=FB77A1AC2FB499CE
Here is the Link to my research:-
Malcolm McLean
John the Baptist and Jesus were of course leaders of 1st century
Jewish factions, seemingly with an overlapping membership. John's
movement died away whilst Jesus' grew into Christianity.
Jesus' relationship with the Jewish religious authorities was a
complex one, it is not fully understood, and an enormous amount has
been written on the subject.
This
"And the Jewish people hated Him the Most whilst the Gentile
appreciated His
Merciful deeds and Preaching most."
however is a gross distortion. The early Christians had a very strong
Jewish element, certainly all the leadership positions were held by
Jews . However early on they agreed to accept Gentiles as members on
equal terms, and this, together with the explosive growth of the
movement, had the effect of diluting and then erasing its Jewish
character.
Rajinder Nijjhar
Rajinder
"Malcolm McLean" <malcolm...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:7a03b384-ae8b-4b0f...@k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
mm
<malcolm...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>This is a newsgroup about Judaism.
I often don't read subject lines, but I did this time and I'm curious
about yours: "Re: John never baptized a woman but only the Jewish
men." Why would you say that? Do you have anything from a Jewish
source that supports that? How would the early Christians get female
gentile members without "baptism"? or are you saying they wouldn't
accept female gentiles? But would accept male gentiles? What would
be the reason for that?
Could it be you are thinking about circumcision! Circumcision doesn't
apply to girls or women.
At the bottom you talk about getting gentile members. Did you know
that early on, gentiles had to convert to Judaism to be Christians**.
(They were called something else at the time, I forget the name.)
Part of conversion to Judaism is circumcision for males, So of course
John would not have attended the circumcision of a female.
I don't see any reason that would apply to "baptism". There was no
baptism for Jews who became Christians, only for non-Jews, who had to
become Jews first before they could be Christians. But for non-Jews,
it was the same for males and females.
**This was before the beliefs of Christianity were (so clearly?)
incompatible with those of Judaism.
>John the Baptist and Jesus were of course leaders of 1st century
>Jewish factions,
Although we don't know how big such factions were. The gospels don't
give numbers afaik, and the gospels were written to encourage new
members to join.
> seemingly with an overlapping membership. John's
>movement died away whilst Jesus' grew into Christianity.
>
>Jesus' relationship with the Jewish religious authorities was a
>complex one, it is not fully understood, and an enormous amount has
>been written on the subject.
>
>This
>"And the Jewish people hated Him the Most whilst the Gentile
>appreciated His
>Merciful deeds and Preaching most."
>
>however is a gross distortion. The early Christians had a very strong
>Jewish element, certainly all the leadership positions were held by
>Jews .
While I don't think your quoted sentence 5 lines up is true, your
reply in itself doesn't prove the quoted sentence is a distortion.
The early Christians including all their Jewish members were still a
very small number compared to the number of Jews who were not involved
in Christianity. It would be possible for this second much larger
group of Jews to hate Jesus (or what he was portrayed as).
> However early on they agreed to accept Gentiles as members on
>equal terms, and this, together with the explosive growth of the
>movement, had the effect of diluting and then erasing its Jewish
>character.
It's other Jews, not the Jewish members who are described as hating
Jesus. If they hated him they wouldn't have been members in the first
place.
Personally I don't think the story of Jesus was seen as important by
the vast, vast majority of Jews in Israel at the time. They didn't
hate him but most also didn't know about him. Of those that knew,
most didn't think about him. Or if they sometimes thought about him,
they separated him from the later beliefs that Christians adopted
about him.
WRT Rajinder's reply to your post: "Yes. You are right. First Church
was Jewish as defined in Matt.12.v43-45." The church at the start was
composed of Jews, but how Jewish it was is another story. Knowing
when it lost what Jewish character it had would depend on knowing
details. For example, afaik, nowhere in the gospels does Jesus claim
to be the messiah, but whenever the church started teaching that he
was, that was a significant departure from "Jewish", even if just as
many members were Jews. However it's that sort of thing which caused
many of the Jewish members to drop out. When the church taught he was
a god, almost all the rest did. And of course others had died before
the innovations.
Meir
mm
wrote:
>
>> However early on they agreed to accept Gentiles as members on
>>equal terms, and this, together with the explosive growth of the
>>movement, had the effect of diluting and then erasing its Jewish
>>character.
>
>It's other Jews, not the Jewish members who are described as hating
>Jesus. If they hated him they wouldn't have been members in the first
>place.
Oops, the lack of a comma makes a big change in meaning. It should
have read: "It's other Jews, not the Jewish members, who are
described as hating Jesus. If they hated him they wouldn't have been
members in the first place."
Again, I don't think that's the case. I think one to four Jews might
have but the rest is exaggeration.