See you in a week

Phil Saunders

unread,

Feb 24, 2013, 3:48:09 AM2/24/13

to

For obvious reasons I shall not be posting for a week.

Phil

1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist

unread,

Feb 25, 2013, 2:47:59 PM2/25/13

to

"Phil Saunders" <philip....@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:dtkWs.58470$xo5....@fx15.fr7...

> For obvious reasons I shall not be posting for a week.

At least you cannot get caught out unawares that way.

Jeff...

chorl...@gmail.com

unread,

Mar 2, 2013, 2:07:43 PM3/2/13

to

On Feb 24, 2:48 am, Phil Saunders <philip.saund...@ntlworld.com>
wrote:

> For obvious reasons I shall not be posting for a week.
>
> Phil

Hmm are you a cardinal in conclave then.

David

1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist

unread,

Mar 6, 2013, 4:53:26 AM3/6/13

to

"Phil Saunders" <philip....@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:dtkWs.58470$xo5....@fx15.fr7...

> For obvious reasons I shall not be posting for a week.

That was posted on the 24/2/13....some 12 days ago to my reckoning.

Jeff...

1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist

unread,

Mar 6, 2013, 4:55:58 AM3/6/13

to

"1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist" <jnhickling[remove]@ntlworld.com>
wrote in message news:...

Apologies' 10 days.

Jeff...

Alwyn

unread,

Mar 6, 2013, 5:59:17 AM3/6/13

to

There are two messages from him awaiting moderation. I wasn't aware he
was on manual.

Alwyn

1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist

unread,

Mar 6, 2013, 11:37:04 AM3/6/13

to

"Alwyn" <al...@dircon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:kh77i4$lo1$1...@news.albasani.net...

See this post form Mark.
-------------------------------
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:32:29 +0000, Phil Saunders put finger to keyboard
and typed:

>On 22/02/2013 17:07, Robert Billing wrote:
>> The hyperspace communicator crackled into life and we heard Graham Nye
>> say:
>>
>>
>>> What is the point of a theoretical political system that fails to treat
>>> people well whenever it has been tried in practice?
>>>
>>> Or are there Communist states that treat their citizens well? Perhaps
>>> you or Phil could suggest some.
>>
>> I think you are looking at this the wrong way. The point of communism is
>> that it enables communists to be in power. It does this very well.
>
>The first two words are clearly untrue.

That is a combination of personal abuse and unnecessarily inflammatory,
both of which are enough to result in you being put on manual for a week.

As is usual, any rejected post during that time will result in the clock
being reset. For avoidance of doubt, the following will all be rejected:

* Intemperate and inflammatory language
* Personal abuse
* Complaints about unfair treatment by any member of the moderation team
* Criticism of any moderation decision

Mark
-----------------------------------

Mark Goodge

unread,

Mar 6, 2013, 12:58:36 PM3/6/13

to

On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:55:58 -0000, "1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist"
<jnhickling[remove]@ntlworld.com> put finger to keyboard and typed:

Phil didn't post for over a week, and then returned with a series of posts
all of which have been rejected due to being in breach of the charter. As I
said in my original article when I put him on manual:

For avoidance of doubt, the following will all be rejected:

* Intemperate and inflammatory language
* Personal abuse
* Complaints about unfair treatment by any member of the moderation team
* Criticism of any moderation decision

Phil is, therefore, still on manual, and will remain on manual until he
manages to go for a week without a rejection.

Mark
--
Moderator for uk.religion.christian
charter : http://www.usenet.org.uk/uk.religion.christian.html
meta-FAQ : http://www.anweald.co.uk/uk.religion.christian.metaFAQ.html

1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist

unread,

Mar 6, 2013, 4:08:30 PM3/6/13

to

"Mark Goodge" <use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote in message
news:vm0fj8d7c819l6bbd...@news.markshouse.net...

> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:55:58 -0000, "1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist"
> <jnhickling[remove]@ntlworld.com> put finger to keyboard and typed:
>
>>"1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist" <jnhickling[remove]@ntlworld.com>
>>wrote in message news:...
>>> "Phil Saunders" <philip....@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>>> news:dtkWs.58470$xo5....@fx15.fr7...
>>>> For obvious reasons I shall not be posting for a week.
>>>
>>> That was posted on the 24/2/13....some 12 days ago to my reckoning.
>>
>>
>>Apologies' 10 days.
>
> Phil didn't post for over a week, and then returned with a series of posts
> all of which have been rejected due to being in breach of the charter. As
> I
> said in my original article when I put him on manual:
>
> For avoidance of doubt, the following will all be rejected:
>
> * Intemperate and inflammatory language
> * Personal abuse
> * Complaints about unfair treatment by any member of the moderation team
> * Criticism of any moderation decision
>
> Phil is, therefore, still on manual, and will remain on manual until he
> manages to go for a week without a rejection.

OK.
Just when I checked this morning he had been clear, apart from two waiting
in the queue.

Jeff...

philip....@ntlworld.com

unread,

Mar 6, 2013, 5:07:23 PM3/6/13

to

Seems that week is a very flexible time period these days

"1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist" wrote in message
news:apppac...@mid.individual.net...

Mark Goodge

unread,

Mar 7, 2013, 2:39:33 AM3/7/13

to

On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 22:07:23 -0000, <philip....@ntlworld.com> put

finger to keyboard and typed:

>Seems that week is a very flexible time period these days

You know how it works. You are placed on manual for a specified length of
time. During that time, all posts you make will need to be manually
moderated. At the end of that time, the first post you make after it will
also go for manual moderation, at which point - assuming it is approved, -
you will be reset to auto-posting.

Unfortunately, in your case, the first post you made after your time was up
was one which I felt necessary to reject. So you are, therefore, still on
manual moderation.

1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist

unread,

Mar 7, 2013, 2:19:44 AM3/7/13

to

<philip....@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:B6PZs.1100$n8...@fx10.fr7...

> Seems that week is a very flexible time period these days

Pity you couldn't contain qute yourself on those last two posts, Phil.

Jeff...

celia

unread,

Mar 7, 2013, 5:26:00 AM3/7/13

to

On 7 Mar, 07:19, "1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist"
<jnhickling[remove]@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> <philip.saund...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message

>
>
> Pity you couldn't contain qute yourself on those last two posts, Phil.
>

What's a 'qute'?

Celia

John

unread,

Mar 7, 2013, 2:38:45 PM3/7/13

to

Fond affection? Does Jeff perhaps love Phil after all?

--
John

1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist

unread,

Mar 7, 2013, 3:07:18 PM3/7/13

to

"celia" <celi...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:c5bc94ed-35de-4a99...@x13g2000vby.googlegroups.com...

Pity you couldn't quite contain yourself on those last two posts, Phil.

Jeff...

1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist

unread,

Mar 7, 2013, 3:32:49 PM3/7/13

to

"Mark Goodge" <use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote in message

news:vsggj81oudfbc0h6b...@news.markshouse.net...

> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 22:07:23 -0000, <philip....@ntlworld.com> put
> finger to keyboard and typed:
>
>>Seems that week is a very flexible time period these days
>
> You know how it works. You are placed on manual for a specified length of
> time. During that time, all posts you make will need to be manually
> moderated. At the end of that time, the first post you make after it will
> also go for manual moderation, at which point - assuming it is approved, -
> you will be reset to auto-posting.
>
> Unfortunately, in your case, the first post you made after your time was
> up
> was one which I felt necessary to reject. So you are, therefore, still on
> manual moderation.

Is that for another week?

Jeff...

Alwyn

unread,

Mar 7, 2013, 3:38:52 PM3/7/13

to

On 07/03/2013 07:39, Mark Goodge wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 22:07:23 -0000, <philip....@ntlworld.com> put
> finger to keyboard and typed:
> > Seems that week is a very flexible time period these days
>

> Unfortunately, in your case, the first post you made after your time was up
> was one which I felt necessary to reject. So you are, therefore, still on
> manual moderation.

If Phil has things to say, can't he say then in newsgroup
<uk.net.news.moderation>, where Mark or anyone else is powerless to stop
him and he need fear no sanction?

Alwyn

1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist

unread,

Mar 7, 2013, 3:49:07 PM3/7/13

to

"Alwyn" <al...@dircon.co.uk> wrote in message

news:khatst$tbr$1...@news.albasani.net...

That was a spiritual disaster for Phil when he last did that.

He is now appearing in england.religion.christian.

Jeff...

philip....@ntlworld.com

unread,

Mar 7, 2013, 4:26:32 PM3/7/13

to

"1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist" wrote in message

news:apscii...@mid.individual.net...

Sadly Jeff is still spreading his own personal judgments as if they are
truth or even factual.

And I had nothing to say about Mark in the posts concerned but about the
group as a whole.

I could forward the posts if you'd like?

Phil

1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist

unread,

Mar 7, 2013, 4:58:23 PM3/7/13

to

<philip....@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:kC7_s.1224$xo3...@fx21.fr7...

The posts I am referring to were all about Mark.
Maybe you have posted there since that time,
so I will amend that to.... the last time I saw Phil post there.

Anyway it seems you are suddenly off moderation, so be grateful.

Jeff...