Did you forget something? ;-)
--
Regards,
Jon
It would have helped if I included the link though, sorry.
http://www.4degreez.com/misc/dante-inferno-test.mv
Any comments?
--
Steve Rimmer
http://www.4degreez.com/misc/dante-inferno-test.mv
Infernal choice of colours - I had to turn the off to see the
questions!
I thought I was being quite honest but managed to escape only with
Purgatory.....
<Mock-Freud> Hmm. Interestink zat because you were not damned you think
you cannot have been honest enough. Tell me, vat do you see in this
inkblot? </freud> :)
I ended up in purgatory too - see you there! :)
--
Peter Aldred
"I'm a lawyer; I believe in calling a spade
a landscape modification implement"
> I thought I was being quite honest but managed to escape only with
> Purgatory.....
Seventh level !!!
--
Mitch
Purgatory is the best you can do.
Mark
--
--> http://www.FridayFun.net - now with added games! <--
"Time is a valuable thing, watch it fly by as the pendulum swings"
> I thought I was being quite honest but managed to escape only with
> Purgatory.....
And I was doing OK until I said "A pimp who plans on comitting treason is a
good thing to be". ;-)
1) The question "Have you wished bad things upon your fellow
countrymen?" strikes me as quite strange with its distinction of
"fellow countrymen". Is it OK to wish bad things upon foreigners?
2) The very last question, "do some people deserve to die?", increases
the score in the violence category although it's a position held by
many non-violent people on the grounds of biblical theology.
--
Paul
"I'm on a journey in search of myself.
If I get back first, let me know that I'm
looking for myself and don't let me leave."
> http://www.4degreez.com/misc/dante-inferno-test.mv
...
> I thought I was being quite honest but managed to escape only with
> Purgatory.....
I don't think they offer anything better than Purgatory. Here's
my scorecard.
Purgatory Repenting Believers Very High
Level 1 - Limbo Virtuous Non-Believers High
Level 2 Lustful Low
Level 3 Gluttonous Moderate
Level 4 Prodigal and Avaricious Low
Level 5 Wrathful and Gloomy Low
Level 6 - The City of Dis Heretics Very Low
Level 7 Violent Low
Level 8- the Malebolge Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers Low
Level 9 - Cocytus Treacherous Very Low
I hope David Ould will take note of my score on level 6 :-).
I then tried giving *all* the "good" answers to see whether I
got accused of pride, presumption or complacency. I didn't, but
the "worst" score it gave me as "Low" rather than "Very Low"
on level 8, so maybe it thought it detected a bit of fraud.
--
Gareth McCaughan Gareth.M...@pobox.com
.sig under construc
Ditto - maybe we're just too honest - not sure that you get an
improved rating for that!
Robert
--
He is our homeliest home and endless dwelling - Julian of Norwich
> steve...@aol.comkdsjeneu (Steve Rimmer) writes:
...
>> http://www.4degreez.com/misc/dante-inferno-test.mv
>>
>> Any comments?
>
> 1) The question "Have you wished bad things upon your fellow
> countrymen?" strikes me as quite strange with its distinction of
> "fellow countrymen". Is it OK to wish bad things upon foreigners?
No, but doing so is not evidence of treachery in the sense
used here.
> 2) The very last question, "do some people deserve to die?", increases
> the score in the violence category although it's a position held by
> many non-violent people on the grounds of biblical theology.
Perhaps the author of the test thinks that people who take that
view of biblical theology are more likely to have violent personalities?
> On Mon, 26 May 2003 15:22:53 +0100, Andy McMullon put finger to
> keyboard and typed:
> >I thought I was being quite honest but managed to escape only with
> >Purgatory.....
>
> Purgatory is the best you can do.
Rather disappointing that!
I know there are a few here who who ought to get straight to
Paradise....
Mind you, faith, in Christ apart, I'm not one of them.
> On Mon, 26 May 2003, Mitch B. wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 May 2003 15:22:53 +0100, Andy McMullon enlightened us all
>> with:
>>
>>> I thought I was being quite honest but managed to escape only with
>>> Purgatory.....
>>
>> Seventh level !!!
>
> Ditto - maybe we're just too honest - not sure that you get an
> improved rating for that!
My limited experimentation suggests that you don't.
there's sod all questions to do with heresy. JUst "do you believe in God?"
I'm sure even you could get that right ;-)
One thing Dante didn't work out is that only one question is needed
"do you believe and trust in Christ to take away your sin?"
A yes vote on that and it's straight to Paradise.
> <Mock-Freud> Tell me, vat do you see in this inkblot? </freud> :)
Looks like a Rorschach test to me, Herr Docktor.
--
Graham Nye
graham(a)thenyes.org.uk
>I ended up in purgatory too - see you there! :)
Me too. Kind of surprised at that as well, thought I'd get worse.
Cheers
Neil
--
Deadspam e-mail address is a spamblock.
Please use ndavey _at_ postmaster dot co dot uk if you wish to contact me.
[I said, tongue in cheek as I hope he realised:]
>> Level 6 - The City of Dis Heretics Very Low
...
>> I hope David Ould will take note of my score on level 6 :-).
[David:]
> there's sod all questions to do with heresy. Just "do you believe in God?"
> I'm sure even you could get that right ;-)
Actually, there were a few others. But I agree that it wasn't
exactly a very stringent test of orthodoxy. :-)
> One thing Dante didn't work out is that only one question is needed
> "do you believe and trust in Christ to take away your sin?"
>
> A yes vote on that and it's straight to Paradise.
I suppose he must have been slightly influenced by those
heretical authors who wrote things like
| Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit
| the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral,
| nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor sexual perverts, nor
| thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers,
| nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God.
and
| Also another book was opened, which is the book of life.
| And the dead were judged by what was written in the books,
| by what they had done. And the sea gave up the dead in it,
| Death and Hades gave up the dead in them, and all were judged
| by what they had done.
:-)
> On Mon, 26 May 2003, Mitch B. wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 May 2003 15:22:53 +0100, Andy McMullon enlightened us all
>> with:
>>
>>> I thought I was being quite honest but managed to escape only with
>>> Purgatory.....
>>
>> Seventh level !!!
>
> Ditto - maybe we're just too honest - not sure that you get an
> improved rating for that!
What it does is treat "depression" and all symptoms of mental illness as
signs of depravity :-(
--
Mitch
> > <Mock-Freud> Tell me, vat do you see in this inkblot? </freud> :)
> Looks like a Rorschach test to me, Herr Docktor.
Doesn't look like a Rorschach test to me. Sometimes an inkblot it just an inkblot.
>>I found this online test in another newsgroup its based on Dantes vision of
>>judgement etc. I don't seem to have done very well...how about you?
>http://www.4degreez.com/misc/dante-inferno-test.mv
>
>Any comments?
I got one lower than you: Hell level 3. Full results:
Level Who are sent there? Score
Purgatory Repenting Believers High
Level 1 - Limbo Virtuous Non-Believers High
Level 2 Lustful Low
Level 3 Gluttonous High
Level 4 Prodigal and Avaricious Very Low
Level 5 Wrathful and Gloomy Low
Level 6 - The City of Dis Heretics Very Low
Level 7 Violent Low
Level 8- the Malebolge Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers Low
Level 9 - Cocytus Treacherous Low
Unfortunately my impeccable orthodoxy (!!) and lack of prodigality and
avarice (which was odd when I said I was a hoarder) were insufficient to
compensate for my gluttony (just 'cos I said I enjoyed good food and was
overweight).
I'm not too impressed.
Alan
>there's sod all questions to do with heresy. JUst "do you believe in God?"
>I'm sure even you could get that right ;-)
On that question and the one on belief in the afterlife I regretted the
absence of the 'maybe' and 'sometimes' options (:-)
Alan
Hmm. Tried to load it last night and this evening - in both cases got
only a partial page. The last question in its entirety reads:
Do you consider living a v
(which I don't think is meant to be a brief ascii-art reference to a
well-known finger gesture), and one previous one asks:
Have you been to a ?
which I must admit to some uncertainty over answering.
Something up, methinks.
--
------------------ -------------------------
|\avid Aldred / Da...@familyaldred.org.uk \ Nottingham, England
|/ --------------------------------
I'd like to know on what grounds any one, even anyone here, ought to
get straight to Paradise apart from faith in Christ. Do you mean
their good works and character?
>>> Seventh level !!!
>>
>> Ditto - maybe we're just too honest - not sure that you get an
>> improved rating for that!
>
> What it does is treat "depression" and all symptoms of mental illness as
> signs of depravity :-(
"Despair" was regarded as a very serious sin in the middle ages,
I believe. If you're going to do a "Dante test" then you need
to treat depression as a sign of sin; likewise homosexuality,
not-being-RC, lack of national feeling, and so on.
I don't think the authors of the test actually think Dante's
ideas about sin were entirely correct. :-)
> Mitch B wrote:
>
>>>> Seventh level !!!
>>>
>>> Ditto - maybe we're just too honest - not sure that you get an
>>> improved rating for that!
>>
>> What it does is treat "depression" and all symptoms of mental illness as
>> signs of depravity :-(
>
> "Despair" was regarded as a very serious sin in the middle ages,
> I believe. If you're going to do a "Dante test" then you need
> to treat depression as a sign of sin; likewise homosexuality,
> not-being-RC, lack of national feeling, and so on.
That explains a lot about certain regular posters to this ng :-)
> I don't think the authors of the test actually think Dante's
> ideas about sin were entirely correct. :-)
Unlike the same members of this ng .
--
Mitch
Oh heck - that's it for me then :((
adrian tssf
--
=========================================
Technical Support, BlackFlag Associates
Tertiary, Society of St. Francis, Church of England.
Grandfather & Civil Servant
> "Gareth McCaughan" <Gareth.M...@pobox.com> wrote in message
> news:86r86lw...@g.local...
> > Andy McMullon wrote:
> >
> > > http://www.4degreez.com/misc/dante-inferno-test.mv
> > ...
> > > I thought I was being quite honest but managed to escape only with
> > > Purgatory.....
> >
> > I don't think they offer anything better than Purgatory. Here's
> > my scorecard.
> > Level 6 - The City of Dis Heretics Very Low
> > I hope David Ould will take note of my score on level 6 :-).
> there's sod all questions to do with heresy. JUst "do you believe in God?"
> I'm sure even you could get that right ;-)
>
> One thing Dante didn't work out is that only one question is needed
> "do you believe and trust in Christ to take away your sin?"
Maybe Dante figured it to be more complex than that. I don't suppose he
was an Evangelical, in any modern (since 19th century) use of the word.
> A yes vote on that and it's straight to Paradise.
And some of us will say "Lord, Lord..." and he won't recognise us. I
remain unconvinced.
ciao for now
--
Angela Rayner ><8>
"Afterlife" has always seemed to me a very odd word. AFAICT it
actually means "afterdeath" and it doesn't necessarily refer to
something which is alive eg it may refer to ghosts or spirits. It
also refers to re-incarnation, sublimation / nirvana as well as a more
basic Valhalla-type reward/paradise.
I believe that death is not the final word, that death does not have
dominion over us. But I don't believe in any of the types of
afterdeath I've listed above. Interestingly, Christianity seems to
have the least developed idea of exactly what happens after death of
any religion I can think of apart from Judaism. What we do know is
that we will be changed and all logic points towards the necessity for
drastic change if we are to enjoy the promises offered in the bible.
IMV this change will be more drastic than we realise - we may not even
maintain continuity of conscious self - but this doesn't bother me in
the slightest.
Eternal cup-of-tea with the vicar...
all the best,
Simon.
Simon Crouch replied (snipped)
> Eternal cup-of-tea with the vicar...
Eternal PCC meetings about whether the blue vase should go on the left
side of the Pearly Gates or the right side?
Agh! No! No! I'll be good, I promise!
(My PCC spent half an hour discussing what sort of coffee we should serve
after services...We eventually got to the right answer!)
All the best,
Simon.
Hmmm.
Purgatory Repenting Believers High
Level 1 - Limbo Virtuous Non-Believers Low
Level 2 Lustful Very High
Level 3 Gluttonous Low
Level 4 Prodigal and Avaricious Low
Level 5 Wrathful and Gloomy Low
Level 6 - The City of Dis Heretics Very Low
Level 7 Violent Moderate
Level 8- the Malebolge Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers
Moderate
Level 9 - Cocytus Treacherous Low
Most disappointed to get 'Very low' on Heretics.
I really think my lack of respect for traditional theologies should have
got me at least a 'High'. *sigh*. Still, I guess I'll enjoy
getting molested by Cleopatra and Helen of Troy in Level 2.
Oh no, sorry, misread it. It's the infernal hurricane I get to be
molested by. Oh well.
Simon
------------------------------------------------
Simon Robinson
http://www.SimonRobinson.com
------------------------------------------------
well It appears I will be joining you... fancy a Jaffa Cake ?
The Dante's Inferno Test has banished you to the Second Level of Hell!
Here is how you matched up against all the levels:
Level | Score
Purgatory | Low
Level 1 - Limbo | Low
Level 2 | Very High
Level 3 | High
Level 4 | Very Low
Level 5 | Very Low
Level 6 - The City of Dis | Very Low
Level 7 | Moderate
Level 8- the Malebolge | High
Level 9 - Cocytus | Low
Level descriptions: http://www.4degreez.com/misc/dante-inferno-
information.html
Take the test: http://www.4degreez.com/misc/dante-inferno-test.mv
--
shullie
Cheers! Yes pleasy!
I'm quite intrigued by how this thing works. If it's put you
in 2nd level, then presumably it's working by looking for the
sin you score highest on when deciding where to place you.
If I'm correct then you could find that 'improving' your life
by cleaning up lesser sins could paradoxically
cause you to descend to a worse level of
hell. Looking at your breakdown for example:
> Level | Score
> Purgatory | Low
> Level 1 - Limbo | Low
> Level 2 | Very High
> Level 3 | High
> Level 4 | Very Low
> Level 5 | Very Low
> Level 6 - The City of Dis | Very Low
> Level 7 | Moderate
> Level 8- the Malebolge | High
> Level 9 - Cocytus | Low
I wonder whether if you stopped being lustful, but didn't
change any other sins, you'd find yourself on Level 8 instead
of Level 2. Could be a good argument in favour of lust
here *evil grin*...
I've managed 'Very High' on Heretics, so there.
> Here is how you matched up against all the levels:
> Level | Score
> Purgatory | Low
> Level 1 - Limbo | Low
> Level 2 | Very High
> Level 3 | High
> Level 4 | Very Low
> Level 5 | Very Low
> Level 6 - The City of Dis | Very Low
> Level 7 | Moderate
> Level 8- the Malebolge | High
> Level 9 - Cocytus | Low
It put me in Level 6:
Purgatory Repenting Believers Very Low
Level 1 - Limbo Virtuous Non-Believers Moderate
Level 2 Lustful High
Level 3 Gluttonous High
Level 4 Prodigal and Avaricious Moderate
Level 5 Wrathful and Gloomy Moderate
Level 6 - The City of Dis Heretics Very High
Level 7 Violent Very High
Level 8- the Malebolge Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers High
Level 9 - Cocytus Treacherous Moderate
I think this demonstrates that I have many interests and a well-rounded
personality :-)
--
Laurence
Same here L6 which seems fair enough judging by the description 'heretic'.
--
Tumbleweed
Remove my socks before replying (but no email reply necessary to newsgroups)
> Same here L6 which seems fair enough judging by the description 'heretic'.
Ah, but did you have such a wide range of interests?
I'm a lustful, gluttonous, violent, fraudulent, malicious, pandering
heretic.
--
Laurence
>I'm a lustful, gluttonous, violent, fraudulent, malicious, pandering
>heretic.
Is that all? I've been underestimating you all these years then! ;O)
>>I'm a lustful, gluttonous, violent, fraudulent, malicious, pandering
>>heretic.
> Is that all? I've been underestimating you all these years then! ;O)
Grrrr.
Though I was only counting those marked 'high' or 'very high'.
--
Laurence
>Grrrr.
>
>Though I was only counting those marked 'high' or 'very high'.
:O)