What he was talking about is facing up to the most challenging and
darkest aspects of your life rather than avoiding it as the way to
gaining self-respect and happiness from knowing you have achieved
something valuable and adult. However if you don't like his
Jungian/Freudian language, (I don't much and filter it out along with
his routine references to 'archetypes') you could skip the video along
to 10 minutes section where he starts talking about the the question he
does not like and always gives the answer that he lives 'as if' God
exists. You have to listen carefully to what he says. In a sense he is
right, who can fully believe in God, it's too big an ask and few if any
can achieve it except Christ (I think he's too influenced by Nietzsche
here). However this view is obviously wrong because no one could ever
become a Christian, which is not what the NT teaches. I think he has
misunderstood the question. I think the question actually is; 'do you
believe that God actually exists (ontologically) as an infinite creator
being who has life in himself rather than just an idea or human
construct?'. I think that behind the question is the suspicion that
using 'as if' is a way to approximate Christian belief without
committing to the actual existence of an infinite and self-existent
creator being who incarnated himself in the person of Jesus. I myself
am suspicious because I've noticed atheists sometimes use the same 'as
if' proviso when talking about morality. They will say 'I live as if
there is a moral standard to which we are all duty bound'
To me belief in the *actual* existence of God is a starting point on a
life-long journey towards knowing him in ever greater measure. I think
Peterson jumps right to the end of this process and then in despair,
throws in the towel because he can't measure up. The only other option
is that he is in fact an atheist who sees God as a human construct,
though given his honesty I think he would say so if this was the case.
Steve Wilson