--
Please do not reply to this email address use my new one
: ni...@catford.fsbuisness.co.uk
"Fred Enaj" <berti...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1130611999....@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I was part of the digging party and can assure you that we didn't leave any
rubbish of any kind on the site.
Having studied local large scale maps which clearly show the shelter and
it's approach cutting we approached the golf course for permission to dig
into the shelter which we received. We allocated a weekend last year and
arrived early on Saturday morning with a mini digger. We had exposed the
concrete slab during an exploratory visit some weeks earlier but this is too
high up the slope to be part of the shelter and is probably a blast cap some
distance above the entrance. Like Ashley Road the shelter the shelter is
approached by a deep cutting. The cutting was completely infilled with
rubbish during the 1970's and there is no avoidance of the cutting today.
A WW2 plan of the shelter clearly shows two entrances from the cutting so we
started digging above what we hoped (through measurement) was one of the
entrances. Having removed the top soil we soon came to the rubbish, buts of
car, washing machines, builders rubble which we took out in large
quantities. I think we got down about 16 feet but with a mini digger it's
very slow going especially as you get deeper and beyond the reach of the
digger. We had to excavate a slope down to a lower platform for the digger.
After two days we ran out of time. I feel that if we could use a bigger
digger (JCB or something similar) we would be able to get in with little
difficulty. We suggested this to the golf course and initially they were
enthusiastic but it had to be discussed by the committee and that is as far
as we got.
We financed the hire of the digger but a JCB would be a lot more expensive
and we asked the club to cover the cost. It may have been that that put
them off, I don't know.
If you want to open up new communications with the club if you can get
permission for another dig with a JCB then I'm sure we will get in. We know
exactly where to dig.
The gold club were hoping to use the shelter as a store which is why they
were so helpful.
I've put a picture on a web page:
http://www.subbrit.org.uk/sb-sites/sites/s/special_events/index4.shtml
Nick
Ambulances being sealed in a shelter, sounds rather urban myth to many -
your correct to assume that a large truck size portal would be required for
such a venture, which would also mean a hard track or roadway would have to
be constructed for vehicle traffic. Without sounding niave, a polite enquiry
of the gentleman as to make & model type COULD clear matters up.
John Locke.
No definitely no ambulances unless they were midget ones, the guy has a
vivid imagination. I have a plan of the place and now the width of all the
tunnels.
I have spoken to a number of people who can remember it before it was
demolished although they didn't go inside.
Nick
Ambulances-makes a change from Sherman tanks !
Pete
I've heard the ambulance theory at other sites, it wasn't true there either.
It's amazing what tall stories people come up with.
Many many years ago someone came up to me at a meeting not knowing who I was
and told me he was me. I soon put him straight!!!!
Nick
Same bloke on the other forum, manley, who claimed to have invented the
hovercraft and knew everything about everything??
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:40:01 +0000
> To: <mark.b...@imperial.ac.uk>
> Subject: Underground: Epsom Downs?
>
> Hi Mark,
> In the section of the S.B. site, regarding RAF Wartling, mention is
> made of an air-raid shelter on Epsom Downs.
> I've heard stories for a long time about there being an underground
> hospital there. This has just been confirmed by a (retired) work
> colleague who says that his father used to work for Epsom Council and
> one of his jobs was to periodically open the bunker and check its
> condition. The father even remembers it being built and the concrete
> tunnels being tested for resistance to bombing with explosives (!),
> prior to the tunnels being buried. He also said there was more than one
> operating theatre in the tunnels.
> Hope this is of interest,
>
> Nick Brigden
no that's Coulsdon, going there Thurdsay
That site is also most interesting, and the second site that cannot be
denied access, after merstham.
>
> Ah Coulsdon, the other free to all bunker, open to anyone!
>
> That site is also most interesting
Is that the one with all the machinery inside, or is that Epsom? I get
the two mixed up...
cheers
Jules
the motor and motorcycle parts (and machinery) are in Coulsdon; Epsom
has (had) very little remaining bar the old kitchen and some wiring.
There's still a tractor in there (or was when I last visited at the end of
last summer) - engine block is in the main corridor and the back end
(solid metal wheels rather than tyres) is down a side passage. I think I
remember seeing the seat in there somewhere...
Lots of VW Beetle parts down there too, including a couple of engines.
Plus what looks to be the remains of a large drill press, and many other
odds and ends.
Looking through the junk was possibly more interesting than the shelter
itself :)
cheers
Jules
there is a film here of its use as a telescope factory;
search for cp 312, you need to "purchase" the free preview to see it.
Whats wrong with actually going to the site itself? It is open to all?
Not any more.
because it's a very nice bit of archive film in which shows its former
use
> Whats wrong with actually going to the site itself? It is open to all?
at the moment, yes
>
> Jules wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:09:06 -0800, alexander.mills wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Yes. Coulsdon has loads of remaning junk. IIRC isn't there still some
>> > farming machinery leftover from when a farmer used it for storage? Or
>> > is it all just motor parts?
>>
>> There's still a tractor in there (or was when I last visited at the end of
>> last summer) - engine block is in the main corridor and the back end
>> (solid metal wheels rather than tyres) is down a side passage. I think I
>> remember seeing the seat in there somewhere...
>>
>> Lots of VW Beetle parts down there too, including a couple of engines.
>> Plus what looks to be the remains of a large drill press, and many other
>> odds and ends.
>>
>> Looking through the junk was possibly more interesting than the shelter
>> itself :)
>
> there is a film here of its use as a telescope factory;
That's interesting - I wonder if the two strange machines lurking down
there are anything to do with those days (they look like some sort of
mixing centrifuge type thingies with vacuum pumps in the bases - but I
couldn't figure out what they *actually* were)
cheers
Jules
almost certainly; we were taken down there by a man who claimed to have
been the telescope man's son and he said that's what they were for; I
noticed last week that they are French with Dymo labels stuck on the
switches.
I didn't think it would be long before it was opened up again. It has been
sealed before and that didn't last long either. Is the new access in the
same place ?
Nick
So if it is open, someone else has re-opened it, which means it is ok
for others to go.
I honestly wouldn't worry about it Nick.
I'm not worrying about it, I might want to visit!
I am perfectly happy for it to be open.
Nick
yes, very poorly sealed by the look of it; whoever broke it open did
not think of the safety of anyone who might be walking around there;
have placed a cover over it.
Placing a cover is a responsible act on your behalf.
However, bolting down a cover, or padlocking something shut, to which
only one person has the key is reprehensible however.
Not if it is; a. the owner b. the council or whoever acting on the
owner's behalf
I agree locking a system up for your own personal use without
consulting the landowner is fairly selfish (but it does retain access
if you happen to know who has the key)
Locking up a system for your own personal use whether public or private
is definitely wrong. As for retaining access, it then means you have to
barter/beg/plead for the key, some people won't, which is why sites get
broken into, aka merstham.
IIRC one such site was locked up extremely securely after someone set
light to themselves and they couldn't find a way in to get them out;
seems a fairly good reason for not wanting all and sundry in there
trashing the place and themselves and then claiming against the council
for allowing them to climb in through a hole in the wall via a
home-made scaffold.
for allowing them to climb in through a hole in the wall via a
home-made scaffold.
But do you really believe that all and sundry would choose to set
themselves on fire in an enclosed underground environment?
While I accept there are plenty of peabrainers out there, most people
who go underground tend to be responsible, safety minded adults. But I
do accept why incidents like this cause the council concern.
But then what is the council? A wholly undemocratically formed
government body, that exists solely on the basis of the taxpayer, and
so any claim against the council, means they don't really pay, it is
the taxpayers who pay surely?
I disagree with this, many people who go underground are inexperienced
children with no idea of safety. This is especially true where something is
left open in an urban area. You can be sure the local kids will find out
about it and tell all their friends who will then go and explore, probably
totally ill equipped, an accident just waiting to happen. I know what I was
like as a 12 year old back in the 1960's (riding round on the sprinklers at
the local sewage works until the arm fell off!!), I'm sure nothing has
changed.
I have been on a number of cave rescues at Merstham (Bedlams Bank) in the
past and it usually comes down to people who were ill equipped to be there
in he first place. This even included the fire brigade on one occasion. We
found the lost scouts quite quickly but the lost firemen took a lot longer.
That taught them not to go blundering in in full fire fighter gear without a
clue of where they were going - there are 11 miles of tunnels there and only
one easily accessible entrance.
I also remember another time at Castle Hill in Dudley meeting up with a
party of 10 very young teenagers with only one small torch between them. I
wonder what would have happened if that torch had failed.
No most who go underground are not 'responsible safety minded adults'.
Nick
> I know what I was
> like as a 12 year old back in the 1960's (riding round on the sprinklers at
> the local sewage works until the arm fell off!!)
ha ha - thanks for that image! :-)
> No most who go underground are not 'responsible safety minded adults'.
I don't know about most, but there certainly seems to be a lot of evidence
of kids having been in many of the underground sites. Which is a shame,
because if it were just adults you could take the line that they're
responsible for their own actions and it's their own darn fault if they
get hurt or whatever within a site...
cheers
Jules
After that incident there was a joint training exercise with Cave Rescue and
the Fire Brigade. As far as I know they now wait until Cave Rescue turn up
before entering the system. I've been called out a couple of times around
midnight.
Nick
Locked in a cabin somewhere, no doubt. ROFL some more.