brun...@gmail.com said:
> On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 16:00:02 UTC+1, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>
>> I have noticed that - I pointed the music app at my SD card it took a
>> while and then I foolishly stopped it.
>
> Just the chap, then. I really don't understand this world of online
> music. What /is/ soundcloud? Is the music app a store?
I think 'cloud' means "All your data are belong to us", and I say if you
have your own music on your own storage, stick with that, use software
that can play your stuff from your own storage.
> I have 100GB of music on the PC, some 6,452 files of MP3 and AAC, in 361
> folders. Mostly tagged. A lot of it is English Folk, a lot more
> Classical/Orchestral, and some of it Big Band and Jazz. I pointed
> itunes/AppleMusicMatch at it and it claimed to "import" it whilst also
> mangling the heirarchy and making a total dogs breakfast of the naming and
> categories. Hipsters, it seems, don't realise that "movements" of a
> symphony are not shufflable songs. Nor that I have 3 different versions
> of Beethoven's 9th becuase they are /different/.
Yes. Call the symphony an 'album' and include the
conductor/orchestra/year/whatever in its name, then call the movements
'tracks' and tag them in order (or do it with the filenames. Then don't let
anyone shuffle them.
> How annoyed am I going to get with the 'buntu world of music? Am I
> supposed to copy my (mildy legitimate) audio files into this Soundcloud
> thing? or what?
The Ubuntu world includes programs that can play sound files from your own
storage. Investigate. Personally (Debian) Amarok annoys me, but I seem to
end up using it. Also Clementine. And many others, but those are the ones I
keep coming back too.
itunes, I've never looked at.
Most player programs will annoy you by 'importing' your stuff, which in that
context means looking over everything and building indexes; which can be
slow, and therefore irritating if you just want a quick look. Plus, I have
found linux sound support to be a horrible confusing dog's dinner of
different schemes and daemons and clever wrappers, and different programs
expecting different backends, and yuck. But you may be lucky and have it
work (especially if the way you intend to play things hasn't changed since
you installed the OS, I think that's where a lot of my trouble came from)
Which is all not 'online' ...
> Apple wanted me to buy "albums" and "tracks" from them, at silly money. I
> quite liked WE7 till it got tescofied. After that even though I told it I
> hated things by Taylor Siwft or Buyonce it still kept playing them two
> tracks after I told it to stick them up its nefr. Never really
> understood Spotify after it went legit and stopped being a pirates
> exchange programme.
I haven't spent very much time in the world of 'online' music. "Call me
oldfangled, but ..." it seems to me that the more keen that world is on
something, the less it's anything I care about. It All Sounds The Same.
hem hem. Turned into my father, me ? But many of the aforementioned player
progs include options for dealing with stuff elsewhere.
> I think Amazon are good. You ohl a CD, you get a freee non-drm MP3 too.
> I'd do that, if they paid any taxes in the UK.
I bought some MP3s from them once. Turned out to be 56K. Not good enough,
won't do that again. Other people say they got better quality; I say I
didn't have any info as to quality before I'd got them, so bah. If you've
got the CD, rip it yourself, why do you need them trying to insert
themselves in stuff you can do better without them ?