regards,
Marc.
Sailing performance will be very good in idillic conditions.
Quality will be 0.6mm thick.
On the plus side......
You will get LOTS of "Etc" ...... All kinds of stuff like fender socks,
Warps (soft ones that wont bend the propshaft too much;) Whistles, bells and
mucho plenty free "extras"
There will be nowhere to put the washboards, And alas they will not supply
the jigsaw you will need when time comes to change the waterpump
impeller........
> "Marc" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:aqovuf$ig3$1...@reader12.wxs.nl...
> >
> > Thinking of buying a Bavaria 36, Jeanneau 34.2 or
> > a Beneteau 331. I am completely clueless about the
> > quality, sailing performance etc.
>
I take it this is your first boat? They are all good choices, and you will
not regret it whatever you go for. They are not boats that would satisfy the
hard-core sailor, but for safe, economicish coastal cruising they are good
buys. Jeanneau have a new boat out - the 35 - that has replaced the 34.2.
--
www.yachtinguniverse.com daily in depth sailing news.
Sponsoring www.jakejefferis.com
Sponsoring Bosham Fireworks www.boshamsc.co.uk
Marc <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:aqovuf$ig3$1...@reader12.wxs.nl...
>
I have owned boats from
"computer" <stephen...@spamntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:OL2A9.82$Om4....@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net...
>
> "computer" <stephen...@spamntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:OL2A9.82$Om4....@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net...
>> They are cheap boats, not built for quality nor sailing performance, more
>> for cruising in relative comfort.
>>
> And what is wrong with that?
There's nothing wrong with that, if those are your priorities. But they're
not everyone's priorities and we don't know (because he didn't say) whether
they're the OP's priorities.
--
si...@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
I'll second that! Last summer I was watching a Moorings Beneteau sailing
along the northwest Corsica coast at about four knots where there is a large
submerged rock marked by a cardinal bouy. I was just thinking to myself,
"hmm, those guys either really know what they are doing ...or", when the
whole boat came to sudden stop, and bounced backwards by a foot or so. The
crew looked a bit surprised that all their sails were now flapping, but
undeterred they started up the motor, reversed out, and set off in another
direction.
> There's nothing wrong with that, if those are your priorities. But they're
> not everyone's priorities and we don't know (because he didn't say)
whether
> they're the OP's priorities.
True, but I think if the OP was as experienced as you, he wouldn't have
asked his question, so it wasn't unreasonable for me to put over a
counterpoint to Stephen SUmmer's comment. For people who are not hugely
experienced, these are really good boats. I often see rather scathing
remarks in the British press about these mass-produced boats, and I don't
like to see them getting a knocking. They allow a lot of people to get
access to sailing by virtue of their price, comfort etc. Their success in
the marketplace compared to the traditional British boatbuilders bears
evidence to suggest that they are a good choice for most people.
A view based on what experience I wonder.
I own a Bavaria 32, and have chartered Beneteau and Jeanneau in the 35 -
41 ft range every year for the past 10. Although I've never been out in
<really> nasty weather in any of them, I've been racing in the sort of
conditions where you fall down the front of waves and get a good view of
the top of the keel of the boat next door. I've never had any moments
where I doubted the boat's ability to look after me. As for sailing
capability, last week in Turkey on a Jeanneau 37 we were doing 8 knots
close to the limit of control on a spinnaker reach in the dark under the
milky way and this was quite magic sailing which would be hard to match
in many 'traditional' cruisers.
FWIW, here are my thoughts:
1. In this day of competition and computer design, the overall concepts
of these boats are very similar, and so both accommodation and sailing
performance will also be similar.
2. The standard of finish and comfort on all three makes is very
similar, and you can judge for yourself if you have any preferences. As
Dennis said, everything fits and the layouts have been exceptionally
well thought out.
3. Of what I've sailed, the Beneteaus seem rather more sluggish than the
other 2 makes, particularly in the light stuff. However, I haven't
sailed the latest generation of Benes or any of the Firsts, so don't
read too much into this. My Bav sails well both on and off the wind, but
is slightly lighter than the other 2 makes and perhaps a little bit more
tender. However, its also shorter than what you are proposing and what I
generally charter, so this may not be relevant.
4. Although you stress comfort rather than sailing ability, don't
underestimate the importance of the latter. Everytime you are facing a
contrary tide, small diffences in performance translate to big
differences it ETA. Speed and maneuverability under power are also
important - my Bav with a sail drive is wonderful, particularly in
reverse where it just goes straight back. In contrast, last week's Jenn
373 showed a marked disinterest in travelling backwards at all. Perhaps
it had a folding prop, I just don't know. However, if you are a new boat
owner, handling under power could be an important issue, so try this on
any demo sails you go on.
5. Even if you are sure that you want the ease of in mast furling, try
to get someone to demonstrate the single line reefing that Bav (and
probably the others) offer. Reefing with this system is much less
traumatic than hanging onto the mast in horrid weather and doesn't have
the substantial drawbacks of in-mast systems (eg terrible sail shape,
danger of jamming and weight aloft).
6. Its no coincidence that the marinas are full of boats from these
manufacturers. They represent wonderful value, and the present
generation have been the result of a couple of decades of steady
development.
7. Enjoy
HTH
Pete.
Graham.
And don't forget the depreciation! Assuming you won't keep this boat
forever, when you come to sell a good second hand Moody, Rassy etc you
should recover most of what you paid - maybe even more. It is unlikely you
will find the same with a Beneteau etc. especially if you have bought new.
Tony
--
www.yachtinguniverse.com daily in depth sailing news.
Sponsoring www.jakejefferis.com
Sponsoring Bosham Fireworks www.boshamsc.co.uk
dennis.pogson <dennisnos...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:3D3A9.152$1%5.32841@newsfep2-gui...
>>>>
>>>
>>>Durability isn't too good on any of them but, you get what you pay for
>>
>>like
>>
>>>anything else and to a lot of people they represent good value for
>>
> money,
>
>>>especially wives who look at them in a similar way to caravans.
>>
>>Personally,
>>
>>>I'd rather spend my money on a better built used boat (Moody, Westerly
>>
>>etc)
>>
>>>for the same price.
>>>
>>>Graham.
>>>
>>
>>And don't forget the depreciation! Assuming you won't keep this boat
>>forever, when you come to sell a good second hand Moody, Rassy etc you
>>should recover most of what you paid - maybe even more. It is unlikely
>
> you
>
>>will find the same with a Beneteau etc. especially if you have bought new.
>>
>>Tony
>>
>
> I don't think that's true. A lovely BMW 7 series, 2 years old, can be picked
> up for half price. Same with a Bentley or a Roller. Now whilst the boat
> market is different, I don't think anyone is going to pay more than the new
> price for a 2-year old yacht, no matter who made it.
>
>
>
no but if you buy a 10 year old boat of a good design and sell it five
years later you can often sell it for more than you paid for it,
somtimes even taking inflation into account
--
www.yachtinguniverse.com daily in depth sailing news.
Sponsoring www.jakejefferis.com
Sponsoring Bosham Fireworks www.boshamsc.co.uk
dennis.pogson <dennisnos...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:nKpA9.507$CT5....@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net...
I went on a jeanneau at the boat show a couple of years ago. I sat down
under the saloon table and lifted it off its mountings with my legs. on
closer examination I found it had been held on with 3 no10 by 12mm
screws with about 3 turn biting in the tabletop (no glue at all). I
hope the rest of the woodwork was more solid but I came away very
unimpressed
Westerly Berwicks 1978 boats selling for £26,000+
Centaurs same age £14,000+ now
At the top of the market, look at the price of Hallberg Rassy, because of
the delivery wait people are paying more for 2nd hand than new.
Graham.
Also, why do Jeannneau & Bavaria main bulkheads break loose following
groundings which repairers say most other makes would withstand?
Why, when we were looking at various boats did my insurers advise me not to
go near an Oceanis unless I wanted to pay a loaded premium because of their
experience with structural failures and one of stability/righting problems?
The problem with mass production design engineering is that everything is
cut to the bone to shave as much off the cost as possible and maximise
profit.
Someone previously mentioned resale value. Early Westerlies and Moodys cost
far more now at 25-30 years old than their original purchase cost but, I
doubt if these lightly built boats will be around 2nd hand after that length
of time.
Graham.
Westerlies (circa 1970's) used to be total crap, but they got their act
together during the '80's and 90's. Moody's have always been well enough
built, but even so Moody 33's were not that good ( perhaps this was their
first excursion into mass production.
I have owned and kept boats for 12 years and more, and kidded myself that a
boat bought in 1975 for 20 grand and sold for 25 grand in 1988 actually made
a profit! What about the decrease in purchasing power of the £, and the
enormous amount of improvement added to the boat during ownership?
Currently sailing on ( but do not own) a Beneteau 50, built in Florida in
1990. The construction, interior fittings, and strength of this boat are
simply superb. Newly upholstered last year, she is like new, despite
frequent charters, and the cost (bought from Croatia 2 years ago,) would
astonish most owners of one-off expensive yachts. Perhaps the Yanks are
better at mass-production than the French, but I doubt it.
Moody also have problems in that with their heavier build quality and higher
manufacturing costs in the UK they can't compete against the French mass
produced boats so no longer build anything under 38ft.
> I have owned and kept boats for 12 years and more, and kidded myself that
a
> boat bought in 1975 for 20 grand and sold for 25 grand in 1988 actually
made
> a profit! What about the decrease in purchasing power of the £, and the
> enormous amount of improvement added to the boat during ownership?
>
Previously, you compared boats with cars but the situation is totally
different. Whereas new car values drop as soon as you put them on the road
and depreciate in most cases to virtually zero in 10 years or so, a well
built boat will actually sell for more than it's original purchase price
after the same time. Equipment added increases value or, alternatively,
some of it can be transferred to the next boat.
Of course devaluation of currency plays a part and so does the cost of
maintenance and this varies wildly depending on whether professional or DIY
but that applies to everything one buys. Unlike most sports and hobbies, at
least there's something to trade in for the wheel chair at the end of the
day.
Graham.