Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Jenny Bond's nude gardening

688 views
Skip to first unread message

joe.d.johnson

unread,
Feb 3, 2002, 4:05:03 AM2/3/02
to
Anyone else "Other Half" on BBC1? last night.

Jenny Bond, the prim and proper royal correspondent, admitted to doing her
gardening in the nude.

Joe


J.L.E

unread,
Feb 3, 2002, 5:44:05 AM2/3/02
to

joe.d.johnson <joe.d....@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:G1778.577$XS6.1...@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com...

And your point ?.....


Anthony

unread,
Feb 3, 2002, 7:01:02 AM2/3/02
to

Another non-event


Kev

unread,
Feb 3, 2002, 8:01:43 AM2/3/02
to

"J.L.E" <ne...@scarts.fsnet.co.unitedkingdom> wrote in message
news:a3j8ck$ep9$1...@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...

That someone's found someone that likes doing gardening !

Wonder if she wants practise on an additional garden

(mines a mess!)

Kev


AndyC

unread,
Feb 3, 2002, 8:28:43 AM2/3/02
to

"joe.d.johnson" <joe.d....@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:G1778.577$XS6.1...@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com...
> Anyone else "Other Half" on BBC1? last night.
>
> Jenny Bond, the prim and proper royal correspondent, admitted to doing her
> gardening in the nude.

I reckon at least half the peeps in here do their gardening nude - at least
when it's warm.

We'd also readily "admit" it. Some of us would even be eager to make it
known :-)

--
Andynude
www.its-natural.net


Terry Blunt

unread,
Feb 3, 2002, 12:50:26 PM2/3/02
to
In message <a3jdua$oou$1...@helle.btinternet.com>
"AndyC" <andy...@hotmail.com> wrote:

I can't do my gardening nude. Every inch of it is multiply overlooked froma
all directions :-(


--
Terry Blunt <te...@langri.demon.co.uk>

Sometimes I sits and scratches my head,
but oft times I scratches my bum instead.

Anthony

unread,
Feb 4, 2002, 4:28:08 AM2/4/02
to
On Sun, 03 Feb 2002 17:50:26 GMT, Terry Blunt
<te...@langri.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In message <a3jdua$oou$1...@helle.btinternet.com>
> "AndyC" <andy...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> "joe.d.johnson" <joe.d....@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>> news:G1778.577$XS6.1...@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com...
>> > Anyone else "Other Half" on BBC1? last night.
>> >
>> > Jenny Bond, the prim and proper royal correspondent, admitted to doing her
>> > gardening in the nude.
>>
>> I reckon at least half the peeps in here do their gardening nude - at least
>> when it's warm.
>>
>> We'd also readily "admit" it. Some of us would even be eager to make it
>> known :-)
>>
>> --
>> Andynude
>> www.its-natural.net
>
>I can't do my gardening nude. Every inch of it is multiply overlooked froma
>all directions :-(


And mine has 4 ft high stinging nettles !

AndyC

unread,
Feb 4, 2002, 7:08:22 AM2/4/02
to

"Terry Blunt" <te...@langri.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5a701c03...@langri.demon.co.uk...

>
> I can't do my gardening nude. Every inch of it is multiply overlooked
froma
> all directions :-(

So is Climping Beach...

In principle your reply makes no sense at all, but, understanding the notion
that, nudity = wrong makes sense of the reply.

Realising that others *might* object to nudity makes it prudent to warn
them, or to ask them if they mind. It does not mean though, that we should
assist society perpetuate this notion.

--
Andynude
www.its-natural.net


AndyC

unread,
Feb 4, 2002, 7:19:40 AM2/4/02
to
"joe.d.johnson" <joe.d....@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:G1778.577$XS6.1...@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com...
>
> Jenny Bond, the prim and proper royal correspondent, admitted to doing her
> gardening in the nude.
>
...Also, there are plenty of "prim and proper" naturists. Just like there
are unconventional and improper ones. Naturists cover a very broad range of
personality types.

--
Andynude
www.its-natural.net

Peter Stokes

unread,
Feb 4, 2002, 5:09:16 AM2/4/02
to

"J.L.E" <ne...@scarts.fsnet.co.unitedkingdom> wrote in message
news:a3j8ck$ep9$1...@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
>
The point surely is that in a celebrity-led culture like ours, anyone
remotely 'famous' who promotes or admits to taking aprt in an activity helps
to break down the barriers between that activity and its detractors, and
encourages its wider acceptance. If a 'celeb' does something it becomes
acceptable - if the celebrity is big enough then it becomes fashionably de
rigeur.

peter

J.L.E

unread,
Feb 4, 2002, 3:32:38 PM2/4/02
to

Peter Stokes <pe...@devizes-net.com> wrote in message
news:3c5e5e41$1...@nnrp1.news.uk.psi.net...

If you are right.....

When did taking drugs, divorce and all manner of other thing become
'acceptable' ?....


Alex Heney

unread,
Feb 4, 2002, 5:01:18 PM2/4/02
to
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002 09:05:03 -0000, "joe.d.johnson"
<joe.d....@ntlworld.com> wrote:

She has been known to be a naturist for several years.

There was a period when she was one of the studio presenters on one of
the BBC travel programs, and one of the correspondents (Matthew?) was
always sent somewhere at short notice.

He always remarked that Jenny would want to know about it when he
found naturist beaches, and a couple of times, IIRC, mentioned that he
had met friends of hers at naturist facilities.
--

Alex Heney, global villager

DEFINITION: Computer - A device designed to speed and automate errors.

Please remove NO and SPAM from above
address if replying by email.


Marc

unread,
Feb 4, 2002, 5:52:07 PM2/4/02
to
J.L.E <ne...@scarts.fsnet.co.unitedkingdom> wrote:

> > The point surely is that in a celebrity-led culture like ours,
> anyone
> > remotely 'famous' who promotes or admits to taking aprt in an
> activity helps
> > to break down the barriers between that activity and its detractors,
> and
> > encourages its wider acceptance. If a 'celeb' does something it
> becomes
> > acceptable - if the celebrity is big enough then it becomes
> fashionably de
> > rigeur.
> >
>
> If you are right.....

> When did taking drugs, divorce and all manner of other thing become
> 'acceptable' ?....

A philosphical question...


If Jelly was on his own in a forest, could he still cause an argument
over nothing ?

Zen enough for a Monday?

Anthony

unread,
Feb 5, 2002, 4:30:47 AM2/5/02
to
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002 22:52:07 +0000, ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk (Marc)
wrote:


>
>> When did taking drugs, divorce and all manner of other thing become
>> 'acceptable' ?....
>
>A philosphical question...
>
>
>If Jelly was on his own in a forest, could he still cause an argument
>over nothing ?

He'd be aguing with the trees about them whispering about him !


>
>Zen enough for a Monday?

Still pretty deep, even on Tuesday

J.L.E

unread,
Feb 5, 2002, 12:22:28 PM2/5/02
to

Anthony <a...@poggo.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:u37v5ug8nrqlteccr...@4ax.com...

> On Mon, 4 Feb 2002 22:52:07 +0000, ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk
(Marc)
> wrote:
<snip>

> He'd be aguing with the trees about them whispering about him !

Not everyone is like you and Narc.

Now both of you go back to your wards before Matron notices your
absence....

J.L.E

unread,
Feb 5, 2002, 12:20:20 PM2/5/02
to

Marc <ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f73re8.1rb...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk...

<snip the worthless trolling remarks that add nothing to the thread or
group>

Not a lot left to comment on now......

Go back to sniffing your printing ink marc you wet twat.


J.L.E

unread,
Feb 5, 2002, 12:24:41 PM2/5/02
to

driftwood <mso...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9r9W7RBs...@spamcop.net...
> X-No-archive: yes
> In article <a3mst5$knl$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk> from
> <news:uk.rec.naturist>, J.L.E <ne...@scarts.fsnet.co.unitedkingdom>
> writes

> >
> >Peter Stokes <pe...@devizes-net.com> wrote in message
> >news:3c5e5e41$1...@nnrp1.news.uk.psi.net...
> >>
> >> "J.L.E" <ne...@scarts.fsnet.co.unitedkingdom> wrote in message
> >> news:a3j8ck$ep9$1...@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
> >> >
> [snip]

> >> >
> >> > And your point ?.....
> >> >
> >> The point surely is that in a celebrity-led culture like ours,
> >anyone
> >> remotely 'famous' who promotes or admits to taking aprt in an
> >activity helps
> >> to break down the barriers between that activity and its
detractors,
> >and
> >> encourages its wider acceptance. If a 'celeb' does something it
> >becomes
> >> acceptable - if the celebrity is big enough then it becomes
> >fashionably de
> >> rigeur.
> >>
> >
> >If you are right.....
> >
> >When did taking drugs,
>
> 1967, but see also "Confessions of an English Opium Eater" by Thomas
de
> Quincy, "The Doors of Perception" by Aldous Huxley, any book by Jack
> Kerouac, etc, etc.
>
> >divorce
>
> 1937(?), Edward and Mrs. Simpson.

>
> >and all manner of other thing become
> >'acceptable' ?....
>
> When you stop worrying about what other people think.
>

That's not the same as something being acceptable to others, it just
called doing your own thing.


Marc

unread,
Feb 5, 2002, 6:05:40 PM2/5/02
to
Anthony <a...@poggo.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> >If Jelly was on his own in a forest, could he still cause an argument
> >over nothing ?
> He'd be aguing with the trees about them whispering about him !

It would be worth trying , just for some peace now and then. Just be
glad he's not interested in painting kit cars, he managed to drag one
thread out for weeks repeating the same mantra.

J.L.E

unread,
Feb 5, 2002, 6:33:42 PM2/5/02
to

Marc <ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f75mq4.16r...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk...

And it's still running due to idiots like you who don't know what they
are talking about, you obviously don't know what my trade is, I don't
tell you how to print your bumper stickers, don't you try and tell me
who to paint the rest of the car.....

Marc you are a troll and plonker, go back to alt.troll.


Peter Stokes

unread,
Feb 5, 2002, 11:25:42 AM2/5/02
to

"AndyC" <andy...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a3lu8o$ljg$1...@helle.btinternet.com...

Sure you mean 'uncover' a very ..... sorry, too obvious, couldn't resist it
.....


peter


Peter Stokes

unread,
Feb 5, 2002, 11:23:46 AM2/5/02
to

"J.L.E" <ne...@scarts.fsnet.co.unitedkingdom> wrote in message
news:a3mst5$knl$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...

Don't confuse 'acceptable' to a large number of people with 'right'
according to your - or anyone else's - viewpoint.

Taking drugs is acceptable - it is talked about and written about openly,
celebrities in particular have their drug habits written about without legal
action being taken against them. It is usually illegal, to many it is wrong,
but to many others it is 'acceptable'.

Divorce - only the Catholic Church appears to have a problem with it these
days. Even the old notion of 'staying together for the sake of the children'
has been replaced with the idea that it is better to separate than to have a
troubled and dysfunctional home for children. You may not agree with divorce
and all that it entails, but it has been accepted for a long time.

My point stands - where celebrities lead, acceptance follows. For good or
ill .....

peter

Tim Forcer

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 4:00:07 AM2/6/02
to
"J.L.E" wrote:
>
> ...
>
> When did taking drugs, divorce and all manner of other
> thing become 'acceptable' ?....

Errm, taking drugs has been "acceptable" since drugs were first
discovered. The default is for taking them to be acceptable,
then for society to decide after a while that a certain drug is
unacceptable. IMO the number of drugs which it is "acceptable"
to take in English society today is extremely large.

Divorce became generally acceptable in the last third of the
last century (although for some sections of society it had been
acceptable much earlier).

While "all manner of other" types of behaviour, including sexual
conduct, is "acceptable" today, social nudity is generally not
(IMO) - generally people would accept it ONLY if they weren't
involved. Therefore, IMO it helps common-or-garden folk if
someone with a relatively high meeja profile states
matter-of-factly that they regard nudity as the way to be when
gardening (Jennie Bond), labouring (Mick Aston), swimming
(Esther Rantzen - IIRC) or enjoying a beach (Ken and Barbara
Follett).

--
Tim Forcer t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
The University of Southampton, UK

The University is not responsible for my opinions

Tim Forcer

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 4:06:05 AM2/6/02
to
Alex Heney wrote:
>
> joe.d.johnson wrote:
>>
>> ... Jenny Bond ... admitted to doing her
>> gardening in the nude.

I suspect she "stated" it, not "admitted" it. IIRC the lady
doesn't regard her nude gardening as anything sordid or wrong,
so sees no need for producing an admission of anything.

> She has been known to be a naturist for several years.

True.

> There was a period when she was one of the studio presenters
> on one of the BBC travel programs, and one of the correspondents
> (Matthew?) was always sent somewhere at short notice.
>
> He always remarked that Jenny would want to know about it when
> he found naturist beaches, and a couple of times, IIRC, mentioned
> that he had met friends of hers at naturist facilities.

False memory syndrome. Not Jenny Bond, but that other friend of
and writer about the Royals Penny Junor. AFAIK, Penny Junor has
never stated (or admitted) anything about her personal attitude
to social nudity - she came close a couple of times on The
Travel Show, but (IIRC) never got beyond that.

Anthony

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 4:13:29 AM2/6/02
to
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:05:40 +0000, ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk (Marc)
wrote:

Mantra ? good name for a Kitcar eh?

I've had Jelly killfiled in this group form many months.
However I don't have him killfiled in the Digital Video group cos he's
just sooo funny !

Jan

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 4:25:05 AM2/6/02
to
a.j....@btNOinterSPAMnet.com (Alex Heney) wrote in message news:<3j0u5u8lbh361bcak...@4ax.com>...

> On Sun, 3 Feb 2002 09:05:03 -0000, "joe.d.johnson"
> <joe.d....@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> >Anyone else "Other Half" on BBC1? last night.
> >
> >Jenny Bond, the prim and proper royal correspondent, admitted to doing her
> >gardening in the nude.
> >
>
> She has been known to be a naturist for several years.
>
> There was a period when she was one of the studio presenters on one of
> the BBC travel programs, and one of the correspondents (Matthew?) was
> always sent somewhere at short notice.
>
> He always remarked that Jenny would want to know about it when he
> found naturist beaches, and a couple of times, IIRC, mentioned that he
> had met friends of hers at naturist facilities.


The pendulum swings both ways. BTW it is Jennie Bond.

http://media.guardian.co.uk/bbc/story/0,7521,644590,00.html

marc

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 4:57:58 AM2/6/02
to
Anthony <a...@poggo.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> Mantra ? good name for a Kitcar eh?

Manky VW based wasn't it? A bit like a Nova?


>
> I've had Jelly killfiled in this group form many months.
> However I don't have him killfiled in the Digital Video group cos he's
> just sooo funny !

I think it's the way he blithely blunders on thinking that anything he
says must be right,that's so funny, that and the way that if his point
isn't accepted straight away, the idea is to just constantly repeat it.
Of course to really persuade people, what's needed is his technique of
repeating over and over again, but at each repetition add a bit of name
calling.


--
Marc
T Shirts, Sweatshirts, polo shirts, banners, tabards,
signs,decals, stickers and rally plates for Mini Clubs (And other cars)
http://www.jaceeprint.demon.co.uk/

J.L.E

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 8:34:27 AM2/6/02
to

Anthony <a...@poggo.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hcr16uof03nuuabck...@4ax.com...

Oh yeh, is that 'cos I show you up as the idiot who know f*** all
about digital video ?.....

Back to your hole troll.


J.L.E

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 8:36:53 AM2/6/02
to

marc <ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f76gq3.qcd...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk...
> Anthony <a...@poggo.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>

Idiots

J.L.E

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 8:42:12 AM2/6/02
to

Peter Stokes <pe...@devizes-net.com> wrote in message
news:3c600786$1...@nnrp1.news.uk.psi.net...

>
> "J.L.E" <ne...@scarts.fsnet.co.unitedkingdom> wrote in message
> news:a3mst5$knl$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
> >
> > Peter Stokes <pe...@devizes-net.com> wrote in message
> > news:3c5e5e41$1...@nnrp1.news.uk.psi.net...
> > >
<snip>

>
> Don't confuse 'acceptable' to a large number of people with 'right'
> according to your - or anyone else's - viewpoint.
>
> Taking drugs is acceptable - it is talked about and written about
openly,
> celebrities in particular have their drug habits written about
without legal
> action being taken against them. It is usually illegal, to many it
is wrong,
> but to many others it is 'acceptable'.
>
> Divorce - only the Catholic Church appears to have a problem with it
these
> days. Even the old notion of 'staying together for the sake of the
children'
> has been replaced with the idea that it is better to separate than
to have a
> troubled and dysfunctional home for children. You may not agree with
divorce
> and all that it entails, but it has been accepted for a long time.
>
> My point stands - where celebrities lead, acceptance follows. For
good or
> ill .....
>

Sorry but you seem to be missing my point....
Acceptance that some people will do such things will follow, what does
not follow is that it becomes the norm or that so many people do it
(out of the whole population) that those who don't are the minority.

Andy

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 9:43:36 AM2/6/02
to

"J.L.E" <ne...@scarts.fsnet.co.unitedkingdom> wrote in message
news:a3rda5$dkk$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
[snip]

> Back to your hole troll.
>
Hey Jelly, why not just kill file Ant and Marc?...

--
Andynude
www.its-natural.net


marc

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 10:13:05 AM2/6/02
to
Andy <an...@spambin.skyworld.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> Hey Jelly, why not just kill file Ant and Marc?...

Because he needs to try and win. He doens't often mamage it but that's
another point all together.Have look at his behaviour in any other NG
it's always the same. He can never ignore an argument and is always
convinced he's about to win. I didn't realise he was in the digital
group but I'm sure you can transfer his rants from there to the classic
car one without anyone noticing .

Andy

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 10:43:52 AM2/6/02
to

"marc" <ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f76vfg.f07...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk...

> Andy <an...@spambin.skyworld.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hey Jelly, why not just kill file Ant and Marc?...
>
> Because he needs to try and win. He doens't often mamage it but that's
> another point all together.Have look at his behaviour in any other NG
> it's always the same. He can never ignore an argument and is always
> convinced he's about to win. I didn't realise he was in the digital
> group but I'm sure you can transfer his rants from there to the classic
> car one without anyone noticing .

One thing's for certain Marc, no-one ever "wins" an argument in usenet, all
that happens is a discussion commences and at somepoint it starts to
degenerate into a petty battle between personalities.

How involved anyone of us becomes in the little skirmishes, has much to do
with our ability to refrain from engaging in such nonsense.

Yeah I know... guilty as charged m'lud :-)

--
Andynude
www.its-natural.net


J.L.E

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 11:45:16 AM2/6/02
to

Andy <an...@spambin.skyworld.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:a3rfen$lsm$1...@knossos.btinternet.com...

>
> "J.L.E" <ne...@scarts.fsnet.co.unitedkingdom> wrote in message
> news:a3rda5$dkk$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
> [snip]
> > Back to your hole troll.
> >
> Hey Jelly, why not just kill file Ant and Marc?...
>

If they troll me I will defend myself, why not ask them to stop trying
to troll ? But then you won't do that will you......


J.L.E

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 11:47:45 AM2/6/02
to

marc THE TROLL<ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f76vfg.f07...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk...

> Andy <an...@spambin.skyworld.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hey Jelly, why not just kill file Ant and Marc?...
>
> Because he needs to try and win. He doens't often mamage it but
that's
> another point all together.Have look at his behaviour in any other
NG
> it's always the same. He can never ignore an argument and is always
> convinced he's about to win. I didn't realise he was in the digital
> group but I'm sure you can transfer his rants from there to the
classic
> car one without anyone noticing .
>
>

You just don't like being proved

1/. Wrong,
2/. A troll and
3/. Arrogant.


Tim Forcer

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 12:42:24 PM2/6/02
to
Jan wrote:
>
> Alex Heney wrote:
>>
>> joe.d.johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> ... "Other Half" on BBC1? last night.
>>>
>>> Jenny Bond, ... admitted to doing her

>>> gardening in the nude.
>>
>> She has been known to be a naturist for several years.

[cut]

> The pendulum swings both ways. BTW it is Jennie Bond.
>
> http://media.guardian.co.uk/bbc/story/0,7521,644590,00.html

I see your URL and raise you Jennie Bond as listed on
<http://www.gennex.com/adult/movie/vendor/vcx/classic/classic02.htm>
- nothing about gardening, though.

Marc

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 2:01:19 PM2/6/02
to
Andy <an...@spambin.skyworld.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> One thing's for certain Marc, no-one ever "wins" an argument in usenet, all
> that happens is a discussion commences and at somepoint it starts to
> degenerate into a petty battle between personalities.
>
> How involved anyone of us becomes in the little skirmishes, has much to do
> with our ability to refrain from engaging in such nonsense.
>
> Yeah I know... guilty as charged m'lud :-)

Lol You and me both! :-) But I get you a pint you can't get Jelly to
understand that!

Anthony

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 2:36:50 PM2/6/02
to
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:43:36 +0000 (UTC), "Andy"
<an...@spambin.skyworld.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

>
>"J.L.E" <ne...@scarts.fsnet.co.unitedkingdom> wrote in message
>news:a3rda5$dkk$1...@news7.svr.pol.co.uk...
>[snip]
>> Back to your hole troll.
>>
>Hey Jelly, why not just kill file Ant and Marc?...

He cant. he's too worried about us talking about him !!

Slappa my thighs !!!!!!
OOOOhhhhh larf ? Ipee Iself

J.L.E

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 4:15:41 PM2/6/02
to

Marc <ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f77633.1tl...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk...
> Andy <an...@spambin.skyworld.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>

<snip more trolling from Marc>

Nothing left to comment on........ Other than to say that it looks
like Marc has come back with a view of wrecking the group again.


J.L.E

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 3:26:09 PM2/6/02
to

Anthony <a...@poggo.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:da136u0367t7u7ulj...@4ax.com...

Well I have already said that or don't you read the post you're
replying to, a bit like your mate Ridden then, in fact a lot like
Ridden - your both Trolls of the first order.


Marc

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 6:33:10 PM2/6/02
to
Anthony <a...@poggo.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> He cant. he's too worried about us talking about him !!

He needs the attention. If it wasn't for anyone , taking the piss out of
him or arguing with him, no-one would even know he was there.

Alex Heney

unread,
Feb 6, 2002, 7:17:05 PM2/6/02
to
On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 09:06:05 +0000, Tim Forcer
<t...@ecs.soton.ac.uk.nojunk> wrote:

>Alex Heney wrote:
>>
>> joe.d.johnson wrote:
>>>
>>> ... Jenny Bond ... admitted to doing her
>>> gardening in the nude.

<snip>

>> There was a period when she was one of the studio presenters
>> on one of the BBC travel programs, and one of the correspondents
>> (Matthew?) was always sent somewhere at short notice.
>>
>> He always remarked that Jenny would want to know about it when
>> he found naturist beaches, and a couple of times, IIRC, mentioned
>> that he had met friends of hers at naturist facilities.
>
>False memory syndrome. Not Jenny Bond, but that other friend of
>and writer about the Royals Penny Junor.

Oops.

You're right of course.


--

Alex Heney, global villager

It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa

Please remove NO and SPAM from above
address if replying by email.


Andy

unread,
Feb 7, 2002, 5:00:05 AM2/7/02
to

"J.L.E" <ne...@scarts.fsnet.co.unitedkingdom> wrote in message
news:a3rpj4$o8u$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk...

> If they troll me I will defend myself,
why not ask them to stop trying
> to troll ? But then you won't do that will you......

No and no, there is only one way to deal with trolls, that is to drain their
power by ignoring them...

One thing that I have learnt from Dear Ant over the years is if you don't
like what you read, then you can set up your filters accordingly.


marc

unread,
Feb 7, 2002, 5:31:37 AM2/7/02
to
Andy <an...@spambin.skyworld.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> One thing that I have learnt from Dear Ant over the years is if you don't
> like what you read, then you can set up your filters accordingly.

But that of course doesn't give Jelly the chance to show off his
dazzling wit by repeating "Troll" and "Idiot" ad infinitum.

Anthony

unread,
Feb 7, 2002, 9:31:22 AM2/7/02
to

Ahh but Jelly baiting is FUN !!!

Anthony

unread,
Feb 7, 2002, 9:32:04 AM2/7/02
to
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:31:37 +0000, ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk (marc)
wrote:

>Andy <an...@spambin.skyworld.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> One thing that I have learnt from Dear Ant over the years is if you don't
>> like what you read, then you can set up your filters accordingly.
>
>But that of course doesn't give Jelly the chance to show off his
>dazzling wit by repeating "Troll" and "Idiot" ad infinitum.

Cos they are the only words he can type without miss-spelling them

marc

unread,
Feb 7, 2002, 10:33:24 AM2/7/02
to
Anthony <a...@poggo.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> >One thing that I have learnt from Dear Ant over the years is if you don't
> >like what you read, then you can set up your filters accordingly.
>
> Ahh but Jelly baiting is FUN !!!

And he's so predictable ( Probably because of his low intellect) , that
you can't even put a bet on him ignoring an argument.

marc

unread,
Feb 7, 2002, 10:33:39 AM2/7/02
to
Anthony <a...@poggo.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> >> One thing that I have learnt from Dear Ant over the years is if you don't
> >> like what you read, then you can set up your filters accordingly.
> >
> >But that of course doesn't give Jelly the chance to show off his
> >dazzling wit by repeating "Troll" and "Idiot" ad infinitum.
>
> Cos they are the only words he can type without miss-spelling them

Shhhhh. Otherwise he will have to try squirming and lieiiiing (sic)
again.

J.L.E

unread,
Feb 7, 2002, 5:57:39 AM2/7/02
to

marc <ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f78cq8.1t2...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk...

> Andy <an...@spambin.skyworld.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > One thing that I have learnt from Dear Ant over the years is if
you don't
> > like what you read, then you can set up your filters accordingly.
>
> But that of course doesn't give Jelly the chance to show off his
> dazzling wit by repeating "Troll" and "Idiot" ad infinitum.
>
Grow UP Marc, you'll show your son up, or is that why he doesn't want
to go on holiday with mum and daddy anymore.....


J.L.E

unread,
Feb 7, 2002, 5:58:18 AM2/7/02
to

Marc <ma...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f77ion.1fv...@jaceeprint.demon.co.uk...

Speak for yourself....


Zardoz

unread,
Feb 11, 2002, 11:05:23 AM2/11/02
to
Easy solution. Get a straw hat and put some leaves and twigs in it and
you`ll blend in with the back ground. At least thats what it says in the SAS
survival manual under "Operations on naturist beaches"

"Terry Blunt" <te...@langri.demon.co.uk> wrote
> I can't do my gardening nude. Every inch of it is multiply >overlooked
froma all directions :-(

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 08/02/02


0 new messages