Another Cambridge Outdoor Club perv gets done
Rob Candlish
Jerry
"Rob Candlish" <rob.ca...@ymail.com> wrote in message
news:ba5b9571-1e28-408f...@p3g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...
:
Rob, care to point out were, in any of the above cited web pages,
any of the following words (with or without upper case
characters) have been used [1]; "Naturist", "Nudist",
"Cambridge", "Club"?
But of course you can't as none of them do so, perhaps you might
like to cite the source for your claims about this man and the
naturism (never mind any specific club). Unless you can Rob it
will be very obvious to all that the only person who is linking
this to naturism, never mind any particular club, is you
Candlish, and that you are the only person who reads/hears about
child abuse and thinks "Naturism", one really has to ask why, one
really does have to ask why you seem to automatically equate
child nudity with sex and vise-versa...
[1] the 'Find' facility in web browsers are a wonderful tool
Duncan Heenan
news:iop0c1$2un$1...@dont-email.me...
posting of it was just the usual antagonism from Candlish, who was himself a
naturist until he got thrown out of 4 naturist organisations for
'inappropriate behaviour'. So much for 'tranquility' on URN!
Duncan Heenan
news:ba5b9571-1e28-408f...@p3g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...
A fear more relevant reference would be :
http://www.hertfordshiremercury.co.uk/Hertfordshire/Naturists-dispute-ends-in-restraining-order-for-Ware-man.htm
Rob Candlish
wrote:
> "Jerry" <mapson.sca...@btinternet.INVALID> wrote in message
>
> news:iop0c1$2un$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Rob Candlish" <rob.candl...@ymail.com> wrote in message
> >news:ba5b9571-1e28-408f...@p3g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...
> > :
> >http://www.bearsdenherald.co.uk/news/man_spared_jail_over_abuse_image...
> > :
> > :
> >http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/news/8760755.Former_county_council_l...
> > :
> > :
> >http://www.hertfordshiremercury.co.uk/Hertfordshire/No-jail-for-Herts...
> > :
> > :
> >http://www.hertfordshiremercury.co.uk/Hertfordshire/Former-county-cou...
>
> > Rob, care to point out were, in any of the above cited web pages,
> > any of the following words (with or without upper case
> > characters) have been used [1]; "Naturist", "Nudist",
> > "Cambridge", "Club"?
>
> > But of course you can't as none of them do so, perhaps you might
> > like to cite the source for your claims about this man and the
> > naturism (never mind any specific club). Unless you can Rob it
> > will be very obvious to all that the only person who is linking
> > this to naturism, never mind any particular club, is you
> > Candlish, and that you are the only person who reads/hears about
> > child abuse and thinks "Naturism", one really has to ask why, one
> > really does have to ask why you seem to automatically equate
> > child nudity with sex and vise-versa...
>
> > [1] the 'Find' facility in web browsers are a wonderful tool
>
> Of course you're right, Jerry . There is no link to naturism in this and the
> posting of it was just the usual antagonism from Candlish, who was himself a
> naturist until he got thrown out of 4 naturist organisations for
> 'inappropriate behaviour'. So much for 'tranquility' on URN!
You imply that you have a Cambridge Outdoor Club membership list then
Heenan which doesn't have the name Laycock (as opposed to Professional
Prick) on it? That of course is a piece of your usual hyperbolic
bullshit.
Still no sign of the list of non-naturist organisations you claim I've
been thrown out of, nor a list of employers you claim have sacked me
is there?
I suppose you're too busy with http://naturistactiongroup.webs.com/
trying to defraud enough money from gullible people to get that
repaint finished on your boat aren't you?
Duncan Heenan
"Rob Candlish" <rob.ca...@ymail.com> wrote in message
news:480019d4-b1db-4da4...@r6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
>snip<
>> Of course you're right, Jerry . There is no link to naturism in this and
>> the
>> posting of it was just the usual antagonism from Candlish, who was
>> himself a
>> naturist until he got thrown out of 4 naturist organisations for
>> 'inappropriate behaviour'. So much for 'tranquility' on URN!
>You imply that you have a Cambridge Outdoor Club membership list then
>Heenan which doesn't have the name Laycock (as opposed to Professional
>Prick) on it? That of course is a piece of your usual hyperbolic
>bullshit.
You imply that you have evidence that Laycock was a member of Cambridge
Outdoor Club. If so present it. If not, shut up and stop making it up.
Rob Candlish
wrote:
> "Rob Candlish" <rob.candl...@ymail.com> wrote in message
Heenan demanding evidence?
Where's that list of employers you claim sacked me then Heenan? Oh,
and what about that list of organisations you claim booted me out as
well?
Evidence is a two way street, not the one way thing you seem to expect
will always flow in your direction.
Still, it'll be nice and quiet at Valerian Sun Club on the Isle of
Wight this summer won't it? With David Harris banged up now hopefully
nobody will be fucking the kids, but Heenan's targetting and bullying
will be the thing that keeps visitors away.
Duncan Heenan
"Rob Candlish" <rob.ca...@ymail.com> wrote in message
news:cc347d5e-a768-45ce...@p16g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 21, 7:35 pm, "Duncan Heenan" <duncanhee...@tiscali.co.uk>
wrote:
> "Rob Candlish" <rob.candl...@ymail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:480019d4-b1db-4da4...@r6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
>
> >snip<
>>>> Of course you're right, Jerry . There is no link to naturism in this
>>>> and
>>> the
>>> posting of it was just the usual antagonism from Candlish, who was
>>> himself a
>>> naturist until he got thrown out of 4 naturist organisations for
>>> 'inappropriate behaviour'. So much for 'tranquility' on URN!
>>You imply that you have a Cambridge Outdoor Club membership list then
>>Heenan which doesn't have the name Laycock (as opposed to Professional
>>Prick) on it? That of course is a piece of your usual hyperbolic
>>bullshit.
>
> You imply that you have evidence that Laycock was a member of Cambridge
> Outdoor Club. If so present it. If not, shut up and stop making it up.
>Heenan demanding evidence?
Candlish making false accusations?
Rob Candlish
wrote:
> "Rob Candlish" <rob.candl...@ymail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:cc347d5e-a768-45ce...@p16g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 21, 7:35 pm, "Duncan Heenan" <duncanhee...@tiscali.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Rob Candlish" <rob.candl...@ymail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:480019d4-b1db-4da4...@r6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com...
>
> > >snip<
> >>>> Of course you're right, Jerry . There is no link to naturism in this
> >>>> and
> >>> the
> >>> posting of it was just the usual antagonism from Candlish, who was
> >>> himself a
> >>> naturist until he got thrown out of 4 naturist organisations for
> >>> 'inappropriate behaviour'. So much for 'tranquility' on URN!
> >>You imply that you have a Cambridge Outdoor Club membership list then
> >>Heenan which doesn't have the name Laycock (as opposed to Professional
> >>Prick) on it? That of course is a piece of your usual hyperbolic
> >>bullshit.
>
> > You imply that you have evidence that Laycock was a member of Cambridge
> > Outdoor Club. If so present it. If not, shut up and stop making it up.
> >Heenan demanding evidence?
>
> Candlish making false accusations?
**********
Newsgroups: uk.rec.naturist
From: "bambi" <fatm...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:58:49 +0100
Local: Sun, Jun 22 2008 11:58 am
Subject: Heenan cant be trusted
One has mulled over the events of the past few days.
One has come to the conclusion that Duncan Heenan has proved himself
not to
be trusted with personal information about members past and present
As the BN treasurer this is a very serious allegation one makes, but
it can
be proved by one of his previous posts in which he gives out a name.
BN should thourouly investigate this and people would be well advised
to
insist to BN that Mr. Heenan has no access to their person details as
his
misuses his position
**********
Heenan being untrustworthy again?
Duncan Heenan
>snip<> >Heenan demanding evidence?
>
> Candlish making false accusations?
>**********
>Newsgroups: uk.rec.naturist
>From: "bambi" <fatm...@hotmail.com>
>Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:58:49 +0100
>Local: Sun, Jun 22 2008 11:58 am
>Subject: Heenan cant be trusted
>**********
>snip baseless innuendo<
>Heenan being untrustworthy again?
This anonymous post from 'Bambi' (aka Les Gray), was challenged at the time
(2 years ago). There was no response because it was wholly non-specific, and
had no base in truth. Re-posting it here merely demonstrates that Candlish
does not have the the monopoly of the 'hit and run smear' technique in his
armory of nastiness.
If you wish to make an accusation, please make it specific and I will try to
answer it.
Postings by the convicted criminal Robert Candlish (including those under
his may aliases), can be safely ignored by URN readers, as he has an
established record of dishonesty and smearing anyone who disagrees with him
or challenges him.
http://www.hertfordshiremercury.co.uk/Hertfordshire/Naturists-dispute-ends-in-restraining-order-for-Ware-man.htm
--
Duncan Heenan
Duncan Heenan
news:3ca2809b-5913-4321...@a26g2000vbo.googlegroups.com...
x-no-archive: yes
Mr Candlish, why dont you just do what Heenan is asking. Post the
evidence you have to support the statement you made. When you do so
you will no doubt shut him up. But of course if you dont post it or
simply reply to any demand with further insults then it really does
make you look rather stupid. It is a case of put up or shut up.
I am today posting all of these mails to the Metropolitan Police. It
appears you have evidence of alleged child abuse at an Outdoor club
and I feel it is important the Police interview you regarding whatever
evidence you have. I have no doubt they will review what has been said
here and will be in touch with you if they feel there is a case to
answer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Zardos, I would welcome a proper police investigation in to all
and any of Candlish's wild allegations. I have no doubt that they will be
found to be false, and I sincerely hope any investigation results in action
against Candlish for his vindictive actions. If any such investigation does
happen as I hope, I shall of course cooperate fully. Candlish who has a
record for obstructing the police (as well as criminal damage).
I would recommend that the papers be sent to Hertfordshire Constabulary
rather than The Met., though, as Candlish lives in Ware, Hertfordshire, and
it will save time if the papers go direct to a police force which already
has a large file on him.
--
Duncan Heenan
Hamish
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> On Apr 22, 12:37 am, Rob Candlish <rob.candl...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> evidence you have to support the statement you made. When you do so
> you will no doubt shut him up. But of course if you dont post it or
> simply reply to any demand with further insults then it really does
> make you look rather stupid. It is a case of put up or shut up.
>
> I am today posting all of these mails to the Metropolitan Police. It
> appears you have evidence of alleged child abuse at an Outdoor club
> and I feel it is important the Police interview you regarding whatever
> evidence you have. I have no doubt they will review what has been said
> here and will be in touch with you if they feel there is a case to
>
> - Show quoted text -
I too have sent copies of Candlesticks serious allegations of a
paedophile ring to Herts police. Let`s hope they do
something. Hamish
Rob Candlish
wrote:
> Thank you Zardos, I would welcome a proper police investigation in to all
> and any of Candlish's wild allegations. I have no doubt that they will be
> found to be false, and I sincerely hope any investigation results in action
> against Candlish for his vindictive actions. If any such investigation does
> happen as I hope, I shall of course cooperate fully. Candlish who has a
> record for obstructing the police (as well as criminal damage).
> I would recommend that the papers be sent to Hertfordshire Constabulary
> rather than The Met., though, as Candlish lives in Ware, Hertfordshire, and
> it will save time if the papers go direct to a police force which already
> has a large file on him.
> --
> Duncan Heenan
You seem to have gone very quiet about that list you claim to have of
employers you've been falsely and maliciously saying sacked me and
also the list of non-naturist organisations you've been falsely and
maliciously saying booted me out as well. Any reason for that, apart
from the obvious one that neither of these lists exists because none
of the wild claims you've been making are true?
To use one of your favourite phrases Heenan: put up or shut up.
Jerry
[ in reply to Duncan Heenan ]
: You seem to have gone very quiet
<snip the rest of the usual Candlish lies>
Pity you don't Candlish! Either put up or fuck off, time to stop
bleating about others engaging in child abuse, tax fraud and
falls accounting Candlish, start actually doing something to stop
those who are accusing of these crimes - of course you will
actually need evidence rather than just the rants of a convicted
criminal like yourself...
Duncan Heenan
police. As I pointed out to him when I met him to try to discuss some of his
wild allegations, on 3rd August last year, it is up to the police to gather
evidence - they are the professionals and have the time and resources to do
that. All a member of the public needs is a GENUINE reasonable suspicion of
wrongdoing to report it to the police. Even after being told this
repeatedly, Candlish refused to come to the police with me and take his
allegations to them; instead he ran away. I concluded that he was scared to
take his allegations to the police, and the only reasons I could think of
for him to be scared were;
a) the allegations are false;
or b) taking it to the police might uncover something about him he didn't
want to come to light;
or c) a+b.
I think the sooner the police are involved again the better. Time will tell
as to who is telling the truth and who is playing evil games.
--
Duncan Heenan
Rob Candlish
wrote:
> "Jerry" <mapson.sca...@btinternet.INVALID> wrote in message
>
> news:iorgg4$brl$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Rob Candlish" <rob.candl...@ymail.com> wrote in message
No lists yet though Heenan?
Jerry
"Duncan Heenan" <duncan...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:iori1r$avi$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
: "Jerry" <mapson...@btinternet.INVALID> wrote in message
Indeed but that *does* requires some proof of the suspicion,
evidence in other words (and that doesn't mean the class of
evidence that would be expected in a court of law), otherwise the
police would be snowed under with peoples "GENUINE reasonable
suspicion" of wrong doing simply because (like Candlish) they
want to believe there is both smoke and fire when in reality
there is nothing more than early morning (red-)mist before their
eyes... The days of someone being suspicious because they 'look
like a criminal, so must be guilty' were discredited many moons
ago - in part due to some of the policing methods found in the
1970s.
: repeatedly, Candlish refused to come to the police with me and
take his
: allegations to them; instead he ran away. I concluded that he
was scared to
: take his allegations to the police, and the only reasons I
could think of
: for him to be scared were;
: a) the allegations are false;
: or b) taking it to the police might uncover something about him
he didn't
: want to come to light;
: or c) a+b.
: I think the sooner the police are involved again the better.
Time will tell
: as to who is telling the truth and who is playing evil games.
Well it will have to be c), not because he might or might not be
hiding his own illicit contraband (or what ever) but because
knowingly wasting police time is a criminal offence in its self,
as I'm sure Candlish knows.
Jerry
[ in reply to Duncan Heenan ]
No lists yet though Heenan?
No evidence (for your subject line claims) though yet
Candlish?...
Rob Candlish
Well the first thing they'll do is make you sign a confidentiality
agreement. Take a look at
http://www.herts.police.uk/advice/child_sex_offender_disclosure.aspx
That's no bad thing because it'll shut you up won't it? It'll also
shut "Zardoz" up as well when their incorrectly addressed stuff ends
up where a sensible perdon would have sent it in the first place.
If "Jerry" would now like to come forward he can be shut up as well,
and then URN might experience a bit of tranquility again.
Rob Candlish
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> On Apr 22, 12:37 am, Rob Candlish <rob.candl...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> evidence you have to support the statement you made. When you do so
> you will no doubt shut him up. But of course if you dont post it or
> simply reply to any demand with further insults then it really does
> make you look rather stupid. It is a case of put up or shut up.
>
> I am today posting all of these mails to the Metropolitan Police. It
> appears you have evidence of alleged child abuse at an Outdoor club
> and I feel it is important the Police interview you regarding whatever
> evidence you have. I have no doubt they will review what has been said
> here and will be in touch with you if they feel there is a case to
> answer.
No archive eh?
Jerry
On Apr 22, 8:49 am, Hamish <astie...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
<snip>
: > I too have sent copies of Candlesticks serious allegations
: > of a paedophile ring to Herts police. Let`s hope they do
: > something. Hamish
:
: Well the first thing they'll do is make you sign a
confidentiality
: agreement. Take a look at
:
:
http://www.herts.police.uk/advice/child_sex_offender_disclosure.aspx
:
: That's no bad thing because it'll shut you up won't it?
<snip the rest of the usual Candlish rant>
Hmm, would the above document be the reason why you refuse to
take your allegations to the police then Rob, it would after all
rather cramp your 'style' on the group...
vg4cysss7001
<duncan...@tiscali.co.uk> writes
[snip]
>There is no link to naturism in this and the posting of it was just the
>usual antagonism from Candlish, who was himself a naturist until he got
>thrown out of 4 naturist organisations for 'inappropriate behaviour'.
Are you suggesting that one is not a naturist _unless_ member of
a organisation?
--
Misha
Free on-line, off-site backups?
<https://mozy.com/?ref=UK45Y5>
Virtual Shadow
news:+48ncxMpY$DOF...@spam.filter...
Duncan (I am truly gay) Heenan <duncan...@tiscali.co.uk> writes
>>There is no link to naturism in this and the posting of it was just the
>>usual antagonism from Candlish, who was himself a naturist until he got
>>thrown out of 4 naturist organisations for 'inappropriate behaviour'.
Organization is not spelled with an 's,' dumbpoop.
nakedjuggler
> "vg4cysss7001" <127@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
>
> news:+48ncxMpY$DOF...@spam.filter...
>
> >>There is no link to naturism in this and the posting of it was just the
> >>usual antagonism from Candlish, who was himself a naturist until he got
> >>thrown out of 4 naturist organisations for 'inappropriate behaviour'.
>
> Organization is not spelled with an 's,' dumbpoop.
Do you know what, that response is not even worthy of a fun reply. I
cannot believe your ignorance. You are indeed a sad little Exhaustpipe
Engineer.