Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

OT: Family tree conundrum

1 view
Skip to first unread message

SD

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 8:55:37 PM10/7/08
to
Is it legit for first cousins[1] to marry?
Or is it just "normal for Sheppey"?

[1] Common grandparents.
--
Salad Dodger

Lozzo

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 9:09:07 PM10/7/08
to
SD wrote:

> Is it legit for first cousins[1] to marry?
> Or is it just "normal for Sheppey"?
>
> [1] Common grandparents.

It is legal, though quite uncommon in the UK.

--
Lozzo
SV650S K5, CBR600F-W, SR250 SpazzTrakka
and a shit load more 2-wheeled junk in the garage
I believe in free speech, but I still have to pay my phone bill

Lozzo

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 9:30:18 PM10/7/08
to
Lozzo wrote:

> SD wrote:
>
> > Is it legit for first cousins[1] to marry?
> > Or is it just "normal for Sheppey"?
> >
> > [1] Common grandparents.
>
> It is legal, though quite uncommon in the UK.

Bad form etc, but I found this while googling:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_couple

This section suprised me:

A BBC report found that Pakistanis in Britain, 55% of whom marry a
first cousin, are 13 times more likely than the general population to
produce children with genetic disorders, and that one in ten children
of cousin marriages either dies in infancy or develops a serious
disability. Thus Pakistani-Britons, who account for some 3% of all
births in the UK, produce "just under a third" of all British children
with genetic illnesses.

Grimly Curmudgeon

unread,
Oct 7, 2008, 11:34:00 PM10/7/08
to
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember SD <salad....@idnet.com> saying
something like:

>Is it legit for first cousins[1] to marry?
>Or is it just "normal for Sheppey"?
>
>[1] Common grandparents.

Normally discouraged, but legit. In the Western Isles it wasn't
uncommon, but that's only because the sheep were getting bored and
packing their bags.
--
Dave
GS850x2 XS650 SE6a

"It's a moron working with power tools.
How much more suspenseful can you get?"
- House

The Older Gentleman

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 2:15:15 AM10/8/08
to
Lozzo <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:

> A BBC report found that Pakistanis in Britain, 55% of whom marry a
> first cousin, are 13 times more likely than the general population to
> produce children with genetic disorders, and that one in ten children
> of cousin marriages either dies in infancy or develops a serious
> disability. Thus Pakistani-Britons, who account for some 3% of all
> births in the UK, produce "just under a third" of all British children
> with genetic illnesses.

It doesn't surprise me - The Doctor, whose speciality (as you may know)
is genetic diseases, has been ranting about it for some time. It's a
big, big problem.

--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Yamaha XT600E Honda CB400F
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
"What you're proposing to do will involve a lot of time
and hassle for no tangible benefit."

John Anderton

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 5:57:29 AM10/8/08
to
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:15:15 +0100, totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk (The
Older Gentleman) wrote:

>Lozzo <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> A BBC report found that Pakistanis in Britain, 55% of whom marry a
>> first cousin, are 13 times more likely than the general population to
>> produce children with genetic disorders,

<snippage>


>
>It doesn't surprise me - The Doctor, whose speciality (as you may know)
>is genetic diseases, has been ranting about it for some time. It's a
>big, big problem.

The genetic disorders bit doesn't surprise me but the 55% definitely
does.

Is that stat reliable ?

Cheers,

John

ogden

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 6:33:23 AM10/8/08
to
SD wrote:
> Is it legit for first cousins[1] to marry?
> Or is it just "normal for Sheppey"?

One of my cousins married one of his cousins on the other side, or
something like that. This was in Sittingbourne, so maybe it's an
Estuary thing.

--
ogden

GSXR750 K4
RGV250 VJ22

darsy

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 6:47:11 AM10/8/08
to
On Oct 8, 1:55 am, SD <salad.dod...@idnet.com> wrote:
> Is it legit for first cousins[1] to marry?
> Or is it just "normal for Sheppey"?
>
> [1] Common grandparents.

it's legal but unusual.

Two of A.'s cousins are in a relationship, but since there are no
common grandparents, why the hell not.

--
d.

Beav

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 6:58:07 AM10/8/08
to

"SD" <salad....@idnet.com> wrote in message
news:6l2eo8F...@mid.individual.net...

> Is it legit for first cousins[1] to marry?
> Or is it just "normal for Sheppey"?

I believe it is, but is it normal to have read your header as "Family tree
condom"?
>
> [1] Common grandparents.

Well they would be, wouldn't they?


--
Beav

VN 750
Zed 1000
OMF# 19


Lozzo

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 7:24:19 AM10/8/08
to
ogden wrote:

> SD wrote:
> > Is it legit for first cousins[1] to marry?
> > Or is it just "normal for Sheppey"?
>
> One of my cousins married one of his cousins on the other side, or
> something like that. This was in Sittingbourne, so maybe it's an
> Estuary thing.

My mum's family is riddled with married cousins, apparently it's not
that unusual in Malta.

ogden

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 9:09:34 AM10/8/08
to

If there are no common grandparents, presumably they're not actually
cousins with each other, so the situation's different, no?

c...@nospam.netunix.com

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 11:13:23 AM10/8/08
to
ogden <og...@pre.org> wrote:
> SD wrote:
> > Is it legit for first cousins[1] to marry?
> > Or is it just "normal for Sheppey"?
>
> One of my cousins married one of his cousins on the other side, or
> something like that. This was in Sittingbourne, so maybe it's an
> Estuary thing.
>

Forest of Dean.

--
03 GS500
68 Bantam D14S

Cane

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 11:38:36 AM10/8/08
to
On 8 Oct, 12:24, "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:

> > > Is it legit for first cousins[1] to marry?
> > > Or is it just "normal for Sheppey"?
>
> > One of my cousins married one of his cousins on the other side, or
> > something like that. This was in Sittingbourne, so maybe it's an
> > Estuary thing.
>
> My mum's family is riddled with married cousins, apparently it's not
> that unusual in Malta.

Is that why you're a four foot blind bloke with a dodgy heart?

Lozzo

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 12:03:09 PM10/8/08
to
Cane wrote:

I do get the dodgy heart from my mum's side, but everyone in Malta is a
shortarse - it comes from generations of scrabbling around in caves and
catacombs. It has upsides, small size clothes and size 6 shoes are
easier to find on the shelves.

Grimly Curmudgeon

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 1:59:40 PM10/8/08
to
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> saying
something like:

>
>I do get the dodgy heart from my mum's side, but everyone in Malta is a
>shortarse - it comes from generations of scrabbling around in caves and
>catacombs. It has upsides, small size clothes and size 6 shoes are
>easier to find on the shelves.

So... basically, you're a Dwarf?

Lozzo

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 2:14:53 PM10/8/08
to
Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:

> We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
> drugs began to take hold. I remember "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk>
> saying something like:
>
> >
> > I do get the dodgy heart from my mum's side, but everyone in Malta
> > is a shortarse - it comes from generations of scrabbling around in
> > caves and catacombs. It has upsides, small size clothes and size 6
> > shoes are easier to find on the shelves.
>
> So... basically, you're a Dwarf?

I prefer 'slight of stature', but whatever floats your boat.

Cane

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 2:19:15 PM10/8/08
to
On 8 Oct, 19:14, "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:
> Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:
> > We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
> > drugs began to take hold. I remember "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk>
> > saying something like:
>
> > > I do get the dodgy heart from my mum's side, but everyone in Malta
> > > is a shortarse - it comes from generations of scrabbling around in
> > > caves and catacombs. It has upsides, small size clothes and size 6
> > > shoes are easier to find on the shelves.
>
> > So... basically, you're a Dwarf?
>
> I prefer 'slight of stature', but whatever floats your boat.

In fairness Loz is 'slight' rather than short. Like a boxer.

Message has been deleted

Lozzo

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 2:30:21 PM10/8/08
to
Cane wrote:

I'm 5' 8" tall, so not exactly a shortarse. It's just I'm not some
dumpy fat cunt who people see as being bigger than they really are.

The Older Gentleman

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 2:38:18 PM10/8/08
to
John Anderton <John1_anderto...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Dunno. I can ask her.

wessie

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 2:38:49 PM10/8/08
to
"Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote in news:6l4chtFalhk2U1
@mid.individual.net:

> Cane wrote:
>
>> In fairness Loz is 'slight' rather than short. Like a boxer.
>
> I'm 5' 8" tall, so not exactly a shortarse. It's just I'm not some
> dumpy fat cunt who people see as being bigger than they really are.
>

don't be horrible to darsy

--
wessie at tesco dot net

BMW R1150GS

Champ

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 2:48:17 PM10/8/08
to
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:29:50 +0200, Ace <b.ro...@ifrance.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:19:15 -0700 (PDT), Cane <Cane...@gmail.com>
>wrote:

>A bit more reliable though.

heh.
--
Champ

Two standard issue crutches
To email me, neal at my domain should work.

Champ

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 2:48:32 PM10/8/08
to
On Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:59:40 +0100, Grimly Curmudgeon
<grimly...@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:

>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>drugs began to take hold. I remember "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> saying
>something like:
>
>>
>>I do get the dodgy heart from my mum's side, but everyone in Malta is a
>>shortarse - it comes from generations of scrabbling around in caves and
>>catacombs. It has upsides, small size clothes and size 6 shoes are
>>easier to find on the shelves.
>
>So... basically, you're a Dwarf?

Nah - no beard, and no welsh accent.

darsy

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 2:48:56 PM10/8/08
to
On Oct 8, 7:38 pm, wessie <putmynameh...@tesco.net> wrote:
> "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote in news:6l4chtFalhk2U1
> @mid.individual.net:
>
> > Cane wrote:
>
> >> In fairness Loz is 'slight' rather than short. Like a boxer.
>
> > I'm 5' 8" tall, so not exactly a shortarse. It's just I'm not some
> > dumpy  fat cunt who people see as being bigger than they really are.
>
> don't be horrible to darsy

PF,CT;

--
d.

darsy

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 2:49:29 PM10/8/08
to
On Oct 8, 7:29 pm, Ace <b.rog...@ifrance.com> wrote:
> A bit more reliable though.

hey! look, everyone!

The culturamous said something funny!!!

--
d.

wessie

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 3:21:20 PM10/8/08
to
totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk (The Older Gentleman) wrote in
news:1ioibre.7nz4wock166sN%totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk:

> John Anderton <John1_anderto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:15:15 +0100, totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk (The
>> Older Gentleman) wrote:
>>
>> >Lozzo <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> >> A BBC report found that Pakistanis in Britain, 55% of whom marry a
>> >> first cousin, are 13 times more likely than the general population to
>> >> produce children with genetic disorders,
>> <snippage>
>> >
>> >It doesn't surprise me - The Doctor, whose speciality (as you may know)
>> >is genetic diseases, has been ranting about it for some time. It's a
>> >big, big problem.
>>
>> The genetic disorders bit doesn't surprise me but the 55% definitely
>> does.
>>
>> Is that stat reliable ?
>>
> Dunno. I can ask her.
>

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/4442010.stm

Has the original Newsnight report from 2005. It says the 55% figure is an
estimate. The report does quote some NHS figures from Bradford &
Birmingham.

Message has been deleted

Wicked Uncle Nigel

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 4:09:29 PM10/8/08
to
Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, The Older
Gentleman <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> typed

>The Doctor, whose speciality (as you may know)
>is genetic diseases

How odd that the woman who married you should develop an interest in
genetic diseases.

Probably just coincidence, I expect.

--
Wicked Uncle Nigel - "He's hopeless, but he's honest"

My position was (and, to be honest, largely remains) one of complete ambiguity.

The Older Gentleman

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 4:15:40 PM10/8/08
to
wessie <putmyn...@tesco.net> wrote:


> >>
> >> The genetic disorders bit doesn't surprise me but the 55% definitely
> >> does.
> >>
> >> Is that stat reliable ?
> >>
> > Dunno. I can ask her.
> >
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/4442010.stm
>
> Has the original Newsnight report from 2005. It says the 55% figure is an
> estimate. The report does quote some NHS figures from Bradford &
> Birmingham.

Just asked The Doctor. She has two Pakistani colleagues. Both have just
married their first cousins (one colleague is F, the other M) despite
being sodding geneticists. "Family pressures" apparently.

As regards the stats, all I got was: "I woudn't be surprised..."

The Older Gentleman

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 4:18:31 PM10/8/08
to
Wicked Uncle Nigel <w...@wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote:

> Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, The Older
> Gentleman <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> typed
> >The Doctor, whose speciality (as you may know)
> >is genetic diseases
>
> How odd that the woman who married you should develop an interest in
> genetic diseases.
>
> Probably just coincidence, I expect.

Cnut.

She's been a geneticist since.. well, she was studying it even before
she met me. You cnut.

That said, she did seem to regard procreation and bringing up of
children as some sort of real-life experiment. I have noticed that every
negative trait they possess is laid at my genetic door.

Lozzo

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 4:26:37 PM10/8/08
to
Ace wrote:

> On 8 Oct 2008 18:30:21 GMT, "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
> > I'm 5' 8" tall, so not exactly a shortarse.
>

> Err... oh, forget it.

I've been well and truly wooshed here, can someone please explain.

Lozzo

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 4:27:12 PM10/8/08
to
The Older Gentleman wrote:

> Wicked Uncle Nigel <w...@wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, The Older
> > Gentleman <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> typed
> > > The Doctor, whose speciality (as you may know)
> > > is genetic diseases
> >
> > How odd that the woman who married you should develop an interest
> > in genetic diseases.
> >
> > Probably just coincidence, I expect.
>
> Cnut.
>
> She's been a geneticist since.. well, she was studying it even before
> she met me. You cnut.
>
> That said, she did seem to regard procreation and bringing up of
> children as some sort of real-life experiment. I have noticed that
> every negative trait they possess is laid at my genetic door.

Even his hair?

MikeH

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 4:30:34 PM10/8/08
to
Lozzo wrote:
> Cane wrote:
>
>> On 8 Oct, 12:24, "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Is it legit for first cousins[1] to marry?
>>>>> Or is it just "normal for Sheppey"?
>>>> One of my cousins married one of his cousins on the other side, or
>>>> something like that. This was in Sittingbourne, so maybe it's an
>>>> Estuary thing.
>>> My mum's family is riddled with married cousins, apparently it's not
>>> that unusual in Malta.
>> Is that why you're a four foot blind bloke with a dodgy heart?
>
> I do get the dodgy heart from my mum's side, but everyone in Malta is a
> shortarse - it comes from generations of scrabbling around in caves and
> catacombs. It has upsides, small size clothes and size 6 shoes are
> easier to find on the shelves.

Presumably the lower ones.

--
MikeH
GSX750F

The Older Gentleman

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 4:32:05 PM10/8/08
to
Lozzo <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:

> The Older Gentleman wrote:
>
> > Wicked Uncle Nigel <w...@wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, The Older
> > > Gentleman <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> typed
> > > > The Doctor, whose speciality (as you may know)
> > > > is genetic diseases
> > >
> > > How odd that the woman who married you should develop an interest
> > > in genetic diseases.
> > >
> > > Probably just coincidence, I expect.
> >
> > Cnut.
> >
> > She's been a geneticist since.. well, she was studying it even before
> > she met me. You cnut.
> >
> > That said, she did seem to regard procreation and bringing up of
> > children as some sort of real-life experiment. I have noticed that
> > every negative trait they possess is laid at my genetic door.
>
> Even his hair?

That apart :-)

Champ

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 4:32:43 PM10/8/08
to
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:18:31 +0100, totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk (The
Older Gentleman) wrote:

>Wicked Uncle Nigel <w...@wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, The Older
>> Gentleman <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> typed
>> >The Doctor, whose speciality (as you may know)
>> >is genetic diseases
>>
>> How odd that the woman who married you should develop an interest in
>> genetic diseases.
>>
>> Probably just coincidence, I expect.
>
>Cnut.

A bite!

>She's been a geneticist since.. well, she was studying it even before
>she met me. You cnut.

A double bite!

Well done WUN!

Wicked Uncle Nigel

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 4:36:51 PM10/8/08
to
Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Champ
<ne...@champ.org.uk> typed

>On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:18:31 +0100, totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk (The
>Older Gentleman) wrote:
>
>>Wicked Uncle Nigel <w...@wicked-uncle-nigel.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, The Older
>>> Gentleman <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> typed
>>> >The Doctor, whose speciality (as you may know)
>>> >is genetic diseases
>>>
>>> How odd that the woman who married you should develop an interest in
>>> genetic diseases.
>>>
>>> Probably just coincidence, I expect.
>>
>>Cnut.
>
>A bite!
>
>>She's been a geneticist since.. well, she was studying it even before
>>she met me. You cnut.
>
>A double bite!
>
>Well done WUN!

Ayethangyew.

Bit easy though, no real sense of triumph.

John Anderton

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 7:00:47 PM10/8/08
to
On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:15:40 +0100, totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk (The
Older Gentleman) wrote:

>wessie <putmyn...@tesco.net> wrote:
>
>
>> >>
>> >> The genetic disorders bit doesn't surprise me but the 55% definitely
>> >> does.
>> >>
>> >> Is that stat reliable ?
>> >>
>> > Dunno. I can ask her.
>> >
>>
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/4442010.stm
>>
>> Has the original Newsnight report from 2005. It says the 55% figure is an
>> estimate. The report does quote some NHS figures from Bradford &
>> Birmingham.
>
>Just asked The Doctor. She has two Pakistani colleagues. Both have just
>married their first cousins (one colleague is F, the other M) despite
>being sodding geneticists. "Family pressures" apparently.
>
>As regards the stats, all I got was: "I woudn't be surprised..."

Ta

Hog

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 7:44:19 PM10/8/08
to
The Older Gentleman wrote:
> John Anderton <John1_anderto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:15:15 +0100, totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk
>> (The Older Gentleman) wrote:
>>
>>> Lozzo <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> A BBC report found that Pakistanis in Britain, 55% of whom marry a
>>>> first cousin, are 13 times more likely than the general population
>>>> to produce children with genetic disorders,
>> <snippage>
>>>
>>> It doesn't surprise me - The Doctor, whose speciality (as you may
>>> know) is genetic diseases, has been ranting about it for some time.
>>> It's a big, big problem.
>>
>> The genetic disorders bit doesn't surprise me but the 55% definitely
>> does.
>>
>> Is that stat reliable ?
>>
> Dunno. I can ask her.

TBF how many Pakis do you meet who are not complete Mongs? (ask an Indian)

--
Hog
'03 ST4S '96 Bastard12 '89 R100RS '81 XS650 '78 RD400


Grimly Curmudgeon

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 8:24:57 PM10/8/08
to
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk (The
Older Gentleman) saying something like:

>That said, she did seem to regard procreation and bringing up of
>children as some sort of real-life experiment. I have noticed that every
>negative trait they possess is laid at my genetic door.

I suspect that's the norm in any marriage, geneticist or not.

Lozzo

unread,
Oct 8, 2008, 9:09:50 PM10/8/08
to
Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:

> We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
> drugs began to take hold. I remember totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk
> (The Older Gentleman) saying something like:
>
> > That said, she did seem to regard procreation and bringing up of
> > children as some sort of real-life experiment. I have noticed that
> > every negative trait they possess is laid at my genetic door.
>
> I suspect that's the norm in any marriage, geneticist or not.

Luckily for my daughter she got her mother's brains, and luckily again
she looks pretty much identical to my little sister but not too far in
looks from me.

CT

unread,
Oct 9, 2008, 3:41:19 AM10/9/08
to
wessie wrote:

> The report does quote some NHS figures from Bradford
> & Birmingham.

Haven't they just gone bust?

--
Chris

Beav

unread,
Oct 20, 2008, 6:12:15 PM10/20/08
to

"Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote in message
news:6l43ttF...@mid.individual.net...

But harder to reach?


--
Beav

VN 750
Zed 1000
OMF# 19


Beav

unread,
Oct 20, 2008, 6:19:45 PM10/20/08
to

"Ace" <b.ro...@ifrance.com> wrote in message
news:suupe4170vciq8sdq...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:19:15 -0700 (PDT), Cane <Cane...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>>On 8 Oct, 19:14, "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:
>>> > > It has upsides, small size clothes and size 6
>>> > > shoes are easier to find on the shelves.
>>>
>>> > So... basically, you're a Dwarf?
>>>
>>> I prefer 'slight of stature', but whatever floats your boat.
>>
>>In fairness Loz is 'slight' rather than short. Like a boxer.
>
> A bit more reliable though.

And a lot more useful.

Beav

unread,
Oct 20, 2008, 6:21:15 PM10/20/08
to

"Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote in message
news:6l4chtF...@mid.individual.net...

> Cane wrote:
>
>> On 8 Oct, 19:14, "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:
>> > Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:
>> > > We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when
>> > > the drugs began to take hold. I remember "Lozzo"
>> > > <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> saying something like:
>> >
>> > > > I do get the dodgy heart from my mum's side, but everyone in
>> > > > Malta is a shortarse - it comes from generations of scrabbling
>> > > > around in caves and catacombs. It has upsides, small size
>> > > > clothes and size 6 shoes are easier to find on the shelves.
>> >
>> > > So... basically, you're a Dwarf?
>> >
>> > I prefer 'slight of stature', but whatever floats your boat.
>>
>> In fairness Loz is 'slight' rather than short. Like a boxer.
>
> I'm 5' 8" tall, so not exactly a shortarse. It's just I'm not some
> dumpy fat cunt who people see as being bigger than they really are.

The fat cunts usually think they're smaller than they are, but they're
usually very wrong too.

Lozzo

unread,
Oct 20, 2008, 6:35:58 PM10/20/08
to
Beav wrote:

I don't get this 'boxers being reliable' thing though, can someone
please explain?

Grimly Curmudgeon

unread,
Oct 20, 2008, 8:30:01 PM10/20/08
to
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> saying
something like:

>> And a lot more useful.


>
>I don't get this 'boxers being reliable' thing though, can someone
>please explain?

It's historical - they certainly used to be more reliable than a lot fo
the other shit around at the time. Ignoring the Japanese output, as most
o f th owhers dis. fdwik i'm erahed.

otera hear, bedttim.

Lozzo

unread,
Oct 21, 2008, 2:07:45 AM10/21/08
to
Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:

Ah, Boxer twins, I get it now.

Message has been deleted

Beav

unread,
Oct 23, 2008, 10:44:38 AM10/23/08
to

"Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote in message
news:6m4feeF...@mid.individual.net...

> Beav wrote:
>
>>
>> "Ace" <b.ro...@ifrance.com> wrote in message
>> news:suupe4170vciq8sdq...@4ax.com...
>> > On Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:19:15 -0700 (PDT), Cane <Cane...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>On 8 Oct, 19:14, "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote:
>> >>>> > It has upsides, small size clothes and size 6
>> >>>> > shoes are easier to find on the shelves.
>> > > >
>> >>>> So... basically, you're a Dwarf?
>> > > >
>> > > > I prefer 'slight of stature', but whatever floats your boat.
>> > >
>> > > In fairness Loz is 'slight' rather than short. Like a boxer.
>> >
>> > A bit more reliable though.
>>
>> And a lot more useful.
>
> I don't get this 'boxers being reliable' thing though, can someone
> please explain?

I don't think we have to Loz, not given your love of things German.

Beav

unread,
Oct 23, 2008, 10:45:34 AM10/23/08
to

"Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk> wrote in message
news:6m59tgF...@mid.individual.net...

> Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:
>
>> We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>> drugs began to take hold. I remember "Lozzo" <lo...@lozzo.org.uk>
>> saying something like:
>>
>> >> And a lot more useful.
>> >
>> > I don't get this 'boxers being reliable' thing though, can someone
>> > please explain?
>>
>> It's historical - they certainly used to be more reliable than a lot
>> fo the other shit around at the time. Ignoring the Japanese output,
>> as most o f th owhers dis. fdwik i'm erahed.
>>
>> otera hear, bedttim.
>
> Ah, Boxer twins, I get it now.

'Kin hell Loz, even *I* got that and I don't mind boxers.

0 new messages