On 24/02/2023 13:18, Stephen Packer wrote:
> On Friday, 24 February 2023 at 12:36:35 UTC, wessie wrote:
>> Stephen Packer <
stephen...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>
news:e9309068-344b-4efe...@googlegroups.com:
>>> Or, should I change them after, say, five or six years?
>>>
>> do you need to archive any of it?
>>
>> who will look at this stuff in the future?
>
> Yes, and Me, mostly although I think as my children get older (now in their
> 30s...) they may have some interest in a 'copy of the family archive' (of
> videos and photos)
>
>> I have been having a clear out and found a load of actual printed photos
>> taken in the 90s, mostly of my son on holidays. I have asked if he has any
>> interest and the answer is, "no." I have culled them and just have a few
>> dozen that are of interest to me, which I might scan eventually.
I recently digitised some old Super8 videos. Just short clips of
'significant' periods. Also transcribed some Sony digital8 on to hard
desk and then backed up in to 'the cloud'. The lad was intrigued by some
from the years before he has memories. His new SO enjoyed them at Xmas
too - with his permission to show them.
>
> I recently scanned boxes full of photos. Probably won't ever look at them a lot
> but at least, if I want to, I can... in principal anyway. A bit like the things I keep
> 'just in case' and when I need them can't find them.
Welcome to my world.
Though for the very best 'only very occasional use' tool porn I can
usually find them (like my crow's foot spanner for the MX5 alternator
bottom bolt). Spare bike parts, on the other hand, are sometimes more
elusive. Now I have a decent shed I really must do some further
rationalisation and categorisation.
--
Moto Morini 2C/375
Gilera 175 Sport, Husqvarna 401 Svartpilen
"Do not adjust your mind, there is a fault in the reality"