--
Posted from host213-122-124-206.btinternet.com [213.122.124.206]
via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
--
COWMAN
Mr plod, OSOS#8
===========================================================
Current Bikes
KZ550 f1 spectre 1983 (restored)
Suzuki Bandit GSF 1200 N 1999
Previous Bikes
Suzuki Bandit GSF 600 S 2000
( www.dhnw27612.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/picture/600bandit.jpg )
Suzuki RG125 gamma
Honda CB125 TDC superdream
Suzuki ZR50x1
<snipped a wee bit about ruining a perfectly good bike>
You should have got a Ducati has most of them bits as standard.
>Hi all,I am posting this story for the benefit of anybody considering using the
>services of Metmachex engineering,
<snip>
I have to wonder why you carried on paying them to do work on your
bike when work they had already done wasn't to a satisfactory
standard?
I'd have stopped after the first thing f*cked up. Withheld payment
until it was sorted and then look for another company to do the other
work.
Still, I hope you get it sorted and some or all of your money back.
B
--
GSX-R750 DIAABTCOD#11 BOTAFOT#75 two#19 ICQ#73726000
"We take these risks, not to escape from life,
but to prevent life escaping from us."
******* replace 'spam' with 'ben' to reply *******
<SNIP tale of woe>
>Any comments would be appreciated from anyone on this site the reads it.
>Many thanks,
>Spencer.
Sorry to have to tell you this, Spencer, but you've obviously got (or
perhaps more likely had) more money than sense. If you want an
expensive bike, buy an expensive bike. Hope you get some satisfaction
though.
--
Darren Robinson
Bandit 600, GHPOTHUF#14 and some other stuff I've forgotten.
Knowledge is power, and my batteries are flat.
>carbon look bugger
TCP application?
>I hope you get it all sorted but it does seem a rather excessive amount of
>money to be spending on what is in essence a budget bike! Would it not have
>been easier to have bought something better in the first place. Oh and i'm
>not slagging off the bandit you will notice from my sig that I own one too
>and I can see the point of a one off it just seems rather too much. My list
>of mods is somewhat less extreme basically every fastener is stainless,
>carbon look bugger, belly pan and fender extender and stainless hoses all
^^^^^^
>round plus the obligatory immobiliser/alarm.
Nice.
--
FUB#2, ZX-9R B1. RTFF at http://www.ukrm.net/faq/index.html
"OH GLOBBITS!"
Remove skin to email
>On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 23:00:50 +0000 (UTC), "Spencer Clark"
><gripp...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi all,I am posting this story for the benefit of anybody considering using the
>>services of Metmachex engineering,
>
><snip>
>
>I have to wonder why you carried on paying them to do work on your
>bike when work they had already done wasn't to a satisfactory
>standard?
>
>I'd have stopped after the first thing f*cked up. Withheld payment
>until it was sorted and then look for another company to do the other
>work.
>
AO fucking L
>Still, I hope you get it sorted and some or all of your money back.
>
>B
Should've bought a nicer bike in the first place, if you've got that
much money.
> Hi all,
<snip>
I just can't be arsed to read a tale of woe that's one bloody humungous
block of text, like a binary, with no paragraphs.
--
www.btinternet.com/~Chateau.Murray/homepage2.html
XJ900S 750SS CB400F CB550K BOF#30 GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 WUSS#5 YTC#3
IHABWTJ#1 OETKBC BOTAFOT#60 ANORAK#06 OSOS#1
>Hi all,I am posting this story for the benefit of anybody considering using the
>services of Metmachex engineering,I hope you all read it carefully and you'll
>understand what a horror story it.It's also on visordown.com (thanks Zanx) and
<snip what could just be a made up tale>
I'm sure I've read this bafore ?
Have you posted this here before ??
--
BigJ
Botafot#95
Bony#46
Anorak#10
Captain Pugwash#0
COFF#10
Kotl CptnPW
The UKRM FAQ: http://www.ukrm.net/faq/
www.mjkleathers.com
Spencer Clark <gripp...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:0c69838463042d69885...@mygate.mailgate.org...
> Hi all,I am posting this story for the benefit of anybody considering
using the
> services of Metmachex engineering,I hope you all read it carefully and
you'll
You sir are a salesman's dream. You hand over cash willy-nilly, you except
what you're being told. To me it seems a stupid amount of money to spend on
a Bandit in the first place.
Nevertheless, you've been done and there are laws that should protect you.
Did you have anything in writing?
--
Alan
{NEW} http://sportsbike.org/ {newer} http://Team-UKRM.com
GSX-R1000 (nuff said), Triumph Thunderbird(s are go) , XLH1200 (YUK)
YTC#9 (and proud), DS#2 (Re: H-D), two#24, BOTAFOF#11, TGF
"Nemo repente fuit turpissimus"
I don't remember this tale, but you may be confusing it with a number of
complaints against Metmachex's first replacement Bandit swingarms that
used to, allegedly, collapse where the shock bolted to it
--
Veggie Dave
UKRMHRC#2 BOTAFOF#08
V&S Extreme Photography http://www.bikehouse.demon.co.uk
Extreme Racing http://www.veggie-dave.co.uk
Put Out The Lights On The Age Of Reason
<snip>
>I just can't be arsed to read a tale of woe that's one bloody humungous
>block of text, like a binary, with no paragraphs.
<AOL>
--
Daz
CBR900RRY - Pleasure
CB250 - Purpose
MRO#26 | BOTAFOT #115
http://highside.d2g.com
>On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 07:45:51 +0000, chateau...@btinternet.com (The
>Older Gentleman) wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>>I just can't be arsed to read a tale of woe that's one bloody humungous
>>block of text, like a binary, with no paragraphs.
>
><AOL>
<AOL2>
--
Champ
GSX-R 1000, GPz 750 turbo, ZXR750 Endurance Racer
GYASB#0 BotToS#2 BOTAFOT#35 UKRMFBC#2 IHABWTMMJ#3 MCT#5 WG*#1 BONY#40 DFV#8 IbW#17
Track of the Week : This is Love, PJ Harvey
It's worth reading if there is any chance of you going to Metmachex for any
work to be done on your bike or even just buying parts from them.
They're crap in my book - they can't even be bothered to answer simple email
questions about their products.
Stobie
BONY#36
Bandit 600SY
Durham
>Daz <lewisd35...@hotmail.com> coughed and it sounded like:
>
>>On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 07:45:51 +0000, chateau...@btinternet.com (The
>>Older Gentleman) wrote:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>>I just can't be arsed to read a tale of woe that's one bloody humungous
>>>block of text, like a binary, with no paragraphs.
>>
>><AOL>
>
><AOL2>
<{ao|nt}lcotseukrm>
I think I'll have to trim off the aontlcotse bit and just put <ukrm>
instead.
Ivan posted a link for me once about that.
--
steve auvache
fuset...@thecow.org.uk
BOF#41 YSV#01 IbW#06 OSOS#20 DiS
VT500c(breaking) VT500, K100RT
Trike still pending.
>Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
the words 9mm
kneecap
and big fuck offhole spring to mind stange that mmmm
??????????????????????????
eddiebhoy
yzfr6
--
Posted from host213-1-169-165.btinternet.com [213.1.169.165]
fairy nuff,
If nothing else I should think anybody reading that lot would be very
wary of using metmachex.
I still think it's a waste of money tricking up a bandit to that
extent though.
--
FUB#2,SBS#16. ZX-9R B1. RTFF at http://www.ukrm.net/faq/index.html
I got 4 lines into that, and gave up.
What you need is whitespace, to break up the monolithic block of text
into small, easy to manage sections.
Also, spaces after punctuation help enormously. Multiple punctuation
makes you look like an excited 16 year old girl (on usenet, this is a
bad thing).
But isn't also fair to make the point it appears you have more money
than sense?
I know I'd not go near Metmachex after your story even if the devil were
to posess me and convince me I needed something as ridiculous as a
single sided swingarm on a bandit 12.
--
ginge [at] stopthevoices.org.uk ICQ:638133
TAB#0, DFWAG#1, MRO#4, KotMRO#, BOTAFOT#29, BONY#17, FAST#03(P)
Trying to kill me: Yamaha YZF-R6 Playing dead: Yamaha SZR660
>Multiple punctuation makes you look like an excited
>16 year old girl (on usenet, this is a bad thing).
Who for?
Well, reasoning being, that anything that sounds like
an excited 16yo girl in real life probably isn't too
far off actually being an excited 16yo girl.
On usenet, it means that the person will either be
stalked by net weirdos (e.g., most of ukrm) or considered
a twat, while at the same time having a vanishingly small
probibility of really being an excited 16yo girl.
--
Posted from host213-122-1-214.btinternet.com [213.122.1.214]
>The whole idea behind different concepts of bikes is that people are different.
>If I have plenty of spending money whats that got to do with the issue?
>If someone wants to ride a turbo charged Puch Maxi thats their choice,if you
>want to dye your pubes green and have pubic topiary to leave them in the shape
>of an elephant thats also their choice but it doesn't detract from the story.
>Point made?(Yawn)
>Hello Stobie,It was nice of you pointing me in the direction of this list,but I
>really think I am wasting my time here.
Well unless you learn to quote at least part of the post to which
you're replying, add some white space between paragraphs and generally
stop acting like a ten-year-old, I think you're probably right.
--
Ace in Alsace
955i Sprint ST, CB400F2, V70 XC & assorted pushbikes
BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, UKRMSPC#1, DFV#8
The UKRM FAQ: http://www.ukrm.net/faq/ukrmfaq1.html
You just have a different criteria for two-wheeled enjoyment. Some of us
enjoy modifying bikes to the point where riding a standard bike appears
just as pointless
--
Posted from host213-122-1-214.btinternet.com [213.122.1.214]
>Maybe a picture of all the tattoos and 14 stone of lean bodyweight on a 5'7
>skeleton might convince you I'm not a 16 year old girl,adding to that the fact
>a ride a 210 kilo(dry)1200 Bandit.I also know of no females that can leg-press
>330kilos!
>The typing may not be up to much but then I'm not a secretary,thats a girls
>job(another point made?)
>My very girly missus would also vouch that I'm definately not a lass,as she
>likes it (very) rough.
>I think all of it sums up to :I'm fit,I have a good looking woman ,an unusual
>bike and too much spending money.A good recipe for getting jealous reactions I
>think!
This is just such a *perfect* example of a trollyfrog
Welcome back, Simes
>Champ <uk...@champ.org.uk> said:
>
>>"Spencer Clark" <gripp...@btinternet.com> coughed and it sounded
>>like:
>[...]
>
>
>>This is just such a *perfect* example of a trollyfrog
>>
>>Welcome back, Simes
>
>Really?
Dunno. But I can't believe he's for real.
>
>
>Spencer Clark <gripp...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>news:0c69838463042d69885...@mygate.mailgate.org...
>> Hi all,I am posting this story for the benefit of anybody considering
>using the
>> services of Metmachex engineering,I hope you all read it carefully and
>you'll
>
>
>You sir are a salesman's dream. You hand over cash willy-nilly, you except
>what you're being told.
Wonder if he works for the company buyout part of one of the telcos
;-)
>Maybe a picture of all the tattoos and 14 stone of lean bodyweight on a 5'7
>skeleton might convince you I'm not a 16 year old girl,adding to that the fact
>a ride a 210 kilo(dry)1200 Bandit.I also know of no females that can leg-press
>330kilos!
>The typing may not be up to much but then I'm not a secretary,thats a girls
>job(another point made?)
>My very girly missus would also vouch that I'm definately not a lass,as she
>likes it (very) rough.
>I think all of it sums up to :I'm fit,I have a good looking woman ,an unusual
>bike and too much spending money.A good recipe for getting jealous reactions I
>think!
Heh, top bloke I say, I jellous that you can just throw away 5 grand
on bike mods :-)
I'm 6'4 and 18 stone, unfortuantly I'm not lean anymore.
Bandits are designed to be tricked up.
He's for real, as is his story concerning his sound ripping off by
Metmachex. I've been following this on the SUKBOG list, see? I should say
"we" actually, as there's a lot of familiar Bandit-owning ukrm regular-type
names that occur over there.
Spencer is just trying to warn anybody else off chucking money at a company
which seems to offer some smart gear for bikes but in reality seems to be
better at fucking them and their owners over. A poorly-formatted, lengthy
post, perhaps, but the intent was better than the content.
Sadly, there appears to be only one way to produce a trick-as-fuck bike -
and that's to throw shedloads of dosh at it. Spencer was willing to do
this, using what appeared to be a reputable firm, but got his fingers
severely and severally burned. I'm obliged to him for sharing the info, as
it'll save me doing the same (as if I could afford to do it anyway).
--
Pip - a Garage Pixie. Bandit 1200S - in black with black bits
WS* DFWAG#0 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP FUB#4
ANORAK#8MIRTTH#15Coff#3(EFFA)BOTAFOT#47/34aBONY#13
--------8<
>I got 4 lines into that, and gave up.
>
>What you need is whitespace, to break up the monolithic block of text
>into small, easy to manage sections.
>
>Also, spaces after punctuation help enormously. Multiple punctuation
>makes you look like an excited 16 year old girl (on usenet, this is a
>bad thing).
>
Hmm..
Is this why a book seems easier to read than a computer screen?
Actually, after picking up The Two Towers and having a quick peek, it
doesn't appear to be the case, yet there is no doubt that, for me at
least, it is much easier to read text printed on paper.
This despite the fact that my monitor has roughly six times the space
to display a page than a paperback has. perhaps font choice has more
to do with it, I tend to display text in a fixed font, if available.
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 00:12:48 -0000, "Simian"
><semi_evol...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>--------8<
>>I got 4 lines into that, and gave up.
>>
>>What you need is whitespace, to break up the monolithic block of text
>>into small, easy to manage sections.
>>
>>Also, spaces after punctuation help enormously. Multiple punctuation
>>makes you look like an excited 16 year old girl (on usenet, this is a
>>bad thing).
>>
>Hmm..
>
>Is this why a book seems easier to read than a computer screen?
Actually that's down to how the flicker caused by the refreshing of
the screen interferes with the way your eye scans across the text.
B
--
GSX-R750 DIAABTCOD#11 BOTAFOT#75 two#19 ICQ#73726000
"We take these risks, not to escape from life,
but to prevent life escaping from us."
******* replace 'spam' with 'ben' to reply *******
"Ben Blaney" <benb...@ukrm.net> wrote in message
news:1g2f1u48ffivjmte4...@4ax.com...
> "Pip" <gpz...@garagepixies.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >I've been following this on the SUKBOG list, see? I should say
> >"we" actually, as there's a lot of familiar Bandit-owning ukrm
regular-type
> >names that occur over there.
>
> I joined the SUKBOG mailing list, but it was a bit high traffic, and I
> couldn't keep up.
<g>
*cough*600 unread emails*cough*
Since Friday. It can be a bit busy ...
Don't they talk about pulling wheelies?
--
Dr Will
GPz750turbo
IMC#10 two#7 BOTAFO(F#02|T#58) STB#5 HLR#4 DFVKotL
-------8<
>>Hmm..
>>
>>Is this why a book seems easier to read than a computer screen?
>
>Actually that's down to how the flicker caused by the refreshing of
>the screen interferes with the way your eye scans across the text.
>
>B
Is this addressable by adjusting refresh rates then, I have 85hz at
1280X1024 at the moment, I thought that was high enough to prevent
flicker problems?
>On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:08:04 +0000, Ben Sales <sp...@randygerbil.com>
>wrote:
>
>-------8<
>>>Hmm..
>>>
>>>Is this why a book seems easier to read than a computer screen?
>>
>>Actually that's down to how the flicker caused by the refreshing of
>>the screen interferes with the way your eye scans across the text.
>>
>Is this addressable by adjusting refresh rates then, I have 85hz at
>1280X1024 at the moment, I thought that was high enough to prevent
>flicker problems?
No, apparently not.
<fx: toddles off to get a reference>
<fx: toddles back after finding that the book in question is at uni
with his brother>
<fx: toddles off to the web>
This is quite good in general coverage:
http://www.psych.utoronto.ca/~muter/pmuter1.htm
I can't remember the exact terms but it's something to do with how the
eye fixates on points in the text and doesn't jump from one word to
the next but jumps groups of words at a time and always moving
forwards and back. The refresh rate of the monitor causes
imperceptible flicker which interferes with this fixating process
causing you to continually 'lose your place' as it were.
'Human Computer Interaction' by Dix, Beale, Abowd and Finlay
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0132398648/o/qid=1008187940/sr=2-3/ref=sr_bt_3/026-4870407-7250020
covers it very well. Beale was my HCI lecturer at uni.
Computer screens are bright, much brighter than the surroundings, paper
isn't. If you reverse your screen intensities, i.e. white on black, you'll
find it much easier to read. I find that mid grey on black is better
still.
--
UCE probe.
Don't send mail to Amaps...@yelm.freeserve.co.uk there's nobody home.
The address captures spammer addresses and /dev/nulls all their mail.
Regards, Colin...@yelm.freeserve.co.uk
Apparently there is - and no, I only lurk there.
And that's just the Tech list, where on topic means just that. I've no idea
how high the throughputs on the Social/Announcement lists are. Fills an
idle moment though.
> Spencer is just trying to warn anybody else off chucking money at a company
> which seems to offer some smart gear for bikes but in reality seems to be
> better at fucking them and their owners over.
Hmm.
I've heard good things about Metmachex in the context of better-than-OE
swingarms for ShiteOldItalian bikes.
the original post says:
>I wanted an extra 20mm on the swing arm length
>as the back was going to be raised to accommmadte underseat pipes and I
>didnt want to shorten the wheelbase.
Possibly mistake number one by our punter.
>They also said no problems to that dimension.
Possibly mistake number two by Metmachex.
I'm not about to re-jig the geometry of any of my bikes to that
extent[0] - I'll leave that to the manufacturer.
rgds, Alan
[0] other than +/- 10mm or so in fork height and using the range of
suspension adjustments that are possible
--
99 Ducati 748BP, 95 Ducati 600SS, 81 Guzzi Monza, 74 MV Agusta 350
"Ride to Work, Work to Ride" SI# 7.067 DoD#1930 PGP Key 0xBDED56C5
>
>
>"Ben Blaney" <benb...@ukrm.net> wrote in message
>news:1g2f1u48ffivjmte4...@4ax.com...
>> "Pip" <gpz...@garagepixies.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >I've been following this on the SUKBOG list, see? I should say
>> >"we" actually, as there's a lot of familiar Bandit-owning ukrm
>regular-type
>> >names that occur over there.
>>
>> I joined the SUKBOG mailing list, but it was a bit high traffic, and I
>> couldn't keep up.
>
><g>
>
>*cough*600 unread emails*cough*
>
>Since Friday. It can be a bit busy ...
Which reminds me. I tried emailing you *that* picture last night, but
p...@ukrm.net doesn't work anymore, so *that* picture is currently
floating around the ether looking for a sympathetic email account to
latch onto. Wanna tell me a working one?
--
Vince,
The exoptable one.
ZX9R, ZZR600
Ex-SKoGA#3, YTC#13
BONY#47, SBS#22, BOTAFOF#26, BOTAFOT#102, MRO#23
IAAaBaBKoTL#1.
When we speak of freedom we mean the freedom
of the opposition, It is no freedom if only
the people who agree with those in power and
with their ways and means are free.
- Mohammad Khatami, President of Iran
>Maybe a picture of all the tattoos and 14 stone of lean bodyweight on a 5'7
>skeleton might convince you I'm not a 16 year old girl,adding to that the fact
>a ride a 210 kilo(dry)1200 Bandit.I also know of no females that can leg-press
>330kilos!
Big Deal, Half the blokes on here do this every time they stand up.
and some of the girlies too ;o)
>The typing may not be up to much but then I'm not a secretary,thats a girls
>job(another point made?)
>My very girly missus would also vouch that I'm definately not a lass,as she
>likes it (very) rough.
>I think all of it sums up to :I'm fit,I have a good looking woman ,an unusual
>bike and too much spending money.A good recipe for getting jealous reactions I
>think!
you daft twat, stop boasting about what a man you are, what are you
trying to hide?
It was meant to be helpful for the readers of this newsgroup in case someone
else fell into a similar situation with this company, however after the
remarks Spencer has made on this newsgroup and towards me he has shown
himself to be a very immature, 14stone, tattooed person and probably
invited a lot of his problems by his attitude.
This does not negate the fact that he has been treated very badly by the
company in question.
Stobie
BONY#36
Bandit 600SY
Durham
ukrm is not known for being friendly to newbies who don't take great
care to fit in, but what do you expect from a bunch of
pseudointellectual smelly bikers, ffs? a friendly fucking greeting?
That's not to say that you can't be a sheep shagging, mass murderer
with halitosis and communicable leprosy, so long as you don't top post
and trim sig's, you know the "important things" in life.
It's a shame he didn't post when he first had a problem, we might've
saved him some money and some hassle.
> >
> > It can be a bit busy ...
>
> Which reminds me. I tried emailing you *that* picture last night, but
> p...@ukrm.net doesn't work anymore
It works. Honest. Just the addy it points at was a bit chocka, like. Got
it anyway, TYVM.
<trots off to delete shitloads of email (again)>
--
Pip - a Garage Pixie. Bandit 1200S - in black with black bits
WS* DFWAG#0 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP FUB#4
ANORAK#8MIRTTH#15Coff#3(EFFA)BOTAFOT#47/34aBONY#13
Music choice: "Slip-Slidin' Away - The Bandit Back Tyre Band"
But it is a B12, so inherantly A Good Thing.
heh
"Something wrong with it". Very technical. Have you got
a nice blank cheque for the garage when you turn up and
say 'please fix this, something's wrong with it'?
Very technical. Just sounds like a strip, regrease and reassemble
(the brakes, not you). Easy enough to do; although I've never done
it myself
No, I'm sorry. You *are* Bear.
<fx: impressed that was ever on it>
>>It's very cold in my garage, and I've found that you get dirty if you
>>touch any other than the seat and the handlebars. FUck that.
>
>No, I'm sorry. You *are* Bear.
Fucking LOL!
>It's something to do with the brakes, I think. When I did the 'FOF a
>few weeks back in really shit weather I reckon a load of crap got into
>the brake "things" and bound them on.
Fix it yerself, you poof.
So give them a good whack with a mallet. That oughta free them up enough to
pootle it around to the garage.
--
Molly Fletcher http://www.technodykes.org/molly/
GS850GN Sonja GS850GT Jessy mo...@technodykes.org
DOGMUK TGMCC TCP#5 STB#2 two#13 MSWF#1 BONY#28
Don't forget to take the mallet with you, just incase you are silly enough
to use the brakes on the way.
I'm in Stanley, where you at like ?
>On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:11:35 +0000, amidst the hideous cacophonous
>blare of usenet, the voice of Champ <uk...@champ.org.uk> rang out loud
>and clear:
>
>>Point of order : while I mostly get my bikes dealer serviced nowadays,
>>on account of being able to afford it, I used to do everything myself.
>>I've stripped and rebuilt a *lot* of engines over the years, and built
>>myself a Harris, so I do know one end of a spanner from the other.
>
>Ah... point taken. I was referring more to your fabled reluctance to
>do any diy stuff, erroneously assuming that it indicated a general
>mechanical unwillingness/ineptness/too-bloody-much-money on your part.
>
>I most heartfeltly and humbly apologise if any offence has been caused
>by my previous posting, which any person who doesn't know you might
>take to mean that you are a mechanical numpty. It is now clear that
>you are not. Indeed, I can only prostrate myself and offer obeiscence
>in front of the altar dedicated to El Champino, the fabled builder of
>street machines that make even the followers of the legendary god
>Juggernaut cringe.
>
>(is that enough?)
No - do continue ....
--
Paul C - "the big camp bastard" (tm darsy)
VFR800 | ZX6R | R1150GS (due 2001 if I'm very lucky)|
BOD#5, two#4, BOTAFOT#23, BOTAFOF#4, URMSBC#09, COFF#09
Admits to working for London Underground!
>On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 15:53:51 +0000, amidst the hideous cacophonous
>blare of usenet, the voice of Ben Blaney <benb...@ukrm.net> rang out
>loud and clear:
>
>>>Fix it yerself, you poof.
>>
>>I have no mechanical skills and have no interest in acquiring any.
>
>Jesushkerist, if even Champ (who infamously insists on 'getting a man
>in' to do the slightest technical thing) reckons it's the sort of
>thing that's well within the owner's capabilities, then you have no
>excuse to not do it.
Point of order : while I mostly get my bikes dealer serviced nowadays,
on account of being able to afford it, I used to do everything myself.
I've stripped and rebuilt a *lot* of engines over the years, and built
myself a Harris, so I do know one end of a spanner from the other.
>I most heartfeltly and humbly apologise if any offence has been caused
>by my previous posting, which any person who doesn't know you might
>take to mean that you are a mechanical numpty. It is now clear that
>you are not. Indeed, I can only prostrate myself and offer obeiscence
>in front of the altar dedicated to El Champino, the fabled builder of
>street machines that make even the followers of the legendary god
>Juggernaut cringe.
>
>(is that enough?)
Yes. Now don't do it again :-)