FOAK: Free email
Derek Turner
Vodafone PAYG dongle (from dial-up) so she'll need a free
POPable/IMAPable email account. Preferably spam-filtered. Years since
I've used one so what's the best and what's to avoid (I suppose one or
two lines of text-only advertising would be acceptable).
tia
--
Derek
SteveH
doetnietcomputeren
Gmail.
--
Dnc
Andy Hewitt
As the others said, Gmail. Good spam filtering, and pretty reliable.
--
Andy Hewitt
<http://web.me.com/andrewhewitt1/>
Timo Geusch
> Derek Turner <frd...@cesmail.net> wrote:
>
>> Free email (as in free beer, I suppose). Switching my elderly mum to a
>> Vodafone PAYG dongle (from dial-up) so she'll need a free
>> POPable/IMAPable email account. Preferably spam-filtered. Years since
>> I've used one so what's the best and what's to avoid (I suppose one or
>> two lines of text-only advertising would be acceptable).
>
> As the others said, Gmail. Good spam filtering, and pretty reliable.
... and IMAP usually keeps working even if the front end goes down.
--
Morini Corsaro 125 | XL250 Motosport | R1150RT | 3 1/2 Sport
Laverda SF2 BOTAFOF #33 TWA#10
The UKRM FAQ: http://www.ukrm.info/faq/
"Je profite du paysage" - Joe Bar
spi...@freenet.co.uk
gmail (googlemail) is very good.
--
| |What to do if you find yourself stuck in a crack|
| spi...@freenet.co.uk |in the ground beneath a giant boulder, which you|
| |can't move, with no hope of rescue. |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc |Consider how lucky you are that life has been |
| in |good to you so far... |
| Computer Science | -The BOOK, Hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy.|
Andy Hewitt
> thewil...@me.com (Andy Hewitt) writes:
>
> > Derek Turner <frd...@cesmail.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Free email (as in free beer, I suppose). Switching my elderly mum to a
> >> Vodafone PAYG dongle (from dial-up) so she'll need a free
> >> POPable/IMAPable email account. Preferably spam-filtered. Years since
> >> I've used one so what's the best and what's to avoid (I suppose one or
> >> two lines of text-only advertising would be acceptable).
> >
> > As the others said, Gmail. Good spam filtering, and pretty reliable.
>
> ... and IMAP usually keeps working even if the front end goes down.
Except it's really horrible if you try and use it with Apple Mail!
Kevin Stone
GMail...
My mail server @mydomain.com forwards it all to gmail and I then POP3 to
them to get my de-spammed emails. Even without a catchall, I still get a few
thousand spams a day.
Gmail was my saviour!
--
Kev
www.brainbashers.com
vulgarandmischevious
Andy Hewitt
> Why do you say that? I don't find any problems.
I just can't get a grip with the way Google uses labels, which turn up
as folders in Mail, and with my Smart Mailboxes, I can get 3 copies of
everything.
Catman
I never used to have issue with it either. Not been for a couple of
years, though. Now I use T-bird for IMAP mail and usenet.
--
Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 COSOC#3
Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply)
116 Giulietta 3.0l Sprint 1.7 GTV TS 156 V6 2.5 S2
Triumph Sprint ST 1050: It's blue, see.
www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
vulgarandmischevious
>I set everything up in Mail, then just replicated it to Gmail. So I
>have nested labels for my folders structure, but because I don't
>really use the web interface much it doesn't matter.
I don't like the way gmail handles nested folders, tbh. But, as you
correctly point out, it only matters when you're on the web interface.
Andy Hewitt
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:18:58 +0000, thewil...@me.com (Andy Hewitt)
> wrote:
>
> >Ben <b...@bensalesDOTME.uk> wrote:
[..]
> >I just can't get a grip with the way Google uses labels, which turn up
> >as folders in Mail, and with my Smart Mailboxes, I can get 3 copies of
> >everything.
>
> Ah, I don't use Smart Mailboxes so wouldn't have noticed anything with
> them.
Aye, they just create duplicated sets of messages, which don't seen to
clear away properly once read.
I make a lot of use of Apple's 'Smart' stuff.
> I set everything up in Mail, then just replicated it to Gmail. So I
> have nested labels for my folders structure, but because I don't
> really use the web interface much it doesn't matter.
I don't really often use the web interface either. I do have a fairly
comprehensive organised setup in both though (having tried out the web
interface at one time), which just ends up being a real mess, which I
can't be arsed to sort out, POP works well enough for me anyway.
Andy Hewitt
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:01:20 +0000, thewil...@me.com (Andy Hewitt)
> wrote:
[..]
> >Aye, they just create duplicated sets of messages, which don't seen to
> >clear away properly once read.
> >
> >I make a lot of use of Apple's 'Smart' stuff.
>
> I should use it more but I always forget that it's there because it's
> not something I'm used to using iyswim.
Yup, it took me ages to work it out, but it's really pretty useful once
you do.
> Although I do use it a lot in Aperture for tagging photos and creating
> albums.
Yes, Smart Albums along with a good Keyword setup can be a powerful
organising tool. I tend to use them to find more obscure stuff too, such
as interesting EXIF information, images that haven't got any keywords,
and unedited Raws.