[OT] Israel and Palestine.
Cab
Nuff said.
--
Cab :^) - I'm dyslex-spic apparently
Hah-hah! -> TDR 125
UKRMMA#10 (KOTL), IbW#015, BoB#4, POTM#3, SKA#1
email addy : ukrm_dot_cab_at_rosbif_dot_org
SD
<my_email_addre...@privacy.net> wrote:
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7165652.stm
>
>Nuff said.
373:13 - given the level of arithmetical prowess displayed earlier,
that'll be called about even-Stevens, I suppose.
--
| ___ Salad Dodger
|/ \
_/_____\_ GL1500SEV/CBR1100XXX/CBX1000Z
|_\_____/_| ..93550../..25068.../..31928.
(>|_|_|<) TPPFATUICG#7 DIAABTCOD#9 WG*
|__|_|__| BOTAFOT #70 BOTAFOF #09 PM#5
\ |^| / IbW#0 & KotIbW# BotTOS#6 GP#4
\|^|/ ANORAK#17 IbB#4 YTC#4 two#11
'^' RBR Clues: 00 Pts:0000 Miles:0000
Colin Irvine
squeezed out the following:
>On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:39:08 +0000, "Cab"
><my_email_addre...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7165652.stm
>>
>>Nuff said.
>
>373:13 - given the level of arithmetical prowess displayed earlier,
>that'll be called about even-Stevens, I suppose.
Worse - he'll ladle out the usual shite and try and argue it's biased
against the Israelis.
--
Colin Irvine
YZF1000R BOF#33 BONY#34 COFF#06 BHaLC#5
http://www.colinandpat.co.uk
SaladDodger
> SD <salad.dod...@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> > 373:13 - given the level of arithmetical prowess displayed earlier,
> > that'll be called about even-Stevens, I suppose.
>
> Très drôle, but once again you 'shoot from the hip' in your desperation to
> 'get the boot into Des'.
I was merely taking the piss out of your arithmetic: your religion is
no concern of mine.
If you choose to see it differently, that's down to you.
Colin Irvine
<Salad....@gmail.com> squeezed out the following:
He always does - he talks crap, gets corrected, claims the correction
is a personal attack on him. It's his way of pretending he should have
won the argument.
AW
> He always does - he talks crap, gets corrected, claims the correction
> is a personal attack on him. It's his way of pretending he should have
> won the argument.
He's a troll, go figure.
benb...@gmail.com
> The only parts of Palestine that are currently 'occupied' are those under
> the control of Syria, Jordan, Egypt and the Lebanon (and probably a slice
> of Turkey [1] as well) and which by rights, belong to the Jewish people.
The United Nations Security Council and the International Court of
Justice both describe the West Bank and Golan Heights as "occupied
territory" under international law.
Cab
Depends upon your interpretation of UN Security Council Resolution 242.
The Israeli went for an interpretation that suited themselves.
Tosspot
> stance of the UN ?
>
> Lord, save us from cretins like Blaney ...
<troll feeding[1]>
Yeah, cos the Israelies are of course, de facto, right.
God bless Blaney, the voice of reason.
[1] So shoot me[2].
[2] I am of course, par for the course, pissed.
[3] See [1]
steve auvache
<FrankD...@esa.int> writes
>[1] So shoot me[2].
>[2] I am of course, par for the course, pissed.
>[3] See [1]
<g>
--
steve auvache
A Bloo one with built in safety features
Colin Irvine
<jewish_...@yahoo.de> squeezed out the following:
>I'm constantly amazed at the huge, global (in the true sense of the word)
>confidence trick that has been played on the world by the 'Palestinians'.
>A bunch of thieves and murderers has somehow managed to convince some of
>the highest instances of state power, that they are 'victims'. That same
>bunch of thieves and murderers has somehow convinced ordinarily intelligent
>people to demand that land that was never theirs to begin with, be
>'returned' to them. I believe, as I've said before, that this sympathy
>with a crowd of animals whose hands are drenched in Jewish blood has
>nothing (or very little) to do with supporting 'the underdog', and a lot to
>do with the latent anti-Semitism that runs through the minds of the
>overwhelming majority of Western goyim like blue through a Stilton.
I really think this is worth archiving (which it now will be) in case
anyone in future is foolish enough to believe that there is any
rationality within Des' mindless drivel - or doubts that he continues
to morph in order to evade all the killfiles.
Colin Irvine
poor_...@colinisanidiot.mail.invalid squeezed out the following:
>Colin Irvine <Colin....@seebottomof.home.page> wrote:
>> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 18:21:14 +0100, defender_of_Israel
>> <jewish_...@yahoo.de> squeezed out the following:
>
>>>I'm constantly amazed at the huge, global (in the true sense of the word)
>>>confidence trick that has been played on the world by the 'Palestinians'.
>>>A bunch of thieves and murderers has somehow managed to convince some of
>>>the highest instances of state power, that they are 'victims'. That same
>>>bunch of thieves and murderers has somehow convinced ordinarily
>>>intelligent people to demand that land that was never theirs to begin
>>>with, be 'returned' to them. I believe, as I've said before, that this
>>>sympathy with a crowd of animals whose hands are drenched in Jewish blood
>>>has nothing (or very little) to do with supporting 'the underdog', and a
>>>lot to do with the latent anti-Semitism that runs through the minds of
>>>the overwhelming majority of Western goyim like blue through a Stilton.
>
>I note with some degree of satisfaction (but no surprise whatsoever) that
>what follows is simply _ad hominem_.
>
>> I really think this is worth archiving (which it now will be)
>
>No it won't be.
Oh yes it will - twice now, both times in my posts. You thick, thick
cunt.
colinfuc...@mail.invalid
>>> I really think this is worth archiving (which it now will be)
>>No it won't be.
> Oh yes it will - and I want everyone to know how much I hate Jews and
> love arseshagging Arabs.
Oh look ... I've 'archived' Colin's post.
*snigger*
> You thick, thick cunt.
ROFL !!!
Do you feel as stupid as you look ?
You cannot 'archive' someone else's posts, you stupid bastard.
D.
--
des
French Biking Vocabulary: http://minilien.fr/a0kg0p
'Kaiser: "Can you prove to me the existence of G-d?"
Bismarck: "The Jews, your Majesty. The Jews"'
Colin Irvine
squeezed out the following:
>You cannot 'archive' someone else's posts, you stupid bastard.
No?
doetnietcomputeren
>> You cannot 'archive' someone else's posts, you stupid bastard.
>
> No?
>
He's being pedantic. You cannot archive something you don't have - or in
the case of usenet, an article that wasn't posted by you.
What you can, and did, do, is archive your own post with their quoted text.
The thing he's being deliberately obtuse about, is the fact that it
amounts to the same thing - his words are in the public domain for as
long as google, other "groups" and nntp websites and servers choose.
--
Dnc
Cab
And as long as one decides to store it on ones PC, because the post
also includes header information such as IP address, posting host, etc,
etc.
Anyway, it's extremely easy to killfile Des's posts.
Cab
> Anyway, it's extremely easy to killfile Des's posts.
Really?
D.
The Older Gentleman
> Anyway, it's extremely easy to killfile Des's posts.
Be a pedagogue like him, then, and inform.
--
K1100LT 750SS CB400F CD250 SL125
GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 ANORAK#06 YTC#3
BOF#30 WUSS#5 The bells, the bells.....
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
The Older Gentleman
> I really think this is worth archiving (which it now will be) in case
> anyone in future is foolish enough to believe that there is any
> rationality within Des' mindless drivel - or doubts that he continues
> to morph in order to evade all the killfiles.
Like I said of a depressingly similar poster on reeky - he's the
internet equivalent of a looney who goes around shrieking through
people's letterboxes.
Andy Bonwick
He's off his head. I did wonder if the new year might bring a change
but obviously I was wrong.
Champ
>Oh, you mean the Resolution of which Lord Caradan (British Foreign
>Secretary at the time and one of the drafters of the Resolution) said ...
>
> 'It would have been wrong to demand that Israel return to its positions
> of 4 June 1967 because those positions were undesirable and artificial'
>
>..?
>
>The fact is that Israel has so far given back 91% of the land that it
>seized during the Six-Day War (principally to Egypt). Israel unilaterally
>withdrew from the Gaza Strip, Jews being literally carried from their homes
>by Israeli police. The result? 'Palestinians' defecating on the ruins of
>the Synagogues (which Israel had destroyed precisely to attempt to prevent
>this sort of defilement) on CNN, and thousands of rockets fired into
>Southern Israel.
>
>Ah but wait ... I'd forgotten. That's the 'fault of the Jews', too.
>
>Here's a question that you'll pretend not to have read: why should Israel
>give back land to the 'Palestinians' ... when the land wasn't _taken_ from
>the 'Palestinians' in the first place ?
>
>Hello ?
>
>The land won by Israel in the Six-Day War was taken from Egypt, Jordan, the
>Lebanon and Syria. Territorial disputes have now been settled with the
>first and second-named, and are now only outstanding with the Lebanon and
>with Syria.
>
>Or how about the fact that the war in fact was caused by Egypt's blockade
>of the Strait of Tiran? What about the provisions of that Resolution that
>you mention (and which you have quite obviously never even read) which
>mention peace and security for all parties? What about the Arab states
>that objected to these words, for they would have implied negotiation with
>the 'Zionist entity'?
>
>No wait, here's a better question for you: go and read the Resolution (Wiki
>should have a copy somewhere), and tell me where the word 'Palestinian'
>appears.
>
><waits patiently>
>
>Yes, Cab [1], that's right: the answer is 'nowhere'.
>
>The 'Palestinians' are mentioned nowhere in the text of Resolution 242, so
>where the _fuck_ do you get off whingeing that Israel is 'bad to the
>"Palestinians"' because they apparently haven't 'respected' obligations
>towards them; obligations that in fact exist only in your anti-Jewish mind?
>
>Now tell us all, in order that your wholly non-existent, borderline
>'blaneyish' knowledge of the Middle East impress one and all, when the
>Israelis who fled Arab countries at the time of the Six-Day War, were
>compensated. Answer: they weren't. Oh I've got a better idea: tell us how
>many UN-sponsored bodies were created to aid the Jewish refugees whose land
>in Arab countries had been confiscated. Take your time. Found any? No
>you won't have, for the simple reason that there are none.
>
>I kept the best until last. Tell us the reaction of the PLO to Resolution
>242. I'll save you the trouble ...
>
> 'the implementation of said resolution will lead to the loss of every
> hope for the establishment of peace and security in Palestine and the
> Middle East region'
>
>That's right. They rejected it.
>
>Now we have Cab come along and say, what was it again?
>
>> Depends upon your interpretation of UN Security Council Resolution 242.
>> The Israeli went for an interpretation that suited themselves.
>
>How fucking hilarious. How fucking tragic.
>
>I'm constantly amazed at the huge, global (in the true sense of the word)
>confidence trick that has been played on the world by the 'Palestinians'.
>A bunch of thieves and murderers has somehow managed to convince some of
>the highest instances of state power, that they are 'victims'. That same
>bunch of thieves and murderers has somehow convinced ordinarily intelligent
>people to demand that land that was never theirs to begin with, be
>'returned' to them. I believe, as I've said before, that this sympathy
>with a crowd of animals whose hands are drenched in Jewish blood has
>nothing (or very little) to do with supporting 'the underdog', and a lot to
>do with the latent anti-Semitism that runs through the minds of the
>overwhelming majority of Western goyim like blue through a Stilton.
>
>If Israel had lost the Six-Day War, would fuckwits like you be demanding
>that the Arabs give back land to the Jews? No of course you wouldn't,
>because if Israel had lost, every Jew would be fucking _dead_. That's
>because the Arabs don't just want land: they want the death of every Jewish
>man, woman and child in Israel. Whilst other countries are attacked, only
>Israel is fighting for its very existence. This has nothing to do with the
>Six-Day War, as the attacks began in 1952 (not counting the war of
>aggression of 1948). This has everything to do with a desire to bring
>about the destruction of the state of Israel.
>
>D.
>
>[1] you will note that despite everything, I still refuse to sink to your
>level and reveal personal details concerning another poster. You might
>like to learn from that...
--
Champ
ZX10R | GPz750turbo | GSX-R 600 racer
My advice as your attorney is to buy a motorcycle
To email me, neal at my domain should work.
Champ
<Colin....@seebottomof.home.page> wrote:
>I really think this is worth archiving
Do it properly then ...
Colin Irvine
out the following:
>On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:49:37 +0000, Colin Irvine
><Colin....@seebottomof.home.page> wrote:
>
>>I really think this is worth archiving
>
>Do it properly then ...
<g>
ogden
>
> Cab <my_email_addre...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
> > Anyway, it's extremely easy to killfile Des's posts.
>
> Be a pedagogue
<reachers for pitchfork>
--
ogden
sv650 & rgv250