It also has the ref. S4533 on the underside.
DCC fitting ?
Spares Sheets ?
Any ideas ?
Chris
regards
Misc
"Dragon Heart" <chris....@o2.co.uk> wrote in message
news:d7e0c450-adc8-431d...@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
The only problem is this model has TWO motors, one in each car, and
I understand quite rare ( that's probably both good & bad news ).
As one Hornby DCC chip will be unable two motors I will either have to
install two chips set to one code ( and reverse the wires on one ) or
simply disconnect one motor but the motors are the ones used in 0-6-0
loco's.
Again thanks for your help.
Chris
"Dragon Heart" <chris....@o2.co.uk> wrote in message
news:faf448fe-d872-4754...@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
[ context removed previously ]
> Thanks for that .... it will help a great deal.
>
> The only problem is this model has TWO motors, one in each car,
> and
> I understand quite rare ( that's probably both good & bad news ).
>
> As one Hornby DCC chip will be unable two motors I will either have
> to
Would it not be possible to use a different make of DCC decoder, one
with a higher rating?
> install two chips set to one code ( and reverse the wires on one )
> or
That would be the correct approach...
> simply disconnect one motor but the motors are the ones used in
> 0-6-0
> loco's.
>
...that would be the wrong approach - Hornby didn't fit two motors for
no good reason, IIRC the very early Pacers couldn't pull themselves
along (away from flat track) never mind the skin of a rice pudding!
--
Wikipedia: the Internet equivalent of
Hyde Park and 'speakers corner'...
Yes ! that thought did cross my mind .... they don't 'over engineer'
anything these days.
I assume the main problem is the lack of driving wheels.
Anyone got any ideas on the max. power drain for these type of
motors ? The newer Hornby decoders might manage to take two of these
but can they cope with the variations in the motors ?
Could I replace the normal wheels with the rubber type as there is
still power pick up from the other wheels ?
This looks like a little project for the Winter .......
Chris
> The only problem is this model has TWO motors, one in each car, and
> I understand quite rare ( that's probably both good & bad news ).
All of the early Pacers had both cars motorised.
> As one Hornby DCC chip will be unable two motors I will either have to
> install two chips set to one code ( and reverse the wires on one ) or
> simply disconnect one motor but the motors are the ones used in 0-6-0
> loco's.
I can't see why you can't control both motors with one single decoder. I
can't believe either will draw much more than 1/10th amp, and all decoders
should handle double that with ease.
John.
As the units are mirror images of each other I don't need to reverse
the wire do I ?
Chris
Depends if you want them to go in the same direction...
--
Martin S.
Well it would help :-)
My thoughts at the moment are to use the existing wiring to the
'following' unit, isolate the pick ups in that unit and use the wire
to connect from the decoder to the 2nd motor.
Yes ! I know that MAY cause problems with pick up but any additional
wiring may cause problems at the coupling.
Chris
> My thoughts at the moment are to use the existing wiring to the
> 'following' unit, isolate the pick ups in that unit and use the wire
> to connect from the decoder to the 2nd motor.
> Yes ! I know that MAY cause problems with pick up but any additional
> wiring may cause problems at the coupling.
I think you're making a rod for your own back; you'll need all-wheel (or as
close to that as possible) pick-up on this unit if you want anything near to
decent running.
You're only talking about four wires between the two cars to get best
possible performance - assuming of course that you're not planning on
fitting directional lighting.
John.
I have done several of these conversions for people who wish to remove
one of the motors. Later units and the DCC ready versions now only
have one motor fitted.
Use part X8448 to allow pick up from second unit via the coupling
(X8447 is optional if you wish to renew or replace the existing pick
ups) and wire the decoder in the normal way. You should be able to get
the required parts from your local Hornby Repairer (not necessarily
your local stockist!) or I can supply them for you they are under
£5.00.
The main problem is not the requirement of extra weight in the unit
from which you take the motor, but on the remaining powered unit. This
needs addtional weight to stop the wheels from skidding. I use stick
on wheel weights which are available from most tyre fitters stuck
under the chassis to avoid having to hack out the seating unit /
floor.
Hope this is useful,
Pete.
No there isn't, this is not a binary group you pizzle head...
I suggest that you find a clue before someone files a complain about
your abuse of Usenet to ab...@demon.net, meaning that you stand a real
chance of having your ISP/domain cancelled.
--
"You obviously couldn't get a clue if you rolled in clue
musk and performed the clue mating dance in the middle
of a field full of horny clues at the height of the
clue mating season!"
Oh, FFS! Grow up!
MBQ
> Grow up!
Yes, I wish you would, and whilst you're about it find a clue as to
how Usenet and NNTP servers work. But then you *are* a Goggle
'groupie', so you probably think that Usenet is a web forum!
Steady on there, this isn't the uk.transport group.
--
Bruce Fletcher
Stronsay, Orkney UK
<http://preview.tinyurl.com/3b54af>
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:38:50 +0100, "Jerry" <INV...@INVALID.INVALID>
wrote:
<snip>
Why don't you ask your father (if you know who it is )
Sorry, but I'm not an ignorant bastard like you...
Just keep taking the tablets.
MBQ
Rightly or wrongly I am basing my experience on the tender driven
Mallard I converted to Zero1 many years ago. The decoder was too big
to fit in the tender so they used to suggest putting the wires through
an opening you made in the firebox and had the decoder in the loco
body. The additional stiffness of the wiring used to cause problems
with derailments. With the Pacer being so light I thought this would
increase the problem.
So after some thought I am going with your option John.
I already have some old tyre balancing weights from the local garage
which I have used in my home made track cleaner so I can add these if
the weight problem of the Pacer is am issue.
No I am not planning on fitting directional lighting, unless his nibs
asks for some, but they will have to wait.
Thanks one and all
Chris
> Just keep taking the tablets.
The best advice your doctor could give, considering that Doctors can't
help their patients with self-euthanasia...
What is so wrong about being a fan of Czech Class 754 diesel locomotives?
>, so you probably think that Usenet is a web forum!
--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK
> Rightly or wrongly I am basing my experience on the tender driven
> Mallard I converted to Zero1 many years ago. The decoder was too big
> to fit in the tender so they used to suggest putting the wires through
> an opening you made in the firebox and had the decoder in the loco
> body. The additional stiffness of the wiring used to cause problems
> with derailments.
You need to used soft thin wire - end of stiffness problem. Look at the
wires fitted to the decoders themselves and look for something similar.
John.
There's extermely pliable cable available for use with flexible PCB's
(or that's what we used it for) - admittedly only in pink! Farnell
used to do it (some yearss ago though!). Quite expensive back then.
> John.
>
Cheers
Richard
--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk sa...@beamends-lrspares.co.uk
I have become... comfortably numb
If that's what you want, why didn't you say. The Dignitas clinic in
Zurich is that way --->
MBQ
Take you own advice, after all you know it makes sense...