Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

# measuring a plane sole flatness?

13 views

### bugbear

Dec 22, 2008, 6:20:48 AM12/22/08
to
I have a passing interest (some might say obsession :-)
in making woodworking plane soles flat.

(aside; they clearly need to be "fairly flat";
no-one is quite sure "how flat" they need to be;
I take the view that "too flat" is "flat
enough" ;-)

http://www.geocities.com/plybench/flatten.html

I have (for a while) had a Chinese surface plate,
like this one:

http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?sid=&ccurrency=3&page=32526&category=1,43513

I now have a Mercer G.303 dial indicator (second hand)

http://www.cromwell.co.uk/MER3003187V

And 2 less accurate dial indicators, one with long, linear travel,
but only 1/2 thou resolution,

I also own some surface gauge stands, both branded and

My workshop is a (messy) mixture of woodworking and
metalworking stuff.

http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/workshop.jpg

How can I go about measuring the shape
of my (hoped to be flat) plane sole
as accurately as possible?

BugBear

### Nick Mueller

Dec 22, 2008, 11:48:48 AM12/22/08
to
bugbear wrote:

> I also own some surface gauge stands, both branded and

Here's the method to check for flatness with a gauge stand and a dial
indicator.

Put the dial indicator in each corner and rotate it by 90° after you have
adjusted the stand's arm to reach nearly the other corner (of the short
side). Reapeat with the stand standing in the centre, rotating 360°. If you
do have a very long surface to check, you can also put the stand at 1/2 or
1/3 lengths of sides.

An other method is with a long ruler with exactly parallel sides(that
costs), and a dial indicator riding on the ruler. I have a picture of that,
if you want. Made that thing for checking flatness of a lathe's bed.

Nick
--
The lowcost-DRO:

### bugbear

Dec 22, 2008, 12:38:57 PM12/22/08
to
Nick Mueller wrote:
> bugbear wrote:
>
>> I also own some surface gauge stands, both branded and
>
> Here's the method to check for flatness with a gauge stand and a dial
> indicator.
>
> Put the dial indicator in each corner and rotate it by 90° after you have
> adjusted the stand's arm to reach nearly the other corner (of the short
> side). Reapeat with the stand standing in the centre, rotating 360°. If you
> do have a very long surface to check, you can also put the stand at 1/2 or
> 1/3 lengths of sides.

So the surface gauge is sitting on the surface being measured - no
requirment for a surface plate?

I'm not getting the picture here - since a (e.g.) #5 plane
is 14" by around 2 1/2" I don't see how anything gets turned through 90 degrees,
but since my visualisation of what you're describing is so poor,
that may be natural!

Can you (for this ignorant person) be more explicit about where the surface gauge
base is, and what point is being contacted by the dial gauge, and how the
various dial gauge reading can be translated/interpreted
into a quantative maps of the bumps and hollows?

>
> An other method is with a long ruler with exactly parallel sides(that
> costs), and a dial indicator riding on the ruler. I have a picture of that,
> if you want. Made that thing for checking flatness of a lathe's bed.

When you say ruler, do you mean cast iron straightedge, wide enough for things
to sit on?

http://www.indiamart.com/minimachinetools/pcat-gifs/products-small/cast-iron-camel-back-straig.jpg

BugBear

### Nick Mueller

Dec 22, 2008, 1:14:28 PM12/22/08
to
bugbear wrote:

> So the surface gauge is sitting on the surface being measured - no
> requirment for a surface plate?

Yes!

> I'm not getting the picture here - since a (e.g.) #5 plane
> is 14" by around 2 1/2" I don't see how anything gets turned through 90
> degrees, but since my visualisation of what you're describing is so poor,
> that may be natural!

OK, its a "bit" on the long side. So the method I tried to describe in poor
wording might not be the best. :-))

> Can you (for this ignorant person) be more explicit about where the
> surface gauge base is, and what point is being contacted by the dial
> gauge, and how the various dial gauge reading can be
> translated/interpreted into a quantative maps of the bumps and hollows?

OK, new game, new luck.
Put the stand in one corner. Adjust the arm to reach out a bit less than the
sole's width (2 1/2"). Now the dial's tip sits on the opposing corner where
the stand is. Adjust to zero. Rotate stand 90°. You know what direction to
rotate? :-)

Now you get a difference. It shows you almost (not completely, but quite
good) wether the sole is bent upward or downward.
Move the stand along the longer side in such a way, that if you rotate the
stand, the dial's tip reaches the place where the stand was standing
rotate further 90°, read, move stand, ... Do that all along the sides of
the sole. Now you did get some kind of map. Try to figure out how the sole
has to be warped and bent to get the readings. That method is a bit
complicated and is better to *verify* flatness.

> When you say ruler, do you mean cast iron straightedge, wide enough for
> things to sit on?

I should have said straightedge? Some precision ground flat steel. Not the
ones with a knife that you use against the light. You get them in different
grades. I do have one 1m long in grade 0 (actual deviation 0,007mm). A
500mm straightedge grade 1 should be by far good enough for you and would
put you back at about 50.- EUR. Unfortunately, they are very bad at using
them with touching blue. But very good at checking straightness *along* *a*
*line*.
You can always use that straightedge on the diagonals to show twist.
Sorry, I don't know the right word in English for that "ruler".

HTH somehow. :-)

### mark

Dec 22, 2008, 3:24:22 PM12/22/08
to
On 22 Dec, 11:20, bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote:
> I have a passing interest (some might say obsession :-)
> in making woodworking plane soles flat.
>
> (aside; they clearly need to be "fairly flat";
> no-one is quite sure "how flat" they need to be;
> I take the view that "too flat" is "flat
> enough" ;-)
>
> http://www.geocities.com/plybench/flatten.html
>
> I have (for a while) had a Chinese surface plate,
> like this one:
>
> http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?sid=&ccurrency=3&page=32526&c...

>
> I now have a Mercer G.303 dial indicator (second hand)
>
> http://www.cromwell.co.uk/MER3003187V
>
> And 2 less accurate dial indicators, one with long, linear travel,
> but only 1/2 thou resolution,
>
> I also own some surface gauge stands, both branded and
>
> My workshop is a (messy) mixture of woodworking and
> metalworking stuff.
>
> http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/workshop.jpg
>
> How can I go about measuring the shape
> of my (hoped to be flat) plane sole
> as accurately as possible?
>
>    BugBear

I say your going over the top ........for a stanley plane

the plane may end up perfect
.but wood will never be ........swelling and changing with the
moisture content within hours of you getting it bang on .

if you want to go to the trouble.. do it with a plane that's going to
be worth a lot of money at the end of all your hard work.

stephen thomas in the practical machinist forum builds bespoke wood
planes..........search his posts ..

all the best.markj

### dave sanderson

Dec 22, 2008, 3:29:23 PM12/22/08
to
On 22 Dec, 11:20, bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote:
> I have a passing interest (some might say obsession :-)
> in making woodworking plane soles flat.
>
> (aside; they clearly need to be "fairly flat";
> no-one is quite sure "how flat" they need to be;
> I take the view that "too flat" is "flat
> enough" ;-)
>
> http://www.geocities.com/plybench/flatten.html
>
> I have (for a while) had a Chinese surface plate,
> like this one:
>
> http://www.leevalley.com/wood/page.aspx?sid=&ccurrency=3&page=32526&c...

>
> I now have a Mercer G.303 dial indicator (second hand)
>
> http://www.cromwell.co.uk/MER3003187V
>
> And 2 less accurate dial indicators, one with long, linear travel,
> but only 1/2 thou resolution,
>
> I also own some surface gauge stands, both branded and
>
> My workshop is a (messy) mixture of woodworking and
> metalworking stuff.
>
> http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f234/bugbear33/workshop.jpg
>
> How can I go about measuring the shape
> of my (hoped to be flat) plane sole
> as accurately as possible?
>
>    BugBear

I maybe missing something, but why dont you use the traditional method
of bluing and then scraping the high spots? It will get you as flat as
the
reference with a little patience.
I assume you dont really care about the mapping of the surface, just
that
it is flat?

Dave

### Charles Lamont

Dec 22, 2008, 5:17:15 PM12/22/08
to

> How can I go about measuring the shape
> of my (hoped to be flat) plane sole
> as accurately as possible?

Rest it sole down on the surface plate and see where you can get a
feeler gauge under it.

Or, if it is very good, rest on cigarette papers and see which ones are
touching and which not.

Or blue it up and and see where the high spots are.

--
Charles Lamont

### Andrew Mawson

Dec 22, 2008, 5:43:35 PM12/22/08
to

"Charles Lamont" <cha...@gateho.gotadsl.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5cidnaZtj8Z8jM3U...@pipex.net...

Or bung it on a surface grinder (or even decent flat belt sander) and
skim to a clean up cut, and accept it'll be perfectly adequate for the
job thus freeing up time to worry about things worth worrying about
<G>

AWEM

### Tony Jeffree

Dec 23, 2008, 3:08:53 AM12/23/08
to

I've never felt the need to measure a sole for flatness, or even bung
it on the surface grinder for that matter. A couple of minutes in the
frying pan, then a squeeze of lemon juice is all that it needs <G>

Regards,
Tony

### Andrew Mawson

Dec 23, 2008, 3:11:48 AM12/23/08
to

"Tony Jeffree" <to...@jeffree.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4171l4le7i23h8oe3...@4ax.com...

That's because you don't have a soul - we all know that <G>

AWEM

### bugbear

Dec 23, 2008, 4:51:53 AM12/23/08
to

I've done that. My site that I linked
to explains how to do it.

I wanted to measure, quantitively, how
good (or bad) a job I'd done.

To those telling me not to bother, I would
point out that most model engineering is done
for the sake of the achievement, or enjoyment of
the task itself, not because the final item is
intrinsically "needed".

I am also well aware of the debate concerning
how flat a plane's sole needs to be, and also
how much effort it's worth putting into
a low-value second hand tool, and what the economic
return might be.

BugBear

### Tony Jeffree

Dec 23, 2008, 5:14:48 AM12/23/08
to

Ah - but I do have a kipper <G>

Regards,
Tony

### bugbear

Dec 23, 2008, 5:54:54 AM12/23/08
to

Ah; each measurement is measuring a local gradient, and these
can be integrated to reveal a curve. I understand.

>> When you say ruler, do you mean cast iron straightedge, wide enough for
>> things to sit on?
>
> I should have said straightedge? Some precision ground flat steel. Not the
> ones with a knife that you use against the light. You get them in different
> grades. I do have one 1m long in grade 0 (actual deviation 0,007mm). A
> 500mm straightedge grade 1 should be by far good enough for you and would
> put you back at about 50.- EUR. Unfortunately, they are very bad at using
> them with touching blue. But very good at checking straightness *along* *a*
> *line*.
> You can always use that straightedge on the diagonals to show twist.
> Sorry, I don't know the right word in English for that "ruler".

A ruler is "ruled" i.e. it has divisions in inches, or millimeters.

A straight edge doesn't. Good rulers may be used as straightedges.

Straightedges come in two main styles; "ground flat stock"

http://www.bowers.co.uk/products/show/577

and the ones which are really long, narrow surface plates, either
camel back cast iron:

http://www.gandmtools.co.uk/cat_leaf.php?id=3284

or granite blocks:

http://www.tru-stone.com/pages/smp.asp

I can see how to use that for simple checking,
but I don't understand hwo to use it as you said

> An other method is with a long ruler with exactly parallel sides(that
> costs), and a dial indicator riding on the ruler. I have a picture of that,
> if you want. Made that thing for checking flatness of a lathe's bed.

to the sole was parallel to the surface plate, and using a dial indicator
from above, with the indicator support sliding over the surface plate.

BugBear

### peterc...@hotmail.com

Dec 23, 2008, 7:12:05 AM12/23/08
to
On Dec 23, 10:54 am, bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim>
wrote:
>    BugBear- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

If you make up a little block - say 1"x 1" and drill and tap one face
with 3 screws in a triangle to another face at 90 degerees to the
first, you fix a piece of front silvered miror. Now turn the plane
over and mark it out in pencil in 1" squares, next put the block in
one square standing on the screws and shine a builders lazer at the
mirror from about 10ft and plot the reflection from the lazer beam on
a piece of card by the lazer, so the light has travelled 20ft. You
will be able to easily calculate the error in each square.
For grearer accuracy repeat with the mirror standing at the junction
of each square. I hope you find something more interesting to do over
christmas
Peter

### Charles Lamont

Dec 23, 2008, 1:07:57 PM12/23/08
to
> I've done that. My site that I linked
> to explains how to do it.
>
> I wanted to measure, quantitatively, how

> good (or bad) a job I'd done.

Your measuring method needs to be an order of magnitude more
accurate than the thing you are measuring. You need a Talysurf.

--
Charles Lamont

### Don Young

Dec 23, 2008, 10:32:42 PM12/23/08
to

"bugbear" <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote in message
news:WMWdnVPj2J8kKc3U...@posted.plusnet...
To be theoretically correct, shouldn't the back and front of the sole be
offset from planar at the blade by the depth of cut thickness? I think
planing machines actually do this, since they have significant depths of
cut. You might also want to evaluate the change from flat due to the
frictional heat of the planing and the bending pressure exerted on the
handle(s). ;>)

Don Young (USA)

### Tony Jeffree

Dec 24, 2008, 4:41:46 AM12/24/08
to
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:32:42 -0600, "Don Young" <no...@nonesuch.com>
wrote:

>You might also want to evaluate the change from flat due to the
>frictional heat of the planing and the bending pressure exerted on the
>handle(s). ;>)

If you are going to that kind of extreme for what is, at the end of
the day, a pretty crude a hand tool, then you might also want to get a
life ;-)

Regards,
Tony

### bugbear

Dec 24, 2008, 4:46:16 AM12/24/08
to

This *is* the forum for people who
make 1/5 scale bicycles, yes?

BugBear

### David Littlewood

Dec 24, 2008, 5:55:23 AM12/24/08
to
In article <rs04l4ltv54btdeee...@4ax.com>, Tony Jeffree
<to...@jeffree.co.uk> writes
Could it just be that your irony detector was switched off?

David
--
David Littlewood

### bugbear

Dec 24, 2008, 7:19:47 AM12/24/08
to
Don Young wrote:
> To be theoretically correct, shouldn't the back and front of the sole be
> offset from planar at the blade by the depth of cut thickness? I think
> planing machines actually do this, since they have significant depths of
> cut.

Indeed. On a mailing list, someone proposed the "manx jointer",
a hand plane (on this handtool only list, "tail" is a euphemism
the sole-heel step you propose.

> You might also want to evaluate the change from flat due to the
> frictional heat of the planing

Discussed here:

> and the bending pressure exerted on the
> handle(s). ;>)

Discussed here:

You thought you were joking, didn't you :-)

BugBear

### pent...@yahoo.com

Dec 24, 2008, 8:26:36 AM12/24/08
to

Not to sure of the necessity for extreme flatness of your sole
plate. However a very convenient visual check is the ancient
plate glass methylated spirits capillary test.

Lay a thick piece of glass on your sole plate with one edge of
the glass propped up on a thin spacer chosen to give an airgap
slope of about 1 in 100.

Carefully introduce a small amount of methylated spirits into
this airgap. Very little is needed - the amount carried in a
small artists brush is sufficient. Capillary action will draw
the spirits to the touching end of the airgap. Add enough for a
band of liquid about 1/2" wide. Surface tension causes the free
edge to have uniform thickness so the height of the free edge is
a direct indication of 100:1 amplification of the airgap at the
edge height.

Because the meths is flowing in a very small gap it
takes a little time to settle into its final position. The
smaller the slope the greater the amplification and the longer
the settling time.

The flatness quality of the glass can first be checked by
the same method on your surface plate. The glass doesn't need to
be very thick because it's fully supported along its length.
1/4" or more is OK.

The best glass to use is genuine plate glass as this has
been ground flat and polished on both surfaces. This is not too
easy to find.

Most current glass is float glass. This process inherently
produces glass with two precisely parallel surfaces
but the flatness is dependent on the precision of the mechanical
alignment of the outfeed rollers. This may introduce a small
amount of twist or bow. Its quality as a flatness standard is a
bit variable so selection is necessary.

A much better bet is mirror glass (e.g. an ancient dressing
table mirror). Twist or bow in a reflective surface is
unacceptable so quality mirrors are either plate glass or float
glass selected for minimum twist/bow.

The problem is removing the backing. The silvered surface is
protected by a copper plate layer followed by a paint or resin
film. The film can usually be removed by a methyl chloride based
paint stripper but nitric acid is needed to shift the copper and
silver coating.

For precision work with fine ground optical surfaces a 1 in
1000 slope can be used. For coarser work a similar method is
possible but with a 1 in 20 slope and the meths replaced by a
handful of identical smallballs.

The method is still usable with glass that is not dead flat.
If the workpiece is stationary and the glass position is
changed, workpiece errors stay put, glass errors move with the
glass.

Jim

### Don Young

Dec 24, 2008, 9:47:31 PM12/24/08
to

"bugbear" <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote in message
news:TtmdnQ2bgdJ-tc_U...@posted.plusnet...
Yes, I did. But I am often surprised at how much knowledge and information
actually exists that I am unaware of. ;-)

Don Young (USA)

### F Murtz

Dec 26, 2008, 9:05:09 AM12/26/08
to
Then put a blade in it which is usually hand ground and stone finished
and therefore imperfect.
PS you can get a plane with a flexible sheet base which can be adjusted
concave or convex what do you do then?

### bugbear

Jan 5, 2009, 4:25:48 AM1/5/09
to
pent...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:20:48 +0000, bugbear
> <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote:
>>
>> How can I go about measuring the shape
>> of my (hoped to be flat) plane sole
>> as accurately as possible?
>>
>> BugBear
>
> Not to sure of the necessity for extreme flatness of your sole
> plate. However a very convenient visual check is the ancient
> plate glass methylated spirits capillary test.

I thought I'd read several "older" books on precision
engineering, but I've never read of this technique - thank
you very much!

BugBear

### bugbear

Jan 5, 2009, 4:27:02 AM1/5/09
to
F Murtz wrote:
> Then put a blade in it which is usually hand ground and stone finished
> and therefore imperfect.
> PS you can get a plane with a flexible sheet base which can be adjusted
> concave or convex what do you do then?

Its performance, in terms of predictable behaviour
and surface quality will be less good.

BugBear

### bugbear

Jan 5, 2009, 9:22:03 AM1/5/09
to
bugbear wrote:
> How can I go about measuring the shape
> of my (hoped to be flat) plane sole
> as accurately as possible?

In the end I did this:

http://geocities.com/plybench/flatten_practice.html#measure

Thanks to all for the input.

BugBear