Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Blanket Weed - help!

225 views
Skip to first unread message

aep

unread,
Jun 20, 2002, 4:29:00 PM6/20/02
to
Could anyone advise re a problem I'm having with blanket weed (I'm afraid I
don't have the genus/latin name to hand). It is slowly taking over a (very)
large man-made pond, (just short of 1,000,000 litres) just recently planted
with water lilies & oxygenating & marginal plants. I'm wanting to get rid
of the blanket weed (which seems to be adversely affecting the oxygenating
plants) without damaging the other plants. Removal by hand is not really an
option due to size/depth/location etc. I was thinking of chemical
intervention and was recommended a product, the active ingredient of which
was terbutryn. Has anyone any input/ideas? Any advice would be greatly
appreciated...............Alan


Tumbleweed

unread,
Jun 20, 2002, 4:38:25 PM6/20/02
to

"aep" <a...@whsmithnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3d123...@news2.vip.uk.com...

Bales of barley straw weighted down (Or half bales, etc depending upon the
size. Im not sure how big 1M litres is but it sounds BIG :-)

--
Tumbleweed

Remove my socks before replying (but no email reply necessary to newsgroups)

aep

unread,
Jun 20, 2002, 4:44:56 PM6/20/02
to
Thanks for the prompt response...I've tried barley straw before and it
wasn't that effective...and it could be quite a job considering the size
(approx 60m x 40m x 1.2m deep)...but I appreciate your reply.
"Tumbleweed" <from...@mysockstumbleweed.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:aeteg2$9f9$1...@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...

green grass

unread,
Jun 20, 2002, 4:57:20 PM6/20/02
to

"aep" <a...@whsmithnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3d123...@news2.vip.uk.com...
> Could anyone advise re a problem I'm having with blanket weed .

Having discussed this matter recently, here are some of the replies from my
students, that may help you.
----------------------------------------------------------
I have found that in my hard water area a magnet in line with the pump
clears blanket weed in about 2 weeks.
It also seems to bump off oxygenating Canadian pond weed (I think that's
it's name)
-------------------------------------------------------
have had a baby milk tin stuffed full of powerful magnets on my pond filter
intake for the past 6 years and it does work well, but you have to remove it
every 6 weeks for two weeks or so, otherwise the algae will adapt to it and
it doesn't work, and you may find that you need quite a few magnets, there
are some commercial ones on the market, but to be honest they are a waist of
money, not powerful enough, I have loads of large speaker magnets, screwed
up a couple of watches in the past forgetting it was there lol.
-------------------------------------------------------
At last I have found how to get rid of blanket weed, I have tried magnets,
an electronic gadget called a pond sweep ,barley straw I am now using
CLAROSAN a chemical which has at last stopped its growth and killed it off
---------------------------------------------------------
I'd be leery of chemical algaecides. I'm planning to add a decorative
trickle tower this year, as they are reported to have extraordinary
biofiltration benefits. Even reduce nitrates somehow.

aep

unread,
Jun 20, 2002, 5:20:28 PM6/20/02
to

"> -------------------------------------------------------
> At last I have found how to get rid of blanket weed, I have tried magnets,
> an electronic gadget called a pond sweep ,barley straw I am now using
> CLAROSAN a chemical which has at last stopped its growth and killed it off
> ---------------------------------------------------------

Thanks a lot for the very inclusive response...The Clarosan recommendation
is what I was considering anyway so it's good to have it confirmed by
someone. Does anyone happen to know if its selective action will definitely
not harm the lilies & marginals etc.


ned

unread,
Jun 20, 2002, 5:40:06 PM6/20/02
to
aep <a...@whsmithnet.co.uk> had this to say:

Yes there are chemical products which remove blanket weed but, .........
having killed off the b'weed, the weed decomposes and eats up what
oxygen is in the water. So, the usual recommendation is to remove as
much of the weed by hand, before one treats the water. Yes, this can be
a big job. I have seen boats being used to trawl the stuff up.

However, you asked what the products might be. One was called 'Algofin
Plus'. No doubt you can buy it in larger more economic quantities but,
250ml to treat 5,000 litres used to cost £5. - No cheap option !!!
Another product was called 'Algizin P'.

I found that patience (nature is a great healer) and adding no more tap
water seems to pay off.

Don't worry about the magnitude of the problem. Just think how
satisfying it will be when you succeed. ;-))

--
ned


Andy

unread,
Jun 20, 2002, 6:08:15 PM6/20/02
to

"aep" <a...@whsmithnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3d124...@news2.vip.uk.com...


I cannot vouch for CLAROSAN as I have never heard of it. but with respects
to harming lilies & other plants most of the other chemical remedies do.
I would check what the manufacturer has to say about it before use.
chemical treatments can stunt growth/or even kill plants altogether, but
usually just prevent lilies flowering for 2-3 seasons.

and if you think that is OK. just remember when you stop treating the
water, the blanket weed WILL come back.
remove the nitrates/light in your pond or get a couple of million tadpoles
;-)
tadpoles are the best bet............
they will chomp away & keep it away until the plants have time to grow.

hope this helps.

Andy


oldmolly

unread,
Jun 20, 2002, 6:37:35 PM6/20/02
to

"aep" <a...@whsmithnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3d123...@news2.vip.uk.com...
> Thanks for the prompt response...I've tried barley straw before and it
> wasn't that effective...and it could be quite a job considering the size
> (approx 60m x 40m x 1.2m deep)...but I appreciate your reply.
> "Tumbleweed" <from...@mysockstumbleweed.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:aeteg2$9f9$1...@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...
> >
Barley straw works very well it just takes a little time. It *has* to be
barley straw and not any other kind. I have used this method for years
successfully.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.370 / Virus Database: 205 - Release Date: 05/06/02


ESSJAY001

unread,
Jun 20, 2002, 6:42:38 PM6/20/02
to
Just about 220,000 UK galls, 264,000 US galls

I think that really is a lake!

Stephen

"Tumbleweed" <from...@mysockstumbleweed.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:aeteg2$9f9$1...@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...
>

Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 4:09:18 AM6/21/02
to
In article <3d123...@news2.vip.uk.com>, aep <a...@whsmithnet.co.uk>
writes

>Could anyone advise re a problem I'm having with blanket weed

This topic has cropped up several time recently - as it does every year
about this time. Is it time to create a faq?

Blanket weed is caused by too many nutrients in the water combined with
sunlight. This is why blanket weed topics always crop up at the start of
summer when sunlight levels increase. Find a way of reducing the
sunlight and nutrient levels in the pond and the blanket weed will
disappear.

I suspect your pond a new one? It can take three or four years for the
water in a new pond to stabilise. Does it have a liner or is it a
manmade 'natural' one ie a big hole in clay ground? If so I suspect that
nutrients will be more of a problem that a lined pond - but don't quote
me on that. Are you sure that nutrients (compost, growmore, miracle grow
etc) are not being washed off your garden and into the pond?

Reducing the sunlight entering the pond is usually achieved by making
sure the surface is half covered with leaves of lilies or other surface
hugging plants such as frog bit. Some people here have even tried fairy
moss. At one stage we tried covering our pond with a big sheet but yours
will probably be too big for that.

Reducing the nutrients is achieved by continually removing the blanket
weed. That is, as the blanket weed grows it absorbs nutrients therefore
the more you remove from the pond the more nutrients are removed. It has
also been suggested that growing water cress has the same effect. It
grows quickly therefore absorbs nutrients so that the more you remove,
the more nutrients are removed.

From what I remember of a chemical solution to our small pond years and
years ago, a chemical solution to your size of pond is going to be
expensive.
>
Other articles in this thread and other threads have mentioned other
ways of dealing with blanket weed. You can access these by doing a
google search on uk.rec.gardening.

But bear in mind the root causes of blanket weed - nutrients and
sunlight in the water.
--
Jane Ransom in Lancaster.
If you want to email me,
put jandg dot demon dot co dot uk where you see deadspam.com


Tumbleweed

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 6:37:31 AM6/21/02
to

"Andy" <an...@no.thanks> wrote in message
news:lnsQ8.20049$AZ6.2...@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com...

>
> "aep" <a...@whsmithnet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3d124...@news2.vip.uk.com...
> >
> > "> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > At last I have found how to get rid of blanket weed, I have tried
> magnets,
> > > an electronic gadget called a pond sweep ,barley straw I am now using
> > > CLAROSAN a chemical which has at last stopped its growth and killed it
> off
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the very inclusive response...The Clarosan
recommendation
> > is what I was considering anyway so it's good to have it confirmed by
> > someone. Does anyone happen to know if its selective action will
> definitely
> > not harm the lilies & marginals etc.
>
>
> I cannot vouch for CLAROSAN as I have never heard of it. but with respects
> to harming lilies & other plants most of the other chemical remedies do.
> I would check what the manufacturer has to say about it before use.
> chemical treatments can stunt growth/or even kill plants altogether, but
> usually just prevent lilies flowering for 2-3 seasons.
>
I once tried some that said it didnt harm plants, but at the recommended
dose, it most defintely did, and quite badly. And aftre a few months the
weed came back.Cant remember the make though.

cormaic

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 8:41:54 AM6/21/02
to
Twas Fri, 21 Jun 2002 09:09:18 +0100, when Jane Ransom
<ran...@deadspam.com> enriched all our lives with these words......:

>In article <3d123...@news2.vip.uk.com>, aep <a...@whsmithnet.co.uk>
>writes
>>Could anyone advise re a problem I'm having with blanket weed
>
>This topic has cropped up several time recently - as it does every year
>about this time. Is it time to create a faq?

Well volunteered, that woman! :~)

--
cormaic URG faqs/webring - www.tmac.clara.co.uk/urgring/
Culcheth Garden - www.tmac.clara.co.uk/garden/
Warrington Paving - www.pavingexpert.com/
Peoples' Republic of South Lancashire

cormaic CAN BE FOUND AT borlochshall.co.uk

Kay Easton

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 9:08:45 AM6/21/02
to
In article <81hlCFAu...@jandg.demon.co.uk>, Jane Ransom
<ran...@deadspam.com> writes

>In article <3d123...@news2.vip.uk.com>, aep <a...@whsmithnet.co.uk>
>writes
>>Could anyone advise re a problem I'm having with blanket weed
>
>This topic has cropped up several time recently - as it does every year
>about this time. Is it time to create a faq?

I think you just about have! Do you want to tidy it up and ask Cormaic
to load it?

--
Kay Easton

Edward's earthworm page:
http://www.scarboro.demon.co.uk/garden/

Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 9:29:24 AM6/21/02
to
In article <ks$4bWIdV...@scarboro.demon.co.uk>, Kay Easton
<k...@scarboro.demon.co.uk> writes

>In article <81hlCFAu...@jandg.demon.co.uk>, Jane Ransom
><ran...@deadspam.com> writes
>>In article <3d123...@news2.vip.uk.com>, aep <a...@whsmithnet.co.uk>
>>writes
>>>Could anyone advise re a problem I'm having with blanket weed
>>
>>This topic has cropped up several time recently - as it does every year
>>about this time. Is it time to create a faq?
>
>I think you just about have! Do you want to tidy it up and ask Cormaic
>to load it?
>>
I'll have a hunt through Google tonight to see what we have said in the
past.

Anyone with anything to say on blanket weed please add it to this thread
and I'll include it.

andyp

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 10:27:56 AM6/21/02
to
I also use barley straw. Research papers that I have read suggest that the
barley straw works best when it is placed infront of moving water and hence
giving the naturally released chemical, that I believe prevents the weed
growing rather than killing it off, an opportunity of dispersing though out
the pond.

My pump runs a small fountain and pushes water through a UV filter the
outlet from the UV filter has another small hose pushed up inside which
takes some of the pumped water to the other end of the pond thus I have 3
sources of moving water with straw (packed into old tights) infront of the 2
outlets. Although I get a 1st flush of weed in May/June it has now settled
down and certainly does not clog up the Canadian Pond weed that is the main
oxygen source in my pond.
As the water lillies and Irises get bigger more natural shade is produced. I
also position a potted bay tree (it does not drop its leaves) close to the
pond edge to provide still more shade.

AndyP


--
to email direct remove lloyd. from address

"Wisest are they that know they do not know." Socrates


"aep" <a...@whsmithnet.co.uk> wrote in message

news:3d123...@news2.vip.uk.com...

Kay Easton

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 12:06:42 PM6/21/02
to
In article <tK3RtQA0...@jandg.demon.co.uk>, Jane Ransom

<ran...@deadspam.com> writes
>In article <ks$4bWIdV...@scarboro.demon.co.uk>, Kay Easton
><k...@scarboro.demon.co.uk> writes
>>In article <81hlCFAu...@jandg.demon.co.uk>, Jane Ransom
>><ran...@deadspam.com> writes

>>>This topic has cropped up several time recently - as it does every year


>>>about this time. Is it time to create a faq?
>>
>>I think you just about have! Do you want to tidy it up and ask Cormaic
>>to load it?
>>>
>I'll have a hunt through Google tonight to see what we have said in the
>past.
>
>Anyone with anything to say on blanket weed please add it to this thread
>and I'll include it.

If you remove blanket weed, remember to leave it on the side of the pond
for a day or two to give creepy-crawlies time to get back into the pond.

June Hughes

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 12:36:36 PM6/21/02
to
In article <tK3RtQA0...@jandg.demon.co.uk>, Jane Ransom
<ran...@deadspam.com> writes
>>>

>I'll have a hunt through Google tonight to see what we have said in the
>past.
>
>Anyone with anything to say on blanket weed please add it to this thread
>and I'll include it.
If you use chemicals to get rid of blanket weed, you must make sure to
get rid of the dead weed from the bottom of the pond, or it will clog
your pump and possibly affect the water even worse than the weed did.
--
June Hughes

Jill Bell

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 2:21:01 PM6/21/02
to
In message <tK3RtQA0...@jandg.demon.co.uk>, Jane Ransom
<ran...@deadspam.com> writes

>Anyone with anything to say on blanket weed please add it to this thread
>and I'll include it.

Time and patience:-) Blanket weed is more of a problem in the spring -
once pond weed and surface floaters get going the blanket weed gradually
disappears. We had lots of blanket weed earlier on which has all but
disappeared now.

Ideally have at least 1/3 of the surface covered with floating plants
(though I'm beginning to wonder if the duckweed really was a good
idea!).


Tadpoles seem to do a good job of eating it (blanket weed, I mean).

Jill

--
ji...@bellsbarn.demon.co.uk
http://www.bellsbarn.demon.co.uk

Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 3:15:50 PM6/21/02
to
In article <Aa8RmiIS...@scarboro.demon.co.uk>, Kay Easton
<k...@scarboro.demon.co.uk> writes
>

>If you remove blanket weed, remember to leave it on the side of the pond
>for a day or two to give creepy-crawlies time to get back into the pond.
>
That's already in :)

Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 3:16:04 PM6/21/02
to
In article <x2PVbFHU...@theacct.demon.co.uk>, June Hughes
<juneh...@theacct.demon.co.uk> writes

>>
>>Anyone with anything to say on blanket weed please add it to this thread
>>and I'll include it.

Righty ho!

Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 3:18:41 PM6/21/02
to
In article <MaBEC7GN...@bellsbarn.demon.co.uk>, Jill Bell
<ji...@bellsbarn.demon.co.uk> writes

>In message <tK3RtQA0...@jandg.demon.co.uk>, Jane Ransom
><ran...@deadspam.com> writes
>>Anyone with anything to say on blanket weed please add it to this thread
>>and I'll include it.
>
>Time and patience:-) Blanket weed is more of a problem in the spring -
>once pond weed and surface floaters get going the blanket weed gradually
>disappears. We had lots of blanket weed earlier on which has all but
>disappeared now.
>
>Ideally have at least 1/3 of the surface covered with floating plants
>(though I'm beginning to wonder if the duckweed really was a good
>idea!).
>
Definitely not - if our experience is anything to go by :(

>
>Tadpoles seem to do a good job of eating it (blanket weed, I mean).
>
All in already :)

Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 4:41:16 PM6/21/02
to
In article <9256hu4lpbcr58o5u...@4ax.com>, cormaic
<u...@SODOFFSPAMcormaic.co.uk> writes

>>
>>This topic has cropped up several time recently - as it does every year
>>about this time. Is it time to create a faq?
>
> Well volunteered, that woman! :~)
>
Here is a draft blanket weed faq.
Please comment.

--------------------------------------

Algae, which includes blanket weed, thrives on nutrients, sunlight and
carbon dioxide in pond water. This is why blanket weed topics always crop
up on urg at the start of summer. Sunlight levels increase, pond
water starts to turn green and blanket weed grows.

For starters -

Are you sure that nutrients (compost, growmore, miracle grow, dead
vegetation, plain old soil etc) are not being washed off your garden and
into the pond when it rains?

Are you sure you are not overfeeding your fish and that the extra food
is rotting to provide blanket weed food?

Is your pond is a new one? Don't keep filling it up with 'new' water to
try to clear it because if you do, you will just set yourself back to
square one every time :(( Take heart from the fact that it can take three
or four years for the water in a new pond to stabilise into a well balanced
state.

Does the pond have a liner or is it a manmade 'natural' one ie a big hole
in clay ground? Nutrients may be more of a problem in a natural pond than
in a lined one - but don't quote me on that.

Blanket weed isn't killed by your pond filter :(
In fact, blanket weed will happily clog up your filter :(

To make the blanket weed disappear, find a way of reducing the sunlight
and nutrient levels in your pond and increasing the oxygen level.

Our local pond expert says:
"Don't work against mother nature, try to work with her".

The most natural way to remove blanket weed, as it starts to grow in early
summer, is to encourage lots of tadpoles. Among other things, they feed on
blanket weed :))))

Here are some suggestions
=========================


Reducing sunlight
-----------------

Reducing the sunlight entering the pond is usually achieved by making
sure the surface is half covered with leaves of lilies or other surface

hugging plants such as frog bit and aponogeton.

Some urglers have even tried:
- Azolla (fairy moss) - fast growing and can be scooped off the surface
without harming the pond creatures.
- Covering the pond with a big sheet - can be placed over the pond when
sunlight at its brightest.


Reducing Nutrients
------------------

Reducing the nutrients is achieved by continually removing the blanket
weed. That is, as the blanket weed grows it absorbs nutrients therefore
the more you remove from the pond the more nutrients are removed.

To catch your blanket weed, you can use a tuning fork shaped stick and
twirl the blanket weed round it. You can use a plain straight stick if you
want and use the same circular action as a candy floss catcher. Just be
careful that no little pond creatures are caught in the weed as you remove
it. In fact, leave it at the side of the pond for a couple of days so any
that are caught can crawl back into the pond.

It has also been suggested that growing water cress has the same effect.
It grows quickly therefore absorbs nutrients so that the more you remove,

the more nutrients are removed. The same can be said for any aquatic plant,
but water cress seems to be the fastest grower therefore the fastest
nutrient absorber.


Increasing Oxygen
-----------------

Well, obviously, you chuck in some oxygenating water plants. It is
amazing to watch the streams of tiny bubbles rising from these
plants when the sun shines on them!


Some things other people have tried
===================================

Barley Straw
------------

Barley straw works very well it just takes a little time. It *has* to be
barley straw and not any other kind. I have used this method for years
successfully.

[OldMolly]

I also use barley straw. Research papers that I have read suggest that the

barley straw works best when it is placed in front of moving water and hence


giving the naturally released chemical, that I believe prevents the weed

growing rather than killing it off, an opportunity of dispersing throughout
the pond.
[AndyP]

The reason that the Barley Straw works is AFIAK it absorbs the excess
nitrogen in the pond that the algae feed on. Yes it must be organic, or
bought from an aquatic shop as the chemicals sprayed on to it by
farmers will kill the wildlife in the pond. Growing it yourself is one
good answer, if you have the space.
[Mike]


Chemical Solutions
------------------

From what I remember of a chemical solution to our small pond years and
years ago, a chemical solution to your size of pond is going to be
expensive.

[Jane Ransom]

I cannot vouch for CLAROSAN as I have never heard of it. But with respects


to harming lilies & other plants most of the other chemical remedies do.
I would check what the manufacturer has to say about it before use.

Chemical treatments can stunt growth/or even kill plants altogether, but
usually just prevent lilies flowering for 2-3 seasons and if you think that
is OK just remember when you stop treating the water, the blanket weed WILL
come back. Remove the nitrates/light in your pond or get a couple of million
tadpoles ;-) tadpoles are the best bet. They will chomp away & keep it away

until the plants have time to grow.

[Andy]

If you use chemicals to get rid of blanket weed, you must make sure to
get rid of the dead weed from the bottom of the pond, or it will clog
your pump and possibly affect the water even worse than the weed did.

[June Hughes]

I once tried some that said it didn't harm plants, but at the recommended
dose, it most definitely did, and quite badly. And after a few months the


weed came back. Cant remember the make though.

[TumbleWeed]

Funny you should mention that, this year, despite it being sunny, we have
had little trouble with Blanket Weed which normally blocks filters, pumps
etc.
Three things may have affected this, one is that we have let our Watercress
grow rampant before removing it (and the nutrients it fed on) to the compost
heap.
The second is the use of "Pond Tonic Salt" at the recommended dose
(originally introduced because of a parasitic bloom which was affecting our
fish) and thirdly we have not changed the water in our pond as much as
normal just increased the flow rate of our filters a touch to keep the water
sweet. (it's a 3,000gal Koi pond so a lot of waste matter)
[Bob Holden]

Yes there are chemical products which remove blanket weed but,

having killed off the b'weed, the weed decomposes and eats up what
oxygen is in the water. So, the usual recommendation is to remove as
much of the weed by hand, before one treats the water. Yes, this can be
a big job. I have seen boats being used to trawl the stuff up.
However, you asked what the products might be. One was called 'Algofin
Plus'. No doubt you can buy it in larger more economic quantities but,
250ml to treat 5,000 litres used to cost £5. - No cheap option !!!
Another product was called 'Algizin P'.
I found that patience (nature is a great healer) and adding no more tap
water seems to pay off.
Don't worry about the magnitude of the problem. Just think how
satisfying it will be when you succeed. ;-))

[ned]

But always bear in mind
=======================

The root causes of blanket weed are:

-> nutrients
-> sunlight
-> carbon dioxide

in the pond water.
Get rid of them and your blanket weed D I E S :)))

Sue & Bob Hobden

unread,
Jun 21, 2002, 6:57:15 PM6/21/02
to

"Jane wrote in message news:3AR3PtAs...@jandg.demon.co.uk...

I've made a few suggestions in between ***

--
Bob
http://www.pooleygreengrowers.org.uk/ about an allotment site
in Runnymede, fighting for its existence against bureaucracy.


> Here is a draft blanket weed faq.
> Please comment.
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> Algae, which includes blanket weed, thrives on nutrients, sunlight and
> carbon dioxide in pond water. This is why blanket weed topics always crop
> up on urg at the start of summer. Sunlight levels increase, pond
> water starts to turn green and blanket weed grows.
>
> For starters -
>
> Are you sure that nutrients (compost, growmore, miracle grow, dead
> vegetation, plain old soil etc) are not being washed off your garden and
> into the pond when it rains?
>
> Are you sure you are not overfeeding your fish and that the extra food
> is rotting to provide blanket weed food?
>
> Is your pond is a new one? Don't keep filling it up with 'new' water to
> try to clear it because if you do, you will just set yourself back to

> square one every time ***as most tap water contains levels of Nitrate from
farmland runoff thus increasing your problem***


Take heart from the fact that it can take three

> or four years for the water in a new ***wildlife type***pond to stabilise


into a well balanced
> state.
>
> Does the pond have a liner or is it a manmade 'natural' one ie a big hole
> in clay ground? Nutrients may be more of a problem in a natural pond than
> in a lined one - but don't quote me on that.
>

> Blanket weed isn't killed by your pond filter.***A biological filter will
actually convert toxic Ammonia waste from your fish into less toxic Nitrates
again increasing your weed problem***
> Blanket weed will happily clog up your filter


>
> To make the blanket weed disappear, find a way of reducing the sunlight
> and nutrient levels in your pond and increasing the oxygen level.
>

> Our local wildlife pond expert says:
> "Don't work against mother nature, try to work with her".
>
> The most natural way to remove blanket weed, as it starts to grow in early
> summer, is to encourage lots of tadpoles. Among other things, they feed on

> blanket weed **however if you keep fish in your pond the tadpoles will be
a welcome food for them***

> nutrient absorber.***Warning...do not eat any watercress grown in a pond,
it could give you Liver Flukes.***

> [Bob Hobden]

Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 22, 2002, 4:13:17 AM6/22/02
to
In article <200206212...@zetnet.co.uk>, Janet Baraclough
<janet.a...@zetnet.co.uk> writes
>The message <lP3DskA0...@jandg.demon.co.uk>
>from Jane Ransom <ran...@deadspam.com> contains these words:

>
>
>> >>Anyone with anything to say on blanket weed please add it to this thread
>> >>and I'll include it.
>
>> Righty ho!
>
> Ummmm..that's yourself you're talking to :~}
>
Ooooooooops - slip of the snip :(

Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 22, 2002, 4:20:37 AM6/22/02
to
In article <af0at6$aln54$1...@ID-93475.news.dfncis.de>, Sue & Bob Hobden
<hob...@btinternet.com> writes

>
>"Jane wrote in message news:3AR3PtAs...@jandg.demon.co.uk...
>
>I've made a few suggestions in between ***
>
Thanks, Bob, will amend accordingly.

green grass

unread,
Jun 22, 2002, 7:28:42 AM6/22/02
to
Due to the sheer size of my pond, I could not even begin to try and clear
any blanket weed, however, I do not suffer from it, in quantity, so just
maybe my filter system, all though laughable, and home made, many years ago,
is working, it comprises of the following.
A large pump,capable of moving solids,(with fish guard)sucks from just below
the surface, of the pond, and pushes the water up to an old plastic
expansion tank with sealed lid, filled with old sacking(Hessian)hidden in
the bushes above my top pond and returns the water back via the waterfall, I
periodically remove the sacking to the compost heap,and renew it.
For the pond bed cleaning, I use a bilge pump, obtained from an old trawler,
these remove large amounts of debris, and no life stock is damaged, due to
no propulsion, as it has a large diaphragm that sucks and blows.
I have never fed the fish, or used any chemicals, and leave nature to run
it's own management, all my fish etc, seem to thrive,and the water looks
very natural, with very little maintenance.

Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 22, 2002, 9:11:29 AM6/22/02
to
In article <%8ZQ8.3497$dM2....@news8-gui.server.ntli.net>, green grass
<green...@forgotten.com> writes

>Due to the sheer size of my pond, I could not even begin to try and clear
>any blanket weed, however, I do not suffer from it,

In actual fact it is more prevalent in small ponds where the surface air
to water volume ratio is smaller. Hessayon says you should have at least
40 square feet of water surface!

Natalie

unread,
Jun 22, 2002, 1:00:31 PM6/22/02
to

> In actual fact it is more prevalent in small ponds where the surface air
> to water volume ratio is smaller. Hessayon says you should have at least
> 40 square feet of water surface!

I wonder how he would suggest fitting it into my 40' x 16' garden? ;~)

Natalie


Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 22, 2002, 2:46:10 PM6/22/02
to
In article <af2arp$at6a9$1...@ID-104725.news.dfncis.de>, Natalie
<ha...@blueyonder.co.uk> writes
It can't be true.
Of the three ponds we have the little one is the healthiest - and it's
only about 3ftx18inches by about a foot deep !!!

green grass

unread,
Jun 22, 2002, 4:23:33 PM6/22/02
to

"Jane Ransom" <ran...@deadspam.com> wrote in message
news:QvrOk$ABeHF...@jandg.demon.co.uk...

> In article <%8ZQ8.3497$dM2....@news8-gui.server.ntli.net>, green grass
> <green...@forgotten.com> writes
> >Due to the sheer size of my pond, I could not even begin to try and clear
> >any blanket weed, however, I do not suffer from it,
>
> In actual fact it is more prevalent in small ponds where the surface air
> to water volume ratio is smaller. Hessayon says you should have at least
> 40 square feet of water surface!
> ----------------------------------
How on earth can anybody come up with a statement like you have just
mentioned, the mind boggles, a pond is a pond, regardless of it's size,
sorry, I do not agree, spawns are subject to warm water and sunshine, If you
do not filter the spawns, you deserve the outcome.
TC.

Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 23, 2002, 3:39:15 AM6/23/02
to
In article <qY4R8.1726$qm1.1...@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net>, green
grass <green...@forgotten.com> writes

>>


>> In actual fact it is more prevalent in small ponds where the surface air
>> to water volume ratio is smaller. Hessayon says you should have at least
>> 40 square feet of water surface!
>> ----------------------------------
>How on earth can anybody come up with a statement like you have just
>mentioned,

I only quoted Hessayon!!!!!!!!!

And I did also say -

It can't be true.
Of the three ponds we have the little one is the healthiest - and it's
only about 3ftx18inches by about a foot deep !!!

green grass

unread,
Jun 23, 2002, 4:14:10 AM6/23/02
to

"Jane Ransom" > wrote in message ...
>
> I only quoted Hessayon!!!!!!!!!
------------------------------------------------------
Jane,
I too, was referring to D,G, Hessayon, (the self professed flower
expert),and not directly to your self, I have little faith in experts, as we
are still all learning, It's all part of growing up, I personally find
Hessayons knowledge of ponds, to be rather limited, however, we all have our
own opinions, and I feel, practical, preference to theoretical experience in
this field, is far superior to book writing.with reference to encyclopaedia,
nature changes it's habits annually.


green grass

unread,
Jun 23, 2002, 4:43:08 AM6/23/02
to
For quick references to problems:
http://www.oase-uk.co.uk/problems/problems.html


June Hughes

unread,
Jun 23, 2002, 7:46:19 AM6/23/02
to
In article <%8ZQ8.3497$dM2....@news8-gui.server.ntli.net>, green grass
<green...@forgotten.com> writes
You are very lucky and probably very clever to be able to build and run
a system like that. Mine is a common or garden (as it were) system and
I wash the three sponges inside the filter every now and again.
--
June Hughes

June Hughes

unread,
Jun 23, 2002, 7:48:26 AM6/23/02
to
In article <QvrOk$ABeHF...@jandg.demon.co.uk>, Jane Ransom
<ran...@deadspam.com> writes

>In article <%8ZQ8.3497$dM2....@news8-gui.server.ntli.net>, green grass
><green...@forgotten.com> writes
>>Due to the sheer size of my pond, I could not even begin to try and clear
>>any blanket weed, however, I do not suffer from it,
>
>In actual fact it is more prevalent in small ponds where the surface air
>to water volume ratio is smaller. Hessayon says you should have at least
>40 square feet of water surface!
>
Hessayon as in the Dr Gardening Expert sort? (Hessayon, hessian,
sacking? Tut, tut June and I haven't even been drinking any form of
alcoholic beverage.)
--
June Hughes
http://www.barnet-rotary.org.uk

Janet Baraclough

unread,
Jun 23, 2002, 9:17:30 AM6/23/02
to
The message <d4J+4MFK...@theacct.demon.co.uk>
from June Hughes <juneh...@theacct.demon.co.uk> contains these words:

> Tut, tut June and I haven't even been drinking any form of
> alcoholic beverage.)

omigod.... after using urg as a secret test site for the June Hughes
terminator gene, Monsanto have finally succeeded in cloning her.

Janet.

Kay Easton

unread,
Jun 23, 2002, 3:35:55 PM6/23/02
to
In article <af2arp$at6a9$1...@ID-104725.news.dfncis.de>, Natalie
<ha...@blueyonder.co.uk> writes
>
Well, it's only 4ft by 10ft, so it would take up a quarter of each of
your dimensions or one sixteenth of the whole - not a great proportion.

June Hughes

unread,
Jun 23, 2002, 4:00:19 PM6/23/02
to
In article <200206231...@zetnet.co.uk>, Janet Baraclough
<janet.a...@zetnet.co.uk> writes
eh?
--
June Hughes

Michael Berridge

unread,
Jun 23, 2002, 5:54:20 PM6/23/02
to

Natalie wrote in message ...
Well it's not too difficult, your garden is 640 sq. feet so it would
only take up a 16th of the garden.

Mike
www.british-naturism.org.uk


A.Malhotra

unread,
Jun 24, 2002, 4:49:05 AM6/24/02
to

That has come up several times but having spent c. 5 hours this weekend
removing blanket weed and pondweed from our pond, i think thta once the
fine mesh-like filaments in which tadpoles and other creepy-crawlies are
often embedded, happily feeding, is removed from the pond, the collapse of
the filaments entraps them very effectively and there is no way they are
going to get out before they die. I reported to stretching each bit out
into a thin sheet and manually removing the snails and tadpoles before
laying the rest by the side of the pond.
Anita

Kay Easton

unread,
Jun 24, 2002, 7:04:32 AM6/24/02
to
In article <3D16DD01...@bangor.ac.uk>, A.Malhotra
<bss...@bangor.ac.uk> writes

>
>That has come up several times but having spent c. 5 hours this weekend
>removing blanket weed and pondweed from our pond, i think thta once the
>fine mesh-like filaments in which tadpoles and other creepy-crawlies are
>often embedded, happily feeding, is removed from the pond, the collapse of
>the filaments entraps them very effectively and there is no way they are
>going to get out before they die. I reported to stretching each bit out
>into a thin sheet and manually removing the snails and tadpoles before
>laying the rest by the side of the pond.

That's true for tadpoles, and I wouldn't remove blanket weed while there
are taddies in it - it's just too difficult to be sure of getting them
all out - but beetles and insect larvae and even snails seem to cope OK.
Leeches tend to live deeper in the silt at the bottom, but they too have
a tendency to get entangled if they get caught up in the blanket weed.

D

unread,
Jun 24, 2002, 7:29:13 AM6/24/02
to
June Hughes <juneh...@theacct.demon.co.uk> writes

>>
>>Anyone with anything to say on blanket weed please add it to this thread
>>and I'll include it.
>If you use chemicals to get rid of blanket weed, you must make sure to
>get rid of the dead weed from the bottom of the pond, or it will clog
>your pump and possibly affect the water even worse than the weed did.

After talking to my local water garden place, I was encouraged to use
'Pond Balance'. I did this last year, and it worked very well, making
the blanket weed disintegrate. This year I started earlier, and I have
it well under control.

This would work well if your pond is not huge, unless you have a lot of
money to pay for a lot of Pond Balance - it costs about £30 for enough
to treat 3000 gallons three times, and you'd need enough to use three
doses in the first month, then once per month thereafter. It works
slowly, taking maybe a month or so to take control, but it does work.
Btw I also put in a bale of barley straw, but it didn't stop the blanket
weed forming, even though the straw is near the waterfall.

I have a natural pond, and everything seems to be growing and living
properly. I had lily plants producing several flowers, fish laying eggs
which developed into fry.

My pump does not scour the bottom of the pond, I have it in a plastic
plant pot, with bricks in the bottom to lift the pump and keep it
underwater. The filters have not been clogged. (I did give them a clear
out in the winter though, digging out most of the sediment)

--
David

June Hughes

unread,
Jun 24, 2002, 9:53:18 AM6/24/02
to
In article <Hr$AFCAJK...@crown-cottage.demon.co.uk>, D
<david@||||.demon.co.uk> writes

>
>I have a natural pond, and everything seems to be growing and living
>properly. I had lily plants producing several flowers, fish laying eggs
>which developed into fry.
>
By a natural pond, do you mean one that is fed by a stream? If you do,
you are very lucky. Most of us have artificial ponds, where the water
has to be kept circulating at all times. Anyone who keeps koi needs to
keep the pond clean and test the water weekly at this time of year for
Ph, ammonia, nitrites and oxygen. Blanket weed is unsightly but is not
a killer unless you kill _it_ and then do not remove the dead stuff,
which sinks to the bottom and causes all sorts of problems when it
decays. Koi make a lot of muck but cannot bear to live in it. Barley
straw is good at keeping the blanket weed in control but it is not a
difficult job to twist a stick in the offending weed so that it comes
out of the pond in a nice, satisfying green blob. It is amazing how
much you can get on to a stick in one go.

Sludge tends to build up at the bottom of the pond as a result of dead
matter, fish-poo etc and needs to be periodically removed. There is a
product on the market called 'Sludge-buster', which I have used before
but it is rather expensive and I wouldn't be prepared to use it every
two weeks, as recommended on the packet.

--
June Hughes

D

unread,
Jun 24, 2002, 6:31:48 PM6/24/02
to
June Hughes <juneh...@theacct.demon.co.uk> writes

>In article <Hr$AFCAJK...@crown-cottage.demon.co.uk>, D
><david@||||.demon.co.uk> writes
>>
>>I have a natural pond, and everything seems to be growing and living
>>properly. I had lily plants producing several flowers, fish laying eggs
>>which developed into fry.
>>
>By a natural pond, do you mean one that is fed by a stream?

I have a pond which is artificial but looks 'natural', ie. the edges
blend into plants and there is no obvious liner, and it has fish which
do not destroy the plant life. Sorry for any confusion :-)


> it is not a
>difficult job to twist a stick in the offending weed so that it comes
>out of the pond in a nice, satisfying green blob. It is amazing how
>much you can get on to a stick in one go.

Its more difficult if its grown round your lillies and other plant life
though. I did try the candifloss method last year before I discovered
Pond Balance.


>
>Sludge tends to build up at the bottom of the pond as a result of dead
>matter, fish-poo etc and needs to be periodically removed. There is a
>product on the market called 'Sludge-buster', which I have used before
>but it is rather expensive and I wouldn't be prepared to use it every
>two weeks, as recommended on the packet.
>

I think that's a matter of opinion. I explained how my pump is situated.
I deliberately did this so it would not scour the bottom and fill up
with sludge.

True natural ponds do not have sludge busters cleaning them out every
couple of weeks, do they, yet they manage to support lots of wildlife
for years. I don't think I'll be tempted until mine is more sludge than
water.......
--
David

June Hughes

unread,
Jun 25, 2002, 3:18:30 AM6/25/02
to
In article <zy4dznAU...@crown-cottage.demon.co.uk>, D
<david@||||.demon.co.uk> writes
snip

>
> True natural ponds do not have sludge busters cleaning them out every
>couple of weeks, do they, yet they manage to support lots of wildlife
>for years. I don't think I'll be tempted until mine is more sludge than
>water.......
I was interested to read your post. As long as you do not keep koi, I
don't think you have anything to worry about.
--
June Hughes

Andy

unread,
Jun 25, 2002, 4:11:54 AM6/25/02
to

"D" <david@||||.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:zy4dznAU...@crown-cottage.demon.co.uk...
<snip>

> True natural ponds do not have sludge busters cleaning them out every
> couple of weeks, do they, yet they manage to support lots of wildlife
> for years. I don't think I'll be tempted until mine is more sludge than
> water.......
> --
> David

Be careful if you leave the sludge to build up, whilst it can be beneficial
it can also be detrimental. especially in winter.

Jane Ransom

unread,
Jun 25, 2002, 5:02:21 AM6/25/02
to
In article <zy4dznAU...@crown-cottage.demon.co.uk>, D
<david@||||.demon.co.uk> writes
>

> True natural ponds do not have sludge busters cleaning them out every
>couple of weeks, do they, yet they manage to support lots of wildlife
>for years. I don't think I'll be tempted until mine is more sludge than
>water.......

*True* natural ponds gradually fill up with dead leaves, growing
vegetation and silt and eventually end up as bogs!!

D

unread,
Jun 25, 2002, 4:04:25 AM6/25/02
to
June Hughes <juneh...@theacct.demon.co.uk> writes

>> True natural ponds do not have sludge busters cleaning them out every
>>couple of weeks, do they, yet they manage to support lots of wildlife
>>for years. I don't think I'll be tempted until mine is more sludge than
>>water.......
>I was interested to read your post. As long as you do not keep koi, I
>don't think you have anything to worry about.

I discussed this at length with the water garden people, who supplied
fish. If you keep koi then they are bottom feeders and will root around
disturbing and moving and quickly wrecking all the plants, its their
nature. His koi pond was very formal, basic and bare with a walled-in
lily enclosure!

OTOH you can go for top feeders, like golden Orfe, which are lovely
graceful fish and will eventually (pond permitting) grow to 18" / 46cm,
or golden rudd. These will even jump a few inches out of the pond to
catch midges :-)) and they do not disturb the plants. Althoughn our pond
has been going only 2 and a half years we have about 50 rudd fry, of
different sizes.

Goldfish seem to feed in the middle, apparently, though they love
sitting just under the surface under plants or pond weed, but here they
are pretty vulnerable to Heron. Actually we saw some of ours for the
first time in ages, just a few days ago laying eggs in the shallows,
making so much noise we couldn't miss them.
--
David

D

unread,
Jun 25, 2002, 6:30:04 AM6/25/02
to
Andy <an...@no.thanks> writes

>Be careful if you leave the sludge to build up, whilst it can be beneficial
>it can also be detrimental. especially in winter.
>
I think its got a way to go yet. I reckon say if it deposits 1cm a year,
the pond is 1.70m (~5ft) deep, and about 15 m (~44 ft) long, so lets say
in 30 years there will still be 1.40m of water.... so I'll put it in the
diary for 2030..... take some sludge out of the pond... but I'll
probably check before then :-))

Actually because its artificial I'm quite keen on accumulating some
sludge, to support the wildlife and also protect the liner.
--
David

June Hughes

unread,
Jun 25, 2002, 11:27:36 AM6/25/02
to
In article <cZMm5GAJ...@crown-cottage.demon.co.uk>, D
<david@||||.demon.co.uk> writes

>June Hughes <juneh...@theacct.demon.co.uk> writes
>>> True natural ponds do not have sludge busters cleaning them out every
>>>couple of weeks, do they, yet they manage to support lots of wildlife
>>>for years. I don't think I'll be tempted until mine is more sludge than
>>>water.......
>>I was interested to read your post. As long as you do not keep koi, I
>>don't think you have anything to worry about.
>
>I discussed this at length with the water garden people, who supplied
>fish. If you keep koi then they are bottom feeders and will root around
>disturbing and moving and quickly wrecking all the plants, its their
>nature. His koi pond was very formal, basic and bare with a walled-in
>lily enclosure!
>
Koi are indeed plant-eaters but not 'bottom feeders'. You can easily
protect plants from koi by having them in plastic baskets on a shelf at
the top of the pond. Problem solved.

>OTOH you can go for top feeders, like golden Orfe, which are lovely
>graceful fish and will eventually (pond permitting) grow to 18" / 46cm,
>or golden rudd.
I always thought Golden Orfe were bottom feeders but as I do not have
any, I am willing to stand corrected.

snip


>
>Goldfish seem to feed in the middle, apparently, though they love
>sitting just under the surface under plants or pond weed, but here they
>are pretty vulnerable to Heron. Actually we saw some of ours for the
>first time in ages, just a few days ago laying eggs in the shallows,
>making so much noise we couldn't miss them.

Herons are a pain and I believed that if they could not wade, they could
not catch fish. This is untrue, - all they have to do is stand by the
pond, spread their wings and wait for the inevitable to happen. I keep
plants in pots round the edge of my pond for that very reason, although
I preferred it when things were more formal.

--
June Hughes

June Hughes

unread,
Jun 25, 2002, 12:31:10 PM6/25/02
to
In article <KKybE2Do...@theacct.demon.co.uk>, June Hughes
<juneh...@theacct.demon.co.uk> writes

>I always thought Golden Orfe were bottom feeders but as I do not have
>any, I am willing to stand corrected.
>
You are correct. I was getting confused with tench. Apols.
--
June Hughes

D

unread,
Jun 25, 2002, 2:33:33 PM6/25/02
to
June Hughes <juneh...@theacct.demon.co.uk> writes

>Koi are indeed plant-eaters but not 'bottom feeders'. You can easily
>protect plants from koi by having them in plastic baskets on a shelf at
>the top of the pond. Problem solved.

OK, I stand corrected, they are bottom nuzzlers, they root around and do
bring up any loose things there :-) and they are fed on the surface of
course.

>I always thought Golden Orfe were bottom feeders but as I do not have
>any, I am willing to stand corrected.
>

These *are* top feeders, they pick off insects and food from the
surface.

I think we're just about correct now aren't we?
--
David

June Hughes

unread,
Jun 25, 2002, 6:41:47 PM6/25/02
to
In article <UQB0rRA9...@crown-cottage.demon.co.uk>, D
<david@||||.demon.co.uk> writes

<g> yes indeed! Happy fish-and-pond-keeping.
--
June Hughes

D

unread,
Jun 26, 2002, 5:16:18 AM6/26/02
to
June Hughes <juneh...@theacct.demon.co.uk> writes

>>I think we're just about correct now aren't we?
>
><g> yes indeed! Happy fish-and-pond-keeping.

I must say I never imagined I would get quite so much pleasure out of a
pond, and the fish and insects and other things that go on in and around
it. Ours is only two and a half years old, and it looks like its been
there forever, I shall have to start taking out some of the water plant
in the autumn, growth has been so spectacular. And the pleasure of
seeing newts, which I've never seen before, and having little tiny fish
fry in small shoals, well, that's really rewarding, not to mention the
host of damsel flies and dragon flies that zip over the water, or the
birds bathing in the shallows, or the swallow and house-martins dipping
over the surface. All because of a little patch of water!

I can certainly recommend the orfe though, they have real character,
slow and subtle moving, huge eyes, long streamlined bodies, and they
cruise so slowly most of the time until the food is dropped, then they
really make the water boil, amazing.

Yes, thanks for the good wishes, and the same to anyone else who is
thinking about it, its really worth all the effort.
--
David

Andy

unread,
Jun 26, 2002, 11:28:32 AM6/26/02
to

"D" <david@||||.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:VzWETEAi...@crown-cottage.demon.co.uk...
<snip>

> I can certainly recommend the orfe though, they have real character,
> slow and subtle moving, huge eyes, long streamlined bodies, and they
> cruise so slowly most of the time until the food is dropped, then they
> really make the water boil, amazing.
>

for anyone who may be interested.
there is a little clue here, if you want to get fish to feed from your hands
or congregate at a certain point in your pond at feeding time.
then I would advise not to stock Orfe! at least until your fish are
responding.
whilst Orfe are a fantastic fish to keep they can & do unsettle other fish
such as shubunkins, comets, Koi etc especially when they dash around at
feeding time.
:-)


0 new messages