Cyclist killed in Victoria lorry crash was 'top global warming scientist'

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

The original post was the over dramatic "Rider down in Victoria Street
London SW1".

"She was killed during morning rush-hour traffic in central London as a
tipper truck turned left into Victoria Street.

The driver of the lorry stopped but no arrests have been made".


Happened to meet one of the investigating officers today. The lorry had
it's indicator on, a sign on the back warning cyclists not to undertake
and a audible warning that the vehicle was turning left.





--
Dave - Cyclists VORP
"It is time for us to say to cyclists 'You want to join our gang, get
trained and pay up'. John Griffin, Addison Lee.

[nik.morgan]

Dave- Cyclists VORP <davi...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> The original post was the over dramatic "Rider down in Victoria Street London SW1".
>
> "She was killed during morning rush-hour traffic in central London as a
> tipper truck turned left into Victoria Street.
>
> The driver of the lorry stopped but no arrests have been made".
>
>
> Happened to meet one of the investigating officers today. The lorry had
> it's indicator on, a sign on the back warning cyclists not to undertake
> and a audible warning that the vehicle was turning left.
>
>

Darwinism in action.

--
ennemm

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

On 16/05/2013 20:44, Justin wrote:
> On 16 mei, 21:41, Justin Lewis <lewisjust...@nospamhotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 19:44:34 +0100, Dave- Cyclists VORP

>>
>> <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>> The original post was the over dramatic "Rider down in Victoria Street
>>> London SW1".
>>
>>> "She was killed during morning rush-hour traffic in central London as a
>>> tipper truck turned left into Victoria Street.
>>
>>> The driver of the lorry stopped but no arrests have been made".
>>
>>> Happened to meet one of the investigating officers today. The lorry had
>>> it's indicator on, a sign on the back warning cyclists not to undertake
>>> and a audible warning that the vehicle was turning left.
>>

>> Thank you very much for doing this research, Dave. It is interesting
>> to see you refer to "a audible warning" (sic).
>>
>> It just shows that you are a cut below the average. I appear to have the
>> same problem with the same letter!!!
>
Justipoo's is getting senile...

[Judith]

On Thu, 16 May 2013 21:41:11 +0200, Justin Lewis
<lewisj...@nospamhotmail.com> wrote:

<snip>



>
>It just shows that you a cut below the average.

ffs - he's back.

Justipoo's own inimitable English.

[Judith]

On Thu, 16 May 2013 14:09:19 -0700 (PDT), justinl...@gmail.com wrote:

>A audible warning , you cut.


Is that a "cut above the average"

Excellent value - you make Numb-nuts look really smart.

[Peter Keller]

On Thu, 16 May 2013 19:44:34 +0100, Dave- Cyclists VORP wrote:

> The original post was the over dramatic "Rider down in Victoria Street
> London SW1".
>
> "She was killed during morning rush-hour traffic in central London as a
> tipper truck turned left into Victoria Street.
>
> The driver of the lorry stopped but no arrests have been made".
>
>
> Happened to meet one of the investigating officers today. The lorry had
> it's indicator on, a sign on the back warning cyclists not to undertake
> and a audible warning that the vehicle was turning left.

I never undertake lorries unless they are *fully* stopped. Indicator,
warning or not.

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

On 16/05/2013 20:41, Justin Lewis wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 19:44:34 +0100, Dave- Cyclists VORP

> <davi...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> The original post was the over dramatic "Rider down in Victoria Street
>> London SW1".
>>
>> "She was killed during morning rush-hour traffic in central London as a
>> tipper truck turned left into Victoria Street.
>>
>> The driver of the lorry stopped but no arrests have been made".
>>
>>
>> Happened to meet one of the investigating officers today. The lorry had
>> it's indicator on, a sign on the back warning cyclists not to undertake
>> and a audible warning that the vehicle was turning left.

> Thank you very much for doing this research, Dave. It is interesting
> to see you refer to "a audible warning" (sic).
>

Lacking the intellectual ability to comment on the cyclists Darwinian
actions, Justipoo's tries to be clever & pick on a typo.

But screws it up.`
>
> It just shows that you a cut below the average. I appear to have the

> same problem with the same letter!!!
>

The same letter being 'n'.

So, did you mean to say;

"that you a cunt below the average"?

Or perhaps;

"that you an cut below the average".

Neither of which make any sense at all.

Mind you, someone who claims to be an English teacher & constructs
sentences like;

"those not liable to pay have can use the roads at will"

"over grit and salt in it?"

"One only look at recent events in Scotland."

"has saved my thousands of pounds"

"transported me of the highest Alpine passes"

"You will ensure that if lives up to your expectations will you not?"

Is simply bound to make a fool of himself.

[JNugent]

Even that is not safe or advisable, especially at a junction. The only
workable simple rule is "never overtake on the nearside, not never, not
nohow".

[Mentalguy2k8]

<justinl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0b358b7b-e9de-46bf...@googlegroups.com...
> Hallo Dave. Thanks for your informative reply.
>
> What are the 'cyclists Darwinian actions' (sic)?
>
> Harwich 22 July? I'll be there at eight o' clock in the evening on Scott
> tax exempt ATB. Why don't pop up? Don't shit out again.

Oh goody, it's the "missing words" round again.

I could string a better sentence together by feeding Scrabble tiles to my
dog and writing the letters down in the order he shits them out. Appalling,
and even more so when we all know you're proofreading your posts and running
them through a spellchecker after your previous dismal failures at written
English.

And drop the tough guy act, while it would be hugely satisfying to come to
"Harwich 22 July at eight o' clock in the evening" and kick you squarely
in your shrivelled nuts, it's really not worth the time or expense. You've
probably got 999 on speed-dial for such an eventuality anyway.

[Mentalguy2k8]

"JNugent" <jenni...@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
news:avm682...@mid.individual.net...

>> I never undertake lorries unless they are *fully* stopped. Indicator,
>> warning or not.
>
> Even that is not safe or advisable, especially at a junction. The only
> workable simple rule is "never overtake on the nearside, not never, not
> nohow".

Too right.

But we're at a situation now where we've conceded so much to cyclists, many
of them feel a sense of automatic priority entitlement to be in front of
everyone else, and think they have the right not to be knocked off when they
perform stupid or reckless actions. We've made them feel so special with
their silly little ASLs and cycle lanes, that we've also made them oblivious
to their own responsibilities.

[nik.morgan]

Sounds like some education would not go amiss, have any of the major
political parties expressed any interest in stopping this carnage by
restricting cyclists rights to endanger and inconvenience the rest of us
who after all are the overwhelming majority?
--
ennemm

[Mentalguy2k8]

"nik.morgan" <ig....@me.com> wrote in message
news:1794898543390483457....@news-europe.giganews.com...

>> But we're at a situation now where we've conceded so much to cyclists,
>> many of them feel a sense of automatic priority entitlement to be in
>> front of everyone else, and think they have the right not to be knocked
>> off when they perform stupid or reckless actions. We've made them feel so
>> special with their silly little ASLs and cycle lanes, that we've also
>> made them oblivious to their own responsibilities.
>
> Sounds like some education would not go amiss, have any of the major
> political parties expressed any interest in stopping this carnage by
> restricting cyclists rights to endanger and inconvenience the rest of us
> who after all are the overwhelming majority?

http://www.bikebiz.com/news/read/ukip-candidate-says-cyclists-thieving-from-paying-road-users/014735

:)

[nik.morgan]

The biased reporter goes on to the oft quoted cyclists defence gambit "Road
Tax" doesn't exist. In spite of the DVLA asking me to buy road tax on
their website.

There seem to be no reason why cyclists should not be registered and forced
to pass some sort of suitability assessment,

In clearly defined residential areas usually where there are 20 mph vehicle
speed limits and pedestrianised areas not specifically banned to cyclists
then unlicensed cycle use should be allowed, this will allow for children
to learn and play. Main roads, A roads and designated B roads cyclists
should be allowed provided they have passed the test and are displaying
proof, Some roads should be banned to all cyclists, main dual carriage way
trunk roads for example.

These measures will save some lives at little cost, other than to cyclists,
cause minimum inconvenience to the majority and open a door for compulsory
third party insurance. We have been repeatedly assured in this cycling
newsgroup cycling is so safe that wearing a safety helmet makes it more
risky then the insurance premiums will be tiny.
--

ennemm

[Mrcheerful]

Justin Lewis wrote:

> Hallo Mr Mental,
> Thanks for taking the time and effort to reply. Your reply is an
> absolute novelty - you are backing down before you have even been
> challenged. I congratulate you upon the wisdom and great vision that
> this decision evinces. Well done!
> It is a red and white Scott ATB, by the way.

You should know that your writings sound very like a Nigerian 419 scam
letter.

[Judith]

On Fri, 17 May 2013 01:14:28 -0700 (PDT), justinl...@gmail.com wrote:

>Hallo Dave. Thanks for your informative reply.
>
>What are the 'cyclists Darwinian actions' (sic)?
>
>Harwich 22 July? I'll be there at eight o' clock in the evening on Scott tax exempt ATB. Why don't pop up? Don't shit out again.


"Why don't pop up?"

You really are excellent value.

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

On 17/05/2013 09:14, justinl...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hallo Dave. Thanks for your informative reply.

That's more than I can say about yours Justipoo's.

>
> What are the 'cyclists Darwinian actions' (sic)?

Oh look, you completely forgot to reply to this bit of my post;

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

Justipoo's won't turn up anyway. He has a history of doing this. He
pretends he will be at a certain location - most of which don't actually
exist.

For example, he wanted me to meet him (I think he might fancy me) &
chose a hotel in Dover. He then claimed he had cycled past 6 times -
and apparently didn't notice it had completely changed it's name.

You should have seen the wriggling that went on after that.

[Mentalguy2k8]

"Dave- Cyclists VORP" <davi...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Grtlt.12486$Km3....@newsfe31.iad...

>> And drop the tough guy act, while it would be hugely satisfying to come
>> to "Harwich 22 July at eight o'clock in the evening" and kick you
>> squarely in your shrivelled nuts, it's really not worth the time or
>> expense. You've probably got 999 on speed-dial for such an eventuality
>> anyway.
>
> Justipoo's won't turn up anyway. He has a history of doing this. He
> pretends he will be at a certain location - most of which don't actually
> exist.
>
> For example, he wanted me to meet him (I think he might fancy me) & chose
> a hotel in Dover. He then claimed he had cycled past 6 times - and
> apparently didn't notice it had completely changed it's name.

lol! I know everyone saw him as a coward but didn't know the full story.
What a tool.

Maybe he should use CraigsList for trying to meet men for sex, I don't think
he's got any takers around here.

[Mentalguy2k8]

"Justin Lewis" <lewisj...@nospamhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f7pcp85o7pua8eekm...@4ax.com...

>>Justipoo's won't turn up anyway. He has a history of doing this. He
>>pretends he will be at a certain location - most of which don't actually
>>exist.

> Thanks for taking the effort to post, Dave. I already have my ticket
> and will be arriving on the Stena Hollandica at 20:00 hours. Don't
> keep shitting out.

Oh do fuck off you tedious little prick.

[nik.morgan]

That's a coincidence, I will be returning around that date from visiting my
family in Amsterdam, I haven't booked the ferry yet, I could book the same
one then we could meet Dave together in Harwich.
--
ennemm

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

On 17/05/2013 18:15, Justin Lewis wrote:

> On Fri, 17 May 2013 18:05:46 +0100, Dave- Cyclists VORP
> <davi...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 17/05/2013 11:54, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
>>>
>>> <justinl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:0b358b7b-e9de-46bf...@googlegroups.com...
>>>> Hallo Dave. Thanks for your informative reply.
>>>>
>>>> What are the 'cyclists Darwinian actions' (sic)?
>>>>
>>>> Harwich 22 July? I'll be there at eight o' clock in the evening on
>>>> Scott tax exempt ATB. Why don't pop up? Don't shit out again.
>>>
>>> Oh goody, it's the "missing words" round again.
>>>
>>> I could string a better sentence together by feeding Scrabble tiles to
>>> my dog and writing the letters down in the order he shits them out.
>>> Appalling, and even more so when we all know you're proofreading your
>>> posts and running them through a spellchecker after your previous dismal
>>> failures at written English.
>>>
>>> And drop the tough guy act, while it would be hugely satisfying to come
>>> to "Harwich 22 July at eight o'clock in the evening" and kick you
>>> squarely in your shrivelled nuts, it's really not worth the time or
>>> expense. You've probably got 999 on speed-dial for such an eventuality
>>> anyway.
>>
>> Justipoo's won't turn up anyway. He has a history of doing this. He
>> pretends he will be at a certain location - most of which don't actually
>> exist.

> Thanks for taking the effort to post, Dave. I already have my ticket
> and will be arriving on the Stena Hollandica at 20:00 hours. Don't
> keep shitting out.

>> For example, he wanted me to meet him (I think he might fancy me) &
>> chose a hotel in Dover. He then claimed he had cycled past 6 times -
>> and apparently didn't notice it had completely changed it's name.

> I was in a car. I never posted that I was on a bike.

You clearly stated that you rode past on a bike, you lying little toad.

>> You should have seen the wriggling that went on after that.

Wriggling still.

[nik.morgan]

Justin Lewis <lewisj...@nospamhotmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:17:31 -0500, nik.morgan <ig....@me.com> wrote:
>
>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mental...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> "Justin Lewis" <lewisj...@nospamhotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:f7pcp85o7pua8eekm...@4ax.com...
>>>

>>>>> Justipoo's won't turn up anyway. He has a history of doing this. He
>>>>> pretends he will be at a certain location - most of which don't actually
>>>>> exist.
>>>
>>>> Thanks for taking the effort to post, Dave. I already have my ticket
>>>> and will be arriving on the Stena Hollandica at 20:00 hours. Don't
>>>> keep shitting out.
>>>

>>> Oh do fuck off you tedious little prick.
>>
>> That's a coincidence, I will be returning around that date from visiting my
>> family in Amsterdam, I haven't booked the ferry yet, I could book the same
>> one then we could meet Dave together in Harwich.

> I have booked one of the Stena Plus seats in a silent lounge, by the
> way. Look forward to meeting you. Could you perhaps give me a lift to
> Hertfordshire on the other side? I am not looking forward to cycling
> the last bit in the dark.

We usually get a cabin to get a few hours sleep, we have a seven hour
journey after the crossing, I will not be going anywhere near Hertfordshire
otherwise I would gladly give you a lift. I will get back once our
arrangements are finalised.
--
ennemm

[Judith]

On Fri, 17 May 2013 21:28:52 +0200, Justin Lewis
<lewisj...@nospamhotmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

>Excellent idea. Let me knoew if you book the same crossing.



"knoew" - I really cannot believe it : such excellent value.

You make Crispin look bright.

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

On 17/05/2013 20:27, Justin Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 19:43:12 +0100, Dave- Cyclists VORP

> Quote me or Front Mech.

They are one & the same Justipoo's - as you well know. You just
confirmed it, idiot.

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

On 17/05/2013 20:27, Justin Lewis wrote:

>>

>>> I was in a car. I never posted that I was on a bike.

Pants on fire.

>>
>> You clearly stated that you rode past on a bike, you lying little toad.

> Quote me or Front Mech.
>

Certainly. My pleasure.

http://www.artikcommunity.biz/showthread.php?t=20363187

05-07-11, 12:27 PM

"I was present from 09:36 to 10:06. No Dave, no one called me **** and
there was no sign written van. I rode and drove back and forth several
times between these times: no sign of Dave".

What are you going to do now, you lying little toad? Claim you 'rode'
past on a horse?

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

On 19/05/2013 06:52, justinl...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks. I did not clearly state that I rode past the hotel on a bike.
> The only means of transport I specifically mentioned was a
> convertible car.

>
> "I was present from 09:36 to 10:06. No Dave, no one called me ****
> and there was no sign written van. I rode and drove back and forth
> several times between these times: no sign of Dave".
>
> What are you going to do now, you lying little toad? Claim you
> 'rode' past on a horse?

Wriggle, wriggle, wriggle.

So what exactly did you, a cyclist, "ride" past the non existent hotel
on then?

A horse?
A surfboard
Roller skates?

Liar, liar, pants on fire.

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

On 19/05/2013 10:29, justinl...@gmail.com wrote:
> You posted that I had clearly stated that I had ridden past the hotel
> on a bike. I did not even mention a bike. I had just arrived on a
> ferry in a two seater convertible car with a passenger who also has a
> licence. We were going to Hertfordshire. No bikes would have fitted
> in or on the car.
>
So, a known cyclist, posting on a cycling group uses the exact phrase "I
rode and drove back and forth several times".

Now, since this cyclist also claims to be a teacher of English & an all
round expert, we must assume the use of both terms "rode" and "drove"
mean different things.

Otherwise you would have said "I drove back and forth" and not "I rode
and drove back and forth" which clearly means you did both.

Actually, you did neither, because you weren't there.

[Judith]

On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:52:33 -0700 (PDT), justinl...@gmail.com wrote:

>Thanks. I did not clearly state that I rode past the hotel on a bike. The only means of transport I specifically mentioned was a convertible car.

So what did you "ride" on?



--
Wearing a cycle helmet will not kill you.

[Partac]

wrote in message
news:17184a03-70a8-4f9e...@googlegroups.com...

Wrong preposition.

Justin "Howler" Lewis correcting the use of English grammar. How ironic is
that?

[Judith]

It never ceases to amaze me just how many such "howlers" he makes.

He is excellent value though.

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

On 20/05/2013 20:24, justinl...@gmail.com wrote:
> Can something never cease to amaze a cartoon invertebrate? Better get the Kent Kant in on that one.
>
Your descent into personal abuse is your way of admitting that you are
bereft of all intellectual capacity .

Justin Lewis 3rd June 2012 1:26pm.

[John Benn]

"Justin Lewis" <lewisj...@nospamhotmail.com> wrote in message

news:561dp8hsfm6aouqmn...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:17:31 -0500, nik.morgan <ig....@me.com> wrote:
>

> Excellent idea. Let me knoew if you book the same crossing.

Make sure you're wearing a life jacket Justin.

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

On 21/05/2013 09:04, Justin wrote:
> On 21 mei, 09:10, Dave- Cyclists VORP <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> wrote:
>> On 20/05/2013 20:24, justinlewis...@gmail.com wrote:> Can something never cease to amaze a cartoon invertebrate? Better get the Kent Kant in on that one.

> Where is the insult?
>
You certainly live up to your name Dutch dimwit.

> Can something never cease to amaze a cartoon invertebrate? Better get the Kent Kant in on that one

Are you claiming that calling someone a cartoon invertebrate is a
compliment?

[Dave - Cyclists VOHR]

On 21/05/2013 18:47, Justin wrote:
> On 21 mei, 19:43, Dave- Cyclists VORP <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk>

> wrote:
>> On 21/05/2013 09:04, Justin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 21 mei, 09:10, Dave- Cyclists VORP <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 20/05/2013 20:24, justinlewis...@gmail.com wrote:> Can something never cease to amaze a cartoon invertebrate? Better get the Kent Kant in on that one.
>>
>>>> Your descent into personal abuse is your way of admitting that you are
>>>> bereft of all intellectual capacity .
>>
>>>> Justin Lewis 3rd June 2012 1:26pm.
>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dave - Cyclists VORP
>>>> "It is time for us to say to cyclists 'You want to join our gang, get
>>>> trained and pay up'. John Griffin, Addison Lee.
>>
>>> Where is the insult?
>>
>> You certainly live up to your name Dutch dimwit.
>>
>>> Can something never cease to amaze a cartoon invertebrate? Better get the Kent Kant in on that one
>>
>> Are you claiming that calling someone a cartoon invertebrate is a
>> compliment?

> Are you claiming that it is possible to insult a fictional character?

No. Because that isn't what you did, Dutch Dimwit.
>


--
Dave-Cyclists VORH
''As the severity of the injury increased the benefit of wearing a
helmet increased, which is very hard to ignore I think,'' Dr Olivier said.

Results showed that cyclists without helmets were more than 3.9 times as
likely to sustain a head injury to those with helmets. Helmets reduced
the risk of moderate head injury by 49 per cent, of serious head injury
by 62 per cent, and of severe head injury by 74 per cent".

[Dave- Cyclists VORC]

On 22/05/2013 21:09, Justin wrote:
> On 22 mei, 21:01, Dave - Cyclists VOHR <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk>

> Judith is fictional, an invention to hide the identity of a male
> poster.
>
But she is not a cartoon invertebrate, is she, Dutch Dimwit?

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

[Dave - Cyclists VOHR]

On 17/05/2013 18:15, Justin Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 18:05:46 +0100, Dave- Cyclists VORP
> <davi...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 17/05/2013 11:54, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:
>>>
>>> <justinl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:0b358b7b-e9de-46bf...@googlegroups.com...
>>>> Hallo Dave. Thanks for your informative reply.
>>>>
>>>> What are the 'cyclists Darwinian actions' (sic)?
>>>>
>>>> Harwich 22 July? I'll be there at eight o' clock in the evening on
>>>> Scott tax exempt ATB. Why don't pop up? Don't shit out again.
>>>
>>> Oh goody, it's the "missing words" round again.
>>>
>>> I could string a better sentence together by feeding Scrabble tiles to
>>> my dog and writing the letters down in the order he shits them out.
>>> Appalling, and even more so when we all know you're proofreading your
>>> posts and running them through a spellchecker after your previous dismal
>>> failures at written English.
>>>
>>> And drop the tough guy act, while it would be hugely satisfying to come
>>> to "Harwich 22 July at eight o'clock in the evening" and kick you
>>> squarely in your shrivelled nuts, it's really not worth the time or
>>> expense. You've probably got 999 on speed-dial for such an eventuality
>>> anyway.
>>

>> Justipoo's won't turn up anyway. He has a history of doing this. He
>> pretends he will be at a certain location - most of which don't actually
>> exist.
> Thanks for taking the effort to post, Dave. I already have my ticket
> and will be arriving on the Stena Hollandica at 20:00 hours. Don't
> keep shitting out.

>> For example, he wanted me to meet him (I think he might fancy me) &
>> chose a hotel in Dover. He then claimed he had cycled past 6 times -
>> and apparently didn't notice it had completely changed it's name.

> I was in a car. I never posted that I was on a bike.

>> You should have seen the wriggling that went on after that.

And the wriggling continues....

[Dave- Cyclists VORP]

On 23/05/2013 08:45, Justin wrote:
> On 22 mei, 22:22, Dave- Cyclists VORC <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk>

> She is a total cock and a sponging freeloader: you told us that.
>

No I didn't, Dutch Dimwit.