where is Doug?

[Mrcheerful]

Has he passed over?

[M Wicks]

On Sep 26, 5:32 pm, "Mrcheerful" <g.odonnel...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Has he passed over?

You'd like that wouldn't you? How callous can you get? And all because
he dared to want to ban cars. Which would probably be a very good
thing.

[JNugent]

On 26/09/2012 17:24, Mrcheerful wrote:

> Has he passed over?

I was wondering that, too.

I hope he's alright.

[Partac]

"M Wicks" wrote in message
news:38228f82-815c-4457...@c19g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...

Don't know what has happened to Doug, but I can see we've got a suitable
replacement loonie waiting in the wings.

[Mrcheerful]

it is a straightforward question.
Many people (myself included) only came to this group because of Doug's
ravings, on some things I agree with him, he has a right to his opinions,
and as far as I remember he was usually polite-ish. Which is far more than
can be said for some of the rabid loons that infest this group.

[Squashme]

"aah, poor ickle pyscholist." (Mrcheerful today).

[Squashme]

Oh, come on! Why should he break the habit of a lifetime?

[nik.morgan]

I hope Doug is alive and well, I didn't agree with him most of the time and
I had some fun feeding him a line to bite on but I sincerely wish him no
harm and would be happy to see him re emerge.
--
ennemm

[Dave - Cyclists VOR]

On 26/09/2012 17:24, Mrcheerful wrote:
> Has he passed over?
>
>

Crashed on his illegal scooter?

Poisoned by an undercooked mung bean?

Doored again?

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster
University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking
and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail
to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their
lives, certainly on a regular basis."

[Peter Keller]

On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:24:58 +0100, Mrcheerful wrote:

> Has he passed over?

Trying to figure out how to get a horizontal night's sleep in his
vertical city.



--
Life is a venereal disease with 100% mortality.

[Mrcheerful]

not really rude, is it? no swear words, no suggestion that you be severely
injured or killed, no threats of legal action or prison, just gentle
chiding.

[Mrcheerful]

Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
> On 26/09/2012 17:24, Mrcheerful wrote:
>> Has he passed over?
>>
>>
> Crashed on his illegal scooter?
>
> Poisoned by an undercooked mung bean?
>
> Doored again?

rammed, you mean.

[John Benn]

"nik.morgan" <ig....@me.com> wrote in message
news:256400454370383612....@news-europe.giganews.com...

Same here. Doug had every right to his opinions even though I disagreed
with most of them. I hope he is well.

[brianwh...@hotmail.com]

I hope he's OK. He's a whining old turd, but he's entertaining. On the other hand, I'm very disappointed to see that you are still drawing breath, Mr Moron.

[nik.morgan]

Do you really want to start that all over again, I suppose your wounds have
healed since last time, OK bring it on.

[BrianW]

On Oct 4, 3:25 am, nik.morgan <ig.t...@me.com> wrote:

> <brianwhiteh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 26, 2012 9:24:02 PM UTC+1, nik. morgan wrote:

I'd be more than happy to ridicule you some more and make you look
like even more of a cunt. But I don't need to, you do it all yourself
without any assistance.

[nik.morgan]

All wind and piss yet again is it? You appear to be one deeply unpleasant
individual.

ennemm

[BrianW]

On Oct 4, 10:52 am, nik.morgan <ig.t...@me.com> wrote:

Whereas you demonstrate, time after time, that you don't just appear
to be, but actually are, one deeply unpleasant individual. And a dumb
cunt to boot.

[nik.morgan]

this is pointless, I never have expressed a wish that someone I disagreed
with was dead thus that IMO makes you deeply unpleasant , the previous
encounters with you displayed you as an unpleasant bully.

You couldn't have been more wrong, everything panned out exactly as I said
it would, not that I'm expecting an apology, you don't have the bottle to
admit in public that you were wrong,

I will not respond to any more of your posts, Nothing would change your
opinion of me so I'm not going to bother you are far too nasty for words.

[JNugent]

On 04/10/2012 14:03, nik.morgan wrote:

> BrianW <brianwh...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> ... you demonstrate, time after time, that you don't just appear

>> to be, but actually are, one deeply unpleasant individual. And a dumb
>> cunt to boot.

> this is pointless, I never have expressed a wish that someone I disagreed
> with was dead thus that IMO makes you deeply unpleasant , the previous
> encounters with you displayed you as an unpleasant bully.
> You couldn't have been more wrong, everything panned out exactly as I said
> it would, not that I'm expecting an apology, you don't have the bottle to
> admit in public that you were wrong,
> I will not respond to any more of your posts, Nothing would change your
> opinion of me so I'm not going to bother you are far too nasty for words.

Doug has disappeared from the net a few times before now and until now
(obviously) has always returned. On one occasion, he reported having been
injured in a accident whilst cycling. He was immediately sent commiserations
by people both in this NG and ukt and ukrd, including, IIRC, your good self
(NM) and others (including myself) who were in the habit of being opposed to
what Doug generally writes.

It is not credible that you (or many others) have wished any harm upon him.