In article <
bhkegf1c2645lbu4f...@4ax.com>,
Graham C <
graha...@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>I have two pairs of Endura under shorts, size medium which measure
>41cm across the flat at the waist, This translates to 32in
>circumference.
...
>Am I missing something?
I think you may be missing the Consumer Contracts (Information,
Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 (aka DSR-bis)
:-). Order three sizes, send two back.
Also there seems to be a thing where "srs" cycling gear is very tight,
because people think that shorts really squeezing your things is a
good thing somehow. IHNI if it makes people faster, but I don't like
it much.
Sometimes retailers hint at whether particular shorts are like this.
For example I just bought a pair of DHB bibshorts aobut which Wiggle
say things like this:
Perfect for commuters and leisure cyclists
while comfort has always been key - whatever the length of your
commute or leisure ride.
ideal for commuting, touring and leisure rides
rather than going on about "compression" and "performance" and shaving
every millisecond or whatever. They're rather more comfortable than
my other bibshorts which are more colourful but were sold with more
"race" emphasis in the blither.
--
Ian Jackson <
ijac...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own.
Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @
fyvzl.net or @
evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.