In article <
QKedndbVGsH-lu_D...@giganews.com>,
Tosspot <
Frank...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why have Presta valves become so common anyway?
>>>
>>> Smaller hole in rim, free flow valve.
>>>
>>> I have no idea why some people dislike them, I much prefer them to
>>> Schraeder or heaven forbid Woods!
>>
>> It's been explained several times before. They are prone to leaking,
>> very fiddly, require good finger dexterity and some strength, don't
>> work with many pumps, are very delicate, and misbehave horribly if
>> the rod is even slightly bent or they don't like the connector.
>> People with even minor physical handicaps often find them extremely
>> hard to use, extremely unreliable, and sometimes completely unusable.
>> My wife couldn't use them at all, even 20 years ago, and I can't get a
>> decent (i.e. reliable) lifetime out of them.
>
>All I can say is in 40 years I've never had one leak or break.
Of the half dozen or a bit more ones I have seen, over half leaked
unless I screwed the nut down, and one did even then. They were not
cheap and nasty ones, either. While I can screw and unscrew that nut,
my wife couldn't, even back then - a LOT of women lose strength after
menopause, and lots of older people have trouble with fiddly things.
And YOU may not have any problem with bending right over or balancing,
but a LOT of people do. All you have to do is jerk that damn rod, and
the valve stops working properly. After I had bent several back, and
replaced a couple of tubes, I thought 'sod this for a lark' and drilled
out for Schraeder/Woods. The point is that there is NO modern field
pump that can be used on those things if the user can't pump while
bending over, or can't hold steady while pumping. Track pumps aren't
a problem.
You don't need to be seriously handicapped to have trouble with that
poxious valve - at a wild guess, half the population would have,
though few of those cycle any longer (unlike up to the 1960s). I have
known people who gave up because they replaced Woods by Presta, and
have advised many others to drill the rims out for Schraeder or Woods
to solve their problems.
>> Woods is the only one that does not need an effective non-return
>> valve in the pump, or can be fixed without the use of fiddly tools.
>> It's the only one my wife can use, and she's not particularly unusual
>> in that respect. Yes, it used to be a problem back when the seal was
>> latex, but so were all other valve types. It's not a problem, unless
>> you have idiots who find it funny to unscrew it.
>
>What do they use now then? I pumped one up yesterday[1] and tbh I was
>just guessing the PSI at about 10 to overcome the valve, so max PSI 75,
>call it 85 on the gauge and hope.
Absolute tyre pressure isn't critical, and you can judge it well enough
simply by feeling the tyre - with moderate experience. That's what we
always used to do, and I have checked it (on Schraeder) against what
the gauge measures. When using a gauge, I tend to allow about 5 psi,
but 10 is close enough, even for lowish-pressure tyres. I wouldn't use
it on seriously high-volume tyres, as Schraeder is by far the best for
those.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.