With thanks in anticipation,
John Hodd
http://www.predecimal.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=253
Links to pictures of the coin on photobucket below
http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z219/oddball101uk/1911EDVIIob.jpg
http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z219/oddball101uk/1911EDVIIrev.jpg
"oddball101uk" <oddba...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:d7444fb3-259b-4820...@o15g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
Let me first make my disclaimer, that I haven't very often used
newsgroups and am not well up on their protocol, so please excuse me
if this posting comes out in the wrong place.
I think you could well be right Billy, being a souvenir or model/play
money although one would expect them normally be dated within the
reign of the monarch but it doesn't seem to be on a mass scale as
quite simply it's almost impossible to locate another one, so far
anyway.
No clues are given by way of an engraver/makers mark, the design being
clearly copies of Pistrucci and De Saulles work.
The "To Hanover/Cumberland Jack" series of so many different dates and
designs were really prolific because of the length of the reign, but
they were also making a political/regal statement about the Duke of
Cumberland.
I also like Stu's comment that could well be a form of evasion money
as to avoid prosecution and probable execution for counterfeiting, the
date and legend being sufficiently different from the correct legend
to avoid the noose, and passed over as half or full sov, the masses of
the population probably being illiterate at that time.
When I get the "coin" it will be interesting to see if it does come
pretty close to a half or full sovereign.
Anyway thanks for your comments fellas, quite interesting anyway I
think.
Cheers John
Who needs a 1794 dollar when this is much more interesting? :-)
My most interesting numismatic items are very often also the cheapest.
Billy
"Stu" <s...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:9l5jv5h7pdnk4tjfu...@4ax.com...