Tata would probably say that James May is the worst TV presenter they had
ever seen on Top Gear. Or, Top Gear is the worst TV programme they had ever
seen on the BBC. That's also saying something!
That's Jaguar and Land Rover screwed then !
Graham
Why?
They're a huge industrial conglomerate - the Tata car making business is
just a tiny part of what they do - this is the company that bought Corus
(formerly British Steel), Tetley Tea and are, as I recall, have one of
the biggest steel pressing plants in the world.
They can invest the money and make the business work, whilst the British
employess can do what they do best - designing class leading cars.
--
SteveH 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - Hongdou GY200 - Alfa 75 TSpark
Alfa 156 TSpark - B6 Passat 2.0TDI SE - COSOC KOTL
BOTAFOT #87 - BOTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #
The current shape Range Rover seems to be pretty well screwed together.
Other than a weakness with the front diffs, they seem pretty bloody good.
The current XJs are as well made as anything else you can buy.
--
Pete M - OMF#9
"Save your breath for cooling your porridge!
W&P Range Rover V8 Turbo
Scorpio Ultima 24v
Elder wrote:
> rabbitsfriend...@hotmail.com says...
>
> > That's Jaguar and Land Rover screwed then !
> >
> Or maybe better screwed together.
Ever been inside an Indian factory ? It makes BL look like perfection.
You would not believe the stuff they got up to. One of the things they
did was akin to hammering screws in.
Graham
Elder wrote:
> rabbitsfriend...@hotmail.com says...
>
> > That's Jaguar and Land Rover screwed then !
> >
> Or maybe better screwed together.
Ever been inside an Indian factory ? It makes BL look like perfection.
SteveH wrote:
> Eeyore wrote:
> > "Mike Cawood, HND BIT" wrote:
> >
> > > The Indian group set to unveil "the cheapest car in the world" next week
> > > is front runner to buy Ford's luxury marques. Remember this company
> > > brought you the CityRover aka Tata Indica - described by "Top Gear" as
> > > the "worst car they had ever driven" and as they had driven Ladas and
> > > Trabants, that's saying something.
> > > http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/engineer
> > > ing/article3126844.ece
> >
> > That's Jaguar and Land Rover screwed then !
>
> Why?
Let's say I've seen the corners the Indians are prepared to cut.
Graham
The City Rover might have been ok for some if sold at a suitable price.
But like all other Rover products of that time they seemed to think the
name worth a premium.
--
*I am a nobody, and nobody is perfect; therefore I am perfect*
Dave Plowman da...@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Same here. The poppadoms at my local take-away seem much smaller these
days and I'm sure they use far too much mono-sodium glutamate.
Let's think of some of the cars from the recent past designed in
Britain then...
Mk1 Ford Focus
L322 Range Rover
Mk1 BMW MINI
Jaguar XJ X350
Jaguar XK X150
That's just ones I can think of from the top of my head, and pretty
much all of them were/are class leading in their respective segments.
The quality of a modern car owes most to the design of the car, the design
of the tooling, the production line and its maintenance. Modern production
tries to do away with human intervention as this introduces variation.
With this in mind though, I can't see why there isn't more car production in
the UK - but then again it is better to have production close to the demand
to reduce distribution costs. India is a growing market.
Nissan was doing quite well in Washigton (T&W), then Renault took
over, hurting the employee relations and quality dropped. That's the
way I heard it. Is it true?