On Mon, 27 May 2013 15:05:30 +0000, Mike P wrote:
[...]
>> I based my much-criticised statement here on the belief that with an
>> older car that is still drivable, if the repair estimate exceeds more
>> than 50% of its trade-in value
>
> Yes, but seeing as the car is worth way more than double the cost of the
> repair, and your parts costing is incorrect, and your labour rates/times
> are incorrect going off what a decent Citroen Indy will charge, it's all
> nonsense isn't it?
My parts costings are not incorrect; look them up yourself. (GSF; I
always find them the best guide to parts that are in between rubbish and
OEM.)
Where in the country are you? In the SE, it's hard to find a decent Indy
or mobile who will work for less than £50/hr. Larger garages are £70/hr,
and main dealers £100.
>> Depending on the OP's exact model and engine, using non-OEM prices from
>> a reliable sources, a DMF is in the range of £360-£520, a clutch kit is
>> £107, and Autodata quote a repair time in the range of 6 to 7 hours.
>
> Clutch kit for a 2.0HDI, £67 inc vat. I'm not sure where you get your
> prices from.
Parts GSF; I'm sure cheaper ones are available, but no decent garage
would use them from the POv that they don't want to do the job twice.
>> If it was mine, I know what I would do...
>
> So, you'd bin off a car worth between 2 and 3 grand for a, lets say,
> £400 repair job?
Where did I say that? I said that if the repairs to an older car exceed
50% of the value, it's better to move it on.
If you take your lower valuation, and a more realistic cost of clutch
plus DMF replacement of £1,000, it would be a close call.
I still don't believe that *anyone* will replace the DMF and clutch on a
Picasso for £400. That would be the parts cost if you used the very
cheapest.
> You've more money than sense.
Maybe; I'm pretty sure that over the last half a century my motoring
costs have been significantly lower than my peers however.