Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

peugeot 307 fault

524 views
Skip to first unread message

tomm

unread,
Jul 27, 2008, 11:27:36 AM7/27/08
to
A friend has a petrol peugeot 307 about 3 year old.
The engine warning light has appeared on the dashboard display
along with a message reading "anti pollution fault "
They can drive the car ok and the performance seems normal but can anyone
tell me what can be causing the fault lights ?

Adrian

unread,
Jul 27, 2008, 11:32:38 AM7/27/08
to
"tomm" <seamons...@yahoo.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

> but can anyone tell me what can be causing the fault lights ?

The fault codes can. Anything else'd be a guess.

Paul P

unread,
Jul 27, 2008, 3:45:54 PM7/27/08
to

"tomm" <seamons...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:004b218e$0$22180$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...

Yes, it's the MAF sensor which is in the pipe going from the air filter
housing to the engine.
Never rely on fault codes from the computer as they can be misleading to
unqualified
mechanics who only know to look the code up in a book. Experience is what
counts and
identifying the cause of the error code. The exhaust emissions light can
come on if the mass
air flow meter is knackered because the engine can't tell how much air and
fuel to mix. It
ends up pushing more petrol or diesel in than required. The sensors in the
exhaust side sense
this and report a fault. As it gets worse the performance will die off or
acceleration will
be nowhere near as good. At some point it will go in to an emergency mode
and use up
quite a bit of petrol.
If it had something simple like a blackened air filter it would be obvious
and would
probably not clear such a fault. After 3 years the filter wouldn't be
clogged up that much
anyway although it could look a bit irty due to the dust it filters. The
surface area is massive.

If you are going to have a go at fixing the car then I would look at a few
hundred pounds.
That's what a new MAF sensor is for modern cars as you want a genuine one
and not some
nasty copy. The MAF only lasts about 3 or 4 years anyway - or at least they
have in my cars.


Duncan Wood

unread,
Jul 28, 2008, 6:21:14 AM7/28/08
to
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:45:54 +0100, Paul P <Pa...@mix.net.uk> wrote:

> "tomm" <seamons...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:004b218e$0$22180$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...
>> A friend has a petrol peugeot 307 about 3 year old.
>> The engine warning light has appeared on the dashboard display
>> along with a message reading "anti pollution fault "
>> They can drive the car ok and the performance seems normal but can
>> anyone
>> tell me what can be causing the fault lights ?
>
> Yes, it's the MAF sensor which is in the pipe going from the air filter
> housing to the engine.

Well it's the most likely culprit, but it could also be either o2 sensor,
either the sensor plugs, the cat, an air leak, an exhaust leak , a missing
fuel filler cap etc. Getting the codes read will be cheaper than a MAF

> Never rely on fault codes from the computer as they can be misleading to
> unqualified
> mechanics who only know to look the code up in a book. Experience is
> what
> counts and
> identifying the cause of the error code.

Which is why most of them will /guess/ it's the MAF sensor

Jimmy

unread,
Jul 28, 2008, 11:11:43 AM7/28/08
to
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:45:54 +0100, "Paul P" <Pa...@mix.net.uk> wrote:

>
>"tomm" <seamons...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:004b218e$0$22180$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...
>>A friend has a petrol peugeot 307 about 3 year old.
>> The engine warning light has appeared on the dashboard display
>> along with a message reading "anti pollution fault "
>> They can drive the car ok and the performance seems normal but can anyone
>> tell me what can be causing the fault lights ?
>
>Yes, it's the MAF sensor which is in the pipe going from the air filter
>housing to the engine.
>Never rely on fault codes from the computer as they can be misleading to
>unqualified


Hmmm I would sooner rely on fault codes than your "expert" opinion.

IIRC you stated that "The piston probably has a hole in it." in the
thread "Running on 3" when the OP in that thread stated the
compressions were 150, 150, 142, 140 psi
--
Jimmy

Doctor D

unread,
Jul 30, 2008, 12:12:30 PM7/30/08
to

"tomm" <seamons...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:004b218e$0$22180$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...

Sorry, no.

I had an 02 plate 307 SW 2.0 petrol from new which randomly showed this
message and had to be reset by the dealer/AA.

Twice it also went into limp home mode whilst showing the message - once on
a French motorway. Never got to the bottom of the cause despite much
interrogation and parts swapping by several Peugeot dealers and after 12
months and 32,000 miles of aggro persuaded the company to send it back to
Leaseplan.

Out of the five Peugeots we've owned this was the only one that gave any
major problems. I pity the poor sods who bought it after!

Jerry

unread,
Jul 30, 2008, 12:22:52 PM7/30/08
to

"Jimmy" <Ja...@invalidaddress.co.uk> wrote in message
news:24or845lejgq58v36...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:45:54 +0100, "Paul P" <Pa...@mix.net.uk>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"tomm" <seamons...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:004b218e$0$22180$c3e...@news.astraweb.com...
>>>A friend has a petrol peugeot 307 about 3 year old.
>>> The engine warning light has appeared on the dashboard display
>>> along with a message reading "anti pollution fault "
>>> They can drive the car ok and the performance seems normal but can
>>> anyone
>>> tell me what can be causing the fault lights ?
>>
>>Yes, it's the MAF sensor which is in the pipe going from the air
>>filter
>>housing to the engine.
>>Never rely on fault codes from the computer as they can be
>>misleading to
>>unqualified
>
>
> Hmmm I would sooner rely on fault codes than your "expert" opinion.

Especially as he hasn't even seen the car, never mind been told the
fault code...!

>
> IIRC you stated that "The piston probably has a hole in it." in the
> thread "Running on 3" when the OP in that thread stated the
> compressions were 150, 150, 142, 140 psi

LOL, or should that be COL? :~(


0 new messages