I don't know the A6, but if the flywheel is a dual mass one, they are prone
to failure, and the price quoted could well be realistic.
Perhaps you/he should 'phone a dealer for a flywheel price?
FWIW, I know several folk who have used the local Mr Clutch; none of them
would do so a second time...
Chris
--
Remove prejudice to reply.
My sister used Mr Clutch a few years ago: true to form they said the
flywheel needed a skim (maybe it did!) but she just told them to fit the
clutch anyway.
much the same as all quick fit places, they have to boost the job to earn
money, they have to estimate a low price to get you in. they don't get
repeat business or recommendations so they just take everything they can off
each person that walks in the door on their first and only visit. One of my
customers went to a mr clutch, then asked me to fix the oil leak and the
reversing lights!! I told her to take it back to them and I refused to work
on it when she next asked. I would have done the clutch cheaper than them
and done it properly first time.
Seems a bit churlish. Would you treat a new customer with a
similar experience with Mr Clutch in the same way?
Having said that I can still understand how you might feel.
Mike.
Had similar problems with them several years ago. They reckoned my
gearbox was damaged , all the bastards did was spray the gearbox green
and call it reconditioned .The only problem was a slipping clutch
unfortunatly my wife dealt with the problem initially as i was away
from home .
An inspection revealed that the gearbox had not been changed , the
clutch was the original unit , the adjustment mechanism had been
adjusted but all the nuts were loose
biggest bunch of wankers on this earth
--
A guy opened up locally car sales & garage about 6 months ago.
We bought a car from him and he did some work on our other car, he was
helpful, reasonable and seemed genuinely honest, I really liked the bloke.
He shut down last week damn it.
Half the mechanics about now haven't got a clue, the other half is split
between
main dealers ripping people off by only knowing how to use a fault reader
and
others working on a points or bonus system to ensure the customers is being
charged for work not required. Lie to make as much out of each person as
possible.
I know of one branch of Lookers that passed a car through an MOT with a
broken track rod end and wheel bearing. A full 12month certificate was
given and the advisory note "lost". Another allowed a car out with
defective
brakes after the rear drums were put together incorrectly. There was no
need to ever remove them. What about a bald tyre on a car that must have
either not been inspected or had the bald one put back after the MOT.
VOSA will not get involved and no one will take reports of this kind
seriously
unfortunately. Even Trading Standards will only prosecute smaller garages
and
not big dealership names. There is an arrangement in place obviously.
We should all name and shame garages that rip us off. Next time you go to a
main dealer, put a mark on your air filter and oil filter. You will be
amazed how
many charge for the parts and never change them. Vauxhall and Honda
dealers are also well known for deliberately overfilling the engine oil so
it goes
above maximum. This could be to generate repeat business. So check the oil
levels before you leave the garage. In both garages they have done this on
three cars I sent in over a 6month period.
I took one car back to a Vauxhall garage and 5.2litres of oil was drained
off
after the mechanic had written on their healthcheck form "oil very slightly
over
maximum".
Garages are ripping customers off each day, so beware and refuse to pay for
work that is NOT required and for parts NOT changed.
> I have NEVER found an honest mechanic either.
I know plenty.
> I know of one branch of Lookers that passed a car through an MOT with a
> broken track rod end
No, you don't. If the TRE was actually "broken", the car would be
literally undrivable.
> We should all name and shame garages that rip us off.
Strange how many people in the motor trade could probably name and shame
plenty of customers who are trying to get something for nothing.
Done by one of our Asian friends at a garage in Northampton. My bet is
it never saw the test station. Needless to say, VOSA were informed and
inspected the car at Beverley. I doubt the MOT tester will have his
licence much longer.
--
Conor
I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't
looking good either. - Scott Adams
That is terrible Conor! how in gods name did they pass that!
Why did you put it in for a MOT like that ? was you thinking whatever they
find they can fix and then pass it ?
[...]
>
> That is terrible Conor! how in gods name did they pass that!
Welcome to the world of the motor trade! I also know of vehicles that
are "paper legal", yet never went near the MOT bay.
(Sincere apologies to the likes of Mr Cheerful, reg, et al; if only there
were more like you.)
> Why did you put it in for a MOT like that ? was you thinking whatever they
> find they can fix and then pass it ?
Conor said it was his new Capri, so I'm guessing he bought it like that,
rather than submitted it himself.
What are you suggesting?!
More than likely as he doen't live anywhere near Northampton either. He
knows his Capris and wouldn't MOT a faulty car.
I have to say some bits of Holly's Mini should never have passed the MOT
- there is a fail sheet with it as well as the pass certificate, but at
least one of the items on there was never done - exhaust mounting
bracket - because there wasn't one and I had to fit it myself.
Apparently it needed welding to the sill - there was a badly done patch
on there (MOT legal but still badly done!) but I can also still see
daylight through one part of the sill!
--
asahartz woz ere
Copying and pasting your standard bullshit is really pathetic. I assume you
must keep a folder full of notepad files, each with a different bollocks
response to peoples questions?
--
Dan B
Clio R27
I suspect the indians are outnumbered by the cowboys...
> "Conor" <conor_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> What are you suggesting?!
Quite. I wonder if Conor would have felt it necessary to mention if the
tester had, say, an Irish sounding name?
Yeah, that's right. The previous keeper MOT'd it mid-June. I bought it
the beginning of August.
> More than likely as he doen't live anywhere near Northampton either. He
> knows his Capris and wouldn't MOT a faulty car.
>
Too chuffing right. I have one MOT station I use because I get a strict
MOT. My old Capper never failed a test. One of the things on the new
Capper is a fuelpump bracket next to the tank that's quite rotten. I
was horrified to find it's not even testable.
The holes in the sill are obvious and have been there a while - they're
not something that's just appeared - and one of them has been blatantly
bodged with silicone.
I've got a couple more jobs I want to do on it before I deem it
driveable to my satisfaction and if I were to sell it, I'd do them
before I sold it, even though they're not testable items.
> One of the things on the new Capper is a fuelpump bracket next to the
> tank that's quite rotten. I was horrified to find it's not even
> testable.
http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_720.htm
Method of inspection...
1. Check the following for leaks or insecurity:
c. all visible fuel system components.
Reasons for rejection...
b. a fuel system component insecure.
I'm still changing it though.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing but out of the last 5 garages I've used, 3
have been run by whitey and 2 by ethnic minorities. On satisfaction rating,
the Ethnics are currently ahead. They both did top jobs, as did the garage
in Missenden that Adrian used to use. The other two white run garages up
North were *shit*. Dangerously so, to the point of putting a brake pad in
the wrong way round. I still have the pad with the piston mark on the
friction surface. I'm so glad I foudn out about that on the M65 at night..
MIke P
> I'm not agreeing or disagreeing but out of the last 5 garages I've
> used, 3 have been run by whitey and 2 by ethnic minorities. On
> satisfaction rating, the Ethnics are currently ahead. They both did top
> jobs, as did the garage in Missenden that Adrian used to use.
I think you may be thinking of somewhere else - I don't think "balding
but still just about noticably ginger" counts as an ethnic minority...
>> > One of the things on the new Capper is a fuelpump bracket next to the
>> > tank that's quite rotten. I was horrified to find it's not even
>> > testable.
>> http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_720.htm
>>
>> Method of inspection...
>> 1. Check the following for leaks or insecurity: c. all visible fuel
>> system components.
>>
>> Reasons for rejection...
>> b. a fuel system component insecure.
> Sadly a rotten bracket doesn't make it insecure.
So what's the problem?
No, I'm not classing LB and his gang as Ethnics ;-), they were the
"non-ethnic" garage that did a *top* job on the XM. Possibly one of the best
garages I've ever used. I used an Indian and a Rasta in Wycombe, both very
good. I used two non-ethnics up North, they were both shite - despite one of
them being our "family" garage for years and still run by the same chap.
I don't think it makes any difference really, but then again, I won't
usually use a garage that's not been recommended to me by someone who knows
what they're on about. Both the chaps in Wycombe are friends of friends, the
supposedly good guy up North is the son of a long time family friend. Only
the guys who totally screwed the MOT on the ZX were not known to me before I
used them.
Mike P
Mike P
Good luck Conor, I hope the bastards get strung up. It's a total pisser when
something like this happens, especially on a rot-hiding Capri. My first 2.8i
needed a grands worth of welding 7 months after it had passed an MOT.
Mike P
Back in 88 or so we bought a Commer Camper with a 11 month ticket. Similar
situation to yours. It had some serious rot around the rear suspension
hangers and other various problems. The seller even came and threatened my
dad - "don't report it or else". Wrong thing to do with my dad..
Anyway, we did report it, the test station lost his licence pretty quickly
IIRC.
Mike P
>>> I'm not agreeing or disagreeing but out of the last 5 garages I've
>>> used, 3 have been run by whitey and 2 by ethnic minorities. On
>>> satisfaction rating, the Ethnics are currently ahead. They both did
>>> top jobs, as did the garage in Missenden that Adrian used to use.
>> I think you may be thinking of somewhere else - I don't think "balding
>> but still just about noticably ginger" counts as an ethnic minority...
> No, I'm not classing LB and his gang as Ethnics ;-), they were the
> "non-ethnic" garage that did a *top* job on the XM.
Ah, gotcha.
<re-reads>
My bad.
Moral of the story never trust an MOT when you buy a car .
--
The thing about Capris is they only tend to rust in certain places, any
MOT tester should know where they are as it's a simple car and the rust
tends to be bloody obvious on them. If it was MOT'd in June Conor
/might/ just get away with his complaint about the rust issues. Headlamp
earth isn't an issue if you tap the light and it comes on - that,
amazingly, is good enough for a pass (discussed this very thing with a
VOSA inspector last week). Indicator not working 3 months later doesn't
mean shit on a 20 year old car, neither does the leaky rear axle or the
rotten fuel pump bracket.
I suspect that tester will last a good while yet, unfortunately.
There used to be a tester near me whos name appeared on more MOT'd old
sheds than you'd believe, to the extent that you could go looking at
cars and spot the ones which were pretty much guaranteed to have one of
his MOTs on. He must have been MOTing most of the old shite on
Merseyside for about 10 years, and VOSA had 'random inspected' his
garage quite a few times but could never pin a bloody thing on him.
*Never* buy an older car with 9 months MOT...
--
Pete M - OMF#9
BMW 325i SE Touring
Range Rover V8 Turbo
Renault 30 TX Auto
"Wait! We can't stop here, this is Bat Country"
I do hope you don't mean me...
>>> I'm not agreeing or disagreeing but out of the last 5 garages I've
>>> used, 3 have been run by whitey and 2 by ethnic minorities. On
>>> satisfaction rating, the Ethnics are currently ahead. They both did
>>> top jobs, as did the garage in Missenden that Adrian used to use.
>> I think you may be thinking of somewhere else - I don't think "balding
>> but still just about noticably ginger" counts as an ethnic minority...
> I do hope you don't mean me...
No, you're a scouser, so definitely effnic.
> If it was MOT'd in June Conor
> /might/ just get away with his complaint about the rust issues. Headlamp
> earth isn't an issue if you tap the light and it comes on - that,
> amazingly, is good enough for a pass (discussed this very thing with a
> VOSA inspector last week).
There was no headlamp earth. It was just hanging in space. It's also
the earth for the passenger indicator too.
> Indicator not working 3 months later doesn't
> mean shit on a 20 year old car,
Was a broken stalk.
> neither does the leaky rear axle
It does when there was a repacement set in the boot.
>> >> > One of the things on the new Capper is a fuelpump bracket next to
>> >> > the tank that's quite rotten. I was horrified to find it's not
>> >> > even testable.
>> >> http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_720.htm
>> >>
>> >> Method of inspection...
>> >> 1. Check the following for leaks or insecurity: c. all visible fuel
>> >> system components.
>> >>
>> >> Reasons for rejection...
>> >> b. a fuel system component insecure.
>> > Sadly a rotten bracket doesn't make it insecure.
>> So what's the problem?
> I prefer not to have a fuelpump held in place solely by fuel lines.
If it's secure, what's the problem?
If it's insecure, it's a fail.
>> Indicator not working 3 months later doesn't mean shit on a 20 year old
>> car,
> Was a broken stalk.
When did it break?
>> neither does the leaky rear axle
> It does when there was a repacement set in the boot.
Purchased when?
> >> neither does the leaky rear axle
>
> > It does when there was a repacement set in the boot.
>
> Purchased when?
>
Long enough ago for the retaining ring to have surface rust.
>> >> Indicator not working 3 months later doesn't mean shit on a 20 year
>> >> old car,
>> > Was a broken stalk.
>> When did it break?
> Certainly before the MOT. It was the metal housing it's in. Had split
> down the back.
How do you know it was before the MOT?
>> >> neither does the leaky rear axle
>> > It does when there was a repacement set in the boot.
>> Purchased when?
> Long enough ago for the retaining ring to have surface rust.
<shrug> Doesn't mean anything. It may be new-old stock that's sat around
in poor storage conditions before being sold to the guy when the leak was
found just before sale. Is a leaky back axle even a fail point? I doubt
it.
Well there's certainly none of those around here (Blackburn).
> that there's a higher percentage of them which are dodgy.
I dunno about that but they still seem to be able to do a days work for less
than you could hire a brain surgeon, unlike their white counterparts.
Being a cynic, a quick Google reveals that in 2007, for failures when
servicing or repairing cars; Allen Ford Group were prosecuted by
Warwickshire TS, and Nationwide Autocentres by Bournemouth TS, and Charles
Hurst Group by Belfast TS...................
My local village mechanic is fantastic. Ł30 per hour, collection and
delivery service and repairs parts rather than replaces them. Never had a
problem with any job he's done.
The only issue comes when goes on holiday and shuts for a fortnight!
>In article <6jni9cF...@mid.individual.net>, Adrian says...
>> "R D S" <rsa...@yahoo.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
>> saying:
>>
>> > "Conor" <conor_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:6jmf02F...@mid.individual.net...
>> >> Done by one of our Asian friends
>>
>> > What are you suggesting?!
>>
>> Quite. I wonder if Conor would have felt it necessary to mention if the
>> tester had, say, an Irish sounding name?
>>
>My experience of MOT testers and garages run by ethnic minorities is
>that there's a higher percentage of them which are dodgy.
Blacks are far less dodgy than Pakis.
we arnt allowed to just pull things off we have to test the vehicle as
presented & yes its a fail. What they should have done was to give you the
opportunity to remove it when you dropped the vehicle off. Your not the
only one it happens to, i had 8 mot's today and over half of them had stuff
hanging from the mirror & sat nav holders stuck to the window.
How strange you are posting this.
If I had presented such a poorly maintained vehicle with such glaringly
obvious points of failure for an MOT *anywhere*, I'd be too embarrassed
to tell a soul...
Chris
--
Remove prejudice to reply.
Don't you have the car regularly serviced - either DIY or professionally?
If you did, then this would have been sorted before the MoT.
BTW, if the rear brakes are that bad, you would have known about it anyway.
>and an air freshner hanging over 40mm !!!!!!!! They
> could have saved one of those, why didnt they pull the air freshner
> off, it was broken anyway...
Why have such a poxy thing hanging in front of you? And if you knew it was
broken, why didn't you take remove you lazy sod?
>they quoted me �290.00 to put all
> repairs right, my friend said that was daylight robbery and to go and
> get a quote elsewhere.
Probably saw the state of your car and quoted for the worst case scenario -
or perhaps they thought that we don't really want to work on this pile of
shit so we'll quote high - and if he accepts it well...
>I did this and got the same repairs done for
> �74.84.
I wonder what the state of that job is? Especially if they had to change
the cylinders, fit new linings and bleed the system - plus adjust the
headlights for that price.
>!!!! They should not be called Mr Clutch, my mate calls them
> Mr I clutch all your money ..... they also should have a website
> called come to us and we will rip you off.com. As you can prob tell I
> would rather eat shit, they step one foot onto Mr rip you off again
> !!! (that was from my mate, ha ha ha ) she said she might get a
> wrench and stick it up Mr Clutch's bottom!!! then phone the police
> and tell them he is going out armed with an illegal weapon..... Note
> to Mr Clutch from Lenne and Sam , shuv your 300% dearer quote up from
> backside, but please remember to remove the wrench first!!!!
Perhaps if you managed to connect brain cell number 1 to brain cell number 2
with a couple of jumper leads (in series to get more power), you might just
realise that they probably did you a favour by failing your car, thus
forcing you to get the jobs done - possibly saving someone from serious
injury!
& given the other fails it wouldn't make any difference.
They stitched me years ago on the wifes 205 , cost 500 for clutch ,
gearbox and flywheel , the flywheel was never changed the gearbox was
the original and the clutch replacement needed to be redone
Clutch inernational that own them were a waste of time , eventually i
took the law into my own hands and gave the manager a beating he wont
forget
Its amazing they are still trading
You've obviously not changed a clutch on anything built in the last 10
years...
--
Conor
I'm not prejudiced. I hate everybody equally.