Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Crankshaft pulley for a BMC 1.5 diesel

129 views
Skip to first unread message

Fredxx

unread,
Oct 14, 2010, 12:30:44 PM10/14/10
to
I'm trying to source one of these which are a bit like hens' teeth.

Given this diesel engine is a variant of the B-series 1500 engine, are there
any "compatible" pulleys from the other Austin/BL/Morris range?


Andy Breen

unread,
Oct 14, 2010, 1:40:14 PM10/14/10
to

These engines are /amazingly/ common in marine use - usually under the
Thorneycroft or BMC label. Might be worth trying a marine engineer,
though be warned that any component in marine use will be more expensive
than the equivalent bit in any other use..

Fredxx

unread,
Oct 14, 2010, 2:50:53 PM10/14/10
to

"Andy Breen" <a...@aber.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:i97f9u$d5l$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

The engines are very common in the narrowboat scene but the pulleys don't
seem to be or command a high price. I was hoping to hear anyone's
experience of compatibility as I've heard conflicting stories.

Many thanks for your reply.


Dave Plowman (News)

unread,
Oct 15, 2010, 6:17:04 PM10/15/10
to
In article <i97jfk$iqi$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
Fredxx <fre...@spam.com> wrote:

Diesels like this have a much lower maximum RPM, so the gearing of
waterpump and generator may well be different from the petrol version -
but just how this might be implemented I don't know. I do remember having
a crank pulley on a B Series begin to fail - the rivets holding the pulley
to the boss came loose.

--
*Indian Driver - Smoke signals only*

Dave Plowman da...@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Rob

unread,
Oct 16, 2010, 1:36:11 AM10/16/10
to


They also have a harmonic balance. My MGB has one and the Austin 1800 etc

Geoff Mackenzie

unread,
Oct 16, 2010, 6:29:53 AM10/16/10
to

"Rob" <mesa...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cb939d1$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

Any chance the OP could give us the measurements of the pulley? A photo
might be helpful. My thinking is that this must have been a pretty standard
item, or made up from standard bits - I'd be very surprised if this was a
"custom made" part for this one particular application. Also, what happened
to the original one? Was it missing from your engine, or as Dave hinted,
perhaps the rivets have come loose - in which case it is repairable. Let's
have the back story!

Regards,

GMacK

Fredxx

unread,
Oct 17, 2010, 3:21:34 PM10/17/10
to

"Geoff Mackenzie" <gm...@chapterfive.org.uk> wrote in message
news:8htd5...@mid.individual.net...

The crankshaft pulley on the BMC 1.5D appears a solid affair with a heavy
mass of metal in front of the v-pulley. It doesn't appear to incorporate a
rubber damper I've seen on some A-series engines. I've never worked on
B-series before and so have no idea what variants are available. There are
no rivets.

The reason I need one is because I don't want to disrupt the current use of
the engine whilst I try and fit a second alternator to the engine.


Fredxx

unread,
Oct 17, 2010, 7:45:43 PM10/17/10
to

"Fredxx" <fre...@spam.com> wrote in message
news:i9fiek$gfe$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Just had a look at a photo I have and I believe it does have a damper which
accounts for the "heavy mass"!!

Rob

unread,
Oct 17, 2010, 11:11:28 PM10/17/10
to

The rubber in the damper is not readily visible on those tts only thin.

http://www.mossmotors.com/Shop/ViewProducts.aspx?PlateIndexID=96603

r

Dave Plowman (News)

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 5:14:28 AM10/18/10
to
In article <4cbb...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,

Rob <mesa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just had a look at a photo I have and I believe it does have a damper
> > which accounts for the "heavy mass"!!
> >
> >> The reason I need one is because I don't want to disrupt the current
> >> use of the engine whilst I try and fit a second alternator to the
> >> engine.
> >>
> >
> >

> The rubber in the damper is not readily visible on those tts only thin.

> http://www.mossmotors.com/Shop/ViewProducts.aspx?PlateIndexID=96603

See why Fred wants an alternative...

--
*Black holes are where God divided by zero *

Rob

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 5:49:36 AM10/18/10
to
On 18/10/2010 8:14 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
> In article<4cbb...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,
> Rob<mesa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Just had a look at a photo I have and I believe it does have a damper
>>> which accounts for the "heavy mass"!!
>>>
>>>> The reason I need one is because I don't want to disrupt the current
>>>> use of the engine whilst I try and fit a second alternator to the
>>>> engine.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>> The rubber in the damper is not readily visible on those tts only thin.
>
>> http://www.mossmotors.com/Shop/ViewProducts.aspx?PlateIndexID=96603
>
> See why Fred wants an alternative...
>

Did you say this because of the price of a new unit from Moss?

The one on my B is still original and that's 1962.

r

Dave Plowman (News)

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 5:57:20 AM10/18/10
to
In article <4cbc182e$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,

Yes.

> The one on my B is still original and that's 1962.

They're not really a service item which can push the price of new parts
up.

> r

--
*He is a self-made man and worships his creator

Rob

unread,
Oct 18, 2010, 7:53:45 PM10/18/10
to
On 18/10/2010 8:57 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
> In article<4cbc182e$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,

> Rob<mesa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 18/10/2010 8:14 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
>>> In article<4cbb...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,
>>> Rob<mesa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Just had a look at a photo I have and I believe it does have a damper
>>>>> which accounts for the "heavy mass"!!
>>>>>
>>>>>> The reason I need one is because I don't want to disrupt the current
>>>>>> use of the engine whilst I try and fit a second alternator to the
>>>>>> engine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>> The rubber in the damper is not readily visible on those tts only thin.
>>>
>>>> http://www.mossmotors.com/Shop/ViewProducts.aspx?PlateIndexID=96603
>>>
>>> See why Fred wants an alternative...
>>>
>
>> Did you say this because of the price of a new unit from Moss?
>
> Yes.
>
>> The one on my B is still original and that's 1962.
>
> They're not really a service item which can push the price of new parts
> up.
>
>> r
>

I would say that if I needed one, could have a good second hand item
within 1/2hr for 5 bucks. Those in the Moss catalogue at that price are
exorbitant. My guess is they are a lot cheaper here, over the counter
from the manufacturer in Melbourne or even a MG parts specialist. Moss
are a bit over the top.

Dave Plowman (News)

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 5:15:39 AM10/19/10
to
In article <4cbcde0b$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,

Rob <mesa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > They're not really a service item which can push the price of new parts
> > up.
> >
> >> r
> >

> I would say that if I needed one, could have a good second hand item
> within 1/2hr for 5 bucks. Those in the Moss catalogue at that price are
> exorbitant. My guess is they are a lot cheaper here, over the counter
> from the manufacturer in Melbourne or even a MG parts specialist. Moss
> are a bit over the top.

It's likely the Moss item is re-manufactured?

New damper pulleys for my SD1 cost quite a bit too - but are cheap
secondhand.

Later B Series engines certainly had them - but then that engine was a
substantial development of the earlier one with larger crank bearings,
etc. Dunno if the crank pulleys are interchangeable.

But I also dunno anything about the diesel. Given the original B Series
would break cranks quite readily, it could be it has a stronger one.

--
*Happiness is seeing your mother-in-law on a milk carton

Rob

unread,
Oct 19, 2010, 8:33:09 PM10/19/10
to
On 19/10/2010 8:15 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
> In article<4cbcde0b$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,
> Rob<mesa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> They're not really a service item which can push the price of new parts
>>> up.
>>>
>>>> r
>>>
>
>> I would say that if I needed one, could have a good second hand item
>> within 1/2hr for 5 bucks. Those in the Moss catalogue at that price are
>> exorbitant. My guess is they are a lot cheaper here, over the counter
>> from the manufacturer in Melbourne or even a MG parts specialist. Moss
>> are a bit over the top.
>
> It's likely the Moss item is re-manufactured?
>
> New damper pulleys for my SD1 cost quite a bit too - but are cheap
> secondhand.
>
> Later B Series engines certainly had them - but then that engine was a
> substantial development of the earlier one with larger crank bearings,
> etc. Dunno if the crank pulleys are interchangeable.
>
> But I also dunno anything about the diesel. Given the original B Series
> would break cranks quite readily, it could be it has a stronger one.
>


My B is a 1962 which was #650 off the production line and that has a
balance.

Parts listing for the MGB tells me they had three pulleys, early, then
thru to 74, then 18V 75 on. The picture is showing a balance.

I didn't know that there was a diesel either.

Dave Plowman (News)

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 5:58:57 AM10/20/10
to
In article <4cbe...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,

Rob <mesa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Later B Series engines certainly had them - but then that engine was a
> > substantial development of the earlier one with larger crank bearings,
> > etc. Dunno if the crank pulleys are interchangeable.
> >
> > But I also dunno anything about the diesel. Given the original B Series
> > would break cranks quite readily, it could be it has a stronger one.
> >


> My B is a 1962 which was #650 off the production line and that has a
> balance.

The 'B' is of course pretty well the last variant of the B Series. (I know
it changed from 3 to 5 main bearings) And being the biggest is more likely
to need a vibration damper.

> Parts listing for the MGB tells me they had three pulleys, early, then
> thru to 74, then 18V 75 on. The picture is showing a balance.

I wonder if there were more pulleys for things like air con? The power
steering pump on the 1800 was driven off the dynamo. Dunno if the Marina
offered such things. Or if one was ever stuck on the back of an
alternator.

> I didn't know that there was a diesel either.

I knew it existed, but that's about all. Think it was based on one of the
1600cc versions?

--
*I must always remember that I'm unique, just like everyone else. *

Roberts

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 6:46:42 AM10/20/10
to

"Dave Plowman (News)" <da...@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5168939...@davenoise.co.uk...

> In article <4cbcde0b$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,
> Rob <mesa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > They're not really a service item which can push the price of new parts
>> > up.
>> >Snipped

In the earlier days it was a 1.5 diesel and later on it was based on the
1622 block presumably they ran out of 1500 blocks.
Early A60s and Morris Oxfords had diesel engines mainly taxi drivers wanted
them.
If looking for spares remember these engines were fitted to the vans as well
like the J2,J4 and the Sherpa. The Post Office had loads of them. We always
used to wind up the snobby MGB types by referring to the MGB as a two seater
Sherpa!.
Robbie
>> >>
>> >
>
>>


Fredxx

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 9:13:02 AM10/20/10
to

"Dave Plowman (News)" <da...@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:51691b6...@davenoise.co.uk...

> In article <4cbe...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,
> Rob <mesa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Later B Series engines certainly had them - but then that engine was a
>> > substantial development of the earlier one with larger crank bearings,
>> > etc. Dunno if the crank pulleys are interchangeable.
>> >
>> > But I also dunno anything about the diesel. Given the original B Series
>> > would break cranks quite readily, it could be it has a stronger one.
>> >
>
>
>> My B is a 1962 which was #650 off the production line and that has a
>> balance.
>
> The 'B' is of course pretty well the last variant of the B Series. (I know
> it changed from 3 to 5 main bearings) And being the biggest is more likely
> to need a vibration damper.

Only the 1800 version changed to 5 main bearings. The 1500 stayed with just
3!

>
>> Parts listing for the MGB tells me they had three pulleys, early, then
>> thru to 74, then 18V 75 on. The picture is showing a balance.
>
> I wonder if there were more pulleys for things like air con? The power
> steering pump on the 1800 was driven off the dynamo. Dunno if the Marina
> offered such things. Or if one was ever stuck on the back of an
> alternator.
>
>> I didn't know that there was a diesel either.
>
> I knew it existed, but that's about all. Think it was based on one of the
> 1600cc versions?

I thought the 1600 was a different engine again? The sizes of diesel engine
I'm aware of in common use are the 1.5 and 1.8.


Fredxx

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 9:09:41 AM10/20/10
to

"Rob" <mesa...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cbe...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

> On 19/10/2010 8:15 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
>> In article<4cbcde0b$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,
>> Rob<mesa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> They're not really a service item which can push the price of new parts
>>>> up.
>>> I would say that if I needed one, could have a good second hand item
>>> within 1/2hr for 5 bucks. Those in the Moss catalogue at that price are
>>> exorbitant. My guess is they are a lot cheaper here, over the counter
>>> from the manufacturer in Melbourne or even a MG parts specialist. Moss
>>> are a bit over the top.
>>
>> It's likely the Moss item is re-manufactured?
>>
>> New damper pulleys for my SD1 cost quite a bit too - but are cheap
>> secondhand.
>>
>> Later B Series engines certainly had them - but then that engine was a
>> substantial development of the earlier one with larger crank bearings,
>> etc. Dunno if the crank pulleys are interchangeable.
>>
>> But I also dunno anything about the diesel. Given the original B Series
>> would break cranks quite readily, it could be it has a stronger one.
>>
> My B is a 1962 which was #650 off the production line and that has a
> balance.
>
> Parts listing for the MGB tells me they had three pulleys, early, then
> thru to 74, then 18V 75 on. The picture is showing a balance.
>
> I didn't know that there was a diesel either.

There are probably as many working BMC B-series diesels in use as petrol
variants. Except they tend to be confined to the narrowboats and other
marine applications. They are regarded as a pretty good workhorse where
parts are more available than other engines such as Perkins.


Roger Chapman

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 9:56:00 AM10/20/10
to
On 20/10/2010 14:13, Fredxx wrote:

>> The 'B' is of course pretty well the last variant of the B Series. (I know
>> > it changed from 3 to 5 main bearings) And being the biggest is more likely
>> > to need a vibration damper.

> Only the 1800 version changed to 5 main bearings. The 1500 stayed with just
> 3!
>

What about the 1600 variants that went into the later MGAs?

Fredxx

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 11:53:11 AM10/20/10
to

"Roger Chapman" <ro...@nospam.zetnet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:tPadncMUd4l7aSPR...@bt.com...

Wiki to the rescue http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMC_B-Series_engine

I recall reading somewhere that one fundamental limit of the engine was the
stroke of 89mm which was set by the position of the camshaft.


Dave Plowman (News)

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 1:09:49 PM10/20/10
to
In article <tPadncMUd4l7aSPR...@bt.com>,

Both 3 bearing. There were three different 1600s fitted to the MGA if you
include the twin cam. IIRC, the 5 bearing was developed mainly for the
'Land Crab' 1800 saloons.

--
*Why isn't there a special name for the back of your knee?

Dave Plowman (News)

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 1:07:18 PM10/20/10
to
In article <i9mpuc$384$2...@news.eternal-september.org>,

Fredxx <fre...@spam.com> wrote:
> > The 'B' is of course pretty well the last variant of the B Series. (I
> > know it changed from 3 to 5 main bearings) And being the biggest is
> > more likely to need a vibration damper.

> Only the 1800 version changed to 5 main bearings. The 1500 stayed with
> just 3!

That's because it was *replaced* by the larger variants. It was overbored
to 1588 then a major redesign to 1622 with a larger crank. The 1798 a
development of that - before getting 5 main bearings. Although two sizes
may have been available at the same time, the 1500 was dead and buried
long before the 5 bearing came out.

> >
> >> Parts listing for the MGB tells me they had three pulleys, early,
> >> then thru to 74, then 18V 75 on. The picture is showing a balance.
> >
> > I wonder if there were more pulleys for things like air con? The power
> > steering pump on the 1800 was driven off the dynamo. Dunno if the
> > Marina offered such things. Or if one was ever stuck on the back of an
> > alternator.
> >
> >> I didn't know that there was a diesel either.
> >
> > I knew it existed, but that's about all. Think it was based on one of
> > the 1600cc versions?

> I thought the 1600 was a different engine again? The sizes of diesel
> engine I'm aware of in common use are the 1.5 and 1.8.

Basically a B Series.

--
*You are stuck with your debt if you can't budge it*

Geoff Mackenzie

unread,
Oct 20, 2010, 3:36:44 PM10/20/10
to

"Dave Plowman (News)" <da...@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:51691b6...@davenoise.co.uk...

> In article <4cbe...@dnews.tpgi.com.au>,
> Rob <mesa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Later B Series engines certainly had them - but then that engine was a
>> > substantial development of the earlier one with larger crank bearings,
>> > etc. Dunno if the crank pulleys are interchangeable.
>> >
>> > But I also dunno anything about the diesel. Given the original B Series
>> > would break cranks quite readily, it could be it has a stronger one.
>> >
>
>
>> My B is a 1962 which was #650 off the production line and that has a
>> balance.
>
> The 'B' is of course pretty well the last variant of the B Series. (I know
> it changed from 3 to 5 main bearings) And being the biggest is more likely
> to need a vibration damper.
>
>> Parts listing for the MGB tells me they had three pulleys, early, then
>> thru to 74, then 18V 75 on. The picture is showing a balance.
>
> I wonder if there were more pulleys for things like air con? The power
> steering pump on the 1800 was driven off the dynamo. Dunno if the Marina
> offered such things. Or if one was ever stuck on the back of an
> alternator.
>
>> I didn't know that there was a diesel either.
>
> I knew it existed, but that's about all. Think it was based on one of the
> 1600cc versions?

I recall that Car magazine tested a Morris Oxford (Farina) diesel. The
picture was of a Farina, covered in cobwebs and apparently in a scrapyard.
Part of the text was "I started it up, and omigawd the bigends have gone".
The good days when the irreverent Aussie Doug Blaine was editor.

GMacK

0 new messages