Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Sparrowhawk kill

0 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

MC

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 9:02:34 AM11/22/09
to
Ishvara wrote:

> I heard a screech from the garden this morning, and looked out to see
> a large bird descending from one of the trees. It was a sparrowhawk,
> clutching a starling which it pinned to the ground for two or three
> minutes until the starling stopped twitching, before flying off with
> its bounty.
>
> I don't get many starlings here nowadays, but that's because of a
> loss of local habitats and roosting sites. :-(

...and bloody cats.

MC

justbeats

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 5:58:04 PM11/23/09
to

Woohoo! Go sparrowhawk! Starlings are pests!

Alf King

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 6:16:37 AM11/24/09
to


So are trolls.

Alf King

David WE Roberts

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 9:13:03 AM11/25/09
to

"Ishvara" <ish...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:heb8jc$p9p$1...@aioe.org...

>I heard a screech from the garden this morning, and looked out to see a
>large bird descending from one of the trees. It was a sparrowhawk,
>clutching a starling which it pinned to the ground for two or three minutes
>until the starling stopped twitching, before flying off with its bounty.
>
> I don't get many starlings here nowadays, but that's because of a loss of
> local habitats and roosting sites. :-(

My sympathy is completely with the sparrowhawk.
Round here we have a surplus of starlings at the moment, and it is always
tougher to be at the top of the food chain.

Gordon H

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 12:04:53 PM11/25/09
to
In message <7n4sbbF...@mid.individual.net>, David WE Roberts
<nos...@talk21.com> writes

As was demonstrated in this week's "Life" programme with D.
Attenborough.
It ain't all critters eating critters, but the three cheetahs went
corporate and made a big killing. ;-)
--
Gordon H
Remove "invalid" to reply

Christina Websell

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 3:36:15 PM11/25/09
to

"David WE Roberts" <nos...@talk21.com> wrote in message
news:7n4sbbF...@mid.individual.net...

Why?
It would seem to me to be easier to be top of the food chain - you can eat
anything below you, but if you're at the bottom of it, everything is looking
to eat *you*..

Tina
>


0 new messages