Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Rogers Cadet II
475 views
Skip to first unread message
Phil Allison
Nov 17, 2016, 8:41:40 PM11/17/16
to
** Hi all,
speaking of UK Vintage Hi-Fi, a Rogers Cadet II system turned up for repair this week. Three units in a cardboard box - main amp, control unit and phono pre-amp. See pic of similar system:
http://lab.sekaimon.com/img/fetch/i/321656407324
There was a little rust on the tops of the units suggesting storage in a garage for some time, the white plastic buttons on the push switches had disintegrated and the front of the control unit was discoloured. OTOH, the large can electros had been replaced and all the valves were Mullard made in UK. I doubt if they were the originals.
Both power amps were dead or good as. A check with a multimeter showed that many composition resistors had gone high value or were open. Once they were replaced, good operation was restored. The control unit needed similar attention while the RIAA pre-amp was OK.
I guess the ECL86s are a bit worn as the most power I could get was 6.5 watts into 15 ohms. At 4 watts, THD was around 0.2%.
Internal wiring is very neat with no PCB or tag board used, components are strung between pillars fitted to the chassis and travelling through in case of the two pre-amps. Not the fastest way to build something, but it sure makes repair easy.
Is the Cadet II "a poor man's Leak" or is that too harsh ?? Making the phono pre-amp an option surprises me, limiting use to Ceramic PUs and radio tuners for most buyers.
The ECL86 valves are no longer made and only NOS and used examples are on offer - at rather high prices. Might be smart to rewire the main amp to use EL84s and add a pair of ECC83s on the chassis. Replace the selenium rectifier with a silicon bridge and you could get 10 watts per channel.
.... Phil
Brian Gaff
Nov 18, 2016, 3:23:33 AM11/18/16
to
This is very odd. I have a Cadet II here its all in one unit and the riaa
stage is controlled by anoctal plug in device in one side of the chassis.
IE Ceramic or Magnetic.
Most of the issues mine has are around hum, some crackling on some of the
valveholders the preamp seems worse, and some cosmetic issues and it needs a
new switched volume control. Did they then make these uniits as seperates as
well as integrated. i bought this new in the mid 1960s and its present use
is on a pc as an amp.
My valves are Mullard and have never been changed either. It does keep the
room nice and warm so I doubt if its that efficient. the light on the front
panel needs a clout from time to time to make it come on. The front mounted
Didn socket for tape is a bit mangled now, but its rivetted on and needs to
be drilled to get it off.
The way the amp is split at the tape socket is a bit odd also the mono
button on radio seems to just use one of the aux in sockets not the other
one.
These sockets need a bit of tlc.
The rear mounted mains sockets wer in a previous thread on here.
Still after all this time it was obviously built to last. The two filters
on the front panel seem a bit pointless.
It was used for many years to drive a pair of Denton speakers which are
still in use in a front room and still sound quite reasonable.
Big play was made in the amp of it having ferrite cored speaker tansformers
and several impedence terminals for different speakers.
Last time the power was checked the output was similar to yours, though it
claimed it was 12.5 watts per channel. Intrigingly it seems to be able to
run very loud and sound nice, so I suspect other amps watts are poorer
quality ones than these are grin.
I alway remember an amp made by a couple of Sinclair z12s which on the
surface sounded pretty good but there was a weird overhang caused by the
crossover effect of germanium transistors changing with local heating one
supposes. On tests of course it looked good, but as we all know ears are
not test instruments.
Brian
--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Phil Allison" <palli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d8579a4a-b558-4269...@googlegroups.com...
stage is controlled by anoctal plug in device in one side of the chassis.
IE Ceramic or Magnetic.
Most of the issues mine has are around hum, some crackling on some of the
valveholders the preamp seems worse, and some cosmetic issues and it needs a
new switched volume control. Did they then make these uniits as seperates as
well as integrated. i bought this new in the mid 1960s and its present use
is on a pc as an amp.
My valves are Mullard and have never been changed either. It does keep the
room nice and warm so I doubt if its that efficient. the light on the front
panel needs a clout from time to time to make it come on. The front mounted
Didn socket for tape is a bit mangled now, but its rivetted on and needs to
be drilled to get it off.
The way the amp is split at the tape socket is a bit odd also the mono
button on radio seems to just use one of the aux in sockets not the other
one.
These sockets need a bit of tlc.
The rear mounted mains sockets wer in a previous thread on here.
Still after all this time it was obviously built to last. The two filters
on the front panel seem a bit pointless.
It was used for many years to drive a pair of Denton speakers which are
still in use in a front room and still sound quite reasonable.
Big play was made in the amp of it having ferrite cored speaker tansformers
and several impedence terminals for different speakers.
Last time the power was checked the output was similar to yours, though it
claimed it was 12.5 watts per channel. Intrigingly it seems to be able to
run very loud and sound nice, so I suspect other amps watts are poorer
quality ones than these are grin.
I alway remember an amp made by a couple of Sinclair z12s which on the
surface sounded pretty good but there was a weird overhang caused by the
crossover effect of germanium transistors changing with local heating one
supposes. On tests of course it looked good, but as we all know ears are
not test instruments.
Brian
--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Phil Allison" <palli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d8579a4a-b558-4269...@googlegroups.com...
Phil Allison
Nov 18, 2016, 8:05:28 AM11/18/16
to
Brian Gaff wrote:
>
>
> This is very odd. I have a Cadet II here its all in one unit and the riaa
> stage is controlled by anoctal plug in device in one side of the chassis.
> IE Ceramic or Magnetic.
>
** What you have is a Cadet III, made primarily as an integrated amp but also made as a separate amp and control unit.
>
>
> This is very odd. I have a Cadet II here its all in one unit and the riaa
> stage is controlled by anoctal plug in device in one side of the chassis.
> IE Ceramic or Magnetic.
>
>
> Big play was made in the amp of it having ferrite cored speaker tansformers
> and several impedence terminals for different speakers.
>
As Eliza Doolittle once cried - " not bloody likely".
.... Phil
Brian Gaff
Nov 19, 2016, 5:40:05 AM11/19/16
to
Well It has II on the front of it, and indeed has ferrite cored
transformers and does sound nice so who knows the weirdness of uk
manufacturers of the period and their branding.
Since I've had it from when I could see, I should know what its called. I
have somewhere a service manual for it, but have no idea just where these
days!
In its early days it needed a new balance pot, but now the mains switched
volume is held together with glue and duct tape but still works very well.
It does put into perspective the planned self destruction of modern
equipment though. A Marantz amp from the mid 80s that sounded good now has
a fault where the mode switching is very confused and the tone controls seem
to work weirdly. I had a Pioneer receiver that ate dial lights and went
intermittent in its fm tuner and the dial string broke. My current Denon
from the 90s is doing better but I'e had to take the speaker relay cover
off so I can occasionally clean it when the channels start to disappear due
to dodgy contact aging.
I did have a very nice rather oddly named (Memorex) receiver built to the
din standard ie no phonos that was very good until one day it put 30 volts
dc through a loudspeaker and melted it.
So much for fault protection.
As for CD players, well...
The only one still without issues was made by Philips in 1983, but nowadays
is so slow at moving to tracks its painful. I fancy making the optical
stuff less massy and faster has just made them wear out faster.
My Marantz will only play cds when it feels like it and I'm now using a
cheapo Panasonic dvd player instead and it actually sounds better
That is progress.
transformers and does sound nice so who knows the weirdness of uk
manufacturers of the period and their branding.
Since I've had it from when I could see, I should know what its called. I
have somewhere a service manual for it, but have no idea just where these
days!
In its early days it needed a new balance pot, but now the mains switched
volume is held together with glue and duct tape but still works very well.
It does put into perspective the planned self destruction of modern
equipment though. A Marantz amp from the mid 80s that sounded good now has
a fault where the mode switching is very confused and the tone controls seem
to work weirdly. I had a Pioneer receiver that ate dial lights and went
intermittent in its fm tuner and the dial string broke. My current Denon
from the 90s is doing better but I'e had to take the speaker relay cover
off so I can occasionally clean it when the channels start to disappear due
to dodgy contact aging.
I did have a very nice rather oddly named (Memorex) receiver built to the
din standard ie no phonos that was very good until one day it put 30 volts
dc through a loudspeaker and melted it.
So much for fault protection.
As for CD players, well...
The only one still without issues was made by Philips in 1983, but nowadays
is so slow at moving to tracks its painful. I fancy making the optical
stuff less massy and faster has just made them wear out faster.
My Marantz will only play cds when it feels like it and I'm now using a
cheapo Panasonic dvd player instead and it actually sounds better
That is progress.
Brian
--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Phil Allison" <palli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:70f0e311-cadb-4d1d...@googlegroups.com...
--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Phil Allison" <palli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Eiron
Nov 19, 2016, 10:08:59 AM11/19/16
to
On 19/11/2016 10:39, Brian Gaff wrote:
> I did have a very nice rather oddly named (Memorex) receiver built to the
> din standard ie no phonos that was very good until one day it put 30 volts
> dc through a loudspeaker and melted it.
> So much for fault protection.
Real DIN or just 5-pin sockets?
> I did have a very nice rather oddly named (Memorex) receiver built to the
> din standard ie no phonos that was very good until one day it put 30 volts
> dc through a loudspeaker and melted it.
> So much for fault protection.
Doesn't the relevant standard specify high impedance outputs, current drive and low impedance inputs?
--
Eiron.
Eiron
Nov 19, 2016, 10:38:38 AM11/19/16
to
To hijack the thread, I wonder if there was a connection between Rogers in Catford who made amps
and Rogers in Mitcham, ten miles away, who made speakers.
And CJ Rogers who designed speakers, for that matter. I'd better start googling it.
(Jim Rogers of JR149 fame founded the Mitcham business.)
--
Eiron.
and Rogers in Mitcham, ten miles away, who made speakers.
And CJ Rogers who designed speakers, for that matter. I'd better start googling it.
(Jim Rogers of JR149 fame founded the Mitcham business.)
--
Eiron.
Brian Gaff
Nov 19, 2016, 1:01:14 PM11/19/16
to
It does on everything apart from pick up inputs of course. I think at least
one was proper din as it did not like long cable runs, reducing treble, but
I don't think I ever actually checked it in that way. Certainly it needed
less to drive its inputs at line level.
I don't know who actually made it in fact.
Obviously like many things the actual name was used for all sorts of things
but mostly for tapes and discs of course.
It was a shame about it dying but there you go, so much for progress.
news:e9b88a...@mid.individual.net...
one was proper din as it did not like long cable runs, reducing treble, but
I don't think I ever actually checked it in that way. Certainly it needed
less to drive its inputs at line level.
I don't know who actually made it in fact.
Obviously like many things the actual name was used for all sorts of things
but mostly for tapes and discs of course.
It was a shame about it dying but there you go, so much for progress.
Brian
--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Eiron" <Evelyn....@live.com> wrote in message
--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
news:e9b88a...@mid.individual.net...
David Kennedy
Nov 19, 2016, 2:40:50 PM11/19/16
to
when you top post no one - without scrolling down to read the post and then
back up again to read the answer - has any idea what you're talking about...
On 19/11/2016 18:01, Brian Gaff wrote:
> It does on everything apart from pick up inputs of course. I think at least
> one was proper din as it did not like long cable runs, reducing treble, but
> I don't think I ever actually checked it in that way. Certainly it needed
> less to drive its inputs at line level.
> I don't know who actually made it in fact.
> Obviously like many things the actual name was used for all sorts of things
> but mostly for tapes and discs of course.
> It was a shame about it dying but there you go, so much for progress.
> Brian
>
--
David Kennedy
http://www.anindianinexile.com
back up again to read the answer - has any idea what you're talking about...
On 19/11/2016 18:01, Brian Gaff wrote:
> It does on everything apart from pick up inputs of course. I think at least
> one was proper din as it did not like long cable runs, reducing treble, but
> I don't think I ever actually checked it in that way. Certainly it needed
> less to drive its inputs at line level.
> I don't know who actually made it in fact.
> Obviously like many things the actual name was used for all sorts of things
> but mostly for tapes and discs of course.
> It was a shame about it dying but there you go, so much for progress.
> Brian
>
--
http://www.anindianinexile.com
Woody
Nov 19, 2016, 4:41:30 PM11/19/16
to
"David Kennedy" <davidk...@nospamherethankyou.invalid> wrote in
message news:9NidnVWQcctcN63F...@brightview.co.uk...
programme. Top posting is a major help from us to him, and it is
easier for him to find the top to post his replies.
He is a valued contributor and those of us who are regular members
will do what we can to help him.
--
Woody
harrogate3 at ntlworld dot com
David Kennedy
Nov 19, 2016, 5:02:00 PM11/19/16
to
manner but prefers not to. [At least that was my recollection, if I'm wrong
then I apologise]
Brian-Gaff
Nov 20, 2016, 7:13:45 AM11/20/16
to
Dunno but I don't think there was any connection to Roy rogers.
Brian
--
From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active
Remember, if you don't like where I post
or what I say, you don't have to
read my posts! :-)
Brian
--
From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active
Remember, if you don't like where I post
or what I say, you don't have to
read my posts! :-)
"Eiron" <Evelyn....@live.com> wrote in message
news:e9b9vs...@mid.individual.net...
Graeme Wall
Nov 20, 2016, 9:53:39 AM11/20/16
to
On 20/11/2016 12:13, Brian-Gaff wrote:
> Dunno but I don't think there was any connection to Roy rogers.
> Brian
>
What Triggered that?
> Dunno but I don't think there was any connection to Roy rogers.
> Brian
>
--
Graeme Wall
This account not read.
Jim Lesurf
Nov 20, 2016, 12:05:12 PM11/20/16
to
In article <e9b9vs...@mid.individual.net>, Eiron
IIRC it was the same Rogers who sold amps, etc, from Catford who then
started up Jim Rogers and made the JR149. His old company was bought up via
'Swisstone'. Think this was in 1977 but I'm relying on my unreliable
memory. Had to use a different name as his first company 'owned' that name
for the purposes of making and selling.
Jim
--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/intro/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html
started up Jim Rogers and made the JR149. His old company was bought up via
'Swisstone'. Think this was in 1977 but I'm relying on my unreliable
memory. Had to use a different name as his first company 'owned' that name
for the purposes of making and selling.
Jim
--
Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me.
Electronics http://www.st-and.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/intro/electron.htm
Armstrong Audio http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/Armstrong/armstrong.html
Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html
Eiron
Nov 20, 2016, 12:17:20 PM11/20/16
to
On 20/11/2016 14:53, Graeme Wall wrote:
> On 20/11/2016 12:13, Brian-Gaff wrote:
>> Dunno but I don't think there was any connection to Roy rogers.
>> Brian
>>
>
> What Triggered that?
The idea that if you want to buy a pair of decent speakers these days
> On 20/11/2016 12:13, Brian-Gaff wrote:
>> Dunno but I don't think there was any connection to Roy rogers.
>> Brian
>>
>
> What Triggered that?
you need to talk to the Loan Arranger.
--
Eiron.
Dave Plowman (News)
Nov 20, 2016, 1:58:15 PM11/20/16
to
In article <55e205e...@audiomisc.co.uk>,
his company. Rogers made a lot of money out of the LS3/5a, so the JR 149
was an attempt to cash in on that. And it was a nice little speaker.
The badging on a Rogers Cadet looks the same design as on much later
Rogers speakers. So I'd guess a trade mark.
--
*If God dropped acid, would he see people?
Dave Plowman da...@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Jim Lesurf <no...@audiomisc.co.uk> wrote:
> In article <e9b9vs...@mid.individual.net>, Eiron
> <Evelyn....@live.com> wrote:
> > To hijack the thread, I wonder if there was a connection between
> > Rogers in Catford who made amps and Rogers in Mitcham, ten miles away,
> > who made speakers. And CJ Rogers who designed speakers, for that
> > matter. I'd better start googling it. (Jim Rogers of JR149 fame
> > founded the Mitcham business.)
> IIRC it was the same Rogers who sold amps, etc, from Catford who then
> started up Jim Rogers and made the JR149. His old company was bought up
> via 'Swisstone'. Think this was in 1977 but I'm relying on my unreliable
> memory. Had to use a different name as his first company 'owned' that
> name for the purposes of making and selling.
Think that's right. Although he became known as Jim Rogers after selling
> In article <e9b9vs...@mid.individual.net>, Eiron
> <Evelyn....@live.com> wrote:
> > To hijack the thread, I wonder if there was a connection between
> > Rogers in Catford who made amps and Rogers in Mitcham, ten miles away,
> > who made speakers. And CJ Rogers who designed speakers, for that
> > matter. I'd better start googling it. (Jim Rogers of JR149 fame
> > founded the Mitcham business.)
> IIRC it was the same Rogers who sold amps, etc, from Catford who then
> started up Jim Rogers and made the JR149. His old company was bought up
> via 'Swisstone'. Think this was in 1977 but I'm relying on my unreliable
> memory. Had to use a different name as his first company 'owned' that
> name for the purposes of making and selling.
his company. Rogers made a lot of money out of the LS3/5a, so the JR 149
was an attempt to cash in on that. And it was a nice little speaker.
The badging on a Rogers Cadet looks the same design as on much later
Rogers speakers. So I'd guess a trade mark.
--
*If God dropped acid, would he see people?
Dave Plowman da...@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
Brian Gaff
Nov 21, 2016, 4:52:22 AM11/21/16
to
Just a shot in the dark, or horsing around I guess.
news:o0sdcg$aen$1...@dont-email.me...
Brian
--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Graeme Wall" <ra...@greywall.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
bri...@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please!
news:o0sdcg$aen$1...@dont-email.me...
Phil Allison
Nov 26, 2016, 8:40:56 AM11/26/16
to
Phil Allison wrote:
>
>
> speaking of UK Vintage Hi-Fi, a Rogers Cadet II system turned up for
> repair this week. Three units in a cardboard box - main amp, control
> unit and phono pre-amp. See pic of similar system:
>
> http://lab.sekaimon.com/img/fetch/i/321656407324
>
> There was a little rust on the tops of the units suggesting storage
> in a garage for some time, the white plastic buttons on the push
> switches had disintegrated and the front of the control unit was
> discoloured. OTOH, the large can electros had been replaced and all
> the valves were Mullard made in UK. I doubt if they were the originals.
>
>
** Had a chat with the owner this afternoon, fist chance for me since he delivered the system to a retail store I deal with.
>
>
> speaking of UK Vintage Hi-Fi, a Rogers Cadet II system turned up for
> repair this week. Three units in a cardboard box - main amp, control
> unit and phono pre-amp. See pic of similar system:
>
> http://lab.sekaimon.com/img/fetch/i/321656407324
>
> There was a little rust on the tops of the units suggesting storage
> in a garage for some time, the white plastic buttons on the push
> switches had disintegrated and the front of the control unit was
> discoloured. OTOH, the large can electros had been replaced and all
> the valves were Mullard made in UK. I doubt if they were the originals.
>
>
The Cadet II set up belonged to his father and the Mullard valves are all ORIGINAL, so 50+ years old !!!!
He also has a pair of Leak 3-way speakers with 12 inch woofers from the same era to use with it.
Nice going, Mr Rogers.
.... Phil
Dave Plowman (News)
Nov 26, 2016, 10:56:35 AM11/26/16
to
In article <d96a6c74-adca-411b...@googlegroups.com>,
And pentode output valves like EL84 not known for a long life.
> He also has a pair of Leak 3-way speakers with 12 inch woofers from the
> same era to use with it.
Interesting - which model? Most Leaks were two-way.
> Nice going, Mr Rogers.
--
*Can atheists get insurance for acts of God? *
Phil Allison <palli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ** Had a chat with the owner this afternoon, fist chance for me since he
> delivered the system to a retail store I deal with.
> The Cadet II set up belonged to his father and the Mullard valves are
> all ORIGINAL, so 50+ years old !!!!
Which simply means it hasn't had much use. All valves wear out eventually.
> ** Had a chat with the owner this afternoon, fist chance for me since he
> delivered the system to a retail store I deal with.
> The Cadet II set up belonged to his father and the Mullard valves are
> all ORIGINAL, so 50+ years old !!!!
And pentode output valves like EL84 not known for a long life.
> He also has a pair of Leak 3-way speakers with 12 inch woofers from the
> same era to use with it.
> Nice going, Mr Rogers.
--
*Can atheists get insurance for acts of God? *
Phil Allison
Nov 26, 2016, 9:04:43 PM11/26/16
to
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
>
> > ** Had a chat with the owner this afternoon, fist chance for me since he
> > delivered the system to a retail store I deal with.
>
> > The Cadet II set up belonged to his father and the Mullard valves are
> > all ORIGINAL, so 50+ years old !!!!
>
> Which simply means it hasn't had much use. All valves wear out eventually.
> And pentode output valves like EL84 not known for a long life.
>
** Even valves left in their boxes often do not last 50+ years - developing faults like going gassy. These valves have likely not had a huge amount of use, nevertheless to see all 8 in near perfect condition is remarkable.
>
> > ** Had a chat with the owner this afternoon, fist chance for me since he
> > delivered the system to a retail store I deal with.
>
> > The Cadet II set up belonged to his father and the Mullard valves are
> > all ORIGINAL, so 50+ years old !!!!
>
> Which simply means it hasn't had much use. All valves wear out eventually.
> And pentode output valves like EL84 not known for a long life.
>
> > He also has a pair of Leak 3-way speakers with 12 inch woofers from the
> > same era to use with it.
>
> Interesting - which model? Most Leaks were two-way.
>
Rank took over Leak and Wharfedale production in the 70s, so some cross pollination with mid ranges and tweeters went on.
.... Phil
Dave Plowman (News)
Nov 27, 2016, 7:32:38 AM11/27/16
to
In article <3193b671-584a-4d67...@googlegroups.com>,
(both bought used). Both needed valve replacement at some time while in
use. And the period I had them nothing like 50 years. Be interesting to
know just how those survived so well/
> > > He also has a pair of Leak 3-way speakers with 12 inch woofers from
> > > the same era to use with it.
> >
> > Interesting - which model? Most Leaks were two-way.
> >
> ** Leak made numerous 3-way models too, ones with 12 inch woofers
> include the Sandwich 600 and the 2060. Sandwich 600s were made in
> Australia at one time so are likely suspects here. The owner said the
> speakers were labelled 8ohm.
> Rank took over Leak and Wharfedale production in the 70s, so some cross
> pollination with mid ranges and tweeters went on.
Right. Leak had a brief period of popularity in the UK when they first
brought out the sandwich. But after that I personally didn't see them very
often. Obviously, depends on what your friends etc bought.
--
*Atheism is a non-prophet organization.
Phil Allison <palli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
> >
> > > ** Had a chat with the owner this afternoon, fist chance for me
> > > since he delivered the system to a retail store I deal with.
> >
> > > The Cadet II set up belonged to his father and the Mullard valves
> > > are all ORIGINAL, so 50+ years old !!!!
> >
> > Which simply means it hasn't had much use. All valves wear out
> > eventually. And pentode output valves like EL84 not known for a long
> > life.
> >
> ** Even valves left in their boxes often do not last 50+ years -
> developing faults like going gassy. These valves have likely not had a
> huge amount of use, nevertheless to see all 8 in near perfect condition
> is remarkable.
Yes it is. I had two valve amps in the day - Quad II and Radford STA25
> Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
> >
> > > ** Had a chat with the owner this afternoon, fist chance for me
> > > since he delivered the system to a retail store I deal with.
> >
> > > The Cadet II set up belonged to his father and the Mullard valves
> > > are all ORIGINAL, so 50+ years old !!!!
> >
> > Which simply means it hasn't had much use. All valves wear out
> > eventually. And pentode output valves like EL84 not known for a long
> > life.
> >
> ** Even valves left in their boxes often do not last 50+ years -
> developing faults like going gassy. These valves have likely not had a
> huge amount of use, nevertheless to see all 8 in near perfect condition
> is remarkable.
(both bought used). Both needed valve replacement at some time while in
use. And the period I had them nothing like 50 years. Be interesting to
know just how those survived so well/
> > > He also has a pair of Leak 3-way speakers with 12 inch woofers from
> > > the same era to use with it.
> >
> > Interesting - which model? Most Leaks were two-way.
> >
> ** Leak made numerous 3-way models too, ones with 12 inch woofers
> include the Sandwich 600 and the 2060. Sandwich 600s were made in
> Australia at one time so are likely suspects here. The owner said the
> speakers were labelled 8ohm.
> Rank took over Leak and Wharfedale production in the 70s, so some cross
> pollination with mid ranges and tweeters went on.
brought out the sandwich. But after that I personally didn't see them very
often. Obviously, depends on what your friends etc bought.
--
*Atheism is a non-prophet organization.
0 new messages