Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What' wrong with rec.radio.amateur.moderated

37 views
Skip to first unread message

Julian Macassey

unread,
Mar 10, 2023, 3:10:26 AM3/10/23
to
rec.radio.amateur.moderated is a group run by authoritarians
who think the only suitable posts are announcements, This make the
group useless. But I suppose they like it that way.

--
“Bob, please get me the names of the Jews, you know, the big
Jewish contributors of the Democrats. … Could we please
investigate some of the cocksuckers?” — Richard Nixon, 1971

Ian Jackson

unread,
Mar 10, 2023, 7:59:34 AM3/10/23
to
In message <slrnu0lpfg....@n6are.com>, Julian Macassey
<jul...@n6are.com> writes
> rec.radio.amateur.moderated is a group run by authoritarians
>who think the only suitable posts are announcements, This make the
>group useless. But I suppose they like it that way.
>
Have you had any posts rejected? I thought that the main problem with
rec.radio.amateur.moderated was that any 'personal' posts usually got
submerged in all the (mainly USA orientated) announcement clutter -
hence the need for a moderated NG aimed at the UK. [I have to admit that
I rarely look at the posts in rec.radio.amateur.moderated. They simply
come in, sit there for a couple of weeks, then expire unread.]
--
Ian
Aims and ambitions are neither attainments nor achievements

Julian Macassey

unread,
Mar 11, 2023, 5:49:55 AM3/11/23
to
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:43:09 +0000, Ian Jackson
<ianREMOVET...@g3ohx.co.uk> wrote:
> In message <slrnu0lpfg....@n6are.com>, Julian Macassey
><jul...@n6are.com> writes
>> rec.radio.amateur.moderated is a group run by authoritarians
>>who think the only suitable posts are announcements, This make the
>>group useless. But I suppose they like it that way.
>>
> Have you had any posts rejected?

One rejected with a Kafkaesque generic response telling
me that I had failed in some way. Another that just disappeared.

> I thought that the main problem with
> rec.radio.amateur.moderated was that any 'personal' posts usually got
> submerged in all the (mainly USA orientated) announcement clutter -
> hence the need for a moderated NG aimed at the UK. [I have to admit that
> I rarely look at the posts in rec.radio.amateur.moderated. They simply
> come in, sit there for a couple of weeks, then expire unread.]

You haven't been missing anything.

--
Wall Street loves socialism for bankers – but not for ordinary
people - Robert Reich

Roger Hayter

unread,
Mar 11, 2023, 7:33:23 AM3/11/23
to
On 11 Mar 2023 at 10:49:53 GMT, "Julian Macassey" <jul...@n6are.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 12:43:09 +0000, Ian Jackson
> <ianREMOVET...@g3ohx.co.uk> wrote:
>> In message <slrnu0lpfg....@n6are.com>, Julian Macassey
>> <jul...@n6are.com> writes
>>> rec.radio.amateur.moderated is a group run by authoritarians
>>> who think the only suitable posts are announcements, This make the
>>> group useless. But I suppose they like it that way.
>>>
>> Have you had any posts rejected?
>
> One rejected with a Kafkaesque generic response telling
> me that I had failed in some way. Another that just disappeared.

I wonder if either was rejected by the moderators, or just failed in some
technical way??


>
>> I thought that the main problem with
>> rec.radio.amateur.moderated was that any 'personal' posts usually got
>> submerged in all the (mainly USA orientated) announcement clutter -
>> hence the need for a moderated NG aimed at the UK. [I have to admit that
>> I rarely look at the posts in rec.radio.amateur.moderated. They simply
>> come in, sit there for a couple of weeks, then expire unread.]
>
> You haven't been missing anything.


--
Roger Hayter

A. non Eyemouse

unread,
Mar 19, 2023, 10:58:26 AM3/19/23
to
Thankfully they are no longer polluting this NG with their BlogSpam.

--
Mouse.
Where Morse meets House.

0 new messages