Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Wouxun KG699 s-meter fault ?

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Andy FTD

unread,
Nov 4, 2009, 3:51:26 PM11/4/09
to
As mentoined elsewhere i have the 66-88MHz version.

Superb handhld but the s meter always reads half scale on zero signal.

Does anyone know of a fix ?

Do other Wouxun rigs or models have the same problem ?

I see there's a Yahoo group for Wouxun rigs, but since
you need memebership just to view the messsage archive
I can't be arsed to join and I'm always suspicious when groups
are like this.

- Andy -

Wimpie

unread,
Nov 4, 2009, 4:18:12 PM11/4/09
to

Hello Andy,

I have a 2m/70cm KG-UVD1P. When you disable the squelch (so it is
always busy), this unit shows the same problem.

With kind regards,

wim
PA3DJS
www.tetech.nl
When you remove abc, you have a valid email address.

Yeti

unread,
Nov 4, 2009, 5:51:14 PM11/4/09
to

The 'S' meter on these chinese rigs really isn't - it just shows if
there's a signal there, it's almost all-or-nothing really.

DieSea

unread,
Nov 4, 2009, 6:23:33 PM11/4/09
to

"Yeti" <ye...@ayrshore.com> wrote in message
news:hct0gp$emr$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Since when ha the "S" meter on any amateur rig been accurate

Its like the current bunch of plonkers arguing that they're 10 Hz off frequency
Kenyaesico rice box

DieSea

If you pay peanuts you get monkeys !!


Yeti

unread,
Nov 4, 2009, 6:29:24 PM11/4/09
to
DieSea wrote:

> Since when ha the "S" meter on any amateur rig been accurate
>

When it's set up properly....

and in contests, when everyone's 5 and 9... :P

Andy FTD

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:39:52 AM11/5/09
to

> Since when ha the "S" meter on any amateur rig been accurate

It doesn't need to be.

Just so long as it has sufficienct dynamic range to enable a
user to peak up the signal when trying to use a repeater.

Thanks to all the other posters comments. I think I'll hold back
on any other purchases for the time being.

But fo a 4m rig, I still recomend them.

- Andy -

Brian Reay

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:56:46 AM11/5/09
to
"Andy FTD" <andy...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:44c134b9-1155-4f21...@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

It keeps the idiots and disruptive element out. You rarely see rants about
the "police state", YouTube posts, people faking mental problems to swindle
a retirement, ill-informed posts on licence conditions,........... etc. in
the serious Yahoo groups. Conversely, you do see useful posts, exchanging
technical information, in a polite manner. The reason is simple, the well
run groups either don't let the idiots in, expel them if they don't behave,
or moderate their posts.

It is your loss if you exclude yourself from such groups, although knowing
of your technical expertise, I am sure you could contribute to many of them.

--
73
Brian G8OSN/W8OSN
www.g8osn.net

Jimbo GM4DHJ ...

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:04:29 AM11/5/09
to

>You rarely see rants about
> people faking mental problems to swindle a retirement,

> 73
> Brian G8OSN/M3OSN
> www.m3osn.net
>

just what are you confabulating about now ya great big puddin'...I suppose
that is me you are referring to there? ..... you are one nasty piece of work
... I was in for early retirement before the blood vessel in my retina burst
and THEY sent me to serco or whatever their name is to find out what was
behind it.........the two are NOT connected ...other in your sick mind
......*****thinks to himself***** .....hold on Jim you are forgetting your
therapy here and reacting badly to a nasty man again..................anyway
brian I know you were referring to me but that is OK as I know the truth and
it doesn't matter what you think because the rest of the good people on here
just consider you as entertainment value ........as I do...........carry
on.............


Spike

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:30:47 AM11/5/09
to

Brian Reay wrote:

>"Andy FTD" <andy...@rocketmail.com> wrote

>
>> I see there's a Yahoo group for Wouxun rigs, but since
>> you need memebership just to view the messsage archive
>> I can't be arsed to join and I'm always suspicious when groups
>> are like this.
>
>It keeps the idiots and disruptive element out. You rarely see rants about
>the "police state", YouTube posts, people faking mental problems to swindle
>a retirement, ill-informed posts on licence conditions,........... etc.

And no posts about awkward, discomforting legal or moral dilemmas,
even if concerning radio or electromag.

> in the serious Yahoo groups. Conversely, you do see useful posts, exchanging
>technical information, in a polite manner. The reason is simple, the well
>run groups either don't let the idiots in, expel them if they don't behave,
>or moderate their posts.

You make them sound like just another bunch of anal-retentives and
control freaks - that isn't everyone's cup of tea either.

>It is your loss if you exclude yourself from such groups, although knowing
>of your technical expertise, I am sure you could contribute to many of them.

It's their loss if they can't cope with the real world.

--
from
Aero Spike
Not a member of the RSGB for 50 years 1959 - 2009

Yeti

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:52:48 AM11/5/09
to

You realise your contradiction there?

There's no repeaters on 4m.

Except for the 'parrot', which isn't really a repeater.

G1LVN

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:57:35 AM11/5/09
to
On 5 Nov, 06:56, "Brian Reay" <seewebs...@invalid.com> wrote:
> "Andy FTD" <andyf...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message

That's a bit rich coming from a man who likes to discuss "World
Events" and other hobbies such as "Food" on our experimental amateur
bands. And actively encourages "Idiots" to obtain amateur radio
licences but dumbing down exams all in the name of "Amateur Radio
Development".

Spike

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 4:11:59 AM11/5/09
to

G1LVN wrote:

>On 5 Nov, 06:56, "Brian Reay" <seewebs...@invalid.com> wrote:

>> It keeps the idiots and disruptive element out. You rarely see rants about
>> the "police state", YouTube posts, people faking mental problems to swindle
>> a retirement, ill-informed posts on licence conditions,........... etc. in
>> the serious Yahoo groups. Conversely, you do see useful posts, exchanging
>> technical information, in a polite manner. The reason is simple, the well
>> run groups either don't let the idiots in, expel them if they don't behave,
>> or moderate their posts.
>>
>> It is your loss if you exclude yourself from such groups, although knowing
>> of your technical expertise, I am sure you could contribute to many of them.

>That's a bit rich coming from a man who likes to discuss "World


>Events" and other hobbies such as "Food" on our experimental amateur
>bands. And actively encourages "Idiots" to obtain amateur radio
>licences but dumbing down exams all in the name of "Amateur Radio
>Development".

One wonders what Brian might advocate to keep 'idiots and disruptive
elements' off the Amateur bands, keeping in mind it now really easy to
get a licence involving no-fail assessments. A 12 wpm CW test,
perhaps?

Len GM0ONX

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 4:32:36 AM11/5/09
to

About as unlikely as you applying for life membership of the RSGB. :-)

John

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 7:09:10 AM11/5/09
to
"Brian Reay" <seewe...@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:KGuIm.24170$Sn4....@newsfe15.ams2...
> ... people faking mental problems to swindle a retirement

A despicable calumny by someone who is to be pitied.

Because it is directed at a well-respected officer in local
government about his behaviour in office, it is a criminal
libel rendering the pityee liable to a term of imprisonment.


EM87

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 7:18:13 AM11/5/09
to
It's just the type of snide remark I would expect from b class brian.

EM87

luc...@eternal-flames.gov

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 8:07:01 AM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:04:29 -0000, "Jimbo GM4DHJ ..."
<jim.g...@googlemail.com> wrote:

>
> >You rarely see rants about
>> people faking mental problems to swindle a retirement,
>


>


>just what are you confabulating about now ya great big puddin'...I suppose
>that is me you are referring to there? ..... you are one nasty piece of work
>... I was in for early retirement before the blood vessel in my retina burst
>and THEY sent me to serco or whatever their name is to find out what was
>behind it.........the two are NOT connected ...other in your sick mind
>......*****thinks to himself***** .....hold on Jim you are forgetting your
>therapy here and reacting badly to a nasty man again..................anyway
>brian I know you were referring to me but that is OK as I know the truth and
>it doesn't matter what you think because the rest of the good people on here
>just consider you as entertainment value ........as I do...........carry
>on.............

Ignore Brian, Jimbo... Most people do.
He's a poor example of the human creature and more to be pitied than
castigated.

Nick.

Len GM0ONX

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 8:18:44 AM11/5/09
to

I can confirm that councils round here have predilection to using
occupational therapy services for all sorts of things. Its usually sod
all to do with the employees mental condition or a way of 'working his
ticket'.

Len GM0ONX

Bob Martin

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 9:20:49 AM11/5/09
to

"Brian Reay" <seewe...@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:KGuIm.24170$Sn4....@newsfe15.ams2...
Brian

Reading the rants and predicting the flamewars or thread length is half the
fun here, if not all the fun, as there's little technical content of value!

How's the new h/h shaping up?

Jim

Jimbo GM4DHJ ...

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 9:51:16 AM11/5/09
to

<luc...@eternal-flames.gov> wrote in message
news:c3j5f5hc4j1ecnj5v...@4ax.com...

Yes it must be a pain to be as twisted and nasty as him.......but It takes
all types.......just a pity he ruined the hobby.........


Jimbo GM4DHJ ...

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 9:53:34 AM11/5/09
to

"Len GM0ONX" <gm0...@goooooglemail.com> wrote in message
news:hcujbk$rr8$1...@news.albasani.net...

what does "working his ticket" mean? ...... all thay are doing is covering
their backsides in case they get taken for ruining employees physical or
mental health ......


G1LVN

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 10:21:13 AM11/5/09
to
On 5 Nov, 12:09, "John" <J...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> "Brian Reay" <seewebs...@invalid.com> wrote in message

According to latest thinking on Internet Law it's also slander and I
for one would happily testify as a witness if anyone here were to
pursue this in court - no need for anyone to call the rossers to
forensic examine anyone's PC.

G1LVN

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 10:25:21 AM11/5/09
to
> mental health ......- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Lovely pint that "Work yer Ticket" brewed locally in Northumbria I
think.

Brian showing his Charva roots again.

G1LVN

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 10:30:01 AM11/5/09
to
On 5 Nov, 13:18, Len GM0ONX <gm0...@goooooglemail.com> wrote:
> Len GM0ONX- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

The only time I've used cognitive behaviourable therapy was to loose
weight - and it worked! Don't think you can get early retirement for
being too fat, but I may be wrong.

Maybe Brian should use it himself, I'm told it's good for anger
management too.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

DieSea

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 11:38:51 AM11/5/09
to

<luc...@eternal-flames.gov> wrote in message
news:c3j5f5hc4j1ecnj5v...@4ax.com...

Couldn't you re arrange those words and change a couple Nick

To

Should be castrated more than pitied

;-)

DieSea


Brian Reay

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 11:44:48 AM11/5/09
to
"Bob Martin" <bma...@qxi.com> wrote in message
news:6bBIm.26617$ep1....@newsfe30.ams2...

> Brian
>
> Reading the rants and predicting the flamewars or thread length is half
> the fun here, if not all the fun, as there's little technical content of
> value!

So true, it keeps the wasters in one place.

>
> How's the new h/h shaping up?
>

Very pleased with it.

Jimbo GM4DHJ ...

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 11:53:14 AM11/5/09
to

"G1LVN" <gareth...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4ce4a885-6e6f-4d4a...@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

I think he is just angry at the world........well I know the world of
amateur radio is very angry at him anyway .......


Jimbo GM4DHJ ...

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 11:55:13 AM11/5/09
to

"Toxic Waste" <Trabant Owners Cl...@nicksplace.co.com> wrote in message
news:L3DIm.2056$Ym4...@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>
> "John" <Jo...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:hcuf9b$jgk$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> Clearly, you don't follow this forum too closely OM. Brian, has had to
> endure more than his fair share of insults, many of the personal.
>
> So much for the "gentlemanly traditions of Amateur Radio" eh?
>
> HTH
> tox
>
yip... so friendly a polis topped himself over it ........


Andy FTD

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:03:14 PM11/5/09
to

> You realise your contradiction there?
>
> There's no repeaters on 4m.
>
No contradiction.

I asked if the other models have the same s-meter bug, because I
might get the 70cms version, in which case I'd like to have an s-meter
suitable for peaking up the signal when using such things as
repeaters.

The KG699 has three flavour, 4.2.70cm...

Andy FTD

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:08:08 PM11/5/09
to

> It keeps the idiots and disruptive element out.

Erm thats on incoming posts.

I have no problem with moderating incoming posts.

But to have a Yahoo group that restricts the *viewing*
of messages to approved members only is plain daft.

No other group does such things,either on Yahoo, qrz or eham.

Life's too short to wait for membership just to *look*
at comments on a handheld.

- Andy -

Brian Reay

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:09:35 PM11/5/09
to
"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message
news:2d55f5h0qqfqv7prc...@4ax.com...

>
> One wonders what Brian might advocate to keep 'idiots and disruptive
> elements' off the Amateur bands, keeping in mind it now really easy to
> get a licence involving no-fail assessments. A 12 wpm CW test,
> perhaps?

Well, as several on here demonstrate, that didn't work- did it?

Andy FTD

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:10:31 PM11/5/09
to

>
> > How's the new h/h shaping up?
>
> Very pleased with it.

What yer got then Brian ?

I seem to have a growing collection of h/h here ;-)

- Andy -

Brian Reay

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:12:30 PM11/5/09
to
"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message
news:am25f51gi5e3v5ta5...@4ax.com...

>
>> in the serious Yahoo groups. Conversely, you do see useful posts,
>> exchanging
>>technical information, in a polite manner. The reason is simple, the well
>>run groups either don't let the idiots in, expel them if they don't
>>behave,
>>or moderate their posts.
>
> You make them sound like just another bunch of anal-retentives

Interesting that you should consider that expecting a certain level of
behaviour should equate to being "anally retentive".
Not surprising as you seem to prefer verbal diarrhoea.

Jimbo GM4DHJ ...

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:15:37 PM11/5/09
to
All handhelds are a waste of time ...


Len GM0ONX

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:25:59 PM11/5/09
to

Correct that's exactly what they are doing! Exactly the same as having
me do two hours on line tuition this afternoon on disability, race, and
gender discrimination legislation. They can now claim I'm trained and
sack me if I make a mistake.

"Working his ticket." A man who feigns stupidity or insanity in order to
be discharged from the service

http://www.westernfrontassociation.com/great-war-on-land/general-interest/890-american-army-terms.html


Brian Reay

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:29:47 PM11/5/09
to

"Andy FTD" <andy...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:2a138d9c-54e7-43bb...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...

>
>>
>> > How's the new h/h shaping up?
>>
>> Very pleased with it.
>
> What yer got then Brian ?

FT60. I wanted something smallish but not too fiddly to use.

I did consider one of the many "Hong Kong" radios but I don't like having
transmitters which can "stray" out of band. I sometimes let newcomers borrow
things and don't want any "slips".

> I seem to have a growing collection of h/h here ;-)

Me to. I still have a old IC32E, plus another I picked up at junk sale for
�3 with a fault (now fixed). The latter is destined for a "loaner" for the
school radio club.

I still like the 32E but wanted something I could "slip into a shit pocket"
when walking.

An old Icom U16 is my "working on the roof" radio (so I can ask one of the
other licensees chez nous to measure SWR etc. when I'm "tweaking"
something) - another junk sale special that it doesn't matter too much if I
drop.

I've a TH215 which used to be a "loaner" but the battery cases aren't easy
to "refill".

Years back I had a KP202 but it got lost. Something about the KP202 I always
liked.

Finally, there is a PF70 and some PF1 somewhere about, converted years back
and since "phased out" of use.

Jimbo GM4DHJ ...

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:47:21 PM11/5/09
to

> Years back I had a KP202 but it got lost. Something about the KP202 I
> always
> liked.
>

I loved my KP202,TR2200GX,TR2300 and my Standard 146A ...modern HHs are
rubbish ........


Brian Reay

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 12:58:58 PM11/5/09
to
"Jimbo GM4DHJ ..." <jim.g...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:hcv33b$2p1$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Never had a 146 (in fact I can't even recall the beast) but still have my
2200GX and a 2300.

2200GX is kept as it was the first "rice box" I ever bought, the 2300 is
used as part of my training kit for FL training.

Also got a VFO30G lurking somewhere, I really should stick it on Ebay.

Spike

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:00:14 PM11/5/09
to

Brian Reay wrote:

The issue is one of quality - it might have worked, and probably did
work, better than the non-scheme currently in place.

Back whenever, two or three club members at a time might have got a
pass; nowadays it's whole clubs at a time. But I doubt they represent
anything like the quality, despite all the expensive hoops that need
to be jumped through.

--
from
Aero Spike
Not a member of the RSGB for 50 years 1959 - 2009

Spike

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:04:34 PM11/5/09
to

Brian Reay wrote:

Tut tut. 'Verbal diarrhoea' is merely a perjorative term, but anal
retentivity is a recognised state - except to those in denial, of
course.

Brian Reay

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:06:24 PM11/5/09
to
"Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message
news:qa46f5lh2bfvqevvs...@4ax.com...

>
> Brian Reay wrote:
>
>> "Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:2d55f5h0qqfqv7prc...@4ax.com...
>>
>>> One wonders what Brian might advocate to keep 'idiots and disruptive
>>> elements' off the Amateur bands, keeping in mind it now really easy to
>>> get a licence involving no-fail assessments. A 12 wpm CW test,
>>> perhaps?
>>
>>Well, as several on here demonstrate, that didn't work- did it?
>
> The issue is one of quality - it might have worked, and probably did
> work,

Loading up PAs
Slope detection
Confusing period with sample rate
Whizzing electrons
Not understanding depletetion mode semiconductors
Nuclear emissions
Having no interest in technical things
...........
..........

Somehow "might" seems a tad generous.

Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:07:33 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:56:46 -0000, "Brian Reay"
<seewe...@invalid.com> wrote:

>It keeps the idiots and disruptive element out. You rarely see rants about
>the "police state", YouTube posts, people faking mental problems to swindle

>a retirement, ill-informed posts on licence conditions,........... etc. in

>the serious Yahoo groups. Conversely, you do see useful posts, exchanging
>technical information, in a polite manner. The reason is simple, the well
>run groups either don't let the idiots in, expel them if they don't behave,
>or moderate their posts.


unlike this ng which has lazy half-hearted effort dodging b-licensees
who revert to outraeous insults to avoid being cornered by awkward
questions.


time was when uk amateur radio had a minimu acceptable standard.

now? all it has is a farce that one M1's dog could do part of.


You couldnt make it up.

Jimbo GM4DHJ ...

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:09:18 PM11/5/09
to

> Having no interest in technical things

That was me !!! ......


Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:09:59 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:11:59 +0000, Spike <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid>
wrote:

>One wonders what Brian might advocate to keep 'idiots and disruptive
>elements' off the Amateur bands, keeping in mind it now really easy to
>get a licence involving no-fail assessments. A 12 wpm CW test,
>perhaps?


the 12wpm or even 5wpm morse *test* kept plenty of layabouts off hf.

its a pity it was done away with.


Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:10:39 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:09:35 -0000, "Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid>
wrote:

>Well, as several on here demonstrate, that didn't work- did it?

it kept you off hf for over 20 years...wasnt that bad.

Jimbo GM4DHJ ...

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:11:11 PM11/5/09
to

"Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid> wrote in message
news:DnEIm.13101$yW6....@newsfe11.ams2...

> 73
> Brian G8OSN/M3OSN
> www.m3osn.net
>
>
>
have to get rid of my 2200 and 2300 nobody worth talking to any more ....


Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:11:25 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:47:21 -0000, "Jimbo GM4DHJ ..."
<jim.g...@googlemail.com> wrote:

>I loved my KP202,TR2200GX,TR2300 and my Standard 146A ...modern HHs are

still have a 146a here.

Jimbo GM4DHJ ...

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:13:32 PM11/5/09
to

"Paul Starship" <p.bl...@google-nospam-email.com> wrote in message
news:4af3154...@news.albasani.net...
fancy selling it? .......


Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:15:15 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:09:35 -0000, "Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid>
wrote:

>Well, as several on here demonstrate, that didn't work- did it?

From: "Brian Reay" <brian...@bigXXXX.com>
Subject: Re: FULL DETAILS OF NEW LICENCE PROPOSALS ON RA SITE
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 19:58:32 +0100

The new announced is totally irrational and, at last, finally exposes
the nonsense of the morse requirement. A Foundation Licensee could no
way learn morse to 5wpm (as well as the other material) in a weekend
BUT he will be let loose on HF. A far better qualified B licensee is
denied access because morse is required for HF access!

your own words Brian dear Brian.
"finally exposes the nonsense of the morse requirement."


Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:16:45 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:20:49 -0000, "Bob Martin" <bma...@qxi.com>
wrote:

>fun here, if not all the fun, as there's little technical content of value!

there used to be more but then the lazy b-licensees turned this ng
into a playpen for howling and whinging about morse code and many of
the good posters stopped posting technical stuff.

Message has been deleted

Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:18:24 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:06:24 -0000, "Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid>
wrote:


you left out


encouraging others to have no repect for their b-licence

running away from a simple 5wpm morse test.

encouraging others to downgrade themselves to beginner level

Message has been deleted

Brian Reay

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:19:32 PM11/5/09
to
"Paul Starship" <p.bl...@google-nospam-email.com> wrote in message
news:4af315e2...@news.albasani.net...

Seems even all those years back I was on the ball!

I'm delighted you recognise the fact!


Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:19:42 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:13:32 -0000, "Jimbo GM4DHJ ..."
<jim.g...@googlemail.com> wrote:

you have my email address...

QRK ? (possibly dublin only expression)

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:21:42 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:17:33 GMT, "Toxic Waste" <Trabant Owners
Cl...@nicksplace.co.com> wrote:

>Remind us all, where and when you passed your Morse assessment?

I never said where or when before so i dont have to *REMIND* YOU.


And MICHAEL, you remain challenged to identify yourself.


Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:25:12 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:19:32 -0000, "Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid>
wrote:


Just goes to show everyone how much howling and whinging you did
against the m3 licence and those who did it in a weekend.


Now?,... you are part of an organisation that
1. allows people to get an m3/m6 licence in a weekend
This goes against your previous howling about the m3 licence.

2. requires poeople to sit a farce morse assessment without which they
can't get any licence at all - not even a vhf-only one.
This goes against your howling about the morse requirement.

Is it any wonder youre so dizzy.

luc...@eternal-flames.gov

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:24:15 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:18:44 +0000, Len GM0ONX
<gm0...@goooooglemail.com> wrote:


>> Ignore Brian, Jimbo... Most people do.
>> He's a poor example of the human creature and more to be pitied than
>> castigated.
>>
>> Nick.
>
>I can confirm that councils round here have predilection to using
>occupational therapy services for all sorts of things. Its usually sod
>all to do with the employees mental condition or a way of 'working his
>ticket'.
>
>Len GM0ONX

Of course they do... It's only rate-payers money, after all.

I hope everybody remembers this, next time the lazy money-grabbing
bastards come knocking on your door wanting you to vote for them.

Nick.

luc...@eternal-flames.gov

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:24:15 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:29:31 GMT, "Toxic Waste" <Trabant Owners
Cl...@nicksplace.co.com> wrote:


>Clearly, you don't follow this forum too closely OM. Brian, has had to
>endure more than his fair share of insults, many of the personal.

He doesn't need you brown-nosing for him, old son.
If he can't take the heat, he's welcome to sod-off out of the kitchen.

Nick.

luc...@eternal-flames.gov

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:24:15 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:25:21 -0800 (PST), G1LVN
<gareth...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Lovely pint that "Work yer Ticket" brewed locally in Northumbria I
>think.
>
>Brian showing his Charva roots again.

Even weeds have roots.

Nick.

luc...@eternal-flames.gov

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:24:15 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:21:13 -0800 (PST), G1LVN
<gareth...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 5 Nov, 12:09, "John" <J...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Because it is directed at a well-respected officer in local
>> government about his behaviour in office, it is a criminal
>> libel rendering the pityee liable to a term of imprisonment.
>
>According to latest thinking on Internet Law it's also slander and I
>for one would happily testify as a witness if anyone here were to
>pursue this in court - no need for anyone to call the rossers to
>forensic examine anyone's PC.


Being in a written form, it's libel, not slander.

In similar circumstances, I would start by making a formal complaint
to the individual's ISP. They may want to play safe and throw him
off, pending the outcome of legal proceedings.

Nick.

luc...@eternal-flames.gov

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:24:15 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:38:51 -0000, "DieSea"
<DieSea.No...@nnttwlwoorrlldd.ccoomm> wrote:


>> Ignore Brian, Jimbo... Most people do.
>> He's a poor example of the human creature and more to be pitied than
>> castigated.
>
>"more to be pitied than castigated"
>

>Couldn't you re arrange those words and change a couple Nick
>
>To
>
>Should be castrated more than pitied
>
>;-)
>
>DieSea

It's certainly very tempting.

"He's such a pietist he's worthy of castration."

How about that? :-)


Nick.


Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:25:47 PM11/5/09
to
Message has been deleted

Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:26:58 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:25:47 GMT, "Toxic Waste" <Trabant Owners
Cl...@nicksplace.co.com> wrote:


[snip]

Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:27:07 PM11/5/09
to
Message has been deleted

luc...@eternal-flames.gov

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:35:24 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:19:21 GMT, "Toxic Waste" <Trabant Owners
Cl...@nicksplace.co.com> wrote:


>Remind us all, where and when you passed your Morse assessment?
>

>tox

How are you getting on with you long-term plans to take the FL, Tox?

Nick.

luc...@eternal-flames.gov

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:35:24 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:17:33 GMT, "Toxic Waste" <Trabant Owners

luc...@eternal-flames.gov

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:35:25 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:21:10 GMT, "Toxic Waste" <Trabant Owners

luc...@eternal-flames.gov

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:35:24 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:20:37 GMT, "Toxic Waste" <Trabant Owners
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

luc...@eternal-flames.gov

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 1:47:02 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:29:47 -0000, "Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid>
wrote:

>Years back I had a KP202 but it got lost.

That's what comes of mis-reading the instructions...
It was you that was supposed to get lost.

Nick.

DieSea

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:08:27 PM11/5/09
to

<luc...@eternal-flames.gov> wrote in message
news:io46f5p74c4cqr8ql...@4ax.com...

True ,

But there's only ONE weed that manages to find its way through concrete

A lot of it not too far from London , they're spending a fortune to get rid of it

Keeps on coming back , unless the jobs done properly

Now who / what does that remind me off

DieSea

Andy FTD

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:11:07 PM11/5/09
to

> >> Very pleased with it.
>
> > What yer got then Brian ?
>
> FT60. I wanted something smallish but not too fiddly to use.

Thats why I like my VX7R, right size and all the features.

>
> I did consider one of the many "Hong Kong" radios but I don't like having
> transmitters which can "stray" out of band. I sometimes let newcomers borrow
> things and don't want any "slips".

I used to follow the same doctine with stuff I used for
training others years ago.

- &y -

Yeti

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:23:17 PM11/5/09
to
On Nov 5, 5:29 pm, "Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid> wrote:

> I did consider one of the many "Hong Kong" radios but I don't like having
> transmitters which can "stray" out of band. I sometimes let newcomers borrow
> things and don't want any "slips".

Wouxun KG-UVD1P you want then.

They've finally got the DTMF tones set to a reasonable length, they're
CE 'approved' and there's a software utility that lets you limit them
to just the amateur bands and nowhere else if you so desire.

Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:36:29 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:35:25 +0000, luc...@eternal-flames.gov wrote:

>How are you getting on with you long-term plans to take the FL, Tox?


You mean that he doesnt even have the FL done ?


Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:37:58 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:30:57 -0000, "Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid>
wrote:


Ask your ball-carrier why he asks the same question ?

seems the only he's doing is proving how much of an eejit he is.

Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:38:41 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:40:35 GMT, "Toxic Waste" <Trabant Owners
Cl...@nicksplace.co.com> wrote:

>> And MICHAEL, you remain challenged to identify yourself.

>Google is your friend...

I hope so, but google can be fooled.

I'd rather operate on facts.


Brian Reay

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:39:18 PM11/5/09
to

"Yeti" <ye...@ayrshore.com> wrote in message
news:46d67f35-fa1d-4733...@g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

I'll keep than in mind, thank you. At the moment, I've got several radios I
can use for training and I'm building up a stock of "loaners", esp. for use
with the school radio club. Of the latter, some I've bought (eg the 32E)
but most have been kindly donated by local amateurs.

--
73
Brian G8OSN/W8OSN
www.g8osn.net

Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:39:48 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:43:09 -0000, "Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid>
wrote:

said m3osn.

form your own radio club did you ?

i wonder why ?

Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:41:41 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:39:34 GMT, "Toxic Waste" <Trabant Owners
Cl...@nicksplace.co.com> wrote:

>Coming from someone who is unable to remember where and when they passed the
>Morse assessment, that's priceless...

I NEVER PASSED A MORSE ASSESSMENT.

I PASSED A MORSE *TEST*

THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE.

Message has been deleted

Paul Starship

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 2:51:47 PM11/5/09
to
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:46:55 -0000, "Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid>
wrote:


wrong as usual.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/desperation


Len GM0ONX

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:18:16 PM11/5/09
to
Paul Starship wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:09:35 -0000, "Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Well, as several on here demonstrate, that didn't work- did it?
>
> it kept you off hf for over 20 years...wasnt that bad.
>

But didn't keep you off. Shows it up as a very flawed device!

Len GM0ONX

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:23:04 PM11/5/09
to
Paul Starship wrote:

>
> your own words Brian dear Brian.
> "finally exposes the nonsense of the morse requirement."
>
>
The Irish Green parrot is obviously upset by the sound of the fireworks
and is squawking again.

Len GM0ONX

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:24:41 PM11/5/09
to
Paul Starship wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:20:49 -0000, "Bob Martin" <bma...@qxi.com>
> wrote:
>
>> fun here, if not all the fun, as there's little technical content of value!
>
> there used to be more but then the lazy b-licensees turned this ng
> into a playpen for howling and whinging about morse code and many of
> the good posters stopped posting technical stuff.
>

You, technical content, you could speel texnecal!

Chris Kirby

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:28:16 PM11/5/09
to
Yeti wrote:


>Except for the 'parrot', which isn't really a repeater.


Troll Alert!

--
Chris

Len GM0ONX

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:25:43 PM11/5/09
to
Toxic Waste wrote:
> "Paul Starship" <p.bl...@google-nospam-email.com> wrote in message
> news:4af3150...@news.albasani.net...

>> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:09:35 -0000, "Brian Reay" <s...@website.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, as several on here demonstrate, that didn't work- did it?
>> it kept you off hf for over 20 years...wasnt that bad.
>
> Remind us all, where and when you passed your Morse assessment?
>
> tox
>
>
>
And for the avoidance of nasty rumour your RAE!
Message has been deleted

Len GM0ONX

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:30:54 PM11/5/09
to
luc...@eternal-flames.gov wrote:

>> I can confirm that councils round here have predilection to using
>> occupational therapy services for all sorts of things. Its usually sod
>> all to do with the employees mental condition or a way of 'working his
>> ticket'.
>>
>> Len GM0ONX
>
> Of course they do... It's only rate-payers money, after all.
>
> I hope everybody remembers this, next time the lazy money-grabbing
> bastards come knocking on your door wanting you to vote for them.
>
> Nick.

Not going to happen is it Nick?

Message has been deleted

Len GM0ONX

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 3:42:22 PM11/5/09
to

Paul complaining about the same question being asked again. Oh, the irony!

Message has been deleted
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages