All of them have "EU" collaborators on their boards - most of whom
have presided over a collapse in their companies share prices - but
also include a number of foreign companies who should know better
than to collaborate in undermining the British nation state.
Do their shareholder's know that these donations are being made -
and do they agree to those donations ?
It is inconceivable that they do !
It is highly improper that directors of public companies should be
using their shareholder's money to support a subversive and anti-
British organisation like "BiE" against the wishes of their shareholders.
They slyly claim that the Anti-EU organisations do not publish the
names of company donors. But that is a lie. For the most part
the anti-EU campaigns are run by private subscription and have no
need to help themselves to shareholder's money without their
permission.
For the remainder, the organisations speak on behalf of their member's
interests in opposing the "EU" crime syndicate and exposing its
many lies, thefts and criminal subversions.
Here is their (rather short) list of "company" donors, all of whom
feature on our lists of proscribed organisations by reason of
having subversives on their board of directors...
"Our (BiE) donors
Since our launch we have received donations of £5,000 or more (cash or
in-kind) from:
AEEU
BAE SYSTEMS
BMP DDB
BAT
British Midland
British Telecommunications plc
Bunzl plc
Cookson Group plc
Dyson Appliances Ltd
Lord Haskins of Skidby
ICL plc
General Utilities
Kellogg's
KPMG
Mindshare UK
Nestle (UK) Ltd
Philips Electronics (UK) Ltd
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Reuters Group plc
Lord Sainsbury of Turville
Unilever plc
United News & Media plc
Xerox Ltd
This list is updated annually at the publication of our annual report..."
end
Unlike the so-called "European (sic = EU) Movement" they deny
receiving any funds from the "EU" (which the "European (sic) Movement"
also denied until they were proved to be liars) although they do not
mention that they do not receive any help of any kind.
Where did the research for the list of anti-EU organisations come
from, for example ?
Like the "European (sic) Movement", however, they are a naked
"EU" propaganda front organisation involved in open and naked
subversion of our nation state.
They are also in one hell of a mess !
--
Guig
(GSF600SY Bandit)
CBFA #1
Tolerance my arse, just shoot the bastards. (Guig, 2002)
You shouldn't have to tolerate people f**king with your stuff. (Daniel
Gislao, 2002)
I have been running a long campaign elsewhere to put an end to
fat cats helping themselves to large slices of shareholder's money
(I am one) whilst presiding over the collapse of their companies.
Cases in point include many treacherous "EU" collaborators like;
Vallence at BT, Gent at Vodafone and Marshall, chairman of
British Airways and of BiE.
If you are interested in our network, you might like to look at the
60 Anti-EU organisations listed by BiE, which represent some of
them in the public domain.
Now go away you stupid little man !
As well as them, Wotan, can you list all the fat cat union leaders who earn
huge salaries from people on minimum wage and donate great sums of working mens
money to pro-Europe causes, even though most of their members probably don't
want anything to do with it. We know how pro-Europe most union leaders are and
it would be interesting to see their names.
The main one is the unctuous and supercilious little maggot who is the
departing head of the TUC.
I can never quite lay my tongue to his name - but I always think of
him as "Mole"
I once sat with the slimy little bastard in a television studio stuffed
with his "European Movement" fellow travellers (a rather spotty
bunch of Marxist nerds - who - like him - lied through their teeth)
and it was all I could do not to kill him there and then on the spot !
The thing positively oozed evil !
Would you mind awfully fucking off, please? In three nice, neat lines, yes,
every member of your "network", all 8 of them ...
--
Robin Carmody, Portland, Dorset
><wo...@valhalla.net> wrote:
>> The main one is the unctuous and supercilious little maggot who is the
>> departing head of the TUC.
>>
>> I can never quite lay my tongue to his name - but I always think of
>> him as "Mole"
>>
>> I once sat with the slimy little bastard in a television studio stuffed
>> with his "European Movement" fellow travellers (a rather spotty
>> bunch of Marxist nerds - who - like him - lied through their teeth)
>> and it was all I could do not to kill him there and then on the spot !
>>
>> The thing positively oozed evil !
> Come on, own up. Who put the acid in Bob's coffee?
I find Bob quite charismatic.
In a grotesque sort of way, yes he is.
Until you pay for my PC, my ISP bills, I'll post wherever and whatever the
hell I like.
You just don't have any ability with insults now do you?
A good insult is meant to flow and be immediately understood by all and
sundry, your teeny-tiny brain has obviously struggled badly to come up with
something that fits.
By that I take it they disagreed with you and ripped the pish out of all
your pitiful arguments.
> and it was all I could do not to kill him there and then on the spot !
So why didn't you? I thought the death penalty was your answer to all these
people.
> The thing positively oozed evil !
But, he's a member of the Fantastic Four, how can he be evil?
Nobody is suggesting that you should not.
Oh, alright ! If you really insist !
How about Gormless, Unctuous, Indolent, Gnat ?
Will that do you ?
You have obviously never read one of Jon's 500 word abuses of
somebody who has really upset him ! And he manages never to
repeat one word !
They are little masterpieces in themselves.
8!!! I thought it was him, his mum, and his gran.
Presumably not even you could believe in that ludicrous possibility !
The creature in question was being carefully protected and fed
by Johnathon Dimbleby - who had something near to a riot in the
studio - which was not, of course, ever screened.
I was not involved in the riot - nor did I encourage it or know
the people involved - who seemed to me to be unconnected in a
quite spontaneous outbust of fury against the transparent scam
being pulled on them.
Why not? You seem quite keen to encourage violence here, what with your
hateful outbursts regarding non-whites. Didn't you have any of your
goose-stepping buddies with you to give you false courage (that's the only
kind you'll ever have)?
Were you in the crowd waving your BNP/NF/Nazi flags? Or did you sit quietly
and hope that no one would notice you and point the finger at you and say -
"there sits a hateful racist"?
>"Wotan" <wo...@valhalla.net> wrote in message
>news:3db07afc$0$5803$fa0f...@lovejoy.zen.co.uk...
>> I was not involved in the riot - nor did I encourage it or know
>> the people involved
>
>Why not? You seem quite keen to encourage violence here, what with your
>hateful outbursts regarding non-whites. Didn't you have any of your
>goose-stepping buddies with you to give you false courage (that's the only
>kind you'll ever have)?
>
>Were you in the crowd waving your BNP/NF/Nazi flags? Or did you sit quietly
>and hope that no one would notice you and point the finger at you and say -
>"there sits a hateful racist"?
If a referendum was held in this country tomorrow has to if we should
get all the none whites out of our country we would be living in a
pure and white pleasant land by Christmas , but we the people of this
land where not consaluted by those who we voted to act on our behalf
when thy let bastards in so I can't see us being asked if they should
stay or go.
If you love em you go and live with em I will stay in my pure white
village its two years now since we got shut of our last unwelcome
visitors and I don't think we shall be getting any more of em here.
Mark .
> If you love em you go and live with em
Why? I was born in this country, I like it here, have no interest in living
anywhere else and intend to stay here until the day I die. And the minority
of bigoted wanks like you won't be able to make me leave. So get that up ye.
> I will stay in my pure white
> village its two years now since we got shut of our last unwelcome
> visitors and I don't think we shall be getting any more of em here.
Good for you, shout your racism from the rooftops. Pray tell, how did you
get those terrible non-whites out of your beautiful little englander
village? Violence? Fire? Burning Crosses? Dragging a few of them behind your
Range Rover?
Really? What's wrong with your self control?
> what with your hateful outbursts regarding non-whites.
Certainly not exclusively so, or has your memory failed you concerning what
Wotan has said about whites like Bliar?
RF
Oh no, RF[1] thinks we're dumb, how shall we ever survive[2]
[1] Random Flatulence
[2] Fine probably.
He's an equal opportunity bigot then.
Actually, "Wotan" was at school in the 1950s and must be getting on for 60
now - going by the general rules of human mortality, his mum might still be
alive but his gran surely wouldn't be. People with his worldview tend to be
middle-aged and elderly men (it is usually men, though you do have the odd
exception - notably the Dowager Lady Birdwood) who *behave* like emotionally
arrested teenagers.
So if Wotan's mum and gran have died, can we assume that his "network" is
entirely a figment of his own imagination? There's "toadflax" and "phil",
of course, but I suspect they're his sons under pseudonyms. Or maybe
they're just Bob himself. Who knows? Who bloody cares?
Thank you for demonstrating how articulate BNP supporters are. I wonder how
you are regarded among your fellow villagers? I doubt very much whether you
are liked or respected - country people don't like intolerance and bigotry
any more than urban dwellers, no matter what Rees-Mogadon and his friends
might tell you.
>If a referendum was held in this country tomorrow has to if we should
>get all the none whites out of our country we would be living in a
>pure and white pleasant land by Christmas ,
That isn't true, Mark. Most people in Britain live in cities where they are
used to mixing with at least *some* people from non-white races. In
general we get on with them reasonably well.
Your position of "send all the darkies back'ome" is actually a very
unpopular one, although most people support some form of immigration
controls. There is quite a wide spectrum of views on immigration policy.
--
PeteM
And more than that, most people in Britain have *experience* of non-white
people, even if they live in those rural areas where the population is still
overwhelmingly white.
Society has changed too much for Mark Strang's opinions to have much
support. The number of places where the effects of post-war immigration
have not seeped through is declining daily. Bad news for the Edwina
Frogbuckets of this world; good news for the rest of us, because it will
inevitably lead to a situation where views like hers (and all the other
right-whingers' opinions) are as antiquated as the ducking stool.