How Chris X of the BNP perfectly exemplifies antisemitism - like an ArabNazi
Ariadne
BOYCOTT WORRIES? TAKE A NUMBER
GERALD M. STEINBERG
The phones began ringing late Friday afternoon - BBC, AFP, co-authors,
family - everyone wanted to know if I was worried about the vote in
Britain
to boycott my university. There was no time to get into details, but as
a
Jew and Israel, my automatic answer to any question that contains the
word
"worry" is yes. On the long list, the boycott comes close behind the
dangers
of Palestinian terror, the Iranian bomb, Hizbollah's missiles, Osama
Bin
Laden, reality TV, Israeli taxi drivers, and the waves of locusts
migrating
from North Africa.
In truth, the direct impact of academic sanctions proposed by the AUT
(Association of University Teachers) against the faculty at Bar Ilan
and
Haifa universities is likely to be minimal. The few viscerally
anti-Israel
academics are probably not participating in any joint research projects
in
any case, and its their loss. Two years ago, my colleague Prof. Miriam
Shlesinger, was ousted from the board of a journal in translation
studies by
an Egyptian-born editor based in the University of Manchester. And the
politically correct anti-Israel atmosphere has probably led a few
anonymous
reviewers to reject research reports submitted to other journals - but
this
is hard to prove.
In any case, the quality of the Israeli academic research is generally
very
high, and good work still trumps bad politics, despite the nonsense of
"post-colonialism", post-modernism, and post-Chomsky/Saidism. In
molecular
biology, immunology, anti-terror methodologies, electro-optics,
strategic
deterrence, and other fields, a political ban on Israelis would be
particularly costly for the banners, if not for the banned. And efforts
to
understand the factors that distinguish between failure and success in
arms
control and peace efforts (my research focus) will be stillborn without
the
active participation of serious Israeli researchers in this field.
At the same time, this effort to impose a political litmus test on
academic
research has created a serious backlash. Since the recent revival of
the
boycott campaign, we have been deluged by emails from colleagues
pledging to
defy the policy, and to increase their contact with Israelis. Many also
reject the medieval nature of such censorship, which contradicts the
core
principle of the marketplace of ideas.
However, the real threat from the boycott, as its authors realize, is
not
from the direct academic impact, but rather from its broader political
objectives. Although the official terminology refers to "occupation"
and
"settlements", and singled out two universities for alleged complicity,
the
Israel-obsessed organizers of the AUT boycott (Susan Blackwell and
Steven
Rose), like their counterparts elsewhere, readily admit that this is
simply
a tactical decision. They have declared all Israelis who serve in the
defense forces and support the government to be guilty.
Indeed, the boycott is only a small part of the broader political war
against Israel's legitimacy as a sovereign Jewish state, and the effort
to
label Israel as the next "apartheid regime" is designed to put an end
to
Zionism. The use of the apartheid label does a gross injustice to those
who
suffered under the real thing, and is a form of modern anti-Semitism,
this
time turning the Jewish state into the devil. The grossly exaggerated
condemnation of Israel, and the systematic removal of the environment
of
terror in the rhetoric of "war crimes" and "ethnic cleansing", is the
political counterpart of the ongoing terrorism and military assaults.
Major
battles of this political war have taken place in the UN (the 1975
"Zionism
is racism" resolution; the infamous 2001 Durban conference, etc.), on
campuses such as Columbia University in New York, in the newsrooms of
the
BBC and CNN, and via the non-governmental superpowers such as Amnesty
International and Human Rights Watch.
After the death of Arafat and the relative calm on the ground,
reflecting
the exhaustion of both Israelis and Palestinians, this political war
has
heated up, particularly in Britain. Christian Aid, a very powerful
group
that uses its charitable status for promoting a blatant ideological
agenda,
ran its massive Christmas appeal around the theme of "Bethlehem's
Child".
This campaign featured the stereotypes of Israeli aggression and
Palestinian
victimization, in which the context of terror had been erased.
Similarly,
Amnesty International issued a barrage of such reports, including one
purporting to focus on the status of Palestinian women, in which Israel
was
blamed for violent attacks by Arab men against their wives and
daughters.
And Human Rights Watch, another NGO that competes with Amnesty in
exploiting
human rights in the war against Israel, is also active in the boycott
campaign. Together, they contributed to building the environment for
adoption of the AUT boycott.
So perhaps I am being too clever in dismissing the AUT's effort to
launch a
boycott of my university. For decades, the propaganda war has always
accompanied and served justified the shooting war. If the anti-Israel
forces
on campuses and in NGOs are gaining strength in Britain, Europe and the
U.S., this will undermine the current efforts to expand the cease-fire
and
conflict management activities in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Ramallah and
Gaza.
And this is the real tragedy of the AUT boycott decision - while
talking
about peace, its backers are actually contributing to war and hatred.
Professor Gerald M. Steinberg directs the Program on Conflict
Management and
Negotiation at Bar Ilan University and is the editor of
www.ngo-monitor.org
http://imra.org.il/story.php3?id=25009
Ariadne
BOYCOTT WORRIES? TAKE A NUMBER
GERALD M. STEINBERG
The phones began ringing late Friday afternoon - BBC,
AFP, co-authors, family - everyone wanted to know if
I was worried about the vote in Britain to boycott my
university. There was no time to get into details, but
as a Jew and Israeli, my automatic answer to any
our hero
> Wednesday, April 27, 2005
>
> BOYCOTT WORRIES? TAKE A NUMBER
> GERALD M. STEINBERG
>
At a glance the article appears to have no connection to Chris X. And
what the hell is an 'ArabNazi' anyway?
Thanks.
OH
Ariadne
the antisemtism consistently shown by
"Chris X". It also indicates where it comes
from.
" Indeed, the boycott is only a small part of the
broader political war against Israel's legitimacy
as a sovereign Jewish state, and the effort to
label Israel as the next "apartheid regime" is
designed to put an end to Zionism. The use of the
apartheid label does a gross injustice to those who
suffered under the real thing, and is a form of
modern anti-Semitism, this time turning the Jewish
state into the devil. The grossly exaggerated
condemnation of Israel, and the systematic removal
of the environment of terror in the rhetoric of
"war crimes" and "ethnic cleansing", is the political
counterpart of the ongoing terrorism and military
assaults."
For the Arab Nazi connection - the propaganda of
which "Chris X" uses all the time - here is a starter.
But the problem is that the people who pursue
Neo-Nazi "policy" don't believe at all in dealing in
any kind of truth.
TROUBLE IN THE HOLY LAND
'PA running Nazi propaganda machine'
Report says Palestinian television promoting genocide against Jews
Posted: January 26, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Aaron Klein
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
A senior Israeli official said yesterday the Palestinian Authority,
even under new President Mahmoud Abbas, is promoting genocide against
Jews and has been running a propaganda campaign similar to that seen in
Nazi Germany.
Israel's Diaspora Affairs Minister Natan Sharansky held a press
conference to coincide with the 60th anniversary of the liberation of
Auschwitz, in which he blasted the PA for disseminating what he said
was Nazi-like propaganda, and presented a report, "Kill a Jew - Go to
Heaven," compiled by Palestinian Media Watch, an Israel-based media
watchdog that monitors incitement in Palestinian society.
"As in Nazi Germany, there is an entire 'culture of hatred' in
Palestinian society today, from textbooks to crossword puzzles, from
day camps to TV music videos," Sharansky said. "Calling for the murder
of Jews, as Jews, is the end result."
Report co-author Itamar Marcus, who directs Palestinian Media Watch,
said Palestinian television has consistently promoted the message that
"the Jews are an evil force, and [evil] is inherent to the Jews and
therefore they have to be killed."
The report accuses the PA of constructing a "legal file," a virtual
propaganda outline for incitement against Jews that uses as its
template incitement from Nazi Germany. The file, the report said,
consists of three phases: presenting Jews as subhuman and possessing
evil qualities; convincing viewers the Jewish nation threatens the
existence of Palestinians, Arabs, and the world in general; and
concluding with the Palestinian version of the "final solution," the
destruction of Israel and elimination of the Jews.
The incitement plan, said Marcus, is directed by the Palestinian
Authority and carried out by the PA's religious, political and academic
elite, and through the PA-controlled media.
At the request of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, Abbas during the
run up to the Palestinian elections Jan. 9 met with the head of the
Palestinian Broadcasting Authority and reportedly asked him to filter
television programs to prevent the broadcast of inciting material.
Since then, Marcus said, the frequency of Palestinian programming
calling for terrorism and the destruction of Israel has realized a
slight decrease, but anti-Semitic and anti-Israel propaganda has
continued unabated.
Earlier this month, PA television blamed the Jews for causing the
tsunami in southeast Asia, and preached the destruction of Israel and
the U.S.
"The Muslim remembers how the Jews corrupted the land ... . They invest
in the East Asian countries, which were destroyed [by the tsunami]
because of the Jewish and American corruption and destruction," said
Palestinian preacher Sheik Ibrahim Madiras Friday during his weekly
sermon broadcast on PA television.
A week before that, Palestinian television featured a senior PA
academic, Dr. Hassan Khater, founder of the Al Quds Encyclopedia,
saying the killing of Jews is mandated by the prophet Mohammed.
Khater, quoting what he said was Islamic tradition, told viewers,
"Mohammed said in his Hadith: 'The Hour [Day of Resurrection] will not
arrive until you fight the Jews, [until a Jew will hide behind a rock
or tree] and the rock and the tree will say: Oh Muslim, servant of
Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!'"
"The world was largely silent in the face of Nazi anti-Semitism in the
1930s, with tragic results. One hopes the international community will
learn from the mistakes of the past and take meaningful steps in
response to the promotion of anti-Semitism by Arab regimes today," Dr.
Rafael Medoff, director of the David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust
Studies, which focuses on how America and its allies responded to
Nazism and the Holocaust, told WND.
Aaron Klein is WorldNetDaily's Jerusalem bureau chief, whose past
interview subjects have included Yasser Arafat, Ehud Barak, Shlomo Ben
Ami and leaders of the Taliban.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42559
Harry The Horse
>
> At a glance the article appears to have no connection to Chris X. And
> what the hell is an 'ArabNazi' anyway?
>
Shaun
A Nazi is a follower idelogy that is believes in extreme right-wing
nationalism based on myths of racial superiority and ancient land
rights. It is characterised by militarism, paranoia, invasion and
settlement of territory, ignoring international law, and persecution
of ethnic groups.
An Arab is an ethnic group that lives in the middle-east.
Obviously no ethnic group living the middle-east share these beliefs
so it is an oxymoron
Ariadne
Shaun wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2005 02:29:49 +0100, our hero
> <our_...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >Ariadne wrote:
> >> Wednesday, April 27, 2005
> >>
> >> BOYCOTT WORRIES? TAKE A NUMBER
> >> GERALD M. STEINBERG
> >>
> >
> >At a glance the article appears to have no connection to Chris X.
And
> >what the hell is an 'ArabNazi' anyway?
> >Thanks.
> >OH
>
indulged in genocide of Jews
An ArabNazi is a member of a perverted
version of Islam with strong connections
to German Nazism intending to carry out
genocide against Jews
Ariadne
ArabNazism
Harry The Horse
> On this page are just a few results of
> ArabNazism
>
Ariadne
Reading may be difficult for you but
this simple guide to ArabNazism was
posted earlier in the thread.
The link
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42559
Energumen
news:42762378$0$576$ed2e...@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net...
> "Shaun" <shaun....@ntlworldnnnnnnospam.com> wrote in message
> news:ir0c71tlri5gt3654...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 02 May 2005 02:29:49 +0100, our hero
>> <our_...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>Ariadne wrote:
>>>> Wednesday, April 27, 2005
>>>>
>>>> BOYCOTT WORRIES? TAKE A NUMBER
>>>> GERALD M. STEINBERG
>>>>
>>>
>>>At a glance the article appears to have no connection to Chris X. And
>>>what the hell is an 'ArabNazi' anyway?
>>>Thanks.
>>>OH
>>
>> A Nazi is a follower idelogy that is believes in extreme right-wing
>> nationalism based on myths of racial superiority and ancient land
>> rights. It is characterised by militarism, paranoia, invasion and
>> settlement of territory, ignoring international law, and persecution
>> of ethnic groups.
>
> do the "race" thing. Instead of racially cleansing the invaded
> "territories" on the contrary captured women can be used for reproduction.
>
> In contrast the modern so called "extreme right" in Europe are a reaction
> to physical colonisation and cultural displacement of existing
> inhabitants, mostly by Muslims, and have shown no intention to invade
> anywhere. On the contrary it is the likes of Bush who believes that Islam
> can be compatible with western democracy and human rights and is a
> proponent of eg. Turkey joining the EU who has invaded Muslim countries.
> He does not seem to realise that his enemy is Islam itself as written in
> the Koran and Hadiths and not some non-standard offshoot of it.
>
>>
>> An Arab is an ethnic group that lives in the middle-east.
>
> though of course the Arabs existed long before Islam was invented and
> cannot be defined by it.
>
Of course most Muslims are just fairly normal people who get on with their
lives just as most members of the NSDAP did in 1920s and 1930s Germany.
Energumen
> <our_...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Ariadne wrote:
>>> Wednesday, April 27, 2005
>>>
>>> BOYCOTT WORRIES? TAKE A NUMBER
>>> GERALD M. STEINBERG
>>>
>>
>>At a glance the article appears to have no connection to Chris X. And
>>what the hell is an 'ArabNazi' anyway?
>>Thanks.
>>OH
>
> A Nazi is a follower idelogy that is believes in extreme right-wing
> nationalism based on myths of racial superiority and ancient land
> rights. It is characterised by militarism, paranoia, invasion and
> settlement of territory, ignoring international law, and persecution
> of ethnic groups.
Rather like the Islam as practiced by Muhammed then. Except Islam doesn't do
the "race" thing. Instead of racially cleansing the invaded "territories" on
the contrary captured women can be used for reproduction.
In contrast the modern so called "extreme right" in Europe are a reaction to
physical colonisation and cultural displacement of existing inhabitants,
mostly by Muslims, and have shown no intention to invade anywhere. On the
contrary it is the likes of Bush who believes that Islam can be compatible
with western democracy and human rights and is a proponent of eg. Turkey
joining the EU who has invaded Muslim countries. He does not seem to realise
that his enemy is Islam itself as written in the Koran and Hadiths and not
some non-standard offshoot of it.
>
> An Arab is an ethnic group that lives in the middle-east.
Arab is to Nazi as German is to Islam. Islam is a form of Arab imperialism
though of course the Arabs existed long before Islam was invented and cannot
be defined by it.
>
Ariadne
Shaun wrote:
>
> An Arab is an ethnic group that lives in the middle-east.
>
> Obviously no ethnic group living the middle-east share these beliefs
> so it is an oxymoron
A fine example of the Arab fantasia!
In 1921 the British released from prison
an Egyptian terrorist, later a Nazi
and "inspiration" to Arafat.
________________________________________
Appointed Mufti of Jerusalem by the British in 1921, Haj Amin
al-Husseini was the most prominent Arab figure in Palestine during the
Mandatory period. Al-Husseini was born in Jerusalem in 1893, and went
on to serve in the Ottoman Army during World War I. Anti-British and
anti-Jewish, the mufti was the key nationalist figure among Muslims in
Palestine. Fearful that increased Jewish immigration to Palestine would
damage Arab standing in the area, the mufti engineered the bloody riots
against Jewish settlement in 1929 and 1936.
Al-Husseini's appointment as mufti was itself the subject of much
controversy. The decision to grant al-Husseini the position was made by
Herbert Samuel, the first high commissioner of Palestine. It was odd
that Samuel, a British Jew, would appoint a man who would be
responsible for so much unrest within the Mandatory area. Al-Husseini
in fact had been sentenced to ten years in prison by the British for
inciting riots in 1920. None of that sentence was served, as
al-Husseini had fled to Transjordan, and was soon after amnestied by
Samuel himself.
For his part, al-Husseini had used his influence to quiet additional
disturbances in 1921. He assured Samuel that he would continue to
maintain order, and it was with this understanding that the high
commissioner granted him the position of mufti. In the following year,
he was also appointed to lead the Supreme Muslim Council, expanding his
already significant powers. Known later as the Grand Mufti, al-Husseini
was able to establish himself as the preeminent Arab power in
Palestine.
One of the mufti's most successful projects was the restoration of the
Dome of the Rock and the al-Aqsa mosque. With funds collected from
India and various Arab states, the Dome was plated in gold. The
impressive looks of the Dome greatly enhanced the status of Jerusalem
in the eyes of Muslims throughout the world. Similarly, al-Husseini's
own status as Mufti of Jerusalem increased his standing as an
influential Arab leader.
The mufti was dismissed from his position following the riots of 1936.
No longer able to stay in Palestine, he continued his extremist
activities from abroad. During World War II, the mufti was involved in
the mobilization of support for Germany among Muslims. In November 1941
the Mufti met with Hitler. Although he continued to be involved in
politics, al-Husseini's influence gradually declined after the defeat
of the Arab armies in 1948.
Jewish Virtual Library
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
By Douglas Davis April 26, 2005
Pay attention, Professor. If you support the proposed academic boycott
of Israel - and if you are to remain intellectually honest - prepare for
a radical lifestyle change. Firstly, unplug your computer. Good. Now
switch off your interactive digital television set. Well done. And now
throw away your mobile phone. Excellent.
You see, Professor, these machines are not only the engine of the
globalized, capitalist world but they also depend on technologies that
have been produced by Israeli academics in the Zionist entity.
Stop playing with your detached mouse, Professor, and concentrate. I'm
afraid you may not use the British Library because it has been
computerized by Ex Libris, a Zionist company that was spawned by the
odious Hebrew University of Jerusalem. And if, God forbid, you develop
problems of the small intestine, you may not pop the Zionist-invented
'video capsule', which passes naturally through your body as it monitors
this delicate piece of your anatomy. You will, sadly, have to take it up
the derri?re, Professor. As a matter of principle, of course. But
remember: your principle allows your proctologist to keep his hand in.
All this boycotting, you see, is the logical extension of proposed
academic sanctions against Israel by some members of the British
Association of University Teachers (AUT). Just visit the website of
Egyptian-born Mona Baker of the University of Manchester Institute of
Science and Technology. She set the standard by firing two Israeli
scholars from the boards of her translation journals as a matter of high
academic principle.
You will see that Ms Baker's ambitions do not end with the academic
boycott. Her website also includes a section entitled 'Boycott Israeli
Products & Services', which features dozens of global brands that,
inconveniently, are not Israeli at all. The offenders presumably have
earned their place in infamy by dealing with the Zionist entity, by
being owned by Jews or by having Jews on their boards. They range from
Coca-Cola and Nescaf? to Johnson & Johnson and Est?e Lauder, from Hugo
Boss and Ralph Lauren to Selfridges and Marks & Spencer, from Kleenex
and Wonderbra to Lanc?me and.... All marked for boycott.
Absent from Ms Baker's list - and here I think I can help - is a set of
global companies which are arguably even more culpable because they not
only operate in Israel but also do most of their R&D there. IBM and
Intel each have three R&D centres in Israel; Microsoft established its
first non-American facility there, and Cisco Systems has built its only
non-American R&D center in Israel. Then there is Motorola, which has its
largest R&D site in Israel, and News Corp, whose company NDS develops
those neat interactive technologies for digital television. There are
many more.
The AUT boycott brigade has cause for concern. It knows that these
companies are attracted not only by the innate brutality of the
expansionist regime but also by the cunning of its university graduates
(most of the R&D centers are located on or near Israeli university
campuses). Proportionally, the Zionist entity has more university
graduates than any other country, while its scientists, engineers and
agriculturists publish more professional papers per capita than do their
counterparts anywhere else on earth. The result is that Israel has the
largest concentration of high-tech companies outside Silicon Valley. But
the ultimate sin is that Israel, which came to independence in the
process of post-war decolonization, stubbornly refuses to become a
failed state.
So dangerous has the situation become, dear Professor, that when the AUT
met in Eastbourne last week, the issue that preoccupied you was the
aggressive imperialist apartheid state: a state that has nurtured the
Palestinian universities and colleges in the West Bank; one that offers
equal rights - and access to its universities - to all its citizens,
regardless of race, religion, ethnicity or sex; and which has educated
tens of thousands of Palestinians at Israeli universities (several
hundred a year still opt for an Israeli education). It is significant
that Omar Barghouti, the Palestinian who is encouraging you and your
British comrades to boycott Israel, is a doctoral student at none other
than Tel Aviv University.
No, Professor, not all Israeli universities and not all Israeli
academics will be boycotted if the AUT motion is passed. Such a
proposition was defeated 3-1 at the association's conference two years
ago, and the boycotters are too smart to repeat past mistakes. The new
motion, says one of its authors, has been 'tactically' amended to get it
passed. 'We've got to be a bit more sophisticated,' she says. And
sophisticated they are. They even had a dry run last December, when they
met to rehearse their presentations and develop killer responses to
potential critics.
Their sleek new motion - which does not involve a single book-burning -
envisages sanctions against only the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Tel
Aviv University and Haifa University. And there's more: the boycotters
generously offer Israeli academics the opportunity to buy themselves
immunity if they are prepared to denounce their country, specifically,
'conscientious Israeli academics and intellectuals opposed to their
state's colonial and racist policies'. Who could seriously question the
integrity of your fellow academic freedom fighters?
But there are, of course, small obstinate obstacles in the way of you
visionaries, Professor. Britain's academic institutions, for example,
have not endorsed boycotting Israel's academic community. Indeed, when
the Oxford don Andrew Wilkie told an Israeli PhD applicant that there
was 'no way would I take on somebody who had served in the Israeli
army', he was hauled before the university's disciplinary body and
suspended without pay for two months.
Cambridge University's Professor Sir Aaron Klug, Nobel laureate and
former president of the Royal Society, put me right when I asked him
about the possible impact - on Britain no less than on Israel - of such
a boycott: 'How important is the AUT? That's the question you have to
ask.' He is no supporter of Israel's Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, and
his policies but he does consider that the proposed boycott is 'ill
considered and doesn't promote anything at all'. The AUT, he says, is
out to attack Israel 'but this is no way to proceed'. Sir Aaron is 'not
one who looks for anti-Semitism around every corner,' he says, 'but I do
think there's an element of that here. It does give people who are
anti-Semitic the opportunity to express themselves.'
But relax, Professor. The AUT has solemnly concluded that there is a
clear distinction between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. They don't
mind Jews. They just detest the Jewish state.
Douglas Davis is a journalist based in London, and co-author, with Helen
Davis, of Israel in the World Changing Lives Through Innovation,
published by Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
(Originally appeared in The Spectator)
--
"Then, We let the people [Israel], who were despised, inherit
the eastern and western parts of the land which we had
blessed. And the fair word of Allah was fulfilled for the
Children of Israel because of their endurance."
- Sura 7.137
"Then We said to the children of Israel: 'Dwell in the land,
and when the promise of the hereafter will be fulfilled,
we shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various
nations."
- Sura 17.104
"Ariadne" <ari...@mac.hush.com> wrote in message
news:1115000155....@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
Pan-Arab Nationalism!
"Shaun" <shaun....@ntlworldnnnnnnospam.com> wrote in message
news:ir0c71tlri5gt3654...@4ax.com...
: On Mon, 02 May 2005 02:29:49 +0100, our hero
:
:
:
John Gilbert
<ri...@zion.org.il> wrote:
>How fucking wrong you are! Guess you are too ignorant to have heard of
>Pan-Arab Nationalism!
Allow me to sum up the situation perfectly, Riain.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W55E2200B <vbg>
Regards, (Or Otherwise)
John G
________________________
It's Time For Change
Vote B.N.P. On May 5th
www.bnp.org.uk
________________________
Energumen
news:42762378$0$576$ed2e...@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net...
Should be Arab is to Islam as German is to Nazi obviously.
ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton
to England and bows your head off!
"John Gilbert" <john.gil...@virgin.net> wrote in message
news:scdc71ljju95ujj66...@4ax.com...
: On Mon, 2 May 2005 17:10:41 +0300, "ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton"
:
Boed...@isp.com
You must be joking! Israel is in The Middle East and there is
no country more militaristic and paranoiac. It has invaded
its neighbours on more than one occasion, ignored international
law and U.N. Resolutions and persecuted those who live
in its boundaries. As for "racial superiority and "ancient rights"
you really must be joking.
John Gilbert
<ri...@zion.org.il> wrote:
>Piss off you fucking British NAZI bastard, before this Irish-Jew comes
>to England and bows your head off!
An Irish oven magnet? Riain, please allow me to say what a great
honour it is to encounter a member of such a rare species <g>.
I am sorry if I offended you in any way, and I'm certainly glad I
didn't take the liberty of posting this one yesterday, you may have
been terribly upset if I had done so:-
http://makeashorterlink.com/?D2E63220B
Regards,
pepys
> <our_...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Ariadne wrote:
>>> Wednesday, April 27, 2005
>>>
>>> BOYCOTT WORRIES? TAKE A NUMBER
>>> GERALD M. STEINBERG
>>>
>>
>>At a glance the article appears to have no connection to Chris X. And
>>what the hell is an 'ArabNazi' anyway?
>>Thanks.
>>OH
>
> A Nazi is a follower idelogy that is believes in extreme right-wing
> nationalism based on myths of racial superiority and ancient land
> rights. It is characterised by militarism, paranoia, invasion and
> settlement of territory, ignoring international law, and persecution
> of ethnic groups.
>
That very appropriately defines the yid.
pepys
"ריעין ברתון/Riain Barton" <ri...@zion.org.il> wrote in message
news:ycBde.123579$f%4.9...@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> Piss off you fucking British NAZI bastard, before this Irish-Jew comes
> to England and bows your head off!
More from the bigoted, bent and confused rayanne barton.
You wouldn't be able to "bow" cream from a fairy cake, you fairy.
The +Revd
wrote:
He knows all about blowing heads though.