will hillary stand against obarmy as a patriotic duty....
abelard
in view of the obvious problems with obarmy's judgement
and dubious values....
is it possible the hillary is continuing to oppose obarmy
as a patriotic duty....
will she see it as her duty to endorse mccain rather than
letting obarmy into the white house....
or perhaps stand against him in the last analysis....
the idea that obarmy could be an able president is quite
ludicrous when he has 'policies as follows...
* abandon our friends in iraq,
* attack our allies in pakistan, and
* appease our enemies in iran.
the idea that a president could have heavy attachments to
a black power 'church', friendship with an unrepentant
terrorist and involvement with rezko presently on trial for
corruption....is the stuff of fiction not of serious politics....
is hillary, as a patriot, perhaps putting her country above her party
and above her attachments as a socialist?
as the great statesman, churchill said....
his loyalty was first to his country....
second to his constituents and
third to his party.....
in the uk much of the socialist labour party used to be patriotic
despite many of them being card carrying reds....
whereas now they are interested only in getting to the trough....
are things still better than that in the usa....
or is it just a dream to hope that the socialist hillary will have
such high ethical standards, and surprise the country by proving
herself a principled patriot?
regards...
--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
aracari
On Sat, 10 May 2008 01:22:02 +0200 'abelard'
wrote this on uk.politics.misc:
[sorry, groups trimmed to three by necessity]
>in view of the obvious problems with obarmy's judgement
> and dubious values....
>is it possible the hillary is continuing to oppose obarmy
> as a patriotic duty....
Possible? definitely.
Probable? Very unlikely imo.
>will she see it as her duty to endorse mccain rather than
> letting obarmy into the white house....
She's a socialist and he's considered by some to be a RINO.
...so maybe.
>or perhaps stand against him in the last analysis....
>
>the idea that obarmy could be an able president is quite
> ludicrous when he has 'policies as follows...
>
> * abandon our friends in iraq,
> * attack our allies in pakistan, and
> * appease our enemies in iran.
>
>the idea that a president could have heavy attachments to
> a black power 'church', friendship with an unrepentant
> terrorist and involvement with rezko presently on trial for
> corruption....is the stuff of fiction not of serious politics....
True, but you also know there's been a lot of concern over the
past 7-8 years about Bush's connections to the Christian fundies.
His constant references to hearing God's voice et al.
>is hillary, as a patriot, perhaps putting her country above her party
> and above her attachments as a socialist?
Personally I doubt it. I wasn't aware socialists were patriotic to
anything other than spreading (international) socialism.
>as the great statesman, churchill said....
>his loyalty was first to his country....
>second to his constituents and
>third to his party.....
How times change...
You'd have to list them in reverse order today.
>in the uk much of the socialist labour party used to be patriotic
> despite many of them being card carrying reds....
>whereas now they are interested only in getting to the trough....
>
>are things still better than that in the usa....
Some Americans I know say that the Dems are not like English
socialists.
>or is it just a dream to hope that the socialist hillary will have
> such high ethical standards, and surprise the country by proving
> herself a principled patriot?
She will hang on until Obama gets the nomination is my guess.
--
socialism is like chronic heart disease ...
you may not know you suffer from it, but it'll kill you in the end.
FACE
on Sat, 10 May 2008 01:22:02 +0200
I seriously doubt that hillary is placing anyone or anything above hillary.
The only reason she is playing the 'patriotic' game right now is to be 'not
obama'. Like everything else about her, it's a sham.
Of course, I think Obama is a sham, too.
McCain is not a conservative and one of the few things he has going for him
is that he is not Obama and he is not Hillary.
FACE
Hothead McCain
they are only "not McCain", whereas McCain would be "not Obama" AND "not Hillary."
So it would be "not Hillary" AND "not McCain" vs "not Obama" AND "not Hillary."
ayatollah obama
> In article <id1a249792cvt2skj2ft0168s84a7u4...@4ax.com>, AFaceInTheCr...@today.net says...
>
>
>
> > From abelard <abela...@abelard.org>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
Probably the only time I'll ever give you a 5-star rating on a post. I
got a good chuckle out of that one!
-------
DemonCraps.... Making the lives of poor people even more miserable!
DemonCraps.... Save a planet, Starve a Nation
Governor Swill
>McCain is not a conservative and one of the few things he has going for him
>is that he is not Obama and he is not Hillary.
And he's not a conservative.
Swill
--
Shift Happens
"Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit.
Slow thinkers keep right." - Peter Principle
(US)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljbI-363A2Q&feature=related
http://preview.tinyurl.com/33cvso
(UK)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeoKQbT8BKs&feature=related
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6nd7kr
FACE
<n...@spamm.com>, wrote
Look, It's really early, but I think you are trying that Boolean Logic
stuff on me! Please flow chart it..................
FACE