Police hunting for Madeleine McCann are looking for the driver of a small
white van, Sky News can reveal.
"One report suggests he was sitting in a small, white van. Police have got a
good description of the man: about 5ft 8in tall, between 30 and 35, not
Portuguese according to one of the witnesses, wearing a blue jacket and
white trousers."
He said police had produced an e-fit of the suspect which they had been
showing to people inside the apartment block in an attempt to jog their
memories.
He added that police are also keen to trace an American man who lives in the
village but who has not been seen for several days - and who also drives a
white van.
******************************
"There is only one start you can make, and that is a start toward being
England. A refusal to be a province of Israel, or an outpost of
Yankee-Judaea."
-Ezra Pound
http://www.nnp.org.uk
http://www.iamanenglishman.com/
http://www.arabeuropean.org/article.php?ID=97
http://holywar.org/indexholy.html
http://www.thirdway.org
http://www.irancartoon.com/
http://www.nowarforisrael.com
http://www.no2id.org
http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/resources/big-brother.pdf
Are you sure it wasn't the Polish bloke what dunnit? You know, the same one
that murdered the Ipswich prostitutes?
Take it up with Sky News if you've got a "problem" with the report,
fucktard.
Ha ha ha ha!! "Fucktard".....WTF is a "fucktard"????
>>>> http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,70131-1265391,00.html
>>>>
>>>> Police hunting for Madeleine McCann are looking for the driver of a
>>>> small white van, Sky News can reveal.
>>>> "One report suggests he was sitting in a small, white van. Police have
>>>> got a good description of the man: about 5ft 8in tall, between 30 and
>>>> 35, not Portuguese according to one of the witnesses, wearing a blue
>>>> jacket and white trousers."
>>>>
>>>> He said police had produced an e-fit of the suspect which they had been
>>>> showing to people inside the apartment block in an attempt to jog their
>>>> memories.
>>>>
>>>> He added that police are also keen to trace an American man who lives
>>>> in the village but who has not been seen for several days - and who
>>>> also drives a white van.
>>>>
>>> Are you sure it wasn't the Polish bloke what dunnit? You know, the same
>>> one that murdered the Ipswich prostitutes?
>>
>> Take it up with Sky News if you've got a "problem" with the report,
>> fucktard.
>>
> Ha ha ha ha!! "Fucktard".....WTF is a "fucktard"????
It's in quite common usage on Usenet, Bloo Loo. Google is your "friend".
Now, do let us know how Sky News respond to your "complaint" about the
article.
For goodness sake man please don't use the awful story for your beliefs.
They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't put that.
LOL ! Merely reporting the news, that's all :)
> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't put that.
It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
You mean selectively reporting the news
>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't put that.
>
> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
Then learn to look harder.
>>>> http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,70131-1265391,00.html
>>>>
>>>> Police hunting for Madeleine McCann are looking for the driver of a
>>>> small white van, Sky News can reveal.
>>>> "One report suggests he was sitting in a small, white van. Police have
>>>> got a good description of the man: about 5ft 8in tall, between 30 and
>>>> 35, not Portuguese according to one of the witnesses, wearing a blue
>>>> jacket and white trousers."
>>>>
>>>> He said police had produced an e-fit of the suspect which they had been
>>>> showing to people inside the apartment block in an attempt to jog their
>>>> memories.
>>>>
>>>> He added that police are also keen to trace an American man who lives
>>>> in the village but who has not been seen for several days - and who
>>>> also drives a white van.
>>>
>>> For goodness sake man please don't use the awful story for your beliefs.
>>
>> LOL ! Merely reporting the news, that's all :)
>
> You mean selectively reporting the news.
No, as I said, it's called "fair use". Deal with it, lamer.
>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't put
>>> that.
>>
>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>
> Then learn to look harder.
No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved ! LOL !
Fair use for your beliefs, I have no doubt.
>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't put
>>>> that.
>>>
>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>
>> Then learn to look harder.
>
> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved ! LOL !
I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
Your link where you mention the American also states
"CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching Madeleine's
description at a nearby petrol station"
Where in your header do you mention those, oh yes, you don't.
One only wonders why.
Like I said lets no use this story for your beliefs.
>>>>>> http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,70131-1265391,00.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Police hunting for Madeleine McCann are looking for the driver of a
>>>>>> small white van, Sky News can reveal.
>>>>>> "One report suggests he was sitting in a small, white van. Police
>>>>>> have got a good description of the man: about 5ft 8in tall, between
>>>>>> 30 and 35, not Portuguese according to one of the witnesses, wearing
>>>>>> a blue jacket and white trousers."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He said police had produced an e-fit of the suspect which they had
>>>>>> been showing to people inside the apartment block in an attempt to
>>>>>> jog their memories.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He added that police are also keen to trace an American man who lives
>>>>>> in the village but who has not been seen for several days - and who
>>>>>> also drives a white van.
>>>>>
>>>>> For goodness sake man please don't use the awful story for your
>>>>> beliefs.
>>>>
>>>> LOL ! Merely reporting the news, that's all :)
>>>
>>> You mean selectively reporting the news.
>>
>> No, as I said, it's called "fair use". Deal with it, lamer.
>
> Fair use for your beliefs, I have no doubt.
"Fair use" for copyright reasons, Mitton. Deal with it.
>>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't put
>>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>>
>>> Then learn to look harder.
>>
>> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved ! LOL !
>
> I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
> Your link where you mention the American also states
>
> "CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching Madeleine's
> description at a nearby petrol station"
Just as I told you it did, Mitton. You really are a total loser !
> Where in your header do you mention those, oh yes, you don't.
> One only wonders why.
Because it's already been common knowledge for a few days. The fact that a
Moronican is being sought *isn't*.
Deal with it.
> Like I said lets no use this story for your beliefs.
Care to try that again in *English* ?
Nothing to do with copyright
>>>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't put
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>>>
>>>> Then learn to look harder.
>>>
>>> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved ! LOL !
>>
>> I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
>> Your link where you mention the American also states
>>
>> "CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching Madeleine's
>> description at a nearby petrol station"
>
> Just as I told you it did, Mitton. You really are a total loser !
So where in your tiltle does it mention them, in fact where in you OP does
it mention them.........cue tumbleweed
>> Where in your header do you mention those, oh yes, you don't.
>> One only wonders why.
>
> Because it's already been common knowledge for a few days.
I must have missed you other post about those three people in the car, could
you point me to it?
Then you're demonstrating your ignorance, as usual.
>>>>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't put
>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then learn to look harder.
>>>>
>>>> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved ! LOL !
>>>
>>> I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
>>> Your link where you mention the American also states
>>>
>>> "CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching Madeleine's
>>> description at a nearby petrol station"
>>
>> Just as I told you it did, Mitton. You really are a total loser !
>
> So where in your tiltle does it mention them,
Why should it ? That's old news, the part about the Yank being sought
*isn't*.
> in fact where in you OP does it mention them.........cue tumbleweed
Fair use. I suggest you deal with it.
>>> Where in your header do you mention those, oh yes, you don't.
>>> One only wonders why.
>>
>> Because it's already been common knowledge for a few days.
>
> I must have missed you other post about those three people in the car,
> could you point me to it?
I didn't post about it, but every other news outlet in the world *did*. Try
telling us you "must have missed" those, too.
You pathetic piece of shit.
>Care to try that again in *English* ?
watch abdul run....
mother sees hakky run....
hakky runs very fast....
run abdul run....
--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Care to point to the copyright that says you can't mention the other 3
suspects?
>>>>>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't put
>>>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then learn to look harder.
>>>>>
>>>>> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved ! LOL !
>>>>
>>>> I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
>>>> Your link where you mention the American also states
>>>>
>>>> "CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching Madeleine's
>>>> description at a nearby petrol station"
>>>
>>> Just as I told you it did, Mitton. You really are a total loser !
>>
>> So where in your tiltle does it mention them,
>
> Why should it ?
It's called accuracy, something else "alien" to you no doubt.
>> in fact where in you OP does it mention them.........cue tumbleweed
>
> Fair use. I suggest you deal with it.
You keep going in circles, fair use copyright has nothing to do with it.
At least stop being juvanile and say the real reason.
>>>> Where in your header do you mention those, oh yes, you don't.
>>>> One only wonders why.
>>>
>>> Because it's already been common knowledge for a few days.
>>
>> I must have missed you other post about those three people in the car,
>> could you point me to it?
>
> I didn't post about it
I rest my case.
>>>>>>>>>> http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,70131-1265391,00.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Police hunting for Madeleine McCann are looking for the driver of
>>>>>>>>>> a small white van, Sky News can reveal.
>>>>>>>>>> "One report suggests he was sitting in a small, white van. Police
>>>>>>>>>> have got a good description of the man: about 5ft 8in tall,
>>>>>>>>>> between 30 and 35, not Portuguese according to one of the
>>>>>>>>>> witnesses, wearing a blue jacket and white trousers."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He said police had produced an e-fit of the suspect which they
>>>>>>>>>> had been showing to people inside the apartment block in an
>>>>>>>>>> attempt to jog their memories.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He added that police are also keen to trace an American man who
>>>>>>>>>> lives in the village but who has not been seen for several days -
>>>>>>>>>> and who also drives a white van.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For goodness sake man please don't use the awful story for your
>>>>>>>>> beliefs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL ! Merely reporting the news, that's all :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You mean selectively reporting the news.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, as I said, it's called "fair use". Deal with it, lamer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fair use for your beliefs, I have no doubt.
>>>>
>>>> "Fair use" for copyright reasons, Mitton. Deal with it.
>>>
>>> Nothing to do with copyright
>>
>> Then you're demonstrating your ignorance, as usual.
>
> Care to point to the copyright that says you can't mention the other 3
> suspects?
The text quoted related to the title, Slimey. Deal with it.
>>>>>>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't
>>>>>>>>> put that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then learn to look harder.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved ! LOL !
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
>>>>> Your link where you mention the American also states
>>>>>
>>>>> "CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching Madeleine's
>>>>> description at a nearby petrol station"
>>>>
>>>> Just as I told you it did, Mitton. You really are a total loser !
>>>
>>> So where in your tiltle does it mention them,
>>
>> Why should it ?
>
> It's called accuracy, something else "alien" to you no doubt.
The thread title reflects the information in the post, end of story.
>>> in fact where in you OP does it mention them.........cue tumbleweed
>>
>> Fair use. I suggest you deal with it.
>
> You keep going in circles, fair use copyright has nothing to do with it.
> At least stop being juvanile and say the real reason.
>
>>>>> Where in your header do you mention those, oh yes, you don't.
>>>>> One only wonders why.
>>>>
>>>> Because it's already been common knowledge for a few days.
>>>
>>> I must have missed you other post about those three people in the car,
>>> could you point me to it?
>>
>> I didn't post about it but every other news outlet in the world *did*.
>> Try telling us you "must have missed" those, too.
>> You pathetic piece of shit.
> I rest my case.
I rest mine, and your surrender is *savoured*, Slimey, you sockpuppetting
wheezing sicko.
So your into reporting titles.
>>>>>>>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't
>>>>>>>>>> put that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then learn to look harder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved ! LOL
>>>>>>> !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
>>>>>> Your link where you mention the American also states
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching Madeleine's
>>>>>> description at a nearby petrol station"
>>>>>
>>>>> Just as I told you it did, Mitton. You really are a total loser !
>>>>
>>>> So where in your tiltle does it mention them,
>>>
>>> Why should it ?
>>
>> It's called accuracy, something else "alien" to you no doubt.
>
> The thread title reflects the information in the post, end of story.
But your title did not reflect that
>>>> in fact where in you OP does it mention them.........cue tumbleweed
>>>
>>> Fair use. I suggest you deal with it.
>>
>> You keep going in circles, fair use copyright has nothing to do with it.
>> At least stop being juvanile and say the real reason.
>>
>>>>>> Where in your header do you mention those, oh yes, you don't.
>>>>>> One only wonders why.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because it's already been common knowledge for a few days.
>>>>
>>>> I must have missed you other post about those three people in the car,
>>>> could you point me to it?
>>>
>>> I didn't post about it but every other news outlet in the world *did*.
>>> Try telling us you "must have missed" those, too.
>>> You pathetic piece of shit.
>
>> I rest my case.
>
> I rest mine, and your surrender is *savoured*, Slimey, you sockpuppetting
> wheezing sicko.
I see your you have paranoia.
I report new deveolpments, Slimey. And the Yank being sought is a new
development. Deal with it.
>>>>>>>>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't
>>>>>>>>>>> put that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then learn to look harder.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved ! LOL
>>>>>>>> !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
>>>>>>> Your link where you mention the American also states
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching
>>>>>>> Madeleine's description at a nearby petrol station"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just as I told you it did, Mitton. You really are a total loser !
>>>>>
>>>>> So where in your tiltle does it mention them,
>>>>
>>>> Why should it ?
>>>
>>> It's called accuracy, something else "alien" to you no doubt.
>>
>> The thread title reflects the information in the post, end of story.
>
> But your title did not reflect that
The title and the included text were indeed compatible, Slimey. Deal with
it.
>>>>> in fact where in you OP does it mention them.........cue tumbleweed
>>>>
>>>> Fair use. I suggest you deal with it.
>>>>>>> Where in your header do you mention those, oh yes, you don't.
>>>>>>> One only wonders why.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because it's already been common knowledge for a few days.
>>>>>
>>>>> I must have missed you other post about those three people in the car,
>>>>> could you point me to it?
>>>>
>>>> I didn't post about it but every other news outlet in the world *did*.
>>>> Try telling us you "must have missed" those, too.
>>>> You pathetic piece of shit.
>>
>>> I rest my case.
>>
>> I rest mine, and your surrender is *savoured*, Slimey, you sockpuppetting
>> wheezing sicko.
>
> I see your you have paranoia.
Care to post that again in English, Slimey ? LOL - Slimey Sheldon, done you
again !
PING 80.229.234.226 (Spaceprobe.plus.com - Slimey's old node on his old
ISP)
Pinging 80.229.234.226 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 80.229.234.226:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
So you see yourself as a reporter eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> put that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then learn to look harder.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved !
>>>>>>>>> LOL !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
>>>>>>>> Your link where you mention the American also states
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching
>>>>>>>> Madeleine's description at a nearby petrol station"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just as I told you it did, Mitton. You really are a total loser !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So where in your tiltle does it mention them,
>>>>>
>>>>> Why should it ?
>>>>
>>>> It's called accuracy, something else "alien" to you no doubt.
>>>
>>> The thread title reflects the information in the post, end of story.
>>
>> But your title did not reflect that
>
> The title and the included text were indeed compatible, Slimey. Deal with
> it.
Compatible with what?
I doubt you would get a response, if they have a firewall.
Is this a form of diversion?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,70131-1265391,00.html
Just another poster on usenet, Slimey. Do continue your sneaky retreat in
this thread, it's very amusing to watch !
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't put that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Then learn to look harder.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved !
>>>>>>>>>> LOL !
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
>>>>>>>>> Your link where you mention the American also states
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching
>>>>>>>>> Madeleine's description at a nearby petrol station"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just as I told you it did, Mitton. You really are a total loser !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So where in your tiltle does it mention them,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why should it ?
>>>>>
>>>>> It's called accuracy, something else "alien" to you no doubt.
>>>>
>>>> The thread title reflects the information in the post, end of story.
>>>
>>> But your title did not reflect that
>>
>> The title and the included text were indeed compatible, Slimey. Deal with
>> it.
>
> Compatible with what?
With each other, Slimey.
No, it's proof that you have finally abandoned Plus.Net Slimey - I bet they
were glad to see the back of you !
You seem to be suffering some sort of delusionary episode, I am sticking to
the subject, unlike you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't put that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Then learn to look harder.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved !
>>>>>>>>>>> LOL !
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
>>>>>>>>>> Your link where you mention the American also states
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching
>>>>>>>>>> Madeleine's description at a nearby petrol station"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just as I told you it did, Mitton. You really are a total loser !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So where in your tiltle does it mention them,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why should it ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's called accuracy, something else "alien" to you no doubt.
>>>>>
>>>>> The thread title reflects the information in the post, end of story.
>>>>
>>>> But your title did not reflect that
>>>
>>> The title and the included text were indeed compatible, Slimey. Deal
>>> with it.
>>
>> Compatible with what?
>
> With each other, Slimey.
But it is plain that in your view they were not equal
I have never been with Plus Net, and frankly you're sounding like a mad fool
with your claims of myself being someone else.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,70131-1265391,00.html
No you're not, but I am. And I'm enjoying watching to try to slink away
"unnoticed". LOL !
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are also looking for 2 men and 1 woman also but you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't put that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's called "fair use", lamer. The link does mention it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then learn to look harder.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No - it is you who should look harder, as I have just proved !
>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL !
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest you didn't look hard enough.
>>>>>>>>>>> Your link where you mention the American also states
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "CCTV footage of a woman and two men with a girl matching
>>>>>>>>>>> Madeleine's description at a nearby petrol station"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just as I told you it did, Mitton. You really are a total loser
>>>>>>>>>> !
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So where in your tiltle does it mention them,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why should it ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's called accuracy, something else "alien" to you no doubt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The thread title reflects the information in the post, end of story.
>>>>>
>>>>> But your title did not reflect that
>>>>
>>>> The title and the included text were indeed compatible, Slimey. Deal
>>>> with it.
>>>
>>> Compatible with what?
>>
>> With each other, Slimey.
>
> But it is plain that in your view they were not equal
Nothing to do with "equality" you fuckwit, everything to do with the thread
title matching what was in the body of the post, which it did. Deal with it.
You're lying Slimey.
> and frankly you're sounding like a mad fool with your claims of myself
> being someone else.
"Myself". Another one of Slimey's favourite words. Watch that posting
style, Slimey. It gives you away every time. It's like a fingerprint.
Abdul has lost it again, sockpuppet, sockpuppet, myself, sockpuppet, we'll
win 65 seats.
ROTFLMAO
It looks like there is only one person who has lost it Slimey!
God it's sad to see the effects of 'care in the community' on the mentally
ill.
You really should be in restraints, safely locked up in a padded
cell......if only for your own good!
Hell hath no fury like Slimey Sheldon getting rumbled. *AGAIN* !
Wherever Chris X is Onlyme soon follows, the brokeback brothers of ukpm, I
hope you are taking certain precautions.
Your mother certainly should have!
Now bummer boy, don't use my posts to construct a reply.
*POSTS*....is that what you've been dropping?
Could have fooled me.......I thought a sewerage pipe had burst!!!
No, that's what is on the end of your prick when you withdraw from Chris X
Such eloquence...such charm.
No, really....I'm impressed!
I thought I would put it in language that you are used to.
....and then you realised that you always have problems with words of more
than one syllable......so you were forced to post your usual shite instead!
>
Looks like Onlyme is losing his temper.
<vbg>
Looks like slimey sheldon the wigan wanker is out on 'care in the community'
again.
What a shame the community couldn't give a shit!
Never mind...the men in white coats will be collecting you in the morning.
You're very angry today Onlyme, could you not get your fix of Pet Shop Boys?
>> Looks like slimey sheldon the wigan wanker is out on 'care in the
>> community'
>> again.
>> What a shame the community couldn't give a shit!
>>
>> Never mind...the men in white coats will be collecting you in the
>> morning.
>
> You're very angry today Onlyme, could you not get your fix of Pet Shop
> Boys?
I wish the men in *black* coats would collect him ;)
Well.....you know....
"Tick-Tock"
Oh yes ! Gawd bless mother nature and her little imperfections !
> He added that police are also keen to trace an American man who lives in
> the village but who has not been seen for several days - and who also
> drives a white van.
Breaking news;
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6655907.stm
Fresh searches have begun at a villa close to the apartment where Madeleine
McCann went missing.
Police and forensic teams have sealed off the house, known as Casa Liliana,
150 yards from the holiday complex in Praia da Luz, Portugal.
The BBC's correspondent Jane Hill, who is in the Algarve resort, said it was
the first time a villa has been sealed off during the hunt.
Madeleine, from Rothley, Leicestershire, disappeared on 3 May.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/13/wmaddy13.xml
Police are also searching for an American man missing from Praia da Luz in
recent days. It is believed that he recently lost custody of his
four-year-old son.
Are you still fantasising about being a Moronican in their "football"
groups, John ?
Done any wiring today, Mr Electrician
<snigger>
Yes thanks, Slimey. Did you have any gene therapy ?
They're dredging ponds as we speak....trying to find suitable genetic
material for him.....so far, everything they pull up turns out to be way too
evolved to be used on Slimey.
The genetic material from the botom of the pond would instantly reject him!
> They're dredging ponds as we speak....trying to find suitable genetic
> material for him.....so far, everything they pull up turns out to be way
> too
> evolved to be used on Slimey.
> The genetic material from the botom of the pond would instantly reject
> him!
ROTFLMAO ! ;)
When was that, in between posts?
<snigger>
>>>>>> > "onlyme" <onlyme_...@home.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> > news:dMydneFD7d56Xdrb...@bt.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> Looks like slimey sheldon the wigan wanker is out on 'care in the
>>>>>> >> community' again.
>>>>>> >> What a shame the community couldn't give a shit!
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Never mind...the men in white coats will be collecting you in the
>>>>>> >> morning.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > You're very angry today Onlyme, could you not get your fix of Pet
>>>>>> > Shop
>>>>>> > Boys?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wish the men in *black* coats would collect him ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>> Well.....you know....
>>>>> "Tick-Tock"
>>>>
>>>> Oh yes ! Gawd bless mother nature and her little imperfections !
>>>
>>> Done any wiring today, Mr Electrician
>>
>> Yes thanks
>
> When was that, in between posts?
That's right Slimey, no posts from me on this newsgroup between 09:44 and
17:46. Of course, you're not going to *ever* obtain employment are you
Slimey, due to your "condition" :)
Tick ....
..... Tock !
Did the DSS force you to get a job?
<snigger>
Of course, you're not going to *ever* obtain employment are you
Slimey, due to your "condition" .
As we thought
<vbg>
>>>>>>>>>> > "onlyme" <onlyme_...@home.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> > news:dMydneFD7d56Xdrb...@bt.com...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >> Looks like slimey sheldon the wigan wanker is out on 'care in
>>>>>>>>>> >> the
>>>>>>>>>> >> community' again.
>>>>>>>>>> >> What a shame the community couldn't give a shit!
>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>>>> >> Never mind...the men in white coats will be collecting you in
>>>>>>>>>> >> the
>>>>>>>>>> >> morning.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > You're very angry today Onlyme, could you not get your fix of
>>>>>>>>>> > Pet Shop
>>>>>>>>>> > Boys?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I wish the men in *black* coats would collect him ;)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well.....you know....
>>>>>>>>> "Tick-Tock"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh yes ! Gawd bless mother nature and her little imperfections !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Done any wiring today, Mr Electrician
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> When was that, in between posts?
>>>>
>>>> That's right Slimey, no posts from me on this newsgroup between 09:44
>>>> and 17:46.
>>>
>>> Did the DSS force you to get a job?
>>
>> Of course, you're not going to *ever* obtain employment are you
>> Slimey, due to your "condition" .
>
> As we thought
Indeed, glad you recognise the hopelessness of your existence, Slimey.