Re: Socialist Countries Again Dominate Top 10 Happiest Countries - the US? Well ...

[Byker]

wrote in message
news:55003e9b-cb90-439e...@googlegroups.com...
>
> Noway, Denmark, Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Netherlands, Canada, New
> Zealand, Australia.

They are NOT true socialist. They all have market economies along with heavy
taxation to support a welfare state.

http://www.aei.org/publication/why-socialism-always-fails/

https://fee.org/articles/the-myth-of-scandinavian-socialism/

http://thefederalist.com/2015/08/11/scandinavia-isnt-a-socialist-paradise/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/10/25/european-socialism-why-america-doesnt-want-it/

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/10/15/bernie-sanders-scandinavia-not-socialist-utopia/lUk9N7dZotJRbvn8PosoIN/story.html


See how well socialism worked for Venezuela. And this is just within the
last seven days:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/14547/ami-horowitz-destroys-democrats-worship-socialism-hank-berrien#

https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/south-america/item/25615-venezuela-socialism-s-house-of-horrors

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/venezuelas-socialist-leaders-seize-bakeries-bread-war-46268076

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/03/14/socialist-venezuela-owns-hundreds-of-companies-and-most-are-going-under/

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/03/15/even-soldiers-are-eating-from-the-trash-in-the-socialist-utopia-of-venezuela-n2298561

[Rudy Canoza]

On 3/21/2017 12:57 PM, Byker wrote:
> wrote in message
> news:55003e9b-cb90-439e...@googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Noway, Denmark, Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Netherlands, Canada, New
>> Zealand, Australia.
>
> They are NOT true socialist.

They aren't socialist *at all*.

> They all have market economies along with
> heavy taxation to support a welfare state.

Exactly right.

[abelard]

On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:57:24 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:

>wrote in message
>news:55003e9b-cb90-439e...@googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Noway

socialists out of power

> Denmark,

socialists out of power

> Iceland,

population of a small town..independents rule

> Switzerland,

4 parties coalition
biggest party..conservative
next socialist...the only socialist in gov't
third...liberals
fourth...centre right

> Finland,

socialists out of power

>Netherlands

socialist parties just crushed

>, Canada,

liberal party

>New Zealand,

national party (centre right)

> Australia.

liberal party...left out of power


every one of your clams is false...all the countries
have rejected leftists
the left is dying all around the free world

but naturally as every socialist is sworn to lie as
a requirement for cult membership
the post is just business as usual



some current socialist governments:-

china
zimbabwe
syria
venezuela
n. korea
cuba...



--
www.abelard.org

[Siri Cruise]

In article <_fOdnTJqrp4-GEzF...@earthlink.com>,

"Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:

> wrote in message
> news:55003e9b-cb90-439e...@googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Noway, Denmark, Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Netherlands, Canada, New
> > Zealand, Australia.
>
> They are NOT true socialist. They all have market economies along with heavy
> taxation to support a welfare state.

Okay, so not true socialist but heavily taxed countries again dominate top 10
happiest countries.

Therefore we should drop medical coverage for poor white people to reduce taxes
for the wealthy? That will make us happier?

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.

[Rudy Canoza]

On 3/21/2017 6:01 PM, Siri Cruise wrote:
> In article <_fOdnTJqrp4-GEzF...@earthlink.com>,
> "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
>
>> wrote in message
>> news:55003e9b-cb90-439e...@googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> Noway, Denmark, Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Netherlands, Canada, New
>>> Zealand, Australia.
>>
>> They are NOT true socialist. They all have market economies along with heavy
>> taxation to support a welfare state.
>
> Okay, so not true socialist but heavily taxed countries

They aren't as heavily taxed as you wish to believe.

[abelard]

On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:01:00 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>In article <_fOdnTJqrp4-GEzF...@earthlink.com>,
> "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
>
>> wrote in message
>> news:55003e9b-cb90-439e...@googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > Noway, Denmark, Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Netherlands, Canada, New
>> > Zealand, Australia.

none of those countries have socialist governments...all around
the west socialists are getting removed from power

>> They are NOT true socialist. They all have market economies along with heavy
>> taxation to support a welfare state.
>
>Okay, so not true socialist but heavily taxed countries again dominate top 10
>happiest countries.
>
>Therefore we should drop medical coverage for poor white people to reduce taxes
>for the wealthy? That will make us happier?

you have left the false post header...

but it is good to see that you have enough knowledge
to realise that socialism is not the same as levels of taxation...


meanwhile scandinavian societies are reducing tax levels and
government interference because of the social damage their
benefit culture policies has tended to generate
you can read data here:-

Scandinavian Unexceptionalism: Culture, Markets and the Failure of
Third-Way Socialism (Readings in Political Economy)
by Nima Sanandaji
Institute of Economic Affairs, 2015, pbk, 120 pp.+ references
ISBN-10: 025536704X
ISBN-13: 978-0255367042
[amazon.com
£10.00 [amazon.co.uk]


meanwhile the left have constantly falsified the history of
socialist administrations and their part in improving
the lot of the poor
here is the example from the uk government medical cartel:-
http://www.abelard.org/socialism/labour-party-did-not-start-nhs.php


socialism only ever gets power by misrepresentation and
ignorance




--
www.abelard.org

[Proctor]

Siri Cruise wrote

> Okay, so not true socialist but heavily taxed countries again
> dominate top 10 happiest countries.
>
> Therefore we should drop medical coverage for poor white
> people to reduce taxes for the wealthy? That will make us
> happier?

It works fine, as long as you like to see old white people
miserable. And since they're also known as TRUMP LOVERS, I don't
see a down side.

[Vidcapper]

On 22/03/2017 00:08, abelard wrote:
>
>
> every one of your clams is false...all the countries
> have rejected leftists
> the left is dying all around the free world

I think you may be a little complacent there.

By it's very nature, free market capitalism creates economic inequality,
so to those at the bottom end without the skills to climb the ladder,
socialism is, and will always be an attractive alternative. That is a
fact of human nature.

--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

[DoD]

"abelard" <abel...@abelard.org> wrote in message
news:s4e3dcho3csscf10c...@4ax.com...

That was a post from edell..... A true wonder of the world being the
dimmest of the dummest.

[abelard]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:33:05 +0000, Vidcapper <vidca...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

only the future can answer your prediction...

right wing parties often mess up with the potential effects
you suggest

but with adequate safety nets why do you suppose they are
'inevitable'?
the collapse of socialist governments is clearly a real experience
in the advanced world...not some sociologist 'theory'

the average family is happy enough on $12 to 15,000 p/a...
'research suggests that above that level there is little change
in perceived/reported happiness....

as societies get ever more wealthy it becomes ever easier to
fund such indulgence...societies are moving slowly toward
a citizen's wage for those the cannot compete economically.

or will you claim that envy is a higher driver/factor than freedom
from the fears of starvation?




--
www.abelard.org

[Jumper]

Capitalism as to be fettered for it to work for everyone in society,
government needs to instil in all people to be charitable, so that rich
people become philanthropists, and businesses give alms to local concerns.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

[abelard]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:49:49 +0000, Jumper <Jum...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 22/03/2017 08:33, Vidcapper wrote:
>> On 22/03/2017 00:08, abelard wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> every one of your clams is false...all the countries
>>> have rejected leftists
>>> the left is dying all around the free world
>>
>> I think you may be a little complacent there.
>>
>> By it's very nature, free market capitalism creates economic inequality,
>> so to those at the bottom end without the skills to climb the ladder,
>> socialism is, and will always be an attractive alternative. That is a
>> fact of human nature.
>>
>
>Capitalism as to be fettered for it to work for everyone in society,
>government needs to instil in all people to be charitable, so that rich
>people become philanthropists, and businesses give alms to local concerns.

like#


--
www.abelard.org

[rbowman]

On 03/22/2017 03:34 AM, abelard wrote:
> the average family is happy enough on $12 to 15,000 p/a...
> 'research suggests that above that level there is little change
> in perceived/reported happiness....

Which century are you posting from? When I was a kid we did fine with
about $12,000 -- but that was in the '50s.

[abelard]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:36:33 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com>
wrote:

adjust according to taste, country and time



--
www.abelard.org

[Vidcapper]

On 22/03/2017 09:34, abelard wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:33:05 +0000, Vidcapper <vidca...@yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>>
>> I think you may be a little complacent there.
>>
>> By it's very nature, free market capitalism creates economic inequality,
>> so to those at the bottom end without the skills to climb the ladder,
>> socialism is, and will always be an attractive alternative. That is a
>> fact of human nature.
>
> only the future can answer your prediction...
>
> right wing parties often mess up with the potential effects
> you suggest
>
> but with adequate safety nets why do you suppose they are
> 'inevitable'?

But surely such safety nets are 'socialist'...

>
> as societies get ever more wealthy it becomes ever easier to
> fund such indulgence...societies are moving slowly toward
> a citizen's wage for those the cannot compete economically.

So who will be the first?

>
> or will you claim that envy is a higher driver/factor than freedom
> from the fears of starvation?

There's also the question of ambition - I don't think that correlates
closely with ability to earn.


--

Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

[#BeamMeUpScotty]

> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:36:33 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 03/22/2017 03:34 AM, abelard wrote:
>>> the average family is happy enough on $12 to 15,000 p/a...
>>> 'research suggests that above that level there is little change
>>> in perceived/reported happiness....
>>
>> Which century are you posting from? When I was a kid we did fine with
>> about $12,000 -- but that was in the '50s.

Since Bush, Obama and maybe TRUMP will all have doubled the national
debt in 8 years due to costs rising, doesn't that mean my paycheck
should also double every 8 years?

--
That's Karma


*Rumination*
138 - The common theme in Liberalism is that they always want to change
reality to fit their feelings.

[abelard]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:47:42 -0400, #BeamMeUpScotty
<CommunityOrganizers...@World.Shadow.gov> wrote:

>
>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:36:33 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/22/2017 03:34 AM, abelard wrote:
>>>> the average family is happy enough on $12 to 15,000 p/a...
>>>> 'research suggests that above that level there is little change
>>>> in perceived/reported happiness....
>>>
>>> Which century are you posting from? When I was a kid we did fine with
>>> about $12,000 -- but that was in the '50s.
>
>Since Bush, Obama and maybe TRUMP will all have doubled the national
>debt in 8 years due to costs rising, doesn't that mean my paycheck
>should also double every 8 years?

it means you 'should' pay it back over the next 8 years


--
www.abelard.org

[abelard]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:27:39 +0000, Vidcapper <vidca...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:

>On 22/03/2017 09:34, abelard wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:33:05 +0000, Vidcapper <vidca...@yahoo.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think you may be a little complacent there.
>>>
>>> By it's very nature, free market capitalism creates economic inequality,
>>> so to those at the bottom end without the skills to climb the ladder,
>>> socialism is, and will always be an attractive alternative. That is a
>>> fact of human nature.
>>
>> only the future can answer your prediction...
>>
>> right wing parties often mess up with the potential effects
>> you suggest
>>
>> but with adequate safety nets why do you suppose they are
>> 'inevitable'?
>
>But surely such safety nets are 'socialist'...

it's strange the ideas socialists can be persuaded to believe

safety nets were in place long before the curse of socialism
ever poisoned a human mind or society

>> as societies get ever more wealthy it becomes ever easier to
>> fund such indulgence...societies are moving slowly toward
>> a citizen's wage for those the cannot compete economically.
>
>So who will be the first?

the seeds are already in place with non contributory pensions,
and 'benefits' of great variety and complexity...

having the guts, judgement and public support are necessary precursors

>> or will you claim that envy is a higher driver/factor than freedom
>> from the fears of starvation?
>
>There's also the question of ambition - I don't think that correlates
>closely with ability to earn.

and ambition is the hope of multiple suitable mates?


--
www.abelard.org

[#BeamMeUpScotty]

They are 10 year bonds, but they roll them over and add more to them
over that 10 years.

Obama's $10 Trillion along with the previous $10 Trillion was financed
while interest rates were near ZERO, the next $20 Trillion borrowed and
the present $20 Trillion will NOT be financed and refinanced at an
interest rate near Zero.

That means that as it rolls over and grows in the next 5 years we will
have half that $40 Trillion raise the deficit spending and then the
following 5 years the interest rates and the deficits will make the
interest payments and deficits self perpetuating and it will all grow
even larger than we would expect and without increasing the spending on
welfare and the Military.

The *ONLY* way to catch the deficit growth is to grow the economy faster
than we grow the government and it's deficit spending, and that will
require a 7% GDP to catch-up to the government growth. You can cut
government regulation and growth and spending, but Democrats won't allow
it and will obstruct all attempts to reign in government.

And without that, the GDP can't grow to 7%.

So the next 10 years are a symptom of failed Liberalism.

--
That's Karma


*Apologize for being Democrats*
Obama should apologize for the rise of million of Americans on food stamps.

[abelard]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:29:22 -0400, #BeamMeUpScotty

it will never be paid back...it will be eroded by inflation

the national debt is a form of taxation


--
www.abelard.org

[#BeamMeUpScotty]

On 03/22/2017 06:49 AM, Jumper wrote:
> On 22/03/2017 08:33, Vidcapper wrote:
>> On 22/03/2017 00:08, abelard wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> every one of your clams is false...all the countries
>>> have rejected leftists
>>> the left is dying all around the free world
>>
>> I think you may be a little complacent there.
>>
>> By it's very nature, free market capitalism creates economic inequality,
>> so to those at the bottom end without the skills to climb the ladder,
>> socialism is, and will always be an attractive alternative. That is a
>> fact of human nature.
>>
>
> Capitalism as to be fettered for it to work for everyone in society,
> government needs to instil in all people to be charitable, so that rich
> people become philanthropists, and businesses give alms to local concerns.

The church encouraged that, until government (Liberals) decided to
attack the Church and now the church just tries to survive for themselves.

The first rule of redistribution is that people need to have money so
that they can redistribute money to the poor.

Liberals oppose that!

--
That's Karma

[Governor Swill]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 01:08:19 +0100, abelard <abel...@abelard.org>
wrote:

>some current socialist governments:-
>
>china

Not socialist anymore.

>zimbabwe

Dictatorship is not socialism.

>syria

Doesn't have a government.

>venezuela

Dead because Obama stimulated US oil production and tanked global oil
prices.

>n. korea

Again, the problem is totalitarianism.

>cuba...

You really don't get the difference between socialism and communism.

Swill
--
President Eisenhower, April 16th, 1953:

"Every gun that’s made, every warship launched,
every rocket fired represents, in the final sense,
a theft from those who hunger and are not fed,
those who are cold and are not clothed."

[Governor Swill]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:47:42 -0400, #BeamMeUpScotty
<CommunityOrganizers...@World.Shadow.gov> wrote:

>

>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:36:33 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/22/2017 03:34 AM, abelard wrote:
>>>> the average family is happy enough on $12 to 15,000 p/a...
>>>> 'research suggests that above that level there is little change
>>>> in perceived/reported happiness....
>>>
>>> Which century are you posting from? When I was a kid we did fine with
>>> about $12,000 -- but that was in the '50s.
>
>Since Bush, Obama and maybe TRUMP will all have doubled the national
>debt in 8 years due to costs rising, doesn't that mean my paycheck
>should also double every 8 years?

Obama didn't double the debt.

[Governor Swill]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:29:22 -0400, #BeamMeUpScotty

<CommunityOrganizers...@World.Shadow.gov> wrote:

>On 03/22/2017 12:55 PM, abelard wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:47:42 -0400, #BeamMeUpScotty
>> <CommunityOrganizers...@World.Shadow.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:36:33 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 03/22/2017 03:34 AM, abelard wrote:
>>>>>> the average family is happy enough on $12 to 15,000 p/a...
>>>>>> 'research suggests that above that level there is little
>>>>>> change in perceived/reported happiness....
>>>>>
>>>>> Which century are you posting from? When I was a kid we did
>>>>> fine with about $12,000 -- but that was in the '50s.
>>>
>>> Since Bush, Obama and maybe TRUMP will all have doubled the
>>> national debt in 8 years due to costs rising, doesn't that mean my
>>> paycheck should also double every 8 years?
>>
>> it means you 'should' pay it back over the next 8 years
>>
>>
>They are 10 year bonds, but they roll them over and add more to them
>over that 10 years.
>
>Obama's $10 Trillion along with the previous $10 Trillion

The previous was 12 Trillion. Obama has added only 7 Trillion.
https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo5.htm

Swill

>was financed
>while interest rates were near ZERO, the next $20 Trillion borrowed and
>the present $20 Trillion will NOT be financed and refinanced at an
>interest rate near Zero.
>
>That means that as it rolls over and grows in the next 5 years we will
>have half that $40 Trillion raise the deficit spending and then the
>following 5 years the interest rates and the deficits will make the
>interest payments and deficits self perpetuating and it will all grow
>even larger than we would expect and without increasing the spending on
>welfare and the Military.
>
>The *ONLY* way to catch the deficit growth is to grow the economy faster
>than we grow the government and it's deficit spending, and that will
>require a 7% GDP to catch-up to the government growth. You can cut
>government regulation and growth and spending, but Democrats won't allow
>it and will obstruct all attempts to reign in government.
>
>And without that, the GDP can't grow to 7%.
>
>So the next 10 years are a symptom of failed Liberalism.
--

[Governor Swill]

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:49:49 +0000, Jumper <Jum...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 22/03/2017 08:33, Vidcapper wrote:
>> On 22/03/2017 00:08, abelard wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> every one of your clams is false...all the countries
>>> have rejected leftists
>>> the left is dying all around the free world
>>
>> I think you may be a little complacent there.
>>
>> By it's very nature, free market capitalism creates economic inequality,
>> so to those at the bottom end without the skills to climb the ladder,
>> socialism is, and will always be an attractive alternative. That is a
>> fact of human nature.
>>
>
>Capitalism as to be fettered for it to work for everyone in society,
>government needs to instil in all people to be charitable, so that rich
>people become philanthropists, and businesses give alms to local concerns.

Yup. Water is vital for life to exist, but too much of it will kill
you.

Swill

[Governor Swill]

The people lost faith in the church because it wasn't doing it's job.

[Governor Swill]

On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:11:41 -0700, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
wrote:

That's amazing! After hearing for decades about Europe's confiscatory
tax rates, it turns out the right was lying the whole time!

[Andy Wainwright]

On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 7:57:28 PM UTC, Byker wrote:
> wrote in message
> news:55003e9b-cb90-439e...@googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Noway, Denmark, Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Netherlands, Canada, New
> > Zealand, Australia.
>
> They are NOT true socialist. They all have market economies along with heavy
> taxation to support a welfare state.
>

> http://www.aei.org/publication/why-socialism-always-fails/
>
> https://fee.org/articles/the-myth-of-scandinavian-socialism/
>
> http://thefederalist.com/2015/08/11/scandinavia-isnt-a-socialist-paradise/
>
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/10/25/european-socialism-why-america-doesnt-want-it/
>
> https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/10/15/bernie-sanders-scandinavia-not-socialist-utopia/lUk9N7dZotJRbvn8PosoIN/story.html
>
>
> See how well socialism worked for Venezuela. And this is just within the
> last seven days:
>
> http://www.dailywire.com/news/14547/ami-horowitz-destroys-democrats-worship-socialism-hank-berrien#
>
> https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/south-america/item/25615-venezuela-socialism-s-house-of-horrors
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/venezuelas-socialist-leaders-seize-bakeries-bread-war-46268076
>
> http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/03/14/socialist-venezuela-owns-hundreds-of-companies-and-most-are-going-under/
>
> https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/03/15/even-soldiers-are-eating-from-the-trash-in-the-socialist-utopia-of-venezuela-n2298561

Somewhat ironically, the UK in the 1950s was the closest interpretation of Marx. It was Reagan's visits that turned him against communism.

Yet people always moan about the present and how the past was better. This is usually total bullshit, because in the past we were young and being young is generally more fun than being old.

[abelard]

On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 01:37:57 -0400, Governor Swill
<governo...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 01:08:19 +0100, abelard <abel...@abelard.org>
>wrote:
>
>>some current socialist governments:-
>>
>>china
>
>Not socialist anymore.
>
>>zimbabwe
>
>Dictatorship is not socialism.
>
>>syria
>
>Doesn't have a government.
>
>>venezuela
>
>Dead because Obama stimulated US oil production and tanked global oil
>prices.
>
>>n. korea
>
>Again, the problem is totalitarianism.
>
>>cuba...
>
>You really don't get the difference between socialism and communism.

the only difference is the degree of power the cult has at any point..

but good to see the usual list of excuses

>Swill

very true


--
www.abelard.org

[#BeamMeUpScotty]

On 03/23/2017 01:37 AM, Governor Swill wrote:

> You really don't get the difference between socialism and communism.
>
> Swill
>

Both are Leftists and both are failed systems.

The difference is that in Venezuela you eat out of Socialist garbage
cans and the government thugs kill you and in China, Mao starved 40
million farmers to death to make communism a better place.

that makes the difference... how they kill you?

--
That's Karma

[First-Post]

Liberal wannabe socialists like Swill have the idiotic dream that if
it is fully instituted then THEY won't have to give up anything they
have for the cause. They live under the stupid assed illusion that
they will somehow become the aristocracy(like Bernie Sanders and the
like) that will be in charge of taking and redistributing wealth only
from the non socialists while they get to keep all of their own
personal wealth as well as taking a piece of everyone else's.
They are delusional at best on top of being just simple minded, easily
brainwashed fools.

[DoD]

"abelard" <abel...@abelard.org> wrote in message

news:tn77dcd0tjedtfq2b...@4ax.com...

Notice how Swill unmasks himself.... He has been bitching about Russia, but
is ok with other strong armed governments... It is
interesting to hear lefties like swill attack Russia, but lionize dictators
like Hugo and Castro etc.... I wonder if they are pissy because the
so called motherland of commie-ism is not so much commie anymore and that is
what they find so abhorent????

[abelard]

On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:26:19 -0500, "DoD" <danski...@gmail.com>
wrote:

i imagine he is powerless and projects his frustrations

'it's someone else's fault...if only...everything would be ok...

and i wouldn't be a loser'

[braf...@hotmail.com]

On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 5:08:27 PM UTC-7, abelard wrote:
>
> some current socialist governments:-
>
> china

> zimbabwe
> syria
> venezuela
> n. korea
> cuba...
>

You should distinguish --- there is a wide difference --- between socialist governments and communist governments.

Under communism, predicted Engels, "the State will wither away". Sadly, under Stalin (whose left arm WAS withered)the State, like all states, continued to attract exactly the same hirelings as does neoliberalism and fascism: men who want more than anything else to work for Daddy and be loved by him. Sean Spicer?

Communist government, please, Abelard?

[#BeamMeUpScotty]

And Putin doesn't suck up to gays either.

--
That's Karma


*Rumination*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFtEbnCv5WY
Typical Liberalism, they are taught to hate America's FREEDOM in the
Liberal Government schools.

[DoD]

"#BeamMeUpScotty" <CommunityOrganizers...@World.Shadow.gov>
wrote in message news:v71BA.96279$Ip6....@fx38.iad...

Well, neither did Castro, Che or the others.... I think it is because the
Ruskies got away from
commie-ism and after the left spent generations hoping for them to be the
shining example,
they are pissed that the motherland left it behind.

[Siri Cruise]

Putin is the dom; Drumpf is the sub.

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Free the Amos Yee one.
Yeah, too bad about your so-called life. Ha-ha.

[DoD]

"Siri Cruise" <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:chine.bleu-17792...@news.eternal-september.org...

And you are the ditz.

[Proctor]

Siri Cruise wrote

> Okay, so not true socialist but heavily taxed countries again
> dominate top 10 happiest countries.
>
> Therefore we should drop medical coverage for poor white
> people to reduce taxes for the wealthy? That will make us
> happier?

It works fine, as long as you like to see old white people
miserable. And since they're also known as TRUMP LOVERS, I don't
see a down side.

[Proctor]

[Proctor]