Re: David Cameron & Rebekah Brooks Agree A Story

[Giga2]

"Mentalguy2k8" <Mental...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:j06kt6$3q0$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> "abelard" <abel...@abelard.org> wrote in message
> news:idlb27hddtp313oka...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:01:05 -0700 (PDT), Turk182
>> <digital...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Two weeks ago Murdoch and his news thugs told the select committee to
>>>effectively get lost - he was not going to appear. Two weeks later,
>>>Murdoch is now in serious trouble with the parent company, and he now
>>>is trying to win favour with the 'humble' line.
>>
>> why do you believe he's 'in serious trouble'?
>>
>> he has almost unlimited control over news corp...
>>
>> news corp shares rose nearly 7% today....
>>
>> news corp is financially secure....
>> rupert has unlimited control....
>>
>> where is this 'serious trouble'?
>
> The only way Murdoch will be in "serious trouble" is if there is proof
> that "his" journalists hacked the phones of the 9/11 victims families in
> the USA, that's the market he really doesn't want to turn on him - and
> they certainly will if it's true. But there won't be any proof, no matter
> how many times his enemies "speculate" about it.
Probably had the CIA and FBI do it for him!