On 2015-06-20 21:31:57 +0000, Michaelangelo said:
> Justin Thyme leapt into action and said:
>> I wonder if there are records of who served where in the NAAFI during
>> WWII. Naturally, it is records readable via the Internet that I am
>> most interested in.
>
> NAAFI staff are civilians. I doubt if personnel records would/should be
> made publicly available.
Like Justin, I don't quite get the reference to them being civilians,
or why civilian records would be treated differently to non civilian
ones.
Its mainly down to time frame, whether civilian or non civilian, its
the time elapsed since the records were made, what kind of info they
contain and whether the people are likely to still be alive that are
usually the deciding factors about if and when they are made available
to the public - though often only at a charge, its rare for original
records to be completely freely available on the net. Whover digitises,
transcribes and hosts them will have invested time and money doing so
and will 'at least' want to cover those costs.
For instance, the church record of 'pre-nuptial enquiries' for my
marriage is in the archives, I (obviously) have the civil cert, but
wanted to see and have a copy of this church record.
I am not allowed to see it as its still in the 'closed to the public'
category. Daft, cos all that would be in it would be baptism dates and
places for both of us, maybe ditto for confirmations. If it was still
at the church I could go and ask to have a shuftie - and I bet my boots
the priest would say yes. But the records are now deposited in the
archives and rules is rules, not their fault - though I did moan at
them :-)
--
Tickettyboo