Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"There is no domestic or foreign any more. In this world today, we are all in it together." Guess which British politician said that?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

LOVE Europe HATE the EU

unread,
Sep 10, 2008, 6:58:53 AM9/10/08
to
None other than great white hope David Cameron earnestly declaring his
enthusiasm for continuing New Labour's treasonous globalism policies.

Death of patriotism: How national pride is 'under threat by a global
super-elite'

By Leo Mckinstry
Last updated at 1:44 AM on 23rd August 2008

Patriotism is back in fashion. With the Union flag flying high over
Beijing after the golden success of our Olympic athletes, the British
public has been given a rare opportunity to indulge in unbridled
expressions of national pride.

Yet, in our ever more globalised world, instinctive patriotism is
being diluted. The concept of nationhood has been undermined by mass
immigration and the imposition of the dogma of multi-culturalism.

Our economy is increasingly tied up with the global financial system,
dominated by multinational giants which see borders as irrelevant.
Supra-national bodies, such as the UN and the EU, have a mounting
influence over our political governance.

The idea of national interest is sliding towards the dustbin of
history.

Only last month, in a rhetorical and extravagant speech to the Israeli
parliament, Gordon Brown called on the nations of the world to ensure
that our era becomes ‘the century of the global community’.

In one overblown passage, he pledged to ‘make a reality of the vision
of a global society in which we create global civic institutions that
turn words of friendship into bonds of human solidarity’.

Not to be outdone, David Cameron has joined this enthusiasm for
earnest globalism.

During his controversial visit to Rwanda last summer, when there was
severe flooding in his own Oxfordshire constituency, he claimed:
‘There is no domestic or foreign any more. In this world today, we are
all in it together.’

As Brown argued, a central part of this globalist vision is the
creation of a new
corporate and political network which would operate far beyond the
level of individual nations.

Such a structure used to be the goal of Utopians, who believed that
harmony on Earth could be achieved only by embracing world government.

H. G. Wells, the science fiction writer and socialist philosopher, was
a passionate advocate of a ‘permanent world congress’ and specialised
international agencies which would spell the end of the nation state.

Patriotism, he believed, was ‘mere flag-waving with no constructive
duties’.

The establishment of the United Nations in the aftermath of World War
II was seen by some as a move towards world government, but in the
decades that followed, national self-rule remained as powerful as
ever, fuelled in no small part by the Cold War, which deepened
divisions between East and West.

But in the opening years of the 21st century, we may now actually be
heading towards the creation of an informal kind of world government.
This development has been accompanied by no fanfare or official edict.

Yet, hidden from the cameras and the public, crucial decisions about
our lives are being taken by a global elite which has no roots in any
single country.

This international group of business leaders, bankers and politicians
might not be the official world congress that H. G. Wells envisaged,
but it is perhaps all the more influential precisely because it
operates behind the scenes at remote conferences and clandestine
meetings.

The nature of this global elite is revealed in a new book by the
American writer and political analyst David Rothkopf.

In Superclass, which has attracted wide interest in the United States,
he argues that there are 6,000 people in this unique set who wield
growing influence over the six billion people on our planet.

Apart from the fact that this elite is mainly white and male, what
really distinguishes its members are the twin characteristics of
enormous power and unprecedented wealth.

Though many political leaders are included in Rothkopf’s 6,000-strong
superclass, as well as the heads of the world’s two biggest religions,
Islam and Christianity, the real power in the elite is derived not
from formal office but from private enterprise.

Around two-thirds of its members are from commerce, such as the
Mexican telecoms tycoon Carlos Slim Helu, one of the richest men in
the world with a fortune worth more than £30billion.

Through his acumen, Helu now controls 94per cent of all Mexico’s
landlines and 70per cent of his country’s internet market, a near
monopoly that he has used to crush his competitors and boost his
wealth to such an extent that his earnings last year were the
equivalent of 8per cent of Mexico’s GDP.

The statistics concerning the riches of the global elite are
staggering.

According to Rothkopf, the top 1 per cent of the world’s most
prosperous people own 40per cent of the planet’s global wealth.
Furthermore, the combined net worth of the 1,000 richest people in the
world is twice that of the poorest 2.5 billion.

The massive influence of the bosses of the global multinationals is
also reflected in the fact that at least a third of the world’s entire
wealth — estimated to be worth £25trillion — is produced by just 250
companies.

As the process of globalisation accelerates, so the resources of the
richest are becoming ever larger.

In Britain alone during the past 17 years, the super-rich have seen
their income go up by an astonishing 600 per cent, at a time when
retail prices increase by only 60 per cent.

The rise of the global elite has been made possible, in part, by the
revolutionary changes in transport, communications and information
technology over recent years.

Not only have these developments helped the rich and powerful
transcend national boundaries, they have also reinforced the elite’s
ability to distance itself from the public.

Equipped with their mobiles, bullet-proof limousines, luxury hotel
suites and apartments, attendants, laptops and private jets, the
superclass can move in a realm far beyond the gaze of ordinary
citizens.

As Rothkopf points out, the Gulfstream private jet, costing around £28
million and customised to the user’s wishes, is the ultimate symbol of
membership of the elite, treated by many executives ‘like very large
BlackBerries’.

Whereas half the people of the world will never venture outside their
own village during their lifetimes, the elite are continually whisked
in luxury from one exclusive meeting to another.

The growth in private air travel has spurred the eagerness of the
elite for their own conferences to discuss global affairs, such as the
World Economic Forum at the snow-capped Swiss resort of Davos.

Like the elite itself, the annual Davos gathering is dominated by the
major corporations, who each pay £150,000 in fees to support the forum
— though politicians and celebrities are also keen attenders.

Typical of the latter group is the singer Bono, a veteran campaigner
for Africa, who, like so many pop icons, manages to combine adolescent
rebelliousness with insider status at the heart of the global
Establishment, thanks to his wealth and fame.

Bono’s description of Davos as ‘fat cats in the snow’ might be more
cutting if he were not one of the fattest cats on the celebrity
circuit.

There have, of course, always been elites in every advanced society
since the dawn of civilisation. The glories of ancient Rome and Athens
were built on the achievements of a narrow patrician class, as was the
Victorian British Empire.

But the crucial difference is that today’s global elite is not
dedicated towards furthering any national interest, but the opposite.

Suspicious of nationalism, borders and sovereignty, it is driven by
the desire to shape global economic forces for the furtherance of
wealth creation, not least for themselves and their companies.

Sheltered from their own societies, they have more in common with each
other than with people from their countries of origin.

Klaus Schwab, the founder of the Davos forum, argues that revolution
in technology and markets means, ‘we are moving from a national
dimension to a global dimension’, so new structures of international
governance are inevitable.

The shift towards greater influence for the global elite can be

seen all around us. In the world’s ten biggest companies, 60per cent
of their revenues came from outside their countries of origin, and
59per cent of their workforces were employed overseas.

The same picture can be seen just by taking a stroll down one of the
most exclusive streets in London, Kensington Palace Gardens, ‘one of
the showcase addresses of the superclass’, to use Rothkopf’s words.

ONE of the homeowners there is the steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal, who
is said to have paid £30million for his house in 2004. Also living in
the street are the British property mogul Jonathan Hunt and the
Russian Len Blavatnik, who made his billions in oil and aluminium.

The idea of a sinister global elite, controlling world events, has
long been the stuff of conspiracy theories. Extreme anti-Semites,
including Nazis and Islamic hardliners, have clung to the belief that
behind Western capitalism is a worldwide Jewish conspiracy.

Others have warned of malign global plots by the Catholic Church, the
Freemasons or the CIA.

David Icke, the former BBC presenter turned eccentric campaigner, has
even claimed that the world is governed by a secretive grouping called
the Illuminati or Babylonian Brotherhood, a cadre of alien reptilians
who can take human form.

In contrast to this outlandish nonsense, Rothkopf does not see
anything especially sinister or conspiratorial in the emergence of the
new global superclass.

He points out that their membership changes regularly, partly due to
varying performances by businesses, partly because of loss of
political office.

There is no sense of this new group being a closed shop, unlike
plutocracies of the past whose membership depended on birth.

None of the new elite is a tyrant or a dictator bent on upholding
totalitarianism. In fact, many — such as Bill Gates, the founder of
Microsoft — are philanthropists.

Neverrtheless, it would be wrong to be too sanguine about the
influence of the superclass.

No matter how allegedly benign it is, the new elite is utterly
unaccountable.

The point of democracy is that leaders should be accountable for their
decisions, giving the public the ultimate say over the government.

That process is bypassed by the new elitists as they huddle together
at Davos or the World Bank or UN.

The former U.S. Secretary of the Navy John Lehman once joked,
misquoting the historian Edward Gibbon: ‘Power corrupts. Absolute
power... is kind of neat.’

This might have been said in jest, but the march of globalisation is
destroying political representation.

We have seen within the EU how the unelected institutions of Brussels
have made a mockery of this in their determination to create a federal
superstate run by an unaccountable elite.

The recent Lisbon Treaty will only hasten the decline of the national
freedoms by strengthening the centralist powers of the EU Commission.

Nor can it be said that the new elite has been a great success in
running the global economy.

For all its supposed expertise, this new breed has dragged the
developed world to the precipice of recession through its
irresponsible decisions and failure to oversee global markets
effectively.

Meanwhile, the vast disparities in wealth across the world continue to
worsen, making the ostentatious wealth of the elitists appear all the
more obscene.

Above all, the new elite runs counter to human nature in its
indifference to nationhood.

The super-rich might not care about national loyalties, but most
ordinary citizens do, as the joy over the Olympics proves.

Contrary to what globalist sophisticates might think, there is nothing
unedifying or crude about patriotism. The need for a sense of
belonging is one of the most natural of all human impulses. And it is
a noble sentiment, signifying a concern for one’s fellow countrymen
and women.

Vague talk about global citizenship can never be a substitute for
genuine patriotism. In the end, the triumph of the superclass will
only destroy our freedom, our democracy and our very identity.

• SUPERCLASS: THE GLOBAL POWER ELITE AND THE WORLD THEY ARE MAKING by
David Rothkopf is published by Little Brown at £20. To order a copy at
£18 (p&p free), call 0845 155 0720.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1048478/Death-patriotism-How-national-pride-threat-global-super-elite.html

ricky

unread,
Sep 12, 2008, 11:17:59 AM9/12/08
to
We are leading painting and decorating contractors in the Wiltshire area,
offering a wide range of skills and experience for commercial and
residential customers.

I will be happy to organise your decorating work and can provide many
references and testimonials.

We have provided a high quality, reliable service since 1982.
We do not use sub-contractors; all painters and decorators are employed
exclusively by the company,full time, and we are careful to only employ
people that you are happy to have in your home..

We provide a full painting and decorating service for factory units,
business premises, schools and letting agencies - interior and exterior.
We are approved Painter and contractors for the NHS and NAAFI.

We are used to working to tight deadlines and specifications, and can work
out-of-hours where necessary.

We provide the following services :
- interior painting
- exterior painting
- wallpapering
- coving
- woodwork renovation


We take the stress and inconvenience out of major projects and have
experience in overseeing them to your satisfaction.

Please contact me to arrange a free quotation or for further information

http://www.paintingcontractorwiltshire.co.uk/index.htm

tel. 01380 720 857

ricky

unread,
Sep 12, 2008, 11:26:28 AM9/12/08
to

> We are leading painting and decorating contractors , offering a wide range

0 new messages