In article <20130922170634.5c34e925@hyperion>,
nos...@ntlworld.com
says...
>
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2013 16:45:34 +0100
> Yellow <
no...@none.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <20130922155911.5980b0d0@hyperion>,
nos...@ntlworld.com
> > says...
> > >
> > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 23:49:53 +0100
> > > Yellow <
no...@none.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I had someone do that with a hotmail address of mine - I had
> > > > the .com and they had the .
co.uk.
> > > >
> > > > I asked them to stop and they did not so I made the mistake of
> > > > sending them a frustrated email explaining exactly would mischief
> > > > I could do if they did not pack it in.
> > > >
> > > > They forwarded my email to Hotmail who cancelled MY account!
> > > >
> > > > So be warned.
> > >
> > > I don't think we really need warning, clearly that would be a
> > > particularly silly thing to do.
> >
> >
> > That an email company would cancel the account of the victim of
> > someone else's stupidity just did not enter my head so while it was
> > most certainly a mistake on my part, you are going to have to explain
> > to me exactly why it was silly.
>
> You threatened them with "mischief".
Now you are the one who is being silly.
I did not use the word "mischief" in my communication nor did I threaten
them but instead highlighted the risks to them of using a email address
that they do not have access to but someone did, for logins etc.
I listed all the account they had freely given me access to and also
mentioned the saucy email her boyfriend had sent my way by error.
I just thought it would make the risks of their carelessness hit home
and that they would stop - but there you go, some people get nasty when
they are called out for being in the wrong.
> You expected (a lacky working
> for) a big corporation to display common sense and "do the right thing"
> rather than take the path of least litigation. If instead you had
> contacted the service provider as a worried user who thought his
> identity had been stolen, you might have had an altogether different
> result (of course it might have turned out just as bad, or you might
> have ended up sending /them/ abusive messages - it wouldn't be
> altogether unusual for "customer service" to be incompetent or
> non-existent).
Crikey! What on earth has caused you concluded that I sent abusive
messages to anyone? Be clear - I most certainly did not!
I said I was frustrated; I did not say I was a psycho.
And as I said, it was a mistake on my part and it was a lesson well
learned which is why I decided to share my story so that other people
(not a smarty-pants like you, clearly) are not tempted to make the same
one.