Has Edward Renner been served?
lurker
petrolcan
>
> as above
Why is it that you have an obsession with spacker?
He's gone, hopefully forever.
lurker
Renner's a coward - he won't be back. The whole world knows who he is,
where he lives, what he sell on eBay etc. etc.. All thanks to you, ha?
Maybe Francesca and Road_Hog were right... all this is just hot air .
petrolcan
>
> Renner's a coward - he won't be back. The whole world knows who he is,
> where he lives, what he sell on eBay etc. etc.. All thanks to you, ha?
spacker revealed himself, simple as.
> Maybe Francesca and Road_Hog were right... all this is just hot air .
Wanna take a bet on that?
The Older Gentleman
The other half of the Fracker entity is still posting the same shite,
though.
I wonder how proud it feels at having effectively killed what was a good
thriving and useful ng?
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
The Older Gentleman
> spacker revealed himself, simple as.
As Parry pointed out to Fracker, which completely ignored the fact.
Gary Baldi
> lurker wrote...
>
> > as above
>
> He's still selling rubbish on Ebay. Is he allowed to run a business
> from his council hovel? Does the dole know what he's doing?
> All those cuddly toys, do you reckon he has a lot of young visitors?
> Anyone got a picture of him on the daily run to the post office?
> Trouble is, a car with road tax parked on his street would stand out
> like a sore thumb.
Get a room with your one post; Lurker is it?
Road_Hog
"lurker" <grah...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:hebi59$5m9$1...@aioe.org...
>
> Maybe Francesca and Road_Hog were right... all this is just hot air .
It certainly is. Taking someone to court for libel is hugely expensive and
fraught with difficulties that only the very rich can get involved with. If
TOG or someone else were going ahead with such action, then I'm sure that
they'd be boasting about it here.
I'll reiterate what I said before, you must have a reputation to be
tarnished, this is Usenet hardly a huge circulation, most of us use sock
puppets not our real name. The level of compensation would be minimal and
most solicitors would advise against taking action because the level of
costs versus the potential payout are not worth it.
petrolcan
Older Gentleman says...
>
> petrolcan <petrol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <hebdq6$v3o$3...@aioe.org>, lurker says...
> > >
> > > as above
> >
> > Why is it that you have an obsession with spacker?
> >
> > He's gone, hopefully forever.
>
> The other half of the Fracker entity is still posting the same shite,
> though.
Same as it ever was.
> I wonder how proud it feels at having effectively killed what was a good
> thriving and useful ng?
Oi! Whilst it may take a while for the thriving to reappear, this NG is
still very useful.
Road_Hog
"The Older Gentleman" <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1j9l99j.dq9yxq1xw6qvcN%totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk...
>
> I wonder how proud it feels at having effectively killed what was a good
> thriving and useful ng?
>
People who cheated sellers, as you did, killed the NG. You only have
yourself to blame. Perhaps if cunts like yourself fuck off elsewhere, then
the NG can be reclaimed by decent people.
petrolcan
Actually I'd say that it is stupid comments like that that are keeping
people away.
Niel J Humphreys
news:hedo5j$moc$1...@aioe.org...
Bollocks, take your petty vendetta elsewhere.
The Older Gentleman
Oh, is Lawnmower Man back again? Colour me surprised.
The Older Gentleman
> Oi! Whilst it may take a while for the thriving to reappear, this NG is
> still very useful.
Troo.
Just *amazing* how the tit keeps playing the race card.
lurker
>>
> Oh, is Lawnmower Man back again? Colour me surprised.
Lawnmower Man and Spacman both cocked up big time revealing their
identities.
Perhaps LM feels a moral obligation to be Spacman's advocate, as ISTR
Spacman did the same when LM bungled up and disappeared. Oh, I mean he
stopped using ebay. But he still hangs around here? Makes sense, ya?
lurker
> He's still selling rubbish on Ebay.
Ya, he's been a busy bunny.
> Is he allowed to run a business
> from his council hovel? Does the dole know what he's doing?
He's registered as a business seller so I guess that means he's legit?
Surely his neighbours know he's running a business from home?
> All those cuddly toys, do you reckon he has a lot of young visitors?
> Anyone got a picture of him on the daily run to the post office?
> Trouble is, a car with road tax parked on his street would stand out
> like a sore thumb.
Someone did a video earlier on, but i doubt it has him in it, because he
was hiding?
Humbug
wrote:
>In article <1j9l99j.dq9yxq1xw6qvcN%totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk>, The
>Older Gentleman says...
>>
>> petrolcan <petrol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > In article <hebdq6$v3o$3...@aioe.org>, lurker says...
>> > >
>> > > as above
>> >
>> > Why is it that you have an obsession with spacker?
>> >
>> > He's gone, hopefully forever.
>>
>> The other half of the Fracker entity is still posting the same shite,
>> though.
>
>Same as it ever was.
>
>> I wonder how proud it feels at having effectively killed what was a good
>> thriving and useful ng?
>
>Oi! Whilst it may take a while for the thriving to reappear, this NG is
>still very useful.
Exactly so.
I'm pleased to have been able to take you out of my killfile now that
you don't have a troll to incense your posts.
This NG will thrive once again with valuable posters who are not
driven off-topic by malicious interlopers.
I'm only a tiny bit concerned about the way that Fran seems to be
escalating where Spacker left off ... there always has to be *one*,
doesn't there?
The killfiule [1] is still a useful tool.
[1] I was going to correct that typo, but it works anyway :-)
--
Humbug
The Older Gentleman
> The Older Gentleman wrote:
>
> >>
> > Oh, is Lawnmower Man back again? Colour me surprised.
>
> Lawnmower Man and Spacman both cocked up big time revealing their
> identities.
>
Well, Lawnmower Man was merely stupid enough to use an identity he'd
used before. Spacker was special in that (as Parry pointed out) he not
only put his postcode in the posting, but he invited all and sundry to
look at it. :-)) That was truly classic.
Didn't stop the other half of the Fracker entity from accusing everyone
of organising a witch-hunt, of course..
The Older Gentleman
> I'm only a tiny bit concerned about the way that Fran seems to be
> escalating where Spacker left off ... there always has to be *one*,
> doesn't there?
Oh, indeed. I see it played the racist card. Again....
Road_Hog
"Niel J Humphreys" <ad...@sznzozwdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in
message news:hee1nb$3i3$1...@energise.enta.net...
Grow up, I thought better of you until you became one of TOC's helpers.
petrolcan
>
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:53:54 GMT, petrolcan <petrol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <1j9l99j.dq9yxq1xw6qvcN%totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk>, The
> >Older Gentleman says...
> >>
> >> petrolcan <petrol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <hebdq6$v3o$3...@aioe.org>, lurker says...
> >> > >
> >> > > as above
> >> >
> >> > Why is it that you have an obsession with spacker?
> >> >
> >> > He's gone, hopefully forever.
> >>
> >> The other half of the Fracker entity is still posting the same shite,
> >> though.
> >
> >Same as it ever was.
> >
> >> I wonder how proud it feels at having effectively killed what was a good
> >> thriving and useful ng?
> >
> >Oi! Whilst it may take a while for the thriving to reappear, this NG is
> >still very useful.
>
> Exactly so.
>
> I'm pleased to have been able to take you out of my killfile now that
> you don't have a troll to incense your posts.
Think about it, why exactly do you think I kept replying?
> This NG will thrive once again with valuable posters who are not
> driven off-topic by malicious interlopers.
>
> I'm only a tiny bit concerned about the way that Fran seems to be
> escalating where Spacker left off ... there always has to be *one*,
> doesn't there?
fran's time will come.
> The killfiule [1] is still a useful tool.
>
> [1] I was going to correct that typo, but it works anyway :-)
Heh.
petrolcan
Older Gentleman says...
>
>
> > The Older Gentleman wrote:
> >
> > >>
> > > Oh, is Lawnmower Man back again? Colour me surprised.
> >
> > Lawnmower Man and Spacman both cocked up big time revealing their
> > identities.
> >
> Well, Lawnmower Man was merely stupid enough to use an identity he'd
> used before. Spacker was special in that (as Parry pointed out) he not
> only put his postcode in the posting, but he invited all and sundry to
> look at it. :-)) That was truly classic.
>
> Didn't stop the other half of the Fracker entity from accusing everyone
> of organising a witch-hunt, of course..
I'm still in the planning stages ;-)
Road_Hog
> Niel J Humphreys <ad...@sznzozwdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> "Road_Hog" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:hedo5j$moc$1...@aioe.org...
>> >
>> > "The Older Gentleman" <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> > news:1j9l99j.dq9yxq1xw6qvcN%totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk...
>> >>
>> >> I wonder how proud it feels at having effectively killed what was a
>> >> good
>> >> thriving and useful ng?
>> >>
>> >
>> > People who cheated sellers, as you did, killed the NG. You only have
>> > yourself to blame. Perhaps if cunts like yourself fuck off elsewhere,
>> > then
>> > the NG can be reclaimed by decent people.
>>
>>
>> Bollocks, take your petty vendetta elsewhere.
>>
>>
> Oh, is Lawnmower Man back again? Colour me surprised.
>
>
> --
Yeah, still here cunt face, how's your libel suit against Spacker going?
Going no where, thought so, all gob and no testicles.
Step up to the plate and put your money where your mouth is, or fuck off and
run away like the weasel that you are.
Road_Hog
Yes lurker and what the fuck do you add to the newsgroup? Fuck all, yes
right.
Road_Hog
"petrolcan" <petrol...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.25747ab23...@text.news.virginmedia.com...
Unfortunately you're still here.
petrolcan
lurker
I add fun and laughter?
lurker
> "The Older Gentleman" <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> Oh, is Lawnmower Man back again? Colour me surprised.
>>
>>
>> --
>
> Yeah, still here cunt face, how's your libel suit against Spacker going?
> Going no where, thought so, all gob and no testicles.
>
> Step up to the plate and put your money where your mouth is, or fuck off and
> run away like the weasel that you are.
Do you do discounts on lawn mowers for upce members?
Humbug
wrote:
>Rose wrote:
>
>> He's still selling rubbish on Ebay.
>
>Ya, he's been a busy bunny.
>
>> Is he allowed to run a business
>> from his council hovel? Does the dole know what he's doing?
>
>He's registered as a business seller so I guess that means he's legit?
It means that he has registered as a business seller with eBay.
That only has an effect upon his status with eBay.
Yes, he is allowed to run a business from his home, and can actaully
claim an allowance against tax for use of part of his home for the
business.
The council would only be concerned if the majority of the use of the
premises was for business rather than as a residence.
If he is claiming benefits, then yes, they would certainly be affected
by his income from eBay sales.
Similarly, he is liable for tax on the income from eBay sales.
He may be liable for registration for VAT if his turnover is high
enough.
That's very easy for eBay traders to miss!
>Surely his neighbours know he's running a business from home?
I doubt very much that his neighbours have any idea at all about what
he's doing.
They almost certainly don't know about his libellous activity on
usenet yet.
>> All those cuddly toys, do you reckon he has a lot of young visitors?
>> Anyone got a picture of him on the daily run to the post office?
>> Trouble is, a car with road tax parked on his street would stand out
>> like a sore thumb.
It's an end of terrace house in a middle class suburban area.
He's got three post offices less than a mile away.
Any vehicle parked on the street might be noticeable because the
residents have driveways and/or garages.
The swimming pool might be a draw for youngsters, but not at this time
of year, I expect :-)
>Someone did a video earlier on, but i doubt it has him in it, because he
>was hiding?
I have a very large number of videos in which he is not visible.
He must be very good at hiding!
Anyway ...
Edward Renner has perpetrated a considerable number of libels against
contributors to this newsgroup, myself included.
I would be prepared to contribute towards legal action against him,
provided that my contribution would be covered by the costs awarded
when he loses the case.
--
Humbug
Road_Hog
Fuck me, do you believe the shit that TOC tells you? You are dimmer than I
thought.
Humbug
wrote:
>In article <8jtlg59b30hpm5l24...@4ax.com>, Humbug says...
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:53:54 GMT, petrolcan <petrol...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <1j9l99j.dq9yxq1xw6qvcN%totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk>, The
>> >Older Gentleman says...
>> >>
>> >> petrolcan <petrol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > In article <hebdq6$v3o$3...@aioe.org>, lurker says...
>> >> > >
>> >> > > as above
>> >> >
>> >> > Why is it that you have an obsession with spacker?
>> >> >
>> >> > He's gone, hopefully forever.
>> >>
>> >> The other half of the Fracker entity is still posting the same shite,
>> >> though.
>> >
>> >Same as it ever was.
>> >
>> >> I wonder how proud it feels at having effectively killed what was a good
>> >> thriving and useful ng?
>> >
>> >Oi! Whilst it may take a while for the thriving to reappear, this NG is
>> >still very useful.
>>
>> Exactly so.
>>
>> I'm pleased to have been able to take you out of my killfile now that
>> you don't have a troll to incense your posts.
>
>Think about it, why exactly do you think I kept replying?
Yes, I know. I just got fed up with reading it.
>> This NG will thrive once again with valuable posters who are not
>> driven off-topic by malicious interlopers.
>>
>> I'm only a tiny bit concerned about the way that Fran seems to be
>> escalating where Spacker left off ... there always has to be *one*,
>> doesn't there?
>
>fran's time will come.
[sigh] Yes, I suppose so :-(
>> The killfiule [1] is still a useful tool.
>>
>> [1] I was going to correct that typo, but it works anyway :-)
>
>Heh.
Quite.
--
Humbug
Humbug
(The Older Gentleman) wrote:
>Humbug <hum...@tofee.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm only a tiny bit concerned about the way that Fran seems to be
>> escalating where Spacker left off ... there always has to be *one*,
>> doesn't there?
>
>Oh, indeed. I see it played the racist card. Again....
Hang on, Fran has no reason to be racist, does he?
--
Humbug
Humbug
wrote:
I'm still here, despite anybody's stupid comments, and I still find
the NG useful.
I will not be driven away.
Valuable posters always beat trolls in the long run.
--
Humbug
Humbug
lurker
> "lurker" <grah...@googlemail.com> wrote in message
> news:hef1e0$kgu$3...@aioe.org...
>> Road_Hog wrote:
>>> "The Older Gentleman" <totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>
>>>> Oh, is Lawnmower Man back again? Colour me surprised.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> Yeah, still here cunt face, how's your libel suit against Spacker going?
>>> Going no where, thought so, all gob and no testicles.
>>>
>>> Step up to the plate and put your money where your mouth is, or fuck off
>>> and run away like the weasel that you are.
>> Do you do discounts on lawn mowers for upce members?
>
> Fuck me,
No thanks
> do you believe the shit that TOC tells you? You are dimmer than I
> thought.
You're not a salesman? You didn't hit 'Reply' instead of 'Reply Group'
on your OE? How do you account for your disappearance after the cockup?
You topped using ebay after you hit 'Reply' and then disappeared for a
while? You're back now - are you using ebay?
lurker
He's made a public apology and has ceased and desisted after he posted
his own address. He's not silly you know.
lurker
That's correct.
Humbug
wrote:
I did not write:
>> Yes.
>
>That's correct.
That is incorrect.
Troll.
[PLONK]
lurker
>>> Yes.
>> That's correct.
>
> That is incorrect.
> Troll.
>
> [PLONK]
Booooooooooooooooo hooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fran
"Humbug" <hum...@tofee.net> wrote in message
news:8jtlg59b30hpm5l24...@4ax.com...
> I'm only a tiny bit concerned about the way that Fran seems to be
> escalating where Spacker left off ... there always has to be *one*,
> doesn't there?
>
One reply is not an escalation and I take some exception to that statement.
I replied to a comment about me, as is my right.
I still have TOG in my killfile, along with his friends, so I don't see the
vast majority of what they post, thankfully. At the moment, I don't intend
adding you, unless you make more snide comments. If that remark of yours was
not intended to be snide, then fine, I apologise.
Fran
He's Jason Drake. Ignore him.
Fran
Now who's escalating, hm?
Niel J Humphreys
You might want to take your own advice here
Fran
They are referring, I suspect, to the fact that I stated my objection to
racism, when replying to a single quoted post I saw that totally
misrepresented my actions. I've chosen to ignore by the judicious use of a
killfile the twaddle that I suspect has still been perpetrated here despite
all the supposed wishes for peace and harmony. I have had the temerity to
post on some EBay topics: dear heaven, the nerve of it.
Now, if you are choosing to interpret that as my being racist, then I am
deeply saddened and very disappointed to find you are not the person I
thought you to be. And pretty disgusted, too. Again, if you did not mean
that, my apologies for my own misinterpretation. I do actually hope that I
have misunderstood your meaning.
Humbug
It was not intended to be snide.
I've read about 1200 posts in the last few days, as I've been out of
the loop for a while, and have now had the opportunity to catch up.
I did not actually see Spacker's departure, but I have seen a number
of yours since.
I was disappointed to find that the tone of your posts seems to have
amplified his attitude since his "outing", and have noted that other
posters have remarked upon this fact.
Since you seem to need to name a scapegoat - The Older Gentleman (who
is actually younger than me) is a poster whom I recognise in this and
other newsgroups.
I find his posts are often useful and informative; I suppose that I
*could* be described as his friend, although I haven't actually met
him IRL yet.
Killfile me if you will, if you wish to tar me with some kind of
supposed brush.
I haven't killfiled you yet, as you may be a useful poster in
uk.people.consumers.ebay
--
Humbug
Humbug
Aha.
You can spot a troll after all!
If only you'd seen through someone else months ago ...
--
Humbug
Fran
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:32:38 -0000, "Fran"
> <autum...@vendredi.fr.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Humbug" <hum...@tofee.net> wrote in message
>>news:8jtlg59b30hpm5l24...@4ax.com...
>>
>>> I'm only a tiny bit concerned about the way that Fran seems to be
>>> escalating where Spacker left off ... there always has to be *one*,
>>> doesn't there?
>>>
>>
>>One reply is not an escalation and I take some exception to that
>>statement.
>>I replied to a comment about me, as is my right.
>>
>>I still have TOG in my killfile, along with his friends, so I don't see
>>the
>>vast majority of what they post, thankfully. At the moment, I don't intend
>>adding you, unless you make more snide comments. If that remark of yours
>>was
>>not intended to be snide, then fine, I apologise.
>>
> It was not intended to be snide.
It came across that way rather strongly.
>
> I've read about 1200 posts in the last few days, as I've been out of
> the loop for a while, and have now had the opportunity to catch up.
>
> I did not actually see Spacker's departure, but I have seen a number
> of yours since.
>
> I was disappointed to find that the tone of your posts seems to have
> amplified his attitude since his "outing", and have noted that other
> posters have remarked upon this fact.
I have, genuinely, no idea what you are talking about. I have replied to ONE
post - yesterday, I think - that made a comment about me. I was away all
last week. Yes, I did object to what happened when he was outed, as you call
it. After that, if you check properly, you'll find I replied to some Ebay
related posts over the past weeks, but I've mostly not been around much, as
I have been out of the country a fair bit.
>
> Since you seem to need to name a scapegoat - The Older Gentleman (who
> is actually younger than me) is a poster whom I recognise in this and
> other newsgroups.
> I find his posts are often useful and informative; I suppose that I
> *could* be described as his friend, although I haven't actually met
> him IRL yet.
Well, having just looked on google groups, I see that he and his sidekick
are still rather tiresomely obsessed with me, and that means they stay in my
killfile.
>
> Killfile me if you will, if you wish to tar me with some kind of
> supposed brush.
I am, as I said, both surprised and disappointed in you, and this post of
yours has done nothing to disabuse me of that sentiment.
>
> I haven't killfiled you yet, as you may be a useful poster in
> uk.people.consumers.ebay
>
Thanks, the condescension is appreciated. Perhaps you might care to offer
useful advice on EBay outages in future, for example, hm?
Humbug
I imagine that you are no more racist than I am. I'm not going to
bother to search for the threads where it was suggested by you and
your friend that I was.
--
Humbug
Humbug
Fran
Humbug, I've no clue what your problem is with me, or why you are choosing
to regurgitate an argument that was best left lie. I do not appreciate the
constant attacks from you tonight, nor will I perpetuate them. This is
unworthy of you. Find another target, I won't be yours.
Fran
I have never suggested you were racist. I do, however, think you are
choosing to start an argument with me for some strange and insane reason
that is frankly beyond my comprehension. Unless it's because you actually do
believe I'm someone I'm not, of course - or I am some sort of substitute.
I've tried to remain reasonable with you tonight, but you've tried my
patience too much. Go and find someone else as a target, I'm not answering
any more of this.
Fran
I now understand what you've been doing. And why.
Humbug, you were one of those I at least had respect for. Not any more. I
won't play your mind games, find someone else.
lurker
>
> Humbug, I've no clue what your problem is with me, or why you are choosing
> to regurgitate an argument that was best left lie. I do not appreciate the
> constant attacks from you tonight, nor will I perpetuate them. This is
> unworthy of you. Find another target, I won't be yours.
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!
Road_Hog
Er no, I was an area manager. The funniest thing ever was, I was going to
offer/suggest TOC help on any parts he needed, prior to him becoming a
tosser, because he seemed to like Honda motorcycles and Honda makes
lawnmowers as well as 2 & 4 wheeled vehicles and that is who I used to work
for.
So no, tit face I wasn't a 'salesman'. But yes I did hit reply instead of
relpy to group in OE. I disappeared a year ago because I dropped ebay, and
needed to concentrate on other revenue streams and didn't want to spend my
time arguing with tits like yourself. I now have things sorted and have
more time to respond to dull cunts like yourself.
Are you really Jason Drake, the internet legend who rips people off and has
spent time at her majesty's pleasure?
Humbug
<autum...@vendredi.fr.com> wrote:
It is a general impression which I have got from reading a huge number
of posts in a short space of time.
I don't think that you have only replied to one single post out of the
1200 or so which I've read over the last weekend, which go back for
some weeks.
>> Since you seem to need to name a scapegoat - The Older Gentleman (who
>> is actually younger than me) is a poster whom I recognise in this and
>> other newsgroups.
>> I find his posts are often useful and informative; I suppose that I
>> *could* be described as his friend, although I haven't actually met
>> him IRL yet.
>
>Well, having just looked on google groups, I see that he and his sidekick
>are still rather tiresomely obsessed with me, and that means they stay in my
>killfile.
When you google for yourself, you may well find stuff you don't like.
Why *should* anybody be obsessed with you?
>>
>> Killfile me if you will, if you wish to tar me with some kind of
>> supposed brush.
>
>I am, as I said, both surprised and disappointed in you, and this post of
>yours has done nothing to disabuse me of that sentiment.
>
>>
>> I haven't killfiled you yet, as you may be a useful poster in
>> uk.people.consumers.ebay
>>
>
>Thanks, the condescension is appreciated. Perhaps you might care to offer
>useful advice on EBay outages in future, for example, hm?
I wouldn't dream of treading on your toes by repeating the same
information which you have, also provided by eBay themselves.
I shall continue giving whatever advice I can to other eBay users
which they may not be able to find easily, if at all, from eBay.
I don't pretend to have all of the answers, but I'll help whenever I
can.
It's a real shame that some people have hijacked this newsgroup for
political purposes.
I hope that you will not allow this either.
--
Humbug
Humbug
<autum...@vendredi.fr.com> wrote:
I don't like being a target either.
Thank you for your sympathy.
--
Humbug
Humbug
<autum...@vendredi.fr.com> wrote:
Explain that please.
>Humbug, you were one of those I at least had respect for. Not any more. I
>won't play your mind games, find someone else.
Who else should that be?
--
Humbug
lurker
Balls, you're a daft salesman that uses OE.
> So no, tit face I wasn't a 'salesman'. But yes I did hit reply instead of
> relpy to group in OE. I disappeared a year ago because I dropped ebay, and
> needed to concentrate on other revenue streams and didn't want to spend my
> time arguing with tits like yourself. I now have things sorted and have
> more time to respond to dull cunts like yourself.
So you don't use ebay but you're back? Haven't you had enough last year
that you fleed? Cum back for more, eh?
> Are you really Jason Drake, the internet legend who rips people off and has
> spent time at her majesty's pleasure?
Your obsession (and Francesca's) with this person is what exactly? Are
you and Francesca the same person?
Humbug
wrote:
Yes, he has.
>He's not silly you know.
No, he is.
--
Humbug
lurker
>> I've tried to remain reasonable with you tonight, but you've tried my
>> patience too much. Go and find someone else as a target, I'm not answering
>> any more of this.
>
> I don't like being a target either.
STOP BULLYING FRANCESCA !
lurker
Stop bullying her, you thick twat! She doesn't want to play your games.
Now piss off!
Road_Hog
You're not denying it then Jason?
Usenet Nutter
"Fran" <autum...@vendredi.fr.com> wrote in message
news:hef645$es8$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
petrolcan
>
> "petrolcan" <petrol...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.25747ab23...@text.news.virginmedia.com...
> > In article <hedo5j$moc$1...@aioe.org>, Road_Hog says...> >> news:1j9l99j.dq9yxq1xw6qvcN%totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk...
> >> >
> >> > I wonder how proud it feels at having effectively killed what was a
> >> > good
> >> > thriving and useful ng?
> >> >
> >>
> >> yourself to blame. Perhaps if cunts like yourself fuck off elsewhere,
> >> then
> >> the NG can be reclaimed by decent people.
> >
> > people away.
>
> Unfortunately you're still here.
Such a cutting remark.
petrolcan
>
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:03:56 GMT, petrolcan <petrol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <8jtlg59b30hpm5l24...@4ax.com>, Humbug says...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:53:54 GMT, petrolcan <petrol...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <1j9l99j.dq9yxq1xw6qvcN%totallyde...@yahoo.co.uk>, The
> >> >Older Gentleman says...
> >> >> I wonder how proud it feels at having effectively killed what was a good
> >> >> thriving and useful ng?
> >> >
> >> >Oi! Whilst it may take a while for the thriving to reappear, this NG is
> >> >still very useful.
> >>
> >> Exactly so.
> >>
> >> I'm pleased to have been able to take you out of my killfile now that
> >> you don't have a troll to incense your posts.
> >
> >Think about it, why exactly do you think I kept replying?
>
> Yes, I know. I just got fed up with reading it.
Perfectly understandable.
> >> This NG will thrive once again with valuable posters who are not
> >> driven off-topic by malicious interlopers.
> >>
> >> I'm only a tiny bit concerned about the way that Fran seems to be
> >> escalating where Spacker left off ... there always has to be *one*,
> >> doesn't there?
> >
> >fran's time will come.
>
> [sigh] Yes, I suppose so :-(
Don't panic, he claims to have me in his killfile and, tbh, I'm happy to
be there.
petrolcan
>
> Humbug wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:11:27 +0000, lurker <grah...@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > Anyway ...
> >
> > Edward Renner has perpetrated a considerable number of libels against
> > contributors to this newsgroup, myself included.
> >
> > I would be prepared to contribute towards legal action against him,
> > provided that my contribution would be covered by the costs awarded
> > when he loses the case.
>
> He's made a public apology and has ceased and desisted after he posted
> his own address.
He didn't email the apology as requested though.
> He's not silly you know.
Oh, yes he is.
petrolcan
> >>He's Jason Drake. Ignore him.
> >
> > Aha.
> >
> > You can spot a troll after all!
> >
> > If only you'd seen through someone else months ago ...
> >
>
> Humbug, I've no clue what your problem is with me, or why you are choosing
> to regurgitate an argument that was best left lie.
Translates to 'I don't want to admit I was wrong'
> I do not appreciate the
> constant attacks from you tonight, nor will I perpetuate them. This is
> unworthy of you. Find another target, I won't be yours.
Someone a little sensitive lately?
lurker
>>> Are you really Jason Drake, the internet legend who rips people off and
>>> has spent time at her majesty's pleasure?
>> Your obsession (and Francesca's) with this person is what exactly? Are
>> you and Francesca the same person?
>
> You're not denying it then Jason?
Why do I have to deny/confirm anything to you, you thick twat?
You and Francesca think I'm 'Jason', so go with whatever rocks your boat
Lawnmower Man!
I don't give a phunk!
Usenet Nutter
"Road_Hog" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:hefae7$trs$1...@aioe.org...
> Are you really Jason Drake, the internet legend who rips people off and
> has spent time at her majesty's pleasure?
I AM JASON DRAKE, AND NO, I HAVE NOIT BEEN TO PRISON EVER...
CHECK YOUR FUCKING FACTS STUPID TWAT.
JackH
NO! I'M JASON DRAKE... AND SO IS MY WIFE!
--
JackH