Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: UK Newsadmin's FAQ
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Stephen Thomas Cole
Aug 4, 2015, 2:53:07 AM8/4/15
to
Mark Goodge
Aug 4, 2015, 3:03:23 AM8/4/15
to
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 06:51:31 +0000 (UTC), Stephen Thomas Cole put finger to
keyboard and typed:
>This post never has any content, what gives?
Eh? It's got 476 lines of content.
It's in multipart/digest form, a standards-compliant method of posting a
message which contains several distinct sections (in this case, each
question is a section). It may be that your news software is too limited to
cope with that. In which case, you should consider upgrading.
Mark
--
Please take a short survey on security and privacy on the Internet: http://meyu.eu/ao
My blog: http://www.markgoodge.uk
keyboard and typed:
>This post never has any content, what gives?
It's in multipart/digest form, a standards-compliant method of posting a
message which contains several distinct sections (in this case, each
question is a section). It may be that your news software is too limited to
cope with that. In which case, you should consider upgrading.
Mark
--
Please take a short survey on security and privacy on the Internet: http://meyu.eu/ao
My blog: http://www.markgoodge.uk
Stephen Thomas Cole
Aug 4, 2015, 3:16:56 AM8/4/15
to
Mark Goodge <use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 06:51:31 +0000 (UTC), Stephen Thomas Cole put finger to
> keyboard and typed:
>
>> This post never has any content, what gives?
>
> Eh? It's got 476 lines of content.
>
> It's in multipart/digest form, a standards-compliant method of posting a
> message which contains several distinct sections (in this case, each
> question is a section). It may be that your news software is too limited to
> cope with that. In which case, you should consider upgrading.
>
> Mark
Thanks Mark, although could have done without the snark old chap.
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 06:51:31 +0000 (UTC), Stephen Thomas Cole put finger to
> keyboard and typed:
>
>> This post never has any content, what gives?
>
> Eh? It's got 476 lines of content.
>
> It's in multipart/digest form, a standards-compliant method of posting a
> message which contains several distinct sections (in this case, each
> question is a section). It may be that your news software is too limited to
> cope with that. In which case, you should consider upgrading.
>
> Mark
Mark Goodge
Aug 4, 2015, 1:06:43 PM8/4/15
to
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 07:15:20 +0000 (UTC), Stephen Thomas Cole put finger to
with an article which gets posted regularly and with which nobody else
seems to have problems. The possibility that it might be a problem your end
would normally be the first thing to check under such circumstances.
keyboard and typed:
>Mark Goodge <use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 06:51:31 +0000 (UTC), Stephen Thomas Cole put finger to
>> keyboard and typed:
>>
>>> This post never has any content, what gives?
>>
>> Eh? It's got 476 lines of content.
>>
>> It's in multipart/digest form, a standards-compliant method of posting a
>> message which contains several distinct sections (in this case, each
>> question is a section). It may be that your news software is too limited to
>> cope with that. In which case, you should consider upgrading.
>>
>> Mark
>
>Thanks Mark, although could have done without the snark old chap.
Well, you did rather invite it by assuming that there was something wrong
>Mark Goodge <use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 06:51:31 +0000 (UTC), Stephen Thomas Cole put finger to
>> keyboard and typed:
>>
>>> This post never has any content, what gives?
>>
>> Eh? It's got 476 lines of content.
>>
>> It's in multipart/digest form, a standards-compliant method of posting a
>> message which contains several distinct sections (in this case, each
>> question is a section). It may be that your news software is too limited to
>> cope with that. In which case, you should consider upgrading.
>>
>> Mark
>
>Thanks Mark, although could have done without the snark old chap.
with an article which gets posted regularly and with which nobody else
seems to have problems. The possibility that it might be a problem your end
would normally be the first thing to check under such circumstances.
0 new messages