Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Trolls

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Møgådöñ Jôhñ

unread,
Sep 8, 2001, 4:00:17 PM9/8/01
to
On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 19:40:27 GMT, Janice <nos...@newsranger.com>
wrote:

>Can the internet be regulated against them? As a lurker in uk.local.yorkshire
>I've seen far too many of them :-(

What's a 'troll'?

Yorkshire Rose

unread,
Sep 8, 2001, 4:12:39 PM9/8/01
to
> What's a 'troll'?

They were very collectible in about 1993....


--
Yorkshire Rose

ULY Code:
-----------------
'82 F Y* L+ U-- KQ C-- c B p+ Sh+
s# H+ SCUM++ N(Bev) I++


Smelly John

unread,
Sep 8, 2001, 4:18:56 PM9/8/01
to

Dave Fawthrop?
-
Watch out, there's a Fawthrop about!

Møgådöñ Jôhñ

unread,
Sep 8, 2001, 6:14:16 PM9/8/01
to
On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 21:18:56 +0100, Smelly John
<smellyj...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 21:00:17 +0100, Møgådöñ Jôhñ
><møgådöñjôhñ20ö01@hôtmail.cöm> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 19:40:27 GMT, Janice <nos...@newsranger.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Can the internet be regulated against them? As a lurker in uk.local.yorkshire
>>>I've seen far too many of them :-(
>>
>>What's a 'troll'?
>
>Dave Fawthrop?

Troll?

Roy Collett

unread,
Sep 9, 2001, 5:28:34 AM9/9/01
to
In article <Luum7.607$%u4....@www.newsranger.com>, Janice
<nos...@newsranger.com> writes

>Can the internet be regulated against them? As a lurker in uk.local.yorkshire
>I've seen far too many of them :-(
>
>Janice.

Trolls are like Flordorpians in that as soon as you make mention of them
they spring up and multiply.

As far as regulating them, it is impossible. Trolls are a necessary part
of the population, like scapegoats and idiots. Exterminating them will
only cause other normal ordinary folk to have to mutate and take over
their roles.

Roy Collett r...@rxs1.demon.co.uk
New Southgate, London, England.

Ian Dinsdale

unread,
Sep 9, 2001, 6:40:49 AM9/9/01
to
On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 19:40:27 GMT, Janice <nos...@newsranger.com>
wrote:

>Can the internet be regulated against them?

Not really.
In any case, one man's troll is another man's humourist. Although if I
could locate that man I'd pass on my commiserations.

The best you can do is ignore them. It's not really all that
difficult. We ignore worse things on a daily basis I suspect.

>As a lurker in uk.local.yorkshire I've seen far too many of them :-(

Killfiles help, but only because they save a bit of time.
Treat it like channel hopping on the TV. Scroll through, and if it
looks interesting read it. If not just move on.
No big deal. We don't have, nor should we expect, to like everything.

Cheers
Ian D

Joe & Monty Hansen

unread,
Sep 9, 2001, 6:51:01 AM9/9/01
to

"Janice" <nos...@newsranger.com> wrote in message
news:Luum7.607$%u4....@www.newsranger.com...
> Can the internet be regulated against them? As a lurker in

uk.local.yorkshire
> I've seen far too many of them :-(
>
> Janice.
>
I rather doubt it. Would be about impossible to do.

Joe & Monty Hansen
>
"You will always be lucky if you know how to make friends with
strange
cats." --Colonial American proverb
>


Joe & Monty Hansen

unread,
Sep 9, 2001, 6:53:19 AM9/9/01
to
> Dave Fawthrop?
> -
> Watch out, there's a Fawthrop about!!

A Fawthrop ? What's that ? Are they dangerous ?

Joe & Monty Hansen

unread,
Sep 9, 2001, 6:54:31 AM9/9/01
to

> >>
> >>>Can the internet be regulated against them? As a lurker in
uk.local.yorkshire
> >>>I've seen far too many of them :-(
> >>
> >>What's a 'troll'?
> >
> >Dave Fawthrop?
>
> Troll?

Yes, a troll. The big, hairy kind.

TGGA

unread,
Sep 9, 2001, 8:02:38 AM9/9/01
to

"Janice" <nos...@newsranger.com> wrote in message
news:Luum7.607$%u4....@www.newsranger.com...
> Can the internet be regulated against them? As a lurker in
uk.local.yorkshire
> I've seen far too many of them :-(
>
> Janice.
>
>

There is always Newsguys Spam Hippo, Cosmo and the like. If people make too
many posts it gets them and filters out the messages before they appear. It
tacks a sort of "do not display" message to them. Most ISPs use the software
otherwise they'd be overwhelmed with crap in the newsgroups.

Møgådöñ Jôhñ

unread,
Sep 9, 2001, 2:36:30 PM9/9/01
to
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 05:54:31 -0500, "Joe & Monty Hansen"
<bugsmc...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
>> >>
>> >>>Can the internet be regulated against them? As a lurker in
>uk.local.yorkshire
>> >>>I've seen far too many of them :-(
>> >>
>> >>What's a 'troll'?
>> >
>> >Dave Fawthrop?
>>
>> Troll?
>
>Yes, a troll. The big, hairy kind.

Dave Fawthrop's big & hairy?

Wm...

unread,
Sep 11, 2001, 4:44:08 PM9/11/01
to
Sun, 9 Sep 2001 13:02:38 <9nflpp$8ap$1...@newsreaderm1.core.theplanet.net>
TGGA <tg...@viper.karoo.co.uk> wrote...

>There is always Newsguys Spam Hippo, Cosmo and the like. If people make too
>many posts it gets them and filters out the messages before they appear. It
>tacks a sort of "do not display" message to them. Most ISPs use the software
>otherwise they'd be overwhelmed with crap in the newsgroups.

Most ISPs? Evidence, please.

--
Wm...
address valid for at least 31 days from date of posting

11 September 2001

0 new messages