Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
I'm going to kill myself!!!
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Clive D. W. Feather
Jul 29, 2002, 12:09:53 PM7/29/02
to
In article <3D451C34...@tampabay.rr.com>, Matt Giwer
<jul...@tampabay.rr.com> writes
>The operator of a remailer is legally liable for everything sent unless
>he can point to the person sending it. Otherwise anyone running a
>remailer could do anything he wanted. That is black letter law long
>before the internet
<jul...@tampabay.rr.com> writes
>The operator of a remailer is legally liable for everything sent unless
>he can point to the person sending it. Otherwise anyone running a
>remailer could do anything he wanted. That is black letter law long
>before the internet
You'd better look at Article 12 of the Electronic Commerce Directive
(2000/31/EC). It basically says the exact opposite of what you've
written. [I would argue that a remailer falls under Article 12, though
I'm willing to discuss it.]
Followups to uk.net.regulation, as the relevant group for this
discussion.
--
Clive D.W. Feather, writing for himself | Home: <cl...@davros.org>
Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 (work) | Web: <http://www.davros.org>
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 (NOTE CHANGE) | Work: <cl...@demon.net>
Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address
0 new messages