URCM Rejection Competition
JMS
The competition is to guess which of these two posts was allowed - and
which was rejected - both to URCM
They are both light hearted - rather than serious.
Helpful clue: one of the posts was made by Matt B - the other was made
by Guy Chapman.
Unhelpful clue: I won't tell you which was which - as there would then
be no competition :-)
============================================================
Q. What's the difference between: no-fault liability insurance,
assumed liability insurance, operating risk insurance?
A. Does anybody know?
============================================================
>Damn these new specs...
>First time I read "a daft FAQ".
I think you have Frank Erskine's glasses there, better hand them back.
============================================================
Mr. Benn
news:d24206dblam1t8bk3...@4ax.com...
It's hard to tell but I will guess that the question about insurance passed
censorship and the other one didn't.
Am I right?
Guy Cuthbertson
@live.co.uk says...
>
> The competition is to guess which of these two posts was allowed - and
> which was rejected - both to URCM
Unfortunately I already knew the answer to this one, so I can't really
participate. The answer certainly doesn't surprise me though. (Can you
believe Chapman's *still* stirring it BTW? Not being able to help
rolling in shit must be a pretty unpleasant condition.)
URCM moderation continutes to excel, what with the moderators' secret
guidelines, list of which posters can get away with gratuitous insults
and irrelevant crap even when their posts are manually moderated, list
of which posters must be given an especially hard time because they've
told a lot of inconvenient truths there and/or elsewhere, etc. It would
be quicker to have a list of the people who *are* allowed to post, a
list of subjects which are allowed to be discussed and a list of
permitted opinions. It wouldn't take long to come up with such lists as
they would be short and precise, and they are already being used (it's
just that they only exist in the moderators' minds).
(Hey, maybe Clivey's so desperate to be a moderator because he wants to
see all the real URCM moderators' secret documents himself! Perhaps
he's actually "one of us", he's been undercover for years and he'll
reveal all once he's infiltrated URCM. I can't imagine why else someone
would want to moderate surely the most poorly and vindictively moderated
uk.* group in a very long time, possibly ever. But whatever the reason
why he's so keen, I think he's finally starting to realise that sucking
up to the moderators is putting him in a very bad light all round, and
even if such crude attempts at impressing the moderators have somehow
worked on them, if he loses everyone else's respect in the process then
he isn't likely to make it to the panel.)
Paul - xxx
>
> The competition is to guess
WGAF?
--
Paul - xxx
'96/'97 Landrover Discovery 300 Tdi
Dyna Tech Cro-Mo comp
JMS
I am sorry - you will have to wait until all entries are received :-)
JMS
wrote:
>JMS wrote:
>
>>
>> The competition is to guess
>
>WGAF?
You obviously - taking the time to respond.
Fuckwit.
David Kemper
You need a better sig.
That one is too obvious.
;-P
JMS
Ho, ho, ho
*That* has never ever been cracked before; makes you one as well.
Paul - xxx
Not really, just taking the piss at the hundreds of responses you've
had .. ;)
JMS
wrote:
>Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
> It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
> Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
> remailer administrator at <ab...@frell.theremailer.net>.
> Identifying the real sender is technically impossible.
>
>Guy Cuthbertson wrote:
>> Unfortunately I already knew the answer to this one, so I can't really
>> participate. The answer certainly doesn't surprise me though. (Can you
>> believe Chapman's *still* stirring it BTW? Not being able to help
>> rolling in shit must be a pretty unpleasant condition.)
>
>It suits you, doesn't it?
>Tell us, wouldn't you rather see a cyclist decapitated
>than anyone else?
Hello, hello, hello
It's Ron ( Frell Anonymous Remailer) shit scared to post using his
normal name.
Give us a clue, initials? : GC or LK
JMS
wrote:
>JMS wrote:
>
>> On 29 May 2010 15:35:29 GMT, "Paul - xxx" <notchec...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > JMS wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> The competition is to guess
>> >
>> > WGAF?
>>
>>
>> You obviously - taking the time to respond.
>
>Not really, just taking the piss at the hundreds of responses you've
>had .. ;)
Well thanks for another.
Ah - I see you thought it was a real competition: what a fuckwit.
A bit too hard for you : it was just pointing out the inconsistency of
the moderators actions.
However - thanks for the response - loving the attention :-)
PhilO
> However - thanks for the response - loving the attention :-)- Hide quoted text -
Judith - we don't care!
Tom Crispin
Clearly you do - you have taken the time to respond.
JMS
<goo1...@googlemail.com> wrote:
Well thank you very much "Phil O" for your interest.
Do you comment on any other matters - or - it seems just direct
replies to me with pathetic one-liners.
Your attention is appreciated.