> On 02/01/2021 15:40, Roland Perry wrote:
>> In message <xn0msf3db...@news.individual.net
>, at 14:22:32 on Sat,
>> 2 Jan 2021, Jeff Gaines <jgaines...@yahoo.co.uk
>>> On 02/01/2021 in message <PgNaJCrq...@perry.uk
> Roland Perry wrote:
>>>>> Maybe your interpretation of the rules. Your posts often inflame
>>>>> opinions in a way that is not becoming of a moderator.
>>>> So being a moderator means I'm not entitled to opinions?
>>> You are provided somebody else applies the standard moderation rules.
>>> You (and other mods) are guilty of saying things that are rejected if
>>> said by non-mods.
>> I don't think so.
> So one rule for you, and one for others.
> You are a good example of how moderated groups should not be run.
> Moderators should have a finite tenure otherwise they think they own the
I remember when, during the various ukram RFD debates/screaming fits, that
various exalted ones from the Great And Good of uk.* made a lot of shrill,
highfalutin noise about how ulm was the “gold standard” for usenet
moderation, with its unimpeachable moderator practices. Oh, there’s egg on
their faces now and no mistake. If they had any sense of shame they’d
resign from the Committee in disgrace.
STC / M0TEY